What does Sup Forums think about Solzhenitsyn and the 66 million the Jews killed starting in 1917?

What does Sup Forums think about Solzhenitsyn and the 66 million the Jews killed starting in 1917?

> the brave Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian writer who has been called the "Conscience of the 20th Century," served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system. Today, he is hated by top-level Jews in America and around the world because he exposed the Jewish leadership of the genocide of 66 million Communist Gulag victims. Many victims were Christians.

Other urls found in this thread:

roca.org/OA/36/36h.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Hundred_Years_Together
thechosenites.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/200-years-together.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

With staggering implications, Together For Two Hundred Years showed how Lenin, Trotsky and other Jewish conspirators had overthrown the Romanov dynasty in 1917 and set up their own Bolshevik totalitarian system. The result: The nightly assassination and roundup of thousands of innocent men, women, and children, most of whom were herded by black-hearted Big Brother secret police into thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration camps.

The largest number of victims, Solzhenitsyn reports, were Christian believers, understandable since the revolutionary Jews despised and hated Jesus and His Chosen People, the Christians. All-in-all, about 66 million innocent people were kidnapped and eventually died a hideous death at the hands of the Jewish "Ivan the Terrible" corps.

You know what I think?
I think you retarded Amerishits should stop using the writings of a smart man to prop up your superficial love of Hitler, you retarded faggots.
Solzhenitsyn was not an anti-Semite nor would he ever support Nazis.
And finally, there wasn't 66 million victims. Solzhenitsyn simply didn't have the data to know the exact number. It was far lover, around 10 million people. Awful crime of course.
If you're really interested in what Solzhenitsyn thought, read:
roca.org/OA/36/36h.htm

I'll give it a read

>66m
Does he have any evidence for this figure lol

archipelago gulag is the ultimate banhammer against communism. back in school i used his book all the time to bitchslap the retarded lefty wannabe commies.

He's counting the Bolsheviks and Stalin together (1918 to 1957). The number would be pretty accurate in that case.

>the Jews killed
Financed by Germany and western states you idiot

He was a paid shill of his time.

My first year history teacher was a Jew that made us read Solzhenitsyn and hated the commies.

66 millions is only pre-WW2.
Aleksandr is politically correct author with hard evidences of jew crimes.

Also polack=jew.

Financed by Jewish Wall Street and finance houses like the Rothschilds, you mean.

>remember the 66 gorillions goys

It's funny how supporting Nazism is considered social suicide in the West, but Communism gets a free pass. Pure coincidence, I'm sure.

Gulag Archipelago and Warning to the West are essential Sup Forums reading. Especially for /bezmanov/ fanboys.

Chilling and prescient.

Every American liberal cuck spit on Stalin saying what he did was "not real communism". What they call communism is not what communism was during the 20th century. I've never seen an American " socialist " defend Stalin or the USSR

>Solzhenitsyn was not an anti-Semite

Of course he was, as are all those with a pure Russian soul.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Hundred_Years_Together

>66 million

yet they wave the USSR flag

He's a lying cunt used for anti-Soviet propaganda first by the West and now by our own anti-Soviet government. And his books are pretty shit

>using fiction as an argument
It's not backed by anything you know, he just made half of that shit up

Maybe. That's mostly a vestige of Cold War propaganda if anything, I think. They wouldn't have any issue with Trotsky or even Marx himself. Liberals today are more authoritarian, so it would only make sense for them to align with Marxist ideas, just look at Bernie and his "revolution." The guy thinks he's the vanguard, and his supporters (along with college campus liberals in general) are like Maoist youth groups shutting down opposition who try to speak out against them.

They are not proud of their nations though, that's the fundamental difference between them and Stalin, Mao, Tito, Nasser and the French revolutionnaries. That hate the Western values, they love Muhammed's cock, they hate nationnalism while the very concept of Nation was created by the left-wing movement of the XVIII-XXth century.

Marxism is inherently globalist by nature.

I know but this doesn't make sense. They wave the Red flag but if you ask them about Stalin, they will say that it's not real communism. This people are double-minded, they don't make sense

The elites are pushing for Maoist one-world government.

>They wave the Red flag but if you ask them about Stalin, they will say that it's not real communism
Well, it isn't. It's socialism. Communism is the hypothetic society that's supposed to be creted in the future. I don't know why so many people struggle with this very basic idea.

>It was far lover, around 10 million people

We totally believe you.
Pack it up boys, we're done here. Mountainnigger has just elucidated another mistery for us.

>Hitler wasn't a national socialist

When my dad dies, there's no way in hell I'm not getting his copy of The Gulag Archipelago.

And I'm going to read the rest of it as a personal tribute to him.

Hitler was a national-socialist.

So why do they wave the Red flag and in the same time say that what this flag represent is wrong ? That doesn't make sense

Bernie Sanders spent his young adulthood working on a kibbutz dedicated to Stalin.

Back in the days, he was a real communist. I don't know what he is now, but I'm sure that his supporters don't support Stalin.

>It da joopooos

Russians were the ones pulling the triggers they didn't care they are souless so who gives a fuck

What does it represent?

I'd assume they share the end goal of building a communist society, but disagree with Stalin's methods, aka building a strongly centralized socialist state as a transitional stage.

>building a strongly centralized socialist state
That's what this flag means. That's what happened under the Soviet rule.

I've read A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, is his other stuff worth reading?

t. gomrade andropov

>That's what this flag means.
Got that straight from the official press release by the International Commission on the Meaning of Flags, I presume.

Lubjana Prison can help cure your problems, Comrade. We should go there sometimes.

That's my interpretation. The USSR doesn't exist anymore, so if you wave their flag, you agree with what happened back then

No.

We have to accept the fact that we'll never get an official English translation for 200 Years Together so we'll have to settle for shitty translations made by anonymous Jewish shills who never includes the most important part, the footnotes. Without the footnotes it's a book full of crazy claims with no citations or anything to support it. This is the version I read: thechosenites.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/200-years-together.pdf

btw. I've always liked this quote spoken by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn when he met David Duke in Moscow back in 2002.
>“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

The footnotes are the best part

Yeah, the footnotes IS the book. The rest is just unimportant narrative. Do you speak German, Russian or French?

Not really, but English is such disaster of a language that Germanic and Romance languages are easier than most would think.

So you read the German translation but you don't speak German, what?

There are a lot of things that I can halfway read, but there is very little that I could speak.

literal memespouter

He was 100% right

he a gud boi he dindu nuffin

>thread has nothing to do with nazis

>stupid Eurotrash brings up nazis for no reason

Out. Out. Out.

t. /his/

bob avakian
michael parenti
grover furr

scores of mid-level humanities academics at any university will refuse to condemn stalin, if not outright praise him

sure it's probably not as common as it is in france but we have no shortage of djugaboos