/éire/

Goth Waifu Edition

Other urls found in this thread:

lefigaro.fr/elections/resultats/
strawpoll.me/12808928
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Sensei>>>>>>>>>>other sluts

I tried that stuff to break down the wax in my ears and when I woke up my left ear was covered in hardened wax.

I'll bump the thread so the lads can see and enjoy it.

You must've slept on the wrong side lad.

I was sleeping on my right previous nights and woke up with my left ear blocked, I slept on my left last night and the same thing happened.

It's been very dry lately.

Cold out.

It's not too bad when there's no wind.

Dublin Tekken tournament yesterday made me realize just how brown Britain has gotten. Might as well have been the pakistan invitational

Whenever there is an election anywhere in the world, why is there always footage of nuns voting on TV? I thought it was just an RTÉ thing, but the BBC, Sky News, and France 24 have done it today too for the French election.

Never seen that before. I think you just have nuns on the mind.

There's no room in my mind for nuns.

Seriously though, search for "Nuns voting in elections" on Google Images and the vast majority of the images are from news outlets.

You might be the only one pointing out this trend.

Who else /gamblingproblem/ here.

I can't stop making bad bets on Paddypower.

Just threw a tenner on Le Penne to win. Considering upping it to real money. Macaron will probably take it but he's got pussy odds, not worth the money.

>gambling
Bet you watch horse racing and soccer as well.

Only to bet. I don't watch if I don't have money on

>Irish flag in the French Election thread supporting Melenchon
I thought Commiebrit was our only Commie?

Le Pen has shit odds too.

Yeah, but realistically she has a chance, unlike Fillion and melenchon

a tenner on macaron will return 16 quid if he wins, a tenner on Le Penne will return just over 40 quid.

Le penne has a good enough chance of winning to make it a reasonable good bet.

I'd put it on melenchon with his 15/1 but that's throwing money away.

Any of them who get to the second have a better chance then Le Pen, she'll do really well if she gets 40% in that next week.

Disagree.

Le Penne and Macaron are the two we can be certain make it to the second round.

Fillion supporters won't vote for Melenchon and Melenchon supporters won't vote for Fillion, so the result will depend on where the Fillion and melechon votes go after they leave.

You can't be sure Fillion supporters will go to Le Penne, nor can you be sure Melechon supporters will go to macaron, as many Melechon supporters are there on the basis of euroskepticism, which would lead them away from Macaron.

Altogether, macaron still almost certainly has it.

Might stick a bet on Labour to win the UK election

>no room in my mind for nuns
>posting dozens of pictures of CC, who was raised by a nun
The nuns are always with you.

What are the odds looking like?

7/1 on no overall majority in the election lads.

Those are great odds,

>Le Penne and Macaron are the two we can be certain make it to the second round.
Not really, Fillon voters don't have many alternatives so he could be pushed ahead of Marcon and Melenchon if they split their vote evenly, Melenchon could make it if people ditch Hamon for him more than expected.
If one of those two get to the next round Le Pen voters would pick one of them over Marcon and Marcon voters would also pick one of them if he doesn't make it instead of Le Pen, that could the other candidate ahead of Le Pen.
Melenchon supporters are far more likely to go to Le Pen as they have similar economic policies and euroskeptisim and some Fillon supporters who are happy with the status quo will plump for Marcon. If it's Le Pen and Melenchon Fillon voters will be dissillusioned, and if it's Le Pen and Fillon Melenchon voters will give a big boost to Le Pen, her best chance of winning is to get Fillon to squeak ahead of the others. Sadly as you say Marcon will probably win.

Dear God, you're right. I fear Ireland may be committing a grave error in turning on such powerful beings.

Paddy power has labour majority at 20/1. Think I'll stick a fiver on it

That doesn't seem particularly good as they need the Scottish seats to mostly come back to Labour for that to happen, the SNP will probably lose a few but not 30+ seats to Labour. Lib Dems will take a few of the Tory seats in England, and some of these would be in areas where Labour would have to gain to get the outright majority, if it was 7/1 on a coalition led by Labour it would be great but I don't think that's good enough to get an outright majority.
That's much better odds than 7/1 for a Labour majority.

>The state of my reading comprehension
I fucked up the first point by thinking it was a Labour majority and not no overall majority, 7/1 is actually very good for that.

Never actually filled out a betting slip lads. What do I write down if I want to bet on Labour winning?

No one thanks the nuns work in eugenics. We'd have a society of ubermensch if more people were given to the sacred septic tanks.

You in a bookies?
Not a clue lad.

Paddy power is just a matter of clicking what you want to bet on, sticking the amount in and clicking the button.

First part of the citizens assembly vote is in, in favour of abortion at any stage of pregnancy if serious risk to the life of the mother

There was a helicopter circling around the area for a good 5 minutes. The fuck did he want?

>real and substantial physical risk to the life of the woman
Fine by me.

The Gardaí have been monitoring your internet activity and are preparing to apprehend you.

No but I have a few betting slips. I assume I just write down "UK election majority winner" and then my choice and stake

Could have been the Garda?

Frogweeb if you're around can you speak French? I saw this thing on Sup Forums which has the results come in, will these start filling in at 21:00 in the timezone in Ireland, and the constitiencies will fill up manually and give us the vote that each candidate receives in each constituency, or am I missing something else on top of that?
lefigaro.fr/elections/resultats/

>local Gardaí do nothing to stop all the drug dealers in the village
>have the money to fuck around in a helicopter whenever someone sees a nipple on the internet
Sounds about right.

Looks like that's what it does, yes. Although I'm not seeing any description of how it works on that page.

Thanks for the link though.

8 of 9 ballots today, 9th is about distinguishing between physical and mental health, which desu shouldn't matter as long as it's diagnosed by a recognised specialist and other therapies/treatments won't work

Ballot 4 results in favour of termination at any stage for mental health, looking for the rest now

Are you on the assembly or did you just lift that from somewhere else, filename looks like it was taken from a phone's camera. Will those ballots come in today too?

I think he's getting it from Twitter - all those images are there already.

Twitter Feminists are singing a different tune regarding the Citizen's Assembly today. Bunch of hypocrites.

Get fucked anti-abortion fags

Are there many of them about?

Can't wait to vote against abortion on demand, lads.

There are one or two in this thread, usually on the basis of degeneracy and cultural decay or some shit.

You're gonna need to move back to ireland then :^)

Voting no abortions just to spite you.

>one or two
That's not how you spell majority.

Majority of /éire/ is anti-abortion on demand by my reckoning.

I'm not sure if the Garda or the Air corps pay for the helicopter. I guess they split it

Going to vote no now because you're a cunt

strawpoll.me/12808928
Let's see how right you are.

From the citizens assembly twitter
Bunch more to come

D'yees not think abortion should be removed simply on the basis that it's not the governments decision to make whether you can or cannot do it?

Besides that, they're only going to go abroad anyway, flights to england only keep the poorest of the poor knackers from them, and they shouldn't be breeding anyway

...

You're right. We need an armed uprising to depose the current administration and put a real government in power.

Good, poor knackers having babies is a burden on the state.

th-that's not what I was saying at all

...

...

If that's what is allowed then we pretty much have abortion on demand, that's the same conditions they have in Great Britain.

Fairly sure it was.

>Besides that, they're only going to go abroad anyway
Fine by me. Irish solution to an Irish problem.

Biggest load of horseshit. I don't want to pay for the mistakes of the personally irresponsible.

And they aren't paid for through child benefit?

Meh I give up and someone else seems to be uploading better, it seems like abortion for any reason up to 12 weeks got through

What do you mean solution? There's no solution here?

Also you're not paying for them to have an abortion. They'll be on benefits if they do have the kid, which, newsflash, you will be paying for.

He wont be paying for it anyway, hes in a foreign country.

>it seems like abortion for any reason up to 12 weeks got through
If that is passed into law, I've lost all hope for the country.

>What do you mean solution? There's no solution here?
How is not a solution? They get to kill their "inconvenience" at their own cost and we get to keep abortion on demand illegal in Ireland.

>having faith in this country
>ever

Not indefinitely. I'm only on a one year contract and I still have no idea if it's gonna be renewed or whether I'm gonna be hauled back home.

They'll be killing it at their own cost here if it's legalised you stupid fuck, it won't be availiable under a medical card

>They'll be killing it at their own cost here if it's legalised you stupid fuck
>it won't be availiable under a medical card
How do you know that? Some of these feminists are demanding that abortion be legal and FREE.

Well, it shouldn't be free. And I can't see it being free, not with an austerity loving government who are reluctant to go near the issue. Don't make a strawman out of fringe feminist arguments.

>They'll be on benefits if they do have the kid, which, newsflash, you will be paying for.
That's not something we should be encouraging anyway, we shouldn't kill the unborn because they're a "burden" on the state to raise them, every kid is going to have a cost to raise them. Reducing benefits would help to a degree too so they don't rely on handouts.
>If that is passed into law, I've lost all hope for the country.
Yes, if that's allowed it's very easy to rectify that to be abortion on demand.

>Don't make a strawman out of fringe feminist arguments.
The demand that it be "free, safe, and legal" is a pretty damn popular argument among the Pro Choice crowd.

>so they don't rely on handouts

That's not how it works. The institution of benefits in the first place was the mistake. Once you've done that you cannot get rid of them. You've created a dependant lower class who will then forever vote for who maintains the benefits.

Moreover, these people are to a certain degree fucked without the benefits. Go to some shithole town in Donegal and have a look at it. You remove benefits here, they're not going to get a job, there are no jobs. If there are no jobs and you remove benefits you just get black markets and crime.

Who gives a shit about the pro choice crowd. At the end of the day they will not make the decision and they'll accept the compromise they are given. We are not the pro choice crowd, why should we argue based on the stated desires of that group?

who /actuallyprochoice/ here?

mise

In limited circumstances like rape, incest, foetal abnormality or risk of death/serious harm to the mother
Bodily automony =/= killing healthy babies

Me, up to 12 weeks anyway.

Would that be really considered a Pro-Choice standpoint? I hold the exact same view and I'm never sure whether to call myself Pro-Life or Pro-Choice.

Realistically that's when most abortions would be carried out anyway, 16 weeks at a stretch

Is there a difference betwenn the foetus at 12 weeks and 22 weeks? In almost all cases the 12 week foetus will develop into the 22 week foetus and eventually a child.

you can argue all day about when the ethical cut off point is. There is no right answer

What it would develop into is irrelevant to me. I don't see a foetus as a person.

That's what I mean, there isn't really an ethical cutoff, it's either you're okay with aborting the foetus or not, you can't be somewhere in the middle in almost all circumstances.

So why is aborting beyond 12 weeks bad in your view?

arbitrary cutoff, then my sense of contempt for women starts kicking in. They should spend a few months nigh crippled.

I would argue that there is a point where it not yet a life, but that's my own perspective, and I don't believe it can be used in the argument as It's hard to draw a line from where it ceases to be a ball of cells and a person.
The distinction must always be arbitrary, and to some extent semantical.

>I would argue that there is a point where it not yet a life, but that's my own perspective, and I don't believe it can be used in the argument as It's hard to draw a line from where it ceases to be a ball of cells and a person.
I can understand that, in my perspective I would say from the moment of conception it begins its life, that's why I see the black and white image. I have that too because I can't really agree on an arbitrary date to start its life with no real evidence of when it begins, so it's best to then pick the earliest time possible in my view.

>The distinction must always be arbitrary, and to some extent semantical.
Which is the main reason why I am so opposed to to abortion on demand; I don't understand why it is acceptable to use arbitrary cut-off points during pregnancy before which it is acceptable to kill a potential life for no good reason. Science has not reached a consensus on when exactly life begins (human life in that context is a nebulous term), and until the day that the scientific community can definitively say that "Human life begins in the womb after X weeks and here is definitively why...", I will not budge on my opposition to abortion on demand.

Pro-life tends to be no abortion in any circumstance, in a 2 position situation that'd put me Pro-choice, though I prefer to think of it as more a common sense or decency position
To me it's more about viability outside the womb

here is nothing in human development to mark it out from any other animal. The distinguishing characteristics of human life only become apparent in the first few years of life. This will always be a moral issue, not a scientific one.

But whether it's immoral (it fundamentally is in nearly all circumstances) should not necessarily play a role in deciding the legislation.

Is it moral or sensible to put the power to prevent this in the hands of the state? Why prohibit when it can happen anyway?

>immoral
Depends on your moral values, There is no universal set.