Whaddaya know, everyone's gay

Whaddaya know, everyone's gay.

broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/ypa7vk/straight-people-dont-exist-new-research-says

I am a mythical creature ahhahaha

the study they site shows that people react to hetero and homo sex, this doesn't mean that they're gay. people are only gay if they say that they're gay, you can't be gay and not know it. I knew I was gay by the time I was twelve I never thought "I'm gay, but maybe I don't know Im straight.

I'd say fuck them, but those mentally ill retards would want that, because they would fuck anything that moves.

My penis does nothing when I see two faggots going at it. In fact I find it quite humorous. Lol fucking homos

nah this article is complete bullshit

sexuality is a sliding scale, I would say the MAJORITY of people aren't 100% straight 100% of the time

Its basically the same as saying 100% gay people dont exist even tho i personally have never found a female attractive and have never pursued tried to be with a female

(((VICE)))

>study only tested sexual responses of women
>surpised when when get horny watchinh porn
>more surprised when confirmed lesbians get aroused more often by lesbian porn

This study is garbage and so is vice.

(((science)))

I identify as straight. Disagreeing with my identity is heterophobic. Checkmate, liberals.

Considering you niggers want to fuck traps this is an information I can believe.

facts.
why are humans like this?

I don't know.

"Yeah man I'm straight for sure and would never fuck a guy. I love fucking women with feminine penis"

I mean, anyone can fall in love with anyone. All you need are the correct triggers and precise conditions. Sure, some people are more straight, meaning it's incredibly unlikely they'll ever be interested even remotely in another guy, but the possibility always remains.

Unless you're not a faggot.

Simple.

Humans all get desensytized over time. Gore isn't as shocking after you've seen so many violent movies/images/clips on the internet for example. Same with porn, the regular stuff eventually stops cutting it for you (or it still does, like most people, but you want even more stimulation) so you start drifting into taboo territory, hence fetishes like BDSM, furry, vore, etc. Which can lead into non straight territory, like traps.

The feeling that this is taboo and/or unnatural is what gets people off.

that research was entirely about women and lesbians and had nothing to do with men.

>saying no to this face

what are you a faggot or something

Applies only to women
Says lesbians don't exist

So get out there Sup Forums and bring some lezzies back to the D

especially you, OP

>article from 2015
Ok, OP?

That actually IS a really nice face, at least at that angle, which is REALLY rare for a dude. Doesn't mean I like what's below, however

...

I'm gonna need some sauce on that, Bill.

>you can't be gay and not know it
na, that is exactly how homophobia takes place in people

Bianca Freire

Lol cool

>he fell for the meme

if a guy can look that convincing to where you can't tell until you open their pants, why not just go for a real female? because you like cock faggot, its not a crime, just illogical and unnatural.

You're a good man

>implying I would say no to a female

I am attracted to good looking, feminine people. Why would I say no to a good looking, feminine person just because of what's in her pants?

even liberals make fun of this myth.

because it's a detriment, no sex unless they haven't eaten in a week or do an enema several times a day, its a pain in the ass literally and figuratively, a woman can use a strapon if you like it up the ass and you won't get shit on your dick having spontaneous sex, a real woman has options. but you're mentally ill, so I'm sure you won't understand. enjoy leaving the literal cesspool of the human body your only option.

>turning down a blowjob from that face

How is that not mentally ill?

Scientists determined that gays cannot exist, because magnets.
Therefore your opinion is null.

This.
Also there is no gay gene and homophobia is genetic, the same as being disgusted by shit, cannibalism, pedophilia.
Homosexuality is so damaging to human society we developed a evolutionary defense mechanism for it.

... Sexuality is fluid. Big news.

Bunch of tards xD

So sexual orientation is a social construct? Has the left has really come full circle...

Vice lol. American Pravda.

...

2017

So true.

>you're either straight or gay
>what is bisexuality
>what is the sexuality spectrum

Well, you sure are gay, because as always OP is a massive faggot.

Gross

I agree with this evolutionary moralist.
Though i think it is more to do with the moral law written in our hearts, we are disgusted by that which is immoral (murder, homosex, etc) unless you're a jaded misanthrope like myself.

scientific study
>journal of social science and psychology

science
>psychology

....sigh

ITS 2017

Actually reading the source, I conclude this article is bullshit. Title should have been "There are no straight women"

"Sexual arousal and masculinity-femininity of women."

This study literally says that there are no straight women. There was never any mention about men. Ripped out of context much.

>illogical and unnatural
So is using contraceptives, then. Sex in the modern day is all about what's pleasurable, so anything sex related that doesn't harm the unwilling is logical and natural. But if you want to talk evolution, then quit using condoms and birth control pills, faggot. Sex just for pleasure is illogical and unnatural; you're supposed to make babies with that batter!

Psychology is a science.
It's just not a hard science like Chemistry or Physics.

if this is the case then gay people dont exist either. i wonder how much faggots would chimp out at that notion.

Not at all, since non-retards have known sexuality is a fluid spectrum with no absolutes for decades. You're just not a non-retard.

Because sex is about procreation first and foremost, the reason it is tied to the pleasure center in humans is because humans are so fucking lazy they wouldn't bother reproducing if it didn't feel good. So people who think sex exists SOLELY for their own pleasure have a genetic defect.

I don't like dicks and guys in a sexual way.
Explain how i am not straight

Because you forgot about the six gorrilion

because this study is about women, read the source.

Who the fuck thinks sex exists "SOLELY" for their own pleasure? That's the worst strawman fallacy I think I've ever read. At most, it could be considered a "bio hack," where people benefit from having recreational sex that pleases them (shit tons of studies have shown it benefits brain function and mood). Far from useless or illogical, and utilizes the natural.

Go bait some other thread, retard.

Because you've never actually given them a fair chance, and likely never will since you automatically respond negatively to what society around you deems taboo. You're a braindead follower, a sheep, a lemming. Your bias, which isn't even really your own, keeps you, what we call, "in the closet," where you will always be unless you reach enlightenment.

Sexuality is a spectrum, and is fluid, for all people. This is indisputable.

It's okay to be bi. The second you actually and truly accept that in your heart, you'll start to like blow job porn just a little more, or traps won't seem quite as disgusting... that's how the awakening starts.

Homophobia is born of denial only.

>When you deliberately misrepresent and twist a scientific study to fit your political agenda

This is the Abstract of the ACTUAL study, not the pseudoscientific article OP posted.

Abstract
Studies with volunteers in sexual arousal experiments suggest that women are, on average, physiologically sexually aroused to both male and female sexual stimuli. Lesbians are the exception because they tend to be more aroused to their preferred sex than the other sex, a pattern typically seen in men. A separate research line suggests that lesbians are, on average, more masculine than straight women in their nonsexual behaviors and characteristics. Hence, a common influence could affect the expression of male-typical sexual and nonsexual traits in some women. By integrating these research programs, we tested the hypothesis that male-typical sexual arousal of lesbians relates to their nonsexual masculinity. Moreover, the most masculine-behaving lesbians, in particular, could show the most male-typical sexual responses. Across combined data, Study 1 examined these patterns in women's genital arousal and self-reports of masculine and feminine behaviors. Study 2 examined these patterns with another measure of sexual arousal, pupil dilation to sexual stimuli, and with observer-rated masculinity-femininity in addition to self-reported masculinity-femininity. Although both studies confirmed that lesbians were more male-typical in their sexual arousal and nonsexual characteristics, on average, there were no indications that these 2 patterns were in any way connected. Thus, women's sexual responses and nonsexual traits might be masculinized by independent factors. (PsycINFO Database Record

I'm not even going to address any falsities in the study, granted there are any.

Wouldn't say no to the face, but to the body and dick.

Idk, seems like a pretty easy intuitive leap to make to me. Even in that abstract, they report "straight" women sexually reacting to females. "Straight people don't exist" makes sense.

What are you gay?

1933.

oh shit alex jones was right they are making the frogs gay

Adressing the body part only, unless you want to argue that liking dick isn't gay.

The shoulders are too broad, the hip waist ratio isn't all that great and I have a problem with obviously fake tits like those. It's mostly about the dick, though.

Alex Jones is a con man and there's something wrong with him. People have always been all bi. That's why all the Greek dudes were fucking each other.

You sound gay-but-in-denial as fuck right now, my boi.

>Not liking guys means i am a braindead sheep
Guys for me are like kids for me not sexually attractive in anyway.
No i am not homophobic i can be homosexual without any consequences but i can't because males aren't attractive for me.
Good luck trying to make your homosexuality sound normal...

It sounds like you are projecting, mate.

>vice
U srs nigga

>can't think of a rebuttal
>quick! Revert to childhood comebacks!
"I know you are but what am I??"
>ha, got him

You asked me, if I was gay for not liking something you like.
I give you my reasoning for not liking it.
You claim, yet again, that I am gay.
I banter back.
Now you call me childish, while you did nothing but call me gay.

Are you sure you aren't simply projecting? It's okay to be into dicks.

>only speaking in terms of homosexuality
This shows just how uneducated on the subject you are, which shows how little you've been exposed to anything LGBT, which only strengthens my stance.

It's all about bisexuality, user. All of it. Everyone is bi on some level. You just don't know how to know it or admit it yet. One day.

This is probably true and it gives credit to the idea no one can be "born" gay. It's technically all choices. That's one of the reasons the Christian church is against gay sex is because it's a degenerate choice to make. If you view sexual orientation as binary then you would have to assume the earth gives birth to people to simply not reproduce which we know in nature is rediculous and counter productive

Tldr; we pick our sexuality

Kurt said that a long time ago

whats with all the gay rights faggotry then?

well maybe its changed since my day.

in my time at university, all the pretty girls and pretty boys did psychology, and they mainly had empty heads.

i now edit scientific journals and the shit in the psych ones makes me laugh more than it makes me consider the point.

>i don't consider it a science, in any way, as it measures nothing and draws no verifiable conclusions. theories only, means its just imaginings, for want of a better word.

eh my evidence is anecdotal but I've always believed this to be true cause of myself. I straight up had zero attraction whatsoever, neither sexually not romantically, in men until I was probably 21. But holy shit did I have a submissive side waiting to be let out- I'm in and out of sissy mode/trying to make as many guys cum as I can on kik like all the time now. I'd argue cock is even better, I get to watch daddy cum on my pics now c:

There's a LOT of non-non-retards. So much so that they overwhelmed the non-retards with sheer numbers and built a power structure on oppressing the non-retards. So we're attempting education this time.

They just don't want to be shamed for being degenerates with a high sex drive who can't emotionally or physically relate to someone of the opposite sex.

I do believe there is merit to the psych field but it has and will always be used as a political weapon

Nope, already proven to be a complex combination of both brain chemistry (born gay) and environmental stimuli growing up (boys locker rooms, etc). It's anything but a choice.

Technically you can choose celibacy, or you can choose to have sex with the opposite gender even if you're not attracted to them, or you can choose what label you'd like to use (based on what you feel most accurately suits you), or you can choose to force yourself into denial, but you can't choose what you're attracted to. That just sorta happens in the background, and your predisposed to certain directions.

oh for fuck's sake. do you hear yourself?

>shows how little you've been exposed to anything LGBT

thank christ I am little exposed to LGBT "anything".

i don't care for the ramblings of mentally ill attention seekers.

there is something seriously wrong with LGBT culture, comprised as it is by either weekend warrior fetishists (the most boring of the bores, who think they are *so* daring, avant-garde and shocking) and the ones who have actually committed to the lifestyle, which generally means they can afford to, which generally means they have income from mummy and daddy and like to rebel, which generally makes them wristers.

note I'm not speaking about people who are just actively gay, lesbian, or bisexual.

I know lots of those people and get on with them just fine.

but when people you've known for years or even most of your life start lisping, limp-wristing, when the piercings and wacky clothes come out, then its 360 time for me.

>Sexuality is a spectrum
your gender is not.

If your peepee gets hard when you see naked man, you're gay, if your peepee gets hard when you see naked woman, you're straight
It's that easy

>ad hominem
>purposely inflammatory language
But I mean yeah, you're right, kinda. At least about the part that no one wants to be shamed by other people for something that has nothing to do with other people.

You're either gay or in denial

>already proven

>this is indisputable

really

Yes but most of the research on sexuality says that it's overwhelming nature over nature. Sure there is more feminine men and masculine women, but I think the great of modern sexuality research and culture is that they tell boys who are feminine that they're gay snd masculine women that they're lesbians. I feel like that's a diservice to people who don't fit archetypal modes of male or female. I prefer masculine women as a straight male. I think it needs to be stated that just because you're a little to feminine or masculine doesn't make you gay

No, yeah, gender is too. A fluid spectrum. Only instead of straight to gay, it's male to female.

How many bis/gays in here got that way because of sexual experiences as kids? I became bi the day my neighbor (my age) felt up my nutsack during a sleepover because he wanted to see if I also had only one testicle.

What if my peepee gets hard looking at both?

But you are actually here. Just like my proof. Your post is self-contradicting, I didn't even have to add anything, kek.

I completely agree, user. People are so quick to apply labels, it's fucking retarded.

My classmate rubbed his dick on my buttcrack when we were like 9 years old and I was having a sleepover. This continued on each time we had a sleepover. Today...I'm not attracted to men, whoops.

Bisexual, maybe something stupid like omnisexual.

For the sake of argument, let's say this is true. What is stopping men from just doing their own thing without women?

>i was encouraged by a guy maybe 4-5 years older than me to experiment when about 8.
>both me and my younger brother, 6
>some touching, some pretending to have buttsex but nothing went in, we were prepubescent
>this extended to me thinking this was OK and playing these games with my cousins (female) and a friend (male)

>fast forward to sexual maturity and on into marriage and kids (am 40) and I have not a single gay thought, attraction to men, or wonder what its like to be bi.

no guilt, no conflict, I believe I was born normal and experimented in a normal way.

yup, just like this

A summary overview of the data shows that the conclusion does not follow from the data.

There are gigantic flaws in the study. Primarily how arousal was determined. They showed women porn clips of men and women and judged them to be "arousing" if their pupils dilated.

this is fundamentally flawed because it ignored the subjective nature of the experience. These are humans with memories, not robots reacting to a simple image. Many of these women, for example, indicated arousal seeing gay men. Well, to her brain, it's a sexual picture of a man. Her being aroused doesn't mean she's gay or not straight. Similarly, a sexual picture of two women might trigger arousal based on a memory of a man doing the same thing to her, or any number of things.

Frankly, the way they are collecting the data is fundamentally flawed. It's like making a study where you assess if someone is oriental by judging if they respond to pictures of rice.

It might be my own personal bias and experience showing but I really have a hard time believing there is such a categorical thing as "gay". If we want to suddenly exclude the phenomenon of lesbians suddenly wanting dick when they're older then we fall into the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. As a Catholic Libertarian, I have no real issue with gays but I do have a problem with the movement saying the earth just gave birth to us naturally. I do believe saying you didn't pick your sexuality means taking away agency, free will, reason, and logic by turning people into just an aggregate of chemicals