What does Sup Forums think of Imperial Japan. Were they based at all?
What does Sup Forums think of Imperial Japan. Were they based at all?
Xavier Gutierrez
Other urls found in this thread:
freakonomics.com
twitter.com
Noah White
micro penis people who make weird cartoons
James Scott
Cameron Long
They had great potential, before they went full total war. Instead I think they should have stayed neutral and tried to develop their economy instead of their military. Just keep the navy strong for defense.
Noah Ward
Imagine where the US would be without all those nigger.
John Rodriguez
Only country that went full war with the US one on one.
Got to respect them for that.
Owen Baker
>What does Sup Forums think of Imperial Japan. Were they based at all?
Other than that business of attacking us, leading us to nuking them, they're okay.
If only they had the foresight to side with allies, maybe we could've helped them take over China by nuking key regions and wiping out Mao and he commies once and for all.
Thomas Moore
No. They dgaf about their people. They couldn't be more unlike the reich. Ally of desperation.
Evan Lee
I like their old flag a hell of a lot more than their new one.
Robert Peterson
>Only country that went full war with the US one on one.
>one on one
Half our forces were in the European theater.
Chase Gutierrez
most of Japan's forces were tied up in China
plus burma/korea/philipines
Brandon Clark
Apologize for War crimes Japan, pay settlement to Korean and China government
Parker Hill
So either way neither Japan or the US were one vs one
Chase Gutierrez
Appologise for war crimes US, pay settlement to the populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Jace Adams
What war crime? There was never a rule that said "No nukes" :^)
Jose Cruz
>Approximate deaths caused by Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined: 146,000~
>Approximate deaths caused by the Nanking Massacre alone: 400,000~
Alexander Perry
Should have stayed home.
Jonathan Young
Pic related, Korean Comfort women
Jacob Ortiz
>implying one is a war crime and the other is not because only half as many people died.
>The US needed to drop nukes on civilian population centres instead of more secluded military bases.
>justify using two instead of one, when really the US wanted to test a second design.
>implying the US would have stopped at two nukes if Japan had not surrendered.
Camden Walker
Top kek.
Zachary Miller
>Implying the whole purpose of dropping the bombs wasn't to wave our dick at the Soviets
Japan was a bonus. Killing a shitload of birds with one stone, if you will.
Jackson Cooper
And by god didn't you kill them efficiently. At no prior point in Earth's history has such a large number of people been put to death over such a short amount of time.
Jonathan Wilson
That's great, was us those fighters who abused those women you killed whilst nuking japan? Or innocent women and children?