So is this the Patriots second dynasty or are we still on the first one?

So is this the Patriots second dynasty or are we still on the first one?

Other urls found in this thread:

fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-patriots-are-the-nfls-greatest-dynasty/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

courtesy of Nate Dirt

fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-patriots-are-the-nfls-greatest-dynasty/

All time dynasty

Meh, they went ten years between titles, so I'd say that's a long enough gap for this to be considered a second dynasty. They're definitely the team of the decade for the 00s and the 10s though.

Mawahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahhabelipooooooppppp on ur face

Best team ever

Good post

The more important question is whether or not they can pull off the unprecedented feat of winning two owls in three years on two separate occasions.

They already did it early in Brady's career. They already won in SB49. They already won in SB51. Now they can actually get it done by winning again in SB52.

NFL 2010'S TEAM OF THE DECADE POWER RANKINGS(2010-PRESENT)

MULTIPLE OWL WINS
1. PATRIOTS

OWL WIN
2. SEAHAWKS
3. BRONCOS
4. PACKERS
5. RAVENS
6. GIANTS

CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP
7. 49ERS
8. STEELERS
9. FALCONS
10. PANTHERS

CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP
11.COLTS
12. CARDINALS
13. JETS
14. BEARS

DIVISIONAL ROUND APPEARANCE

15. TEXANS
16. CHIEFS
17. SAINTS
18. COWBOYS
19. CHARGERS

PLAYOFF BERTH
20. BENGALS
21. LIONS
22. EAGLES
23. VIKINGS
24. REDSKINS
25. DOLPHINS
26. RAIDERS

NO PLAOFF BERTHS

27. BILLS
28. TITANS
29. BUCCANEERS
30. RAMS
31. JAGUARS
32. BROWNS

Still on the first one. The team will go downhill when Belichick retires. I'm not a Pats fan by any means but they're a SB caliber team with or without Brady (obviously much more with).

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Fuck I forgot Cutler and Brandon Marshall made an NFC championship game lmao

>Bengals
>5 playoff appearances since 2010
>can't even get to the divisional round
>even the Jets, Bears, 49ers and Texans have a playoff win

Jesus Christ

>gives Trump more of a chance than most predictors
>called a shill

I don't get it. His polling concerns were from a statistical standpoint. He never said Trump never had a chance to win. I read most of the articles and the most wrong he was was on the Bernie Michigan win because it was even MORE improbably than Trump's GE win, and he even called into question poor polling methods. Do people not read or do they just like to meme?

Don't bother man, Sup Forumstards don't know how to read anything but memes.

You're right. 9 years on this shit site and the memeing has made this place a politicized shithole, but at this hour I don't even care I'm feeding into it.

I'm drunk

How did they lose 2007.

You mean 3 in 4 years?

>So is this the Patriots second dynasty or are we still on the first one?
It will be a second one if they win next season or the season after that.
You have to win 3 times within 5 years.

one very very lucky reception

Same dynasty.
During the years without an Owl win, they still went to 2 more Owls and consistently made the CCG. There was no shit years spent rebuilding and missing the playoffs.

its 2 inside of 1 long one

No

We're in uncharted waters because this dynasty is so long.

I think of it as Brady-Belichick Era I and Era II

Yeah, fair enough. Two dynasties, they just both happen to have Belichick and Brady. Sort of like how the Yankees won 3 titles in the 1940s and 4 titles in the 1950s, all with Berra and Stengel

San Antonio and the Yankees have both done the same thing.

*Could even argue that the Yankees did it a second time, with Jeter/Rivera/Pettite

Titles in '96, '98, '99, '00, '09
Appearances in '96, '98, '99, '00, '01, '03, '09

>San Antonio and the Yankees have both done the same thing.

Popovich-Duncan is a Belichick-Brady type combination.

The Yankees, though are different because the only constant was Derek Jeter, who was far from ever being the most important player on the team.

Hmmm