What's the one common denominator of all of Sup Forums's patricians?

What's the one common denominator of all of Sup Forums's patricians?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Wilder#Death
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Most of them are actually normies pretending to be film buffs online

they are faggots

We appreciate great kiněmatographi̇́

They
>enjoy films
>watch films
>pay attention the film they're watching
>form their own opinions on films rather than relying on Sup Forums or reddit to tell them if it was good

We know the difference between the genres.

They're actually plebs

like Michael Mann flicks

My dick

goose?

They don't exist

They don't visit Sup Forums.

All of them are imaginary.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Wilder#Death

can we stop with meme answers and actually put some thought into this?

Like, is there one film that we can all agree is patrician?

my proposition is lost river.

don't watch superhero movies

They don't watch the films of Wes Anderson.

OP's question is a meme question. Expecting a thoughful answer is naive.

no
drive

feet appreciation

they can appreciate the art of baneposting.

You made a shit post thread and got shit posted. I don't see the problem here.

no u.

We can all agree Stanley Kubrick has never made a bad film. Right?

No

A Clockwork Orange is the most superficial and pleb movie ever
Trust me, I love other Kubrick films, and I have read the book too. A Clockwork Orange is just garbage

>killer's kiss
>fear and desire
>lolita
Idiot

You're literally, (as in 'literally', not 'figuratively') literally retarded

I am in the autism spectrum but how's that related to my opinion in movies

At least I'm not a pleb like you

Your autism prevents you from connecting with the characters and understanding their emotions
You objectively can't understand film as an art

Sucks to be you

EWS is pretty trash tbqh

>implying art has to be connected to human condition or needs the ability of empathy
You know nothing about art

Go back to capeshit threads

they know, that they don't know if they have good taste.

>implying art has to be connected to human condition or needs the ability of empathy
Yes, yes I am. Because that's what makes art beautiful, not that you could understand

You're attempting to redefine art so that you can pretend to understand it. Your use of memeing instead of facing the truth is proof of this. Your opinions can never be worth anything because they stem from a cold, calculated understanding of something whose brilliance lies in its ability to evoke emotion. You're a computer trying to judge a painting

At least I'm not a faggy nigger like you

This.

...

>can't respond so he shitposts
sounds about right

Feet

Why would I try to respond to a reply the length of a short novel that is composed of asspulls about art?

I know nobody on Sup Forums understands anything about cinema as a general so I don't waste time

>the length of a short novel
>4 lines including the line quoted from you
kek
Do you have adhd too?

You have to like Bergman obviously.

baneposting

>Do you have adhd too?
Who knows
I hope I have throat cancer so I can have a reason to shoot myself

only true answers ITT

>needing an excuse
what are you, 12?

hey that's mean

don't call me names you cocksucker motherfucker

>when an autist tries to insult you