>automation is a really big problem, in 10 years there will be self-driving cars and shit and like 30% of the population will be instantly out of jobs, oh no
>Europe is dying out because there are fewer people being born every year and that's a really big problem, oh no
Can someone explain this logic? And why does everyone keep pointing out how Europe needs immigrants to survive if vast majority of low skill jobs will become obsolete soon?
can you imagine how rowdy all the turks are going to get when 90% of service positions and largely menial labor are occupied by infinitely-more-efficient automatons?
how about all the niggers in america?
no point in immigrating from mexico anymore when every sally, dave, and junior have a robot that will mow their lawn without so much as a word, just a whirr.
places like canada and germany who purchase and produce such equipment, respectively, will probably move these automated facilities back into safer countries due to the security offered on these vast investments.
partially automated economies are going to be tons of fun, bois. post-scarcity is a long ways off yet.
I've never thought about it this way. Why the hell are we importing people to do jobs that are about to become obsolete? We need to be slowing population growth, not adding to it.
The idea is that they will be paid basic wage or whatever the swiss term for it is and be happy while doing nothing.
So why exactly does your country need to import them then?
There is no logic, there are only emotions, propaganda and muh feelings.
Automation doesn't cause unemployment only marxist/kike shills believe that
We're talking about automation on a completely different basis than what we were used to.
Ask horses how's the job market these days.
its just a shit excuse to import millions to replace the native races, to dilute the superiority of the european races
I've literally created a thread asking that.
This is stupid, the industrial revolution did not eliminate easy labor jobs. The new wave however WILL eliminate or low-skill or labor jobs which consists of up to 70% in current emplyment. The country will need only high-skilled workers. Now if there is massive unemployment. The country has to either feed the nation on welfare or re-educate all the underskilled workers which is simply not possible because people are lazy and stupid. This is where we have failed as a nation because we ruined the "survival of the fittest" rule which guaranteed that the smartest and healthiest people give offspring. And now imagine if you add on top of that low-IQ migrants in millions. It will be an endless riot.
They just want to remove whites, that's it. Everything else is a story told to convince stupid whites it isn't happening.
>completely different basis
Nice speculation. Do you have any source or scientific paper to back this assertion?
conservashits are against technology because they know capitalism will be obsolete when labor is not needed
>Automation steals all low skilled jobs in 10 years
>Kickstarts the race war
This is a good thing desu
Horses were doing fine when a wheel was invented, or when a plow was invented because, even though their raw power became less useful, in the end it created more jobs for them. Then steam and combustion engines were created and now they are useless.
This.
The only way bluefags will stop being so "ahahah hurr durr you is nazi hahaha" is if something major happens and their lives are turned to complete shit. Which will then open their eyes a bit.
But unemployment didn't rise during those massive technological changes. Again do you have any proof that technology and automation cause secular increases in unemployment?
they have been saying that since the 80s
new menial jobs will emerge, for example in medical care for the elderly
the most menial jobs have been exported to south-east asia, anyway
germany used to have a textile industry, you know
Why are marxist kike shills so cringy?
Stop asking questions or it's off to an Umerziehungslager with you, Hans.
>But unemployment didn't rise during those massive technological changes.
I'm talking from the perspective of horses and for them it definitely had.