Hey Sup Forums Whats the definition of anarchy?

hey Sup Forums Whats the definition of anarchy?

obongo wongo congo

extra spicy mexican food + laxatives + no toilets in a 100 mile radius

It's effectively the abolition of heirarchy.

So no government, no bosses, everybody is equal, and everybody works together to just get done what needs to be done.

would it be possible to own property or sell such?

...

>definitive leader
>caste system
Try again.

nope

No, it also comes with the abolition of money.

Property belongs to those who can work it.

If you're living on a property, you are responsible for what it produces. I.e. if you're living on a farm, you are working as a farmer. If you're living in a factory, you're making sure that factory is making stuff.

It's effectively just everybody works to make sure the entire community runs smoothly.

It sounds strange, but I'll put it to you this way. Nobody has to work hard.

Many hands make light work.

Also as a result, nobody is forced to work long hours or weekends, people can choose the hours they work as long as everybody is putting in.

Anarchy is nice and comfy but it works only in small communities.

this also assumes no one threatens your life to take what you have since there is no law enforcement association

doing anal and she tries to take a shit

its like dive comp...but a political concept...and Genji isn't nerfed

ya browsin it already

95% of crimes are financial.

If there's no money, there's no finance. What are they going to take?

A really stupid idea where the biggest strongest warlord gets to rape you and kill your family because there is no "fascist" government to save you weak ass

Anarchy is pretty much where the human race started and throwing away thousands of years of “progress” just to start again seems kinda pointless to me. Imagine having to live through the brutality of anarchy, tribalism, feudalism and so on again – as that’s probably what would happen – just to probably end up more or less back where we are now.

Lol.

ITT kid uses a fascist example to describe fascism while pointing the blame at anarchism.

Weak.

No no don't worry dumb ass, im not retarded enough to actually think fascism is a good idea

however it would be impossible for anarchy to not just turn out to be an exceedingly violent tribal or feudal society where the strong dominate and kill the weak and "equality" and rights are nonexistent

assuming you live in a first world country, you have it pretty damn good, be glad you don't live in Africa or elsewhere where anarchy is very real and very terrifying

money represents goods
if there is no money, would crime cease?

hurr durr but it wouldn't be illegal cause there would be no laws
checkmate fascist

>effectively

lol

Actually it's extremely possible, and happened in spain.

Until the communists came and fucked everything but that's another story.

So you're wrong, and it's been proven.

Sorry pal, looks like it's time to brush up on your history.

No, crime wouldn't cease because some people are just arseholes.

But when you consider that 95% of crime is financial, imagine the sudden drop.

All of a sudden people who couldn't afford food now have it for free. Boom. No need to steal any more. Make sense?

give some actual evidence rather than just saying it worked

Spanish civil war you faggot. Look it up.

>hey Sup Forums Whats the definition of anarchy?

No government.

but your idea of anarchy will always lead to the formation of a society. if a society gets "fucked" by another society, then it isn't as utopian as you make it seem.

key word being WAR you dumb cunt

This is where you need to look it up to understand the concept, fuckwit.

The civil war wasn't caused because of a system of chaos son. It was the anarchists stopping fascists from overthrowing a government.

But seeing as you know nothing about this, and are not even willing to educated yourself on it, you're not fit to comment son, so pull the buttplug out of your arse and stick it in your fucking mouth son. You need to shut the fuck up.

delusional ancom scum detected

u sound retarded and close minded son

Yeah but they didnt exactly stop them did they, the fascists won that war
anarchism allows violence and warlords to come to power far to easily
In america today if me and a couple guys got some guns together and decided to terrorize the country side sure we'd do some damage, but ultimately the police and military would stop us
In an anarchy we'd be allowed to freely pillage and rape as we pleased until the warlord with a bigger stick killed us all

No government, or as close as you can get. Also in-between more formal governments.

George bushes did 9/11

this

That's not anarchy. That's some variant of anarcho-syndicalism.

Actually they didn't.

The anarchists won, then world war 1 started, and the communists said "Alright look, we're gonna have to band together under communism until we can disband into an anarchist state" They lied, and then they went and fucked the country.

No the fasc did not win.

...

Here comes the ancap.

Ah, thought you meant the Spanish civil war that happened around the beginning of good ol' WW2
I don't particularly give half a shit about Spanish history to be honest

Now instead of telling me about this amazing Utopian society that never happened and never will, could you please address how people would be stopped from becoming despotic warlords in an anarchic society?

Mate, if you can't even grasp the simple concept that anarchy in practice actually worked in recent modern history, I'm not going to waste my time trying to tell you how people would be stopped from becoming despotic warlords, because you have this innate lack of ability to take anything in that's not your petulant narrow minded ideal.

So you've already made your decision, fuck off out of this thread and stop wasting everybody's time.

My favorite book is about Kropotkinism, so not even vaguely. You're just misusing the term. Anarchy simply means a lack of government. In most cases, it refers to periods of political chaos or interregnums (i.e warlords). What you''re trying to refer to isn't anarchy, but "anarchism", a set of mostly utopian political philosophies that are often founded in socialst or communistic ideals, but (as your example displays) covers both sides of the spectrum, and also are often broadened to included non-philosophical and often tribe/clan/family group based historical and prehistorical societies, from the Neolithic to the potlatch.

It works under very limited circumstances.

It doesn't seem to me that it worked
In some very, very brief research it looks like there never was a true anarchism implemented in spain
All I see is years of violence and bloodshed for stupid ideologies
sure what we have right now isn't perfect, but nothing ever is, and there is a lot less unnecessary violence and inequality with democratic societies

I'm not close minded at all, I just don't see anything other than an overly optimistic ideology that will inevitably cause more human suffering

if no one stops that doge, its not going to matter.
That thing looks intelligent and dangerous.

Just finished reading this, stop defending anarchy, you 14 year old madlad. You won't explain yourself to this dude cause you obviously can't.

Anarchy at it's fundamental core is something that CAN NOT work under pretty much any circumstances.

Another user, but one thing I generally support is more experiments with different forms of government. While I share your skepticism, the best thing you can say about the best of the current forms of government is that the others are worse. We're a long way from an actual good form of government. So if people can go off and create their own societies and test what works and what doesn't, one of them is bound to surprise us at some point.

I really don't think there is a better, I think we should just be glad that we have something in which most people can be reasonably happy and healthy

this thread has become anarchy

I think we need to keep trying.

Life without God. Hit me up, playa.

*yawn*

Anarchy is the default state of the world. Its what you have left when society fails.

...

So pretty much Mad Max

Not even close.

order out of chaos... all civilisation is essentially anarchy... inb4 illuminerti edgelord

What you're describing sounds like socialism. There is no requirement to work together in anarchy.

wait, so if someone had a family who was starving and they didn't grow enough corn, they wouldn't in a million years consider theft?

Socialism does not eliminate money. Socialism is just diet capitalism.

Anarchy is about community.

That's the joy of having neighbours. Massive food bowl, everybody helps everybody else.

No need for theft.

and what happens when there isn't enough to go around?
or when human nature kicks in and people want a bigger slice of the pie?

The same thing that happens in a capitalist society. The guy with the gun in your back wins.

Only real difference is in the punishment portion.

Anarchism doesn't mean regressing to third world country status.

We still have irrigation bro. We still have the capacity to overgrow food like we already do.

It can't fail.

suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure...

>underageb&

Real hippies would never use irrigation.

Socialism is non-existent capitalism.

Anarchy is about might makes right.

Hippies don't even do work son. This has got nothing to do with hippies.