3D loli bread

3D loli bread

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu
fpo.xxx/videos/54492/free-porn-of-inner-demons-2017-the-last-of-us-xxx-3d/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

rly don't understand why this shit is legal.

Every day we stray further from god

Bump

It's literally pixels. It's NOT a real person. It's just a stream of pictures.

That just means Sup Forums is going back to its roots.

me neither

You should be locked up in a mental hospital then since you clearly can't tell the difference reality and fantasy.

umm it's legal because it's animated... not real.... isn't that much obvious?

it's art

I get what you mean.

In 5-10 years, when animation gets hard to differentiate from real life, laws will be made...

do you think violent movies or better yet, violent video games should be illegal too?

...

lol so many retards that we all get to laugh at XD

(You) are right, shooting someone in CS GO should also be illegal! Because if it is illegal IRL then pictures or videos of it that are purely fictional should als be illegal. Also enjoy your (You)'s

Op where do you find gifs like that, I got mine of Sup Forums

you rolled 999 wow
i get them of Sup Forums as well

Shit I basically made the same comment because auto refresh didn't work and now I look like an idiot

"will" be made? Content like this is already in a legal grey area. It's weird to hear people talk about laws as if most of them define firm concepts for what constitutes a criminal charge and what doesn't when, in fact, it is largely left up to courts to define those terms on a case by case basis.

In other words, some courts would deem the content in this thread to be "child pornography" based on the criteria the courts list, and some wouldn't, because the criteria includes digital images that, if I recall the language correctly, "simulates realistic children". What consitutes "realistic" is up to a court, but chances are your peers are not going to look kindly on your digital kiddie fucking hobby.

The Truth

rule34hentai

Who are you to talk about this like you know your stuff? I don't think anyone considers an animation child porn no matter how realistic.

...

Here is my last high quality.
Y'all better start posting real soon

Shit I accidentally posted shots in a loli thread. Shame on me

...

Gotta love lolis

come show your mom this thread and ask what she thinks user

dont mind me just gonna be here

source?

Someone who reads laws as a hobby. It's been a while since I've read through these ones specifically, but very little doubt that they are of questionable legality. You can go ahead and google up the language used to define child pornography. It clearly outlines various criteria and uses specific language. Modern definitions include digital imagery that isn't of real people, and I assure you it can still constitute child pornography even if you don't like it. Similar to how photographs of children that are fully clothed can still be deemed child pornography by the court, depending on the content of the image.

youtu dot be/PMdgr6jC1bU

WHERE IS THE SAUCE

funnyxdeee
Would you like some bleach?

Filmmaker

The law is wrong. Stop letting others decide for you.

sauce?

How to watch the Webm's on iphone? Vlc player doesn't loop

wdum filmmaker ?

Idiot.

what is the purpose of webms without sound. is sad. just go back to using .gifs if we cant have sound.

Step 1: open google
Step 2: place your cursor / finger (if on mobile) in the search bar
Step 3: type "The last of us - of inner demons" into the search bar
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Profit

I wasn't arguing whether the law was right or wrong or challenging the validity of it, which is an entirely different argument. I was stating what the law is. The law, as is, deems content like this as probably child pornography.

Sorry, I just got it from another thread

>thoughtcrime

>The law, as is, deems content like this as probably child pornography.
Boo hoo.

fuckin diddle touching nigger

The whole bases of banning underage porn is that it "revictimizes" the underage person.

So it could look totally real, but it's not from a real event, it's still legal.

>Source Filmmaker

This is Sup Forums moron.

...

categorically untrue.

The question is of obscenity, not legally CP.

There needs to be a real human for that.

It stops being thoughtcrime when it's actually breaking a concrete law(possession of illegal imagery). That is a physical crime, not a thoughtcrime. Thoughtcrime would be jailing you for being attracted to children, which is jailing you for thoughts.

Why would you want a 1 minute gif? You can't pause a gif

it's not legal this is CP

>possession of illegal imagery
And do you see any "illegal imagery" in this thread?

...

You aren't making sense. Obscenity laws don't relate to child pornography, which has its own set of classifications which include digital imagery.

There does not need to be a real human for certain imagery to be deemed child pornography. If you want to learn more about this, I urge you to google the law which will outline what imagery constitutes child pornography. Saying it isn't illegal doesn't mean it isn't illegal.

MOOOODS

Arguably, yes. 3D "realistic" imagery of children in sexual positions is, in some circumstances, considered child pornography according to US law.

Thank you so god damn much

[citation needed]

Almost there...

Why does she look like a demon?

...

MODS

if that was the case then this thread wouldnt be up. Clearly animation and cartoon doesnt register with cp laws. Of course some places consider them the same thing but since this is a US based site with US laws and plenty of states have no laws regarding loli Sup Forums can have loli and shota breads all day long.

>tfw morons conflate those that get off to killing children with normal humans that are attracted to youth and would never force themselves on anyone
>they equally bad! mostly the latter!
Muricans, not even once
Protip: the former (((group))) includes ALL the people that currently claim to rule our lives

>3DPD
Get off of our website, you shitty casual fuckheads

>Doesn't complain when there's Shota breads
>Doesn't complain when there's trap breads with obvious underaged young boys shoving objects up their asses for real

Just admit you're a hypocrite then kindly fuck off.

It's amazing that so many people claim that this is either definitely legal or definitely illegal without a single reference to what jurisdiction they are talking about. Don't you guys know that laws differ greatly on this topic around the world and even from state to state within the US?

Sauce? Can't fap without the audio.

It's not a crime if it wasn't from a real event... because it's not real.

3d girls suck
you emulate 3d girls in 2d media
fucking normie

I think you better leave now.

Read the thread before you ask for sauce, I already posted it

It's mostly just trolls. Although there's a few who are so paranoid that they honestly think the FBI is monitoring their web usage and are hoping that all this anti-pedo crap will allow them to be around this material without making it on a watchlist.

I mean the yellow eyes kind of do most of the work for that one... maybe that's why I like her

Go back to Sup Forums

fpo.xxx/videos/54492/free-porn-of-inner-demons-2017-the-last-of-us-xxx-3d/

Then why is real CP banned, yet this stuff is always on Sup Forums (which is literally hosted on FBI servers) accessible in all 50 States and many countries?

>All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
Learn to read, faggot

see
All cases that have even tried to jail people for cartoon CP (which this is... no matter how real it looks) are based off obscenity laws.

Even then they were tack-on charges because the person usually had real CP or was a rapist.

It's like "disturbing the peace" laws. Very broad to just jail certain people for no reason.

>hosted on fbi servers

Go ask your congressman and show him these pictures. They'll hold onto them

hosted on FBI servers? really?
i knew there were a lot of dumb ass people on Sup Forums
but to be this stupid... seriously?

epic samefag

Are you an idiot?

Technically, who ever makes CP owns the copyright to it, yet it's still banned.

>(which is literally hosted on FBI servers) accessible in all 50 States and many countries?

They keep the good stuff for "personal use"

stfu FBI

real cp is banned cuz kids actualy get fucked how is that hard to understand you ideot get a school

>Not only is he dumb, he doesnt know how to show id's

It's a joke, but you get the idea.

...

You are an idiot. You both are. Child pornography is a federal issue, not a state issue. There is no "differs state to state" because federal law concerning child pornography overrides any state law.

Because it's a legal grey area and poorly defined, but if you are caught with it and actually stood in a court, you would very likely be found guilty of possession. How long it is posted is irrelevant.

Another user claimed "obscenity" was necessary to prove in order for digital images to be child pornography, but that isn't the precedent set by Dwight Whorley, where the judge found: "it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists". Very few cases exist outside of his concerning this topic, but I think even if obscenity came into play, you're going to have a very hard time convincing a judge/jury that your pseudo realistic 3d kiddie fucking images aren't obscene.

In short, the images most likely are illegal, but the mods on Sup Forums may not necessarily be aware of it and the law is so poorly enforced that it doesn't matter. It's the same reason people get away with hosting images of "child models" that most certainly ARE child pornography for years on end yet never get taken down. There is a difference between legality and enforcement.

Exactly, that's my point. That's why CP is banned.

Pixes generated by a computer from the mind of an artist doesn't involve any real person.

Get out.

>le ebip le id's meemay trolle xD

>pictures of children are child pornography
It's time to stop now.

>same reason people get away with hosting images of "child models" that most certainly ARE child pornography
No, they aren't.
A child in a bikini suit is not suddenly pornographic.

>All cases that have even tried to jail people for cartoon CP (which this is... no matter how real it looks) are based off obscenity laws.

Not true, as Dwight Whorley was found guilty and "obscenity" never came into the discussion, where the judge deliberately clarified: "it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists"

I'm wondering what cases you're referring to where somehow someone was caught with 3D simulated child pornography and the court deemed that it wasn't obscene and they were let go. I'd like a link to these supposed cases.

...