What the fuck is this movie?

What the fuck is this movie?

excellent desu

DUDE....let's have the main character mumble half his dialogue...LMAO!

Cakes: the movie.

>it's a "moron makes a thread instead of using an internet search engine so he can get his "answers" put through a filter of eternally asshurt, contrarian alt-right 50 IQs" thread

Embarrassing.

A kino.

Kino, you degenerate.

Fun shit.

Like when I dye my poo on St. Patrick's Day.

Pure Quinoa

I bet you enjoy the films of Wes Anderson

The Wes Anderson is bad meme has been one of the greatest pleb filters on Sup Forums for almost 4 years now. It never fails.

So it's a David Lynch joint?

A well done romantic-adventure movie like all of his other recent movies.

It's spelled Ķïño you imbécil

How did you know?

reddit

Tell us again how The Lobster is a great comedic masterpiece.

the weakest of Wes Andersons movies

Life aquatic > darjeeling > grand Budapest

Wes Anderson is bad, though. Every film is full of Reddit tier "quirkiness" with shitty dialogue, bad editing, and symmetry everywhere.

darjeeling is the worst

>reddit tier

how to spot when someone can't come up with an actual reason for not liking something

it was a lot better than this garbage. I actually laughed during The Lobster.

Yeah I don't know. I foud grand Budapest to be corny with the fake Europe setting. But maybe that's because I'm from Eastern Europe and I like history, and the movie was made for burgers who don't know anything about Europe.

Darjeeling is cute and hilds a special place in my heart because when my grandfather died my father and two uncles went through a similar thing. He understands grief p well.

he invented his own europe, like rene clair did with his paris settings, its much better than recording it. the acting in darjeeling ltd is so bad

I'm going to say he's bipoktu.com tier, because that might be a website created 15 years from now that has a userbase which somehow encapsulates his work, even though his work will by then predate its existence by more than 30 years, because I, too, am an absolute fucking retard.

Le Quirky Hotel Resort

Sorry lads, your princess got KEBABED

>people actually enjoy the films of wes fucking anderson

Oy vey

hearty kek

Just because you've never achieved anything with your pathetic life. Let's see you make a better film, you worthless cunt.

Bullshit.
An excuse for hipster shits to bump elbows about how they 'get it' while everyone else doesn't like it.

Can (you) make a better film?

But was it a good story?

Ķïñò to be precise

Ignore these faggot autistics. It was a good story.

The most prevalent criticism of Wes Anderson's oeuvre is that he puts more effort into the his intricate dioramas than writing, plot, characters, etc. I don't find that to be an accurate criticism of his other movies, but it definitely fits here. All the sets are very ordered and detailed, to an absurd and frankly off-putting level. There's next to no character development in the movie; characters are whisked in and out before we get to know anything about them really. Kovacs has a cat and he's a lawyer. Agatha is a pastry-chef and has a Mexico-shaped birthmark. So what? Why should we care? The characters we do get any sort of real characterization of are either one-note baddies or one-note dandies (i.e. M. Gustave). Everyone is a complete caricature. It's almost funny that Anderson's two previous movies had much more rounded characters, and they starred animated foxes and children, respectively. The script is absolutely atrocious, flitting between sickening sentimentality and sudden-vulgarity-is-funny-right-guys?. It's also, tellingly, the first script written entirely by Anderson.

Perhaps most infuriating was Wes Anderson's use of emotional manipulation in the movie . He uses such things as the hotel being oppressed by the SS - sorry the "ZZ" - and Agatha being killed by the "Prussian grippe" as cheap methods of sympathy while also using them as stupid jokes. "ZZ" stands for "zig-zag," a joke that seems very characteristic of his sense of humour, but one that is totally inappropriate, especially given that the hotel isn't persecuted for any reason other than Nazis are mean and do bad things and are short-hand for bad guy. The tone-deaf preciousness is echoed in the "Prussian grippe" name; it's funny because the Spanish flu killed 50 million people? This sort of thing is practically unprecedented in Wes Anderson's movies, but then again there hasn't been one so hollow thus far so either.

The infuriatingness of his quasi-ideology doesn't end there either. I found M. Gustave to be a pretty terrible character, and yet the movie doesn't really try to satirize him so much as it lionizes him as a noble spirit from a bygone age or some such bs. He talks about treasuring things like "civilization" and the way things are supposed to be and Romantic poetry and "purity" in women which just makes me want to throw up. It just kind of encapsulates all the shitty things about the way Wes Anderson thinks into one truly unlikeable character.

Honestly, this movie was so bad I'm having paranoid thoughts that I don't actually like the rest of his movies. Is The Royal Tenenbaums actually any good? If I rewatch Rushmore will it seem just as bad?

tldr: A 1/5 movie