ENVIRONMENT

Donald Trump is great, but I'm not voting for him else he addresses climate change.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg
who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/
nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
grist.org/series/skeptics/
wattsupwiththat.com/2016/05/09/facts-clear-astrophysicist-soon-of-wrongdoing-while-indicting-journalists-covering-climate-debate/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

why would he? i dont support trump
but if you actually believe that the 0.117% of greenhouse gasses that are man made CO2 dictate world temperature then youre fucking retarded

I believe he's addressed it on multiple times already.

The EPA and all other voices that's address "climate change" are all hypocritical. The EPA dumped millions of gallons of toxic water in a colorado river, Al Gore flies around on jets, emission standards lower fuel economy.

according to the WHO 4 million children under the age of five die annually due to diseases caused by indoor smoke from fires fed by grass and feces they are forced to use due to environmental regulations :^)

He's right and he dosn't need your vote... stay home faggot.

moving industries from china to the US would be extremely good for the environment. China doesnt give a fuck what companies dump into their rivers and oceans and it's disgusting. When those companies move to the US they wont be able to do that any longer

Climate change is not real dicknigger

DAILY REMINDER THAT MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE ULTIMATE BLUE PILL
ID SWALLOW BLACK DICK BEFORE I SWALLOW THAT PILL

daily reminder that 0.117% of greenhouse gasses are man made

have some red pills
youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg

>.05 has been added to your PayPal via Exxon CO.
>thank you for fighting the good fight!

D E B A T E
M
E
N I G G E R

OH WAIT YOU CANT

Ah, but you see .005% are methane, which, adjusted for how much it hurts the climate, means the oil and gas industries are effectively responsible for 98% of all climate change.

Never mind the fresh water supplies. We just need to shut down industry and reduce the world's population to a "sustainable" level so you good goyim can throw off the chains of your old religion and believe in your new religion where you worship the earth and we are your new g-ds, heh, heh, heh.

Now give us all our -erm- "your" money back so we can take better care of it -erm- "you" for us -erm- you. That's it. It'll make your life easier and help the climate!

>admitting you suck black cock
>shilling as hard as possible

You've already lost

climate change is a huge marxist scam. Even the EPA chief has admitted it countless times.

None of the policies put in place by the eco-marxists will make any dent in c02 levels (they admit this openly). They are merely trying to destroy the fossil fuel economy.

>being blue pilled
>not having an argument
stay mad climate KEK

That's objectively false. I'd post citation but it's too fun watching you autist up this thread

ah shit im getting real bored waiting for that argument, could it be you dont have one?

Climate Change
666 Go Fuck Yourself Avenue
Jew York, Jew York

There, addressed.

>replying twice to the same post in 30 seconds

Try harder Exxon shill

smelly dumb bluepillede scum
waiting on that argument

tick tock tick tock you havent made a dent in any of my points

You've made none

He has addressed it, he said it's a Chinese conspiracy

STAY
BLUE PILLED
LAD
STAY
IGNORANT

Oh no. Better just end this shit debate right here.
Dispite the fact that both sides act like anti vaxers and or fedora atheists you can't deney that the world would be a better place if we all would be a little less poluting

>+.05

he was joking

Carbon trading is a scheme designed export more American property and force complete reliance on the a globalist commerce and finance cartel..

GOOD REBUTTAL, STAY BLUEPILLED
tell that to
lets just end human progression and ignore how climate regulations murder the developing world AMIRITE XDDD

Go ahead and care about climate change if you want to get economically demolished by China. As long as they don't give a shit about the environment there's no reason for us to since we will barely make a dent in light of the emissions they produce.

Climate change is a lie. It's a Chinese-funded lie to smear Donald Trump's campaign

>+.05

Ok?

My turn; Were going to be 20 plus trillion in debt..

#remember the 0.117%

>it was just a joke! He was only pretending to be retarded!

>MUH DEBT

Climate change must be ignored because it is a competitive world. You cuck yourself by adhering to it and your enemies gain on you.

/thread

what compels you to be so ignorant, why do you shut out the truth like it burns? why do you lack the basic human ability to question right and wrong, true and false. could you be a bot?

>truth

"No"

>rebuttal
non existent

This desu, it doesn't even matter whether the climate change we're experiencing is accelerated by humans or not. All that matters is that we continue to increase efficiency to the point where emissions and pollution are negligible. Not for the sake of the environment, but rather just to show that we can.

>Original argument

Asinine

>hasnt made one single point in this entire argument let-alone refuted any of my many

child

so just ignore the fact that environmental regulations are slaughtering the entire developing world and 4,000,000 children under the age of 5 die yearly due to diseases from indoor fires fed by feces they must use due to environmental regulations

...

>muh starving dying poor kids
Like I give a fuck

>"'no"

What do you suppose he should do about Climate Change? If you tackle it, nothing happens except the pollution happens elsewhere, and guess what - it's all the same air no matter where the CO2 is released.

If he brings industry back to the US he will be doing more for the environment than any other candidate by preventing the need to buy shit from China and shipping it halfway around the world.

who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/
guess you just lack humanity lad, source in case you dont believe
>mfw i already refuted that

nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html

Try harder

Fucking rekt hahaha

>not understanding that its a false graph that measures solar irradiance instead of sunspot activity and subatomic particles from space which are recorded to almost identically follow temperature trends
>posting graphs he doesnt even understand that dont account for more than 90% of the equation
>not understanding less than 5% of co2 is man made
HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
not understanding that 30 yers means LITERALLY NOTHING on the planetary climate scale

no good arguments coming, ill be on my way i guess, done wasting time with domo arigato mega retardo

You should probably read the works of the scientist your citing. Who also has been influenced by the fossil fur industry to publish faulty science and correlations without disclosing his sources of funding.

Its over shill. You can keep posting to get your 5 cents, as long as you understand it.

>MUH CHILLUNS WONT SOMEBODY THINK ABOUT THE CHILLUNS
>b-but you lack empathy
I only care about people within my sphere of influence because I realized it was a waste of my time to think otherwise, and it's not like we'll ever solve Africa's problems. Interfering in their affairs and trying to speed up their technological and cultural development has only done more harm than good anyway, they need to sort their shit out themselves.

"He has accepted more than $1.2 million in money from the fossil-fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers. At least 11 papers he has published since 2008 omitted such a disclosure, and in at least eight of those cases, he appears to have violated ethical guidelines of the journals that published his work.

The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money. He used the same term to describe testimony he prepared for Congress."

run along now Exxon shill like a good little bitch

Literally every single argument you loony climate change deniers spout has been debunked.

grist.org/series/skeptics/

I don't know why anyone even tries to argue with you guys anymore.

Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of state for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.)

Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick,said: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”

In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment, told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer, speaking in November 2010, advised that: “…one has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. Instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth…”

ftfy

Ah yes, the endlessly repeated hockeystick graph. Tacking on high frequency data onto low frequency data. A statistical abomination. Daily measured CO2 tacked onto ice core air samples which have a temporal range of 70+ years. Put that CO2 hockey blade through a 70 year mean value smoother and it will disappear.

Now look at this high frequency CO2 data that goes back to the 19th century. Surprise! Nothing new about today's CO2 levels.

Source: Fig. 12 from Beck, Ernst-Georg. "180 years of atmospheric CO2 gas analysis by chemical methods." Energy & Environment 18.2 (2007): 259-282.

Never seen these data before, have you? And yet you warmists think the the UN IPCC is all about science, don't you?

Graph is here.

...

You do understand that the error bars in radiative forcing estimates are huge; much more than difference between warming and cooling. And this data you graphed don't account for any possible negative feedback. Instead the CO2 "forcing" (a very poor term because it assumes that all global temperature influences are equivalent to surface energy fluxes; which is false) assumes positive feedback. Namely by increased water vapor in the upper troposphere.

That assumption is false. Graph related. This is why warmists never talk about it anymore.

Oh Noes! One scientist got paid $60K a year (after institutional overhead)! Meanwhile climate "scientists" get total funding in the $Billions. Pic related. Skeptic funding is 0.1% of "help us get $Billions for the U.N" funding.

And Dr. Soon has been vindicated; meanwhile the scumbag "journalists" who "exposed him" are shown to be scum.

wattsupwiththat.com/2016/05/09/facts-clear-astrophysicist-soon-of-wrongdoing-while-indicting-journalists-covering-climate-debate/

Trump's official comment on "Climate Change"

"The climate changes, faggot. It has been doing this for hundreds of billions of years. You're a cucked SJW crying about "muh causes", and giving your money to a money laundering scam. Go die"

Who cares? Their music was lame. Why should I listen to what they think about climate change?

Isn't it funny how NASA cherry picks research which supports there desire to get more funding? There are a number of papers which show strong solar changes. Pic related (magnify it to get the specific citations). As you can see the assertion that solar changes have been little-to-none is nothing but conjecture. Significant research suggests otherwise.

You're the bitch. Read here

>"The world is going to end and we're all going to die in tidal waves and shit unless you let us tax you"
>masses freaking out