Is white genocide real?

Is white genocide real?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q
strawpoll.me/13598394
un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=aH5uhNHcOgs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

No it's not. Yes people who have the loudest voices are the fuckers who think this is racist that is racist the dirt under my keyboard is racist. They make it seem like the majority of people think like them. Therefore it makes it see, like there is a gigantic attack on white people. The only place where it seems like there is an issue is Europe with the influx of refugees. The whole thing is stupid because Europe has to take them all while countries who are rich and right next to twhere they are emigrating from refuse to take people in.

No, it's just a fetish.

Nah. It's basically larping for the kids who ride the short bus.

It's real for white people with a victim complex

White people make up 10-15% of the global population, yet they're the only ones accepting huge mass migrations of people into their countries.

Do you see Japan, China, Iran, India etc becoming 'multicultural' any time soon?

White people are literally the only people in the world who care about opening their borders like this, they are committing cultural and genetic suicide.

Good. Fuck white people.

You bet it exists. I've been serial murdering white folk for sport since before I can remember. You silly white folks make for the best game. Your skittish and afraid of contact, like a lame deer, but you still have exceptional movement and motion skills (acrobatics/athletics/etc) that makes patience and precision to make the shot.
Don't change, white folk.

Yes white genocide is real.

Whites commit genocide more than any other race.

Genetic suicide? The aryan capital of europe is going sterile.

We may infact need outside genetics to continue existing.

See? Larping fags.

Europe's 84% white. Which is slightly lower than the majority percentage of Han in China. It's much higher than the percent of Iran that is Persian. It's insanely higher than any single ethnic group in India even approaches.

>b-b-but I get to make up what the races are!
Is really all that they have to go on.

Not to mention that the population of white people is increasing, globally. So no: a genocide, by definition, cannot be occurring.

>b-b-but the percentage share is going down!
That's not what genocide means. The number of white people would have to be going down. And it isn't. The end: no genocide.

First of all, all of those nations (excluding Japan) are rules by brutal regimes in an unstable economic and social environment that people are fleeing from. Your "you don't see them becoming mticturalism hurr durr" nonsense doesn't hold any wiegh.
Second of all, Japan is desperate to bring in new blood because thier principal mortality rate is exceeding thier principal birth rate. More people are dying then being born. You can't have a country without any people.

At least do the most basic, cursory research before you speak. God damn

/thread

Not really. The greatest offenders in that realm are all Chinese.

oh come on, most of the brazilian population is white

"Outside genetics" means, on the larger scale, the extinction of our peoples as distinct ethnicities.

>Europe's 84% white. Which is slightly lower than the majority percentage of Han in China. It's much higher than the percent of Iran that is Persian. It's insanely higher than any single ethnic group in India even approaches.

It's funny how you've broken down Chinese ethnic groups into Han Chinese, and mentioned different ethnic groups in India.

But you group all Europeans as 'white people' meanwhile there are Dutch, British, Hungarian, Polish, Finnish, Italian etc.

it has begun
alpha race proclaiming their belongs

...

this
your methodology is fucked m8

>Second of all, Japan is desperate to bring in new blood because thier principal mortality rate is exceeding thier principal birth rate

Since when? There immigration laws are probably the strictest in the world outside of North Korea. They literally let in 6 refugees last year lmao.

>First of all, all of those nations (excluding Japan) are rules by brutal regimes in an unstable economic and social environment that people are fleeing from

China is a fairly well off country compared to a lot of the world, and they have a huge, wealthy middle class. Iran is also doing fairly well, don't group all Middle Eastern countries together as being 'shit'. Either way, these countries are much better of than most parts of Africa, or the bad parts of the Middle East, they could easily accept some of the large number of migrants from those countries, but they don't.

My methodology? I'm using the other guy's methodology, are you completely daft?

He said that Han Chinese is not the major ethnicity in China. So by his logic, how much of say Britain is purely British? Not Irish, not Danish, not Polish, not Italian, just pure British?

White people have a longer history, more cultures, and more continents under their belt than asia.

They just dont have the high score by a single person award

I didn't call all white people a single race. The people claiming white genocide exists do.

Agreed: white people aren't a single race.

Mostly because "race" is a pseudo-scientific category that has no meaning.

Which is another reason that "white genocide" isn't real.

As a latino, whites are the only bearable social group that exists today. White people are nice as fuck, look at EU and US/canada, spending billions internationally, taking in refugees and advocating, often with a tremendous economic price, for the dignity and human rights of people in oppressive countries. All of that shit happens because white culture is progressive and not a part of the selfvictimizing oppression olympics which seems to efface non-white identity as a whole. Brown people are becoming a monolith, again. But this time, theyre doing it to themselves.

have you live under a rock for the past 2 years?
the mayority against all you said is white people specially US

Modern idea of ethnicity is that it is largely composed of social aspects more than genetic ones.

I'm being completely serious here, this is a really good documentary to watch:

>youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q

Covers the taboo topic of 'race', and before you go shouting that it's some neo nazi bullshit, it's actually a Norwegian documentary, and they are renowned for being very 'liberal' people.

The 'race is a social construct' phrase is just pop science bullshit with no basis in reality.

White power

Name one other group of people in the entire world you try to help legitimate refugees or other poor countries as much as white people. Seriously.

Mexican latino or spanish latino?

Spain is white europeans. Mexico are brown mestizo race

Know what's better than youtube links? Scientific research papers that are sourced and peer reviewed. Which have definitively debunked the category of human races as being fuzzy science nonsense.

What basis do they decide that upon? How do they define the races?

Found the jew

White power is real though.
>white people managed to be the richest and created real civilization being the biggest minority
>all other races that were much more numerous and had access to natural resources were living in huts made from shit
Really makes you think.

>science is a conspiracy!
>the fact that it disproves my preconceived notions proves it!
>you believe in science, so you, too, are part of the conspiracy!
Larpers anonymous can help you out, user.

I never understood this whole tribal mentality based on color of skin, or other asinine criteria. I think people who strongly associate themselves with an arbitrary group like race do that because they know they got nothing else going on with their lives. So they desperately try to be part of a "group", whatever that may be.

The fact that you aren't even willing to view something which goes against your own opinions is sad, and actually proves my point. They interview a number of very prominent scientists in the documentary.

Your opinions don't matter though, only science matters, and that's what will always win in the end.

Arabs created civilization but thanks for playing

Cite those scientists then.

Your like the guy that swears he can disprove 911 if you just watch the video

But that means no more welfare in your future my nigga

I lived in a Mexican/ white area in CA and most of mestizo mixed with whites. Many of their kids look white or even aryan, with blond and blue eyes. I was looking through Facebook and most of the Hispanic/ mixes seemed to produce white kids.

Would these kids be considered white? I don't know. They look it. As long as lighter skin Mexicans mix with white, the USA white population will grow.

Modern Western civilisation came from the Greeks and Romans.

But yes, the very first civilisation in the world was Mesopotamia.

In the history of humanity, various races and civilizations were the most advanced civilization. White civilizations are top now, but they weren't always.

Gregory Cochran and Richard Lynn

Latino is a such a bullshit term. There are Japanese Peruvians and German Brazilians, both Latino.

Yes, in South Africa. Media isn't talking about it.

>satanic trips

It is a fetish though this guy isn't joking. Why I have no clue.

White genocide is real, and it's happening

Just to be clear,bfor everyone else. both of those men argued for statistical differences in races. Not that we are separate species.

No

But the neo nazis need something to fear, and since no woman wants their fat asses they blame white genocide instead.

Yes. White people are commiting genocide.

Wow white nationalists are just LARPers

Also we have a culture? White people have many different cultures that have all kind of vanished, now our culture is whatever you want it to be.

White genocide is like the idea of black genocide. Everyone thinks if they deviate from some precieved template of their race, that their race will just disappear.

have you ever thought about it like whites were just the race who cared about advancing shit? Is fighting to be the best (at the cost of war, genocide, etc) really that important?

Ever thought about it like village people (Africans, Native Americans, etc) were just content with life and happy with the Earth's bounty?

Being a more developed nation does not make your race better

Lol

However I need to be "that guy" and point out most genocides happen and are happening in Africa

But we commit the largest and most noticeable ones

Niggers in South Africa are. They want white owned farms. They haven't learned from their neighbors that pushing out whites is bad news. The average Africa nigger iq is 70. They need all the help they can get.

Fuck south africa.

God I wish

You fuckers thinking white genocide is white girls not wanting to have unprotected sex with you is white genocide we didn't even get to the shooting yet

Why would you live in south africa with niggers?

Its your own fucking fault.

>White people are literally the only people in the world who care about opening their borders like this, they are committing cultural and genetic suicide.
Then maybe they deserve to go extinct? You guys always use arguments like the strong should trample the weaker races anyways. So if whites are acting weak what is the issue? Oh yeah these white guys don't like their own mentality being thrown right back in their faces.
>Not to mention that the population of white people is increasing, globally.
You are going to have to source this. Everything I've read indicates true non-hispanic whies are decreasing globally. They have a birthrate under 2. Which is below replacement level.

Yes. White people are demonized everywhere currently. Normally by people who benefit the most from white culture and tech.

strawpoll.me/13598394
strawpoll.me/13598394
strawpoll.me/13598394
strawpoll.me/13598394
strawpoll.me/13598394

>North America
>white genocide

That's rich.

>Australians
>white

Australians look pretty black to me.

>Is white genocide real?
No, the whole "muh white genocide" thing is purely semantics.
YOU adopted the "one drop of ink" doctrine (anyone with even one black ancestor is black).
But YOU refuse to accept the "one drop of bleach" doctrine (you insist anyone with any non-white ancestors aren't white).
Almost every black person in America has white ancestors, but YOU refuse to count them as white,
YOU made the rules of the game such that you can't "win".
Congratulations, YOU are the driving force behind "muh white genocide".

You are not aware of the present demographic replacement, are you?

The demonization is well earned. Should take a couple of centuries before the stigma of public lynchings wears off.

White people colonised the whole world and now they complain about immigration?

Get fucked whitey. Enjoy being replaced.

Current?

No. Just the historical one.

White people started that off by colonizing a country, then saying that the minorities are the superior race and the majorities are inferior. When white people leave the majorities take their revenge on the minorities, see what happened in Rwanda. Typing this out makes me realize that this is kind of happening in my own country, special focus on minorities anger the majority... :o

Yes.
un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm

youtube.com/watch?v=aH5uhNHcOgs

>Is white genocide real?

No. Are "white people" getting murderer anywhere on a large scale?

The tinfoil hat always quote some alleged UN definition that includes forced assimilation.

The UN actually defines genocide as

>(a) Killing members of the group;
>(b) Causing serious bodily harm, or harm to mental health, to members of the group;
>(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
>(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
>(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Now tell me where the "white genocide" is in there?

One should also consider that the people talking about preserving "white genetics" often look something like this.

>Compare the entire Caucasian racial group to individual Asian ethnicities

Retard.

America is made up of mostly white people. Yet, that isn't reflected in the media. Say, a lot of media figures are white. That's expected in a mostly white country. However, a disproportionate amount of black people are in adverts, TV, film, media etc. It's the same in organisations now. Diversity means anti- white straight male.

To be fair there are 2 billion asians or so. You almost need to compare them to a subset

The entire thing reminds me of the Holocaust: The people who deny it the hardest are also the one who want it to happen the most.

It's only the people who get offended at even the notion of preserving white ethnicities who are also fullblown pro-immigration preachers. It's the same people who's first argument is "well, maybe white people deserve to die out".

So, is there a concerted effort to destroy the white race? No. Are white people more than average the target of enforced "diversity" and generally forbidden or kept from preserving their demographic make-up? Yes.

"White genocide" is just a racy term for retarded left wing policy that's been pursued for decades already. They're not trying to make white people go extinct, but they simply don't give a fuck if they do, and typically have some sort of insane karma logic where they excuse anything bad that ever happens to white people, whether motivated by racism or not.

If the lefties here want to prove it isn't real, all they have to do is one thing: Stop mass immigration. There's broad support for coming back on our liberal immigration policies, so it's politically feasible. Immigration has brought us nothing but misery and huge costs, so it's smart. But that where we reach the focal point of this stuff: Left wing people don't WANT to stop mass immigration. That's the one thing European politics have been deadlocked over for decades, simply because the left does not want to compromise on one of its core principles. Why? Because politics are stupid, I guess. The same reason American Republicans can claim to be Christian, yet hate social policy.

And if they just keep saying it isn't real, but pursuing policy that makes it seem very real to a lot of people, well, the isn't it just a name for something that's already happening?

Pro one thing does not mean anti the other thing. Pro choice does not mean anti life.

Also america is predominantly female. They should be more represented than white males by that logic.

Pop quiz hotshot. Do immigrants raise or lower the crime rate in a given area?

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
(D) Imposing measures intedted to prevent births within the group. (polularizing divorce, and birth control and abortion available to everyone)

and (e) in part..
child protective services often unreasonably/unlawfully removes children and put them up for auctio...Err.. i mean adoption.

>muh birthright argument

I'll believe it when you lot personally escort every nigger and muslim in Europe back to their respective regions. And for Muslims that's only the Arabian peninsula. The rest is rightful Christian land. Going by your logic, at least.

Which area? Which immigrants?

Birth control is just smart. It cuts back on the need for welfare.

in reality theres actually more of a white suicide, but in arguable that if we keep it up, we're goners, for sure

>colonized the whole world
Whew. Were you also kangz once, user?

>The demonization is well earned. Should take a couple of centuries before the stigma of public lynchings wears off.
hi john bettendorf

All. As a whole. The top 200 cities in the world with all applicable races. As a general trend does it raise or lower crime?

Capitalism cuts down on welfare.
But yeah, im glad we have it, aswell, but i feel like it was inteded for young girls, and that they werent supposed to use it for the remainder of their (ovaries) lives

great post hahahahaha

white supremacists shoot themselves in the foot every other step. thank fuck too because if they were smart you could wave fucking goodbye to world peace.

It can only be suicide if it's a widely supported effort. For instance, there was a pacifist tribe that was wiped out by the Maori who let themselves be killed. But "white people" aren't one monolithic group. That's an American perspective, really. We're not even one ethnic group, or one cultural group.

The politics that are leading to mass immigration in white countries are only supported by a minority of white people. In most places it's about 50/50, but in Eastern Europe it's rejected as a whole. As such, most white people reject mass immigration and other left wing policies associated with it. Even the 50/50 thing would normally be cause to come to a compromise. But not with immigration. It's that dogged attitude, and the sheer hostility against anyone who speaks out against it, that makes people think there's a legit white genocide going on.

And just look at this thread. The logic some people use here is definitely racist against white people. Hence the Holocaust comparison. You'll find no more fervent denier of the Holocaust than someone who wants to do it all over again. Same with white genocide deniers. Despite their denial actually being correct.

Who the hell is this guy? Where is the proof that he is posting all these threads? Who is paying him if he is?

First whites have to GTFO of north America, South Africa, Australia and NZ and everywhere else.

That's a tougher question than you think. The answer depends on what country the immigrants come from, and whether or not the new arrivals in the area have come legally or illegally.

On a technical level, 100% of undocumented immigrants are criminals, since they are illegally present in the country. It's for this reason alone that we deport them back to their home country.

If we exclude illegal immigrants, then it's true that legal immigrants tend to have a lower crime rate than the native population.

This makes sense rhetorically: For legal immigrants, the consequences of committing crime is higher than for citizens (who can't be deported). - if they commit a serious crime they will likely be both deported and banned from the country for a period of years.

Meanwhile, the whole immigration system is designed to permit the kinds of people who will follow the law and contribute to the community.

So to your question:

illegal immigrants certainly raise the crime rate in the area where they live

legal immigrants likely lower the crime rate in their neighbourhood

combining the two groups doesn't make sense, because we're talking about two very different types of people.

Mass immigration in Europe isn't focused on all applicable races. It's focused on different racial and cultural groups than the natives, which is the cause of the problems.

You're trying to commit the typical tactic of making the issue so broad that local arguments don't work. You'll say "oh, but X place has loads of white, European immigrants (who are leaving Europe at the same rate as Europe is importing Africans and Muslims) so in X place immigration is actually leading to an economic boom, therefor ALL immigration is a good thing!"

But we're not talking about some random place, with some random immigrants. We're talking about political policy being pursued in a well defined place, affecting well defined groups of people. And it's that policy I want to amend. You can keep your immigration policy in whatever place it's actually working.

While I see your point. This is the first time you said "illegal".

The rest of your statements referred to both groups as a whole. Maybe you should specify if you wish to divide them

It's your argument, therefor the burden of proof lies with you. But no, we just ought to do what you want us to do, and then when it's your turn the rules suddenly don't apply anymore.

But can you at least admit that you're massively racist, then?

You mean revolutionized the world. Sup Forums, the internet, twitter, Facebook, iPhone are all white inventions. You're welcome.

Yes, it is real and this
is the same fag, possibly even the OP of this thread too.

Is that an invitation?

Europe's situation is not Americas situation. Where you're from immigration is ruining the place.

The rest of the world is not like this.