Downloading 10GB Bluray rips when the human eye can't see past 480p

>downloading 10GB Bluray rips when the human eye can't see past 480p

try 360p

>watching rips with 48kbps audio encoding

dumb frogposter

Well done, man. Great thread, top fucking notch. Excellent. This'll be sure to start a very interesting discussion.

Nice trips
Check these dubs

so it begins

>listening to loud movie when humans can't tell the diferrence over 40 hz

>He doesn't have 18-34gb rips of his kino that he hasn't bought

fugggggggggg

480p masterrace

>finally got a 4K jewray player for my 75 inch tv
>literally can't tell the difference

rips are always a lesser quality than the original, anway

torrenting and worrying about quality is such a giggle moment

Thanks to based YIFY a 1080 rip is about 1gb.

I download 2GB rips tbf

there are rips and there are 1:1 duplicates.
real talk: if a blu-ray duplicate is for example 40GB, I can only really start to see a difference if the rip is less than 15 GB (calibrated FW900.) It really affects the grain at that point and anything less than 8 GB is unwatchable if I know a better copy exists.

>being this new

>downloading 720 when youre just gonna watch it on your iphone

>he fell for the 4k meme

I was right

no copy is the same as the original, because they are not the original. copy a file over n over and you will be able to detect a lessening in quality.

It's not that hard to believe and it's just the nature of time.

>over n over

480p in what size?

>no copy is the same as the original
bullshit

>copy a file over n over and you will be able to detect a lessening in quality
bullshit, this is only true when you rerender or download from a streaming site because it rerenders automatically (i.e. youtube)

copying bits from a file doesn't change a thing to the new file, it's exactly the same as the original

try it, copy paste any movie in your library a thousand times and the last copy will just be as clear as the original

thanks for not disagreeing

why are you asking me to do what you're unwilling to do? because you know I'm right. my reasoning is much more logical than yours is.

Dude it was a shitty ruse to begin with. The 'copying of files lessens the quality' killed it.

bullshit, you don't know how files work you fucking retard
you don't know how rendering works
you basically know nothing about software

your reasoning is based on a flawed and inapplicable premise

never talk about software again until you actually educate yourself on the topic you dense fuck

typical nerd fascist

typical retard

>this is the hundredth copy
>this is the original

"I'll take the hundredth" is your "logic."

I don't know, I lost a couple of kbps in my LoTR trilogy torrent last time I backed it up.

>frogposter
>being a huge fucking retard

Yep, it checks out.

That is the film standard rate in America, which is the only place that matters

please provide proof. I'm the one who is supporting your experience.

I think the problem lies is torrenters who've lovingly amassed and stored an extensive library of various media files feels threatened that their house of cards is falling down.

Confirming this.

Yeah, I downloaded BvS and now the takes looks like shit

>watching films in color when colors aren't even real

>please respond

Nah, fuck this thread.

>human eye has a resolution measured in pixels

>Not downloading a 40gb rip and running it through interpolation software to output it at 120 frames per second

Fucking plebs.
I bet you losers still watch films at 30 fps.

What resolution do we see in? Betting not even 4k

How would we know what we can't see?

One minute of a degree, aproximately.

If you're being serious right now that's probably because it's only upscaling to """""4k"""""