Okay Sup Forums

Okay Sup Forums

So a few years ago I stumbled upon a weird spiritual science website that has since gotte taken down but I wrote down all the stuff about it.

It talked a lot of about black holes and singularities.

The main idea was that singularities are people and that every singularity is surrounded by an infinite number of other singularities. It really got me thinking about quantum physics in an entirely different way.

Thing is, I wrote all this stuff down and I still remember most of it but I was going to use it again in a book idea. I think I lost most of the old files and the data from the website was wiped just like most stuff on my hard drive. Figures.

A singularity is defined as any point on any chart or graph, including approaching the base level defined as real.

Imaginary particles ultimately make up real particles. Each particle can be represented by a number. An imaginary particle (i) can be any imaginary numbers, but a real particle (r) can be any real number or set of real numbers.

A singularity is surrounded by an infinite number of other singularities. But you can define a singularity as anything in the universe. For example if you assign a dog as a singularity, then it's surrounded by an infinite number of other singularities like the observable fact that the dog is orange would make u one sing, but every time a different person looks at it, a new singularity is assigned because no two people sees orange as the same color.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

what was the website called?

So basically every single person, place, or thing is a singularity surrounded by infinite information because it can be observed by an infinite number of people.

Also particles can be represented by numbers which are ultimately imaginary.

Put enough imaginary numbers together and they eventually make up a real number.

For example, i + i = -1

Thoughts?

have to be careful OP always ask for proof before buying into an idea

new hope for the human species I think. This was in 2009 but it had a lot of cool info. This was back when quantum physics was brand new. And it made a real impression on me.

Particles also cycle one another at an infinite rate. And each singularity binds to an infinite number of other singularities.

Well its just a theory. Lots of ideas but nothing testable. I wanted to see what a real scientist might say about it. But even /sci/ doesn't seem to care. I have better luck on Sup Forums finding smart people sometimes. By sheer volume of people.

Any actual scientists on here? I'd love to see your opinion since /sci/ is fucking hopeless.

I'm starting to forget most of it. I had a lot of that shit written down but my old hard drive has been dead. Maybe I should rewrite it and get some people's opinions. I was gonna turn it into a book or a movie idea since it was so cool.

Imaginary particles are the only particles that can pass through black holes because you can just imagine one passing over a black hole. Imaginary particles store infinite energy because they can't interact with material particles. Instead they pass right through them.

go fuck yourself

Just want to explain it better to get people's opinion.

If you assign a singularity to be a car for example, then an infinite number of other singularities surround it.

For example, it can be red if one person observes it.

But another person who is blind would observe that it is loud.

And another person who can't see or hear who observed it would observe that it's smooth (with touch)

So everyone is assigning an infinite amount of singularities to the base sing.

no u faget

Are you into the New Age bullshits?

Ok so basically a soul is a singularity. And when a soul is observed by other souls, its energy changes and it moves into a different universe.

So if a person is observed by a certain group of people, they might become happy and move towards a universe where they went to the store to buy cake mix.

But if they are observed by mean people then they will stay in bed all day and move down to a universe where they never went to the store.

It's been a while and I'm starting to forget a lot of what I had witten dow.

is this simulation theory shit

Base level particles (protons/neutrons) make up reality, but electrons don't exist.

Instead, electrons are the protons/neutrons of different universes which surround our own universe.

Depending on different emotion assigned to them by an observer, they change into different quantum states of solidification. They are more or less likely to become protons/neutrons based on the surrounding electrons.

So like basically:

(electron, imaginary particle) Possible Universe 1

-------------- proton/neutrons (real particles) (current solid universe)

(electron, imaginary particle) Possible Universe 2


Thoughts?

Yeah man

Yeah but I can't find the website anymore since 2012. It got wiped. Anything cool always gets wiped off the internet.

>A singularity is defined as any point on any chart or graph, including approaching the base level defined as real

No, it isn't.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity

What kind of singularity are you talking about?

That's probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

Electrons are the god particle because they are imaginary.

Dude, every single particle is a singularity because it is made up of an infinite number of imaginary particles.

Every single particle, person, concept, or thing you can think about is infinitely dense because it's made up of an infinite amount of imaginary particles surrounding it.

Well your mom is the dumbest fling I ever lured (into bed)

Faget

Any actual legit scientists on here right now? Not twees and weeaboos who just finished fapping to loli porn.

pls respond

By the way the unified field that everyone is searching for is credibility, because all particles are ultimately imaginary.

Any actual scientist agree? Looks like it was right way back in 2009. Some scientists say that today.

>infinitely dense

Then a singularity, by one of your own many definitions of the word, is defined as a point of "infinite density". In other words, a black hole.

>infinite amount of imaginary particles surrounding it
Particles aren't "imaginary". At the quantum level, they exist in multiple states. But by no stretch of the scientifically accurate imagination could they be considered "infinite". We simply don't know enough about quantum states to be able to make ANY of the assertions you read on that website. It's all pseudo science bullshit. It doesn't even make sense.

Correction:

i + i = 2i

i * i = -1

"Some scientists" also claim that climate change is a hoax. They're a fringe minority writing papers for grant money.

>Electrons are imaginary.

Shit tier b8 m8.

Yes, the entire universe is black holes.

>Particles aren't "imaginary". At the quantum level, they exist in multiple states. But by no stretch of the scientifically accurate imagination could they be considered "infinite". We simply don't know enough about quantum states to be able to make ANY of the assertions you read on that website. It's all pseudo science bullshit. It doesn't even make sense.

Think about it though. If the universe is infinitely dense with imaginary particles, then EVERY point is a black hole surrounded by an infinite number of other black holes.

Yeah ur right my bad

They are imaginary because they don't exist until you observe them. As proven by the double slit experiment.

Protons and neutrons exist whether observed or not because they have enough energy to remain stable.

>But even /sci/ doesn't seem to care.
Because this is something that my drug-addled brain would come up with after hour 58 of an LSD bender.
Ever hear of the scientific method, OP?

If the entire universe were nothing but black holes, it would cease to exist. We cannot survive in an area completely surrounded by points of infinite density.

If we fall into one black hole, our entire being (matter and all) gets stretched out spaghetti thin until it dissipates into its constituent (TOTALLY EXISTENT) elementary particles. And those particles fall into a pit of gravity so dense that light itself cannot escape. Which would mean that we would also be blind, because photons bouncing off of objects are literally how we see the world around us.

This theory is physically impossible for so many reasons that it'd take hours to explain it all. Which I simply don't have the patience for.

The website came out during the same time that "What the bleep!" was considered "legitimate science". We've learned A LOT since then, even about quantum theory. So much that its re-written our understanding of the universe. Even if this theory was supported at its time (nearly a decade ago), its no longer relevant given the information we have in the year of our lord 2017. And that's assuming it was a possible assertion to begin with.

Yeah but think about it 100 years ago the heliocentric model was pseudoscience too. The guy who posted this stuff had a phd in physics so it kind of adds to the mystery of it especially since the website got taken down so quickly. Kind of creepy and mysterious.

>If the entire universe were nothing but black holes, it would cease to exist. We cannot survive in an area completely surrounded by points of infinite density.

Dude think about it LOGICALLY.

We are surrounded by an infinite number of IMAGINARY particles which DO NOT INTERACT with the matter we are made of. Ergo, every point in the universe is infinitely dense with imaginary energy.

If one person observes a point, he adds an infinite amount of descriptions (energy) to it. If another person observes the same point, he adds another infinite amount of energy to it.

The reason we don't disintegrate is because the infinite energy is IMAGINARY. Not literal black holes, but imaginary black holes.

You have to start thinking with imaginary particles dude.

It makes so much sense but you are just misunderstanding it.

No, their state doesn't "exist" until you observe them. Which is completely different than "they don't exist until you see them". They have to "Exist" in order for you to see them whatsoever, to change the nature OF THEIR EXISTENCE. You cannot observe something that doesn't exist, and change the nature of it so it suddenly "exists". You cannot summon matter out of thin air. That is physically impossible.

Quantum fluctuations depend on observation, but they exist whether we understand them, observe them, or ignore them entirely. The things fluctuating will always exist in an unobserved state, therefore rendering the adjective "imaginary" inaccurate.

Infinity is purely a concept and not a tangible form like the number one or two is. This is all based on nothing. Dude probably ran out of money for hosting the website.
"Look how retarded we once were." Is not an argument for accepting nonsense. It's neither creepy or mysterious. Take less drugs, OP.

>LOGICALLY

Nothing you've said is even remotely logical. It's all pseudo science you're repeating from memory, from a website that was taken down (probably for a very good reason) 8 years ago.

>It makes so much sense
To anyone who has never studied quantum theory, i.e. you. To those who have, none of this makes any sense whatsoever.

Well they collapse into waves instead of particles, so electrons themselves don't exist until they are observed. Instead, electron WAVES exist, not electron PARTICLES. Two different things.

>You cannot summon matter out of thin air. That is physically impossible.

Yeah you can. It's called pulling matter out of imaginary particles basically.

Under every particle is even smaller particles, so if you pull enough small particles that are super tiny, you make up bigger particles. Like the teleporter on Star Trek.

I am a little high right now yeah but not by enough.

Bro you need to start thinking about particles as numbers. If imaginary numbers exist then why not imaginary particles? Just think about it is what I'm saying.

We are all in a computer equation. Ultimately, every particle is a number, including imaginary particles.

You are stupid as fuck if u disagree just saying.

I couldn't even be fucked to proof read this, OP. Don't take that as some evidence that I don't know what I'm talking about. I rewrote some shit then got bored and tied it all together in a sentence. This is my Star Wars 3 post of the day.

Ok so why do u think that imagiary particles don't even exist? Are you dumb?

I just imagined a fucking electron booger with a mass of -9001x10^999 floating around my room.

Ergo, it now exists in an imaginary state.

Prove me wrong.

>This was in 2009 when quantum physics was brand new.

>100 years ago the heliocentric model was pseudoscience too

This is why nobody takes you seriously.

Prove that your imagination exists and that you're not a figment of my imagination, first. The burden of proof lies with both of us.

I think therefore I am

Wat.

But now it's real science.

wat

quantum mechanics includes what you posted in your op and was not "new" in 2009

The heliocentric model was introduced around the 1500s

you've clearly dropped some acid and think you understand the universe but you're going to come down in a few hours and realize you're a fucking idiot that doesn't understand quantum mechanics is incredibly mathematical and not just people spouting their fever dreams on anonymous message boards

My research is related to quantum mechanics, I'm a phd student and I want to say - fuck all of you crazy people mixing some new age bullshit with real science and making QM being associated with unbelievable stories that have nothing to do with it. That's all, goodbye.

Dude particles are assigned MATHEMATICALLY along an axis of reality with different levels of energy assigned depending on how much emotion thy are being observed with.

Imaginary particles are NUMBERS which make up real NUMBERS eventually. Math.

A fucking goldfish can understand common sense not my fault you can't understand. Are you serious??

Why don't you think that imaginary particles exist? You literally create them out of thin air when you imagine them.

Also dark matter is all the particles all the other species have discovered but not us. That's why they make up most of the universe. Same with dark energy.

>back when quantum physics was brand new
>1920's
new in 2009
>mfw

I've got a bachelors in physics and singularities have a specific definition.

You seem to be describing a multiverse theory where conscious thought creates and maintains these seperate realities. Emotions and thought being the interactions between these imaginary/real particles that fuel this creation process. Without which there would be no universe at all. A high proportion of people seeing a car as red then influencing the 'mean' reality which makes the car redder.

This is a major problem I have with multiverse theory/alternate universe entering the public sphere of knowledge. It's not based off of peoples actions. If multiverse theory is correct (and unproveable btw) then it will be probability of particle interactions causing the generation of alternate realities and not thoughts. The simplest thought contains million of such interactions each of which would create another reality. Thats what infinite means.

The problem with that theory is that you're thinking cosmically but not big or complex enough for what multiple realities would actually mean. It's also a bit of a rip on the whole fermi paradox of intelligent life. Universes with varying physical laws come and go but only really exist in the brief times when they generate intelligent life that is capable of observing the universe it is in.

You're fucking retarded, is why sci didn't take you seriously.

what really?

Dude that is what I'm saying. EVERYTHING is a singularity because EVERYTHING is surrounded by an infinite number of particles. The particles are just imaginary. You are not getting that everything is a black hole.

I think I think that you think therefore you are.

Assigning something a number is not mathematics. I don't grab a number for the DMV and think they're physicists.

I understand what you're attempting to say and I understand that its a bunch of bullshit. If you want someone to take you seriously, move to California and make it into a cult.

>imaginary numbers make up real numbers

what?

oh shut the fuck up. you clearly have no idea what a singularity is, nor dark matter or energy. go outside and play, kid.

But think about it. A proton is +1/+1 mass/charge. It's a number.

>imaginary numbers make up real numbers

i*i = -1

>EVERYTHING is a singularity
>everything is a black hole

is that why I ejaculate hawking radiation?

get your facts straight faggot, i've skimmed across the thread and you come up as some kind of pseudo scientific quack with your baloney who thinks he's the next Nikola Tesla in the being

you probably huffed alot of mason jars enclosed fermented farts and it went directly to your brain

settle down tiger

Your mom so fat she's dark matter.

Also your dick is a singularity.

Probably the most retarded thing that I've read on Sup Forums this month. You deserve some kind of medal

>imaginary particles.
OP is a trowl

Whatever u idios whoever takes the credit for this shit will be rich one day mark my words. Im gonna be the next tesla because I stole this shit from someone else. Isn't that how science works? At least on this planet.

case in point

the thought process you had to imagine that particle is made up of measurable electrical currents going through a 'real' substrate of atoms in your brain. It's therefore a product of 'real' particles and not 'imaginary'.

It's the same way that cold doesnt exist but heat does. Your body registers a temperature differential and creates the sensation of cold. it's actually a lack of heat outside your body causing that difference and heat is IR waves or thermal conduction through particle collisions. Both of which are measurable nd real, unlike cold which is imaginary but not 'imaginary'

I was lured by the picture of electron clouds
turned out OP is just some retard twaddling about some nonsensical pseudoscientific bullshit.
>singularities are people
>what.jpg
And right after that you give a mathematical definition of singularity. What are you, a retard?

Stop trying to look smart and deep while talking about things you don't fully understand. It just makes you look stupid in the eyes of people who actually know the therminology.

If you want to conize some real mind-blowing shit then learn real science, son. Not that piece of shit spiritual 'science' (btw that's an oxymoron, science can't be spiritual, that's dumb).
Legit quantum physics is basically indistinguishable from magic. You, your table and a piece of shit you took can equally be accounted as observers. There is no insurmountable distinguishes between life and non organics, stones are our cousins. You are an autocatalytic reaction which created multi-layered membrane to preserve primary ocean conditions. Subjective feelings are an illusion. Freedom of will doesn't exist. A particle can instantly transmit information to another particle at the other end of the fucking universe. Everything in the universe is connected and everything is a part of everything. God is a reality we ought to create. Observed reality is just a variation of existence of nothingness. Basically nothing exists and existence is nothing. Last moth I raped someone whose face I cannot remember.

I have a bachelors and masters in physics and am studying for a PhD. Unfortunately It's pretty much just nonsense. The thing with all the legitimate physical theories including ones that are 'untestable', such as numerous differing string theories, is that they're all backed by concrete mathematics. Theoretical physics isn't about coming up with an idea that sounds cool, it's about developing a sound mathematical framework. If your theory had no mathematics in it, it's pretty much just made up rubbish.

No think about it man.

Let's say you are born in the year 1800, and the human species only discovered protons/neutrons/electrons so far.

So there's only 3 particles that exist. No such thing as quarks and shit.

So basically at that point in time, quarks would be imaginary particles because they were never observed yet. But they still exit and make up protons/neutrons and whatever else.

Right now in the year 2017 there's an infinite number of imaginary particles underneath all the particles we discovered so far. Which means all real numbers(particles) are made up of imaginary numbers (particles)

By the way string theory is correct. But the strings are logical lines of thought, not any kind of material. At least according to what I remember and know for a fact obviously.

>No such thing as quarks and shit
kys dummy

seriously man, just stfu and unlearn that bullshit, it's not worth pursuing

>waah u guise don't get it, my idea is rly cool

kys faggot

>Stop trying to look smart and deep while talking about things you don't fully understand

posts with Rick and Morty image. I see what you did there. I like your nihilistic rant though

Not in the year 1800 because they were never observed and never stabilized. So they were still in wave form not particle form.

I've thought about it a lot man.

>Last moth
so soft
amidst the edge-
so where will you be when "legit" quantum physics gets overhauled?
-like all scientific observation does at regular interval along human development timeline-
what among these things you "knew" will be laughed at as hokum?
if you were truly an adherent to the scientific method of acquiring knowledge/understanding, you'd realize how tenuous and tedious your expressed litany of "real science" truly is

I hate the fanbase of that show too.
But if I posted a pic of Ilyenkov or smth like that noone would get it.

You are fucking stupid holy shit read the damn post.

Singularities are people because they are ultimately IMAGINARY particles. Souls are imaginary particles.

strings exist on a 10^-34 scale, human thoughts exist in the 10^-9 to 10^-8 scale.

'String theory' isn't a single theory that can be correct or incorrect. It's more of a large framework that contains numerous different theories, many of which are mutually exclusive. Also, they're all untestable as of yet so whoever told you that string theory was correct didn't understand what string theory is.

Not human thoughts. Logical lines of data smaller than human thoughts. More like computer thoughts or smaller.

oh of course. Excuse me, I just need to jump off a building onto a bicycle with no seat. It's less painful than trying to work out how your brain works

computer thought? please just neck yourself just in case whatever you have is contagious

Nah guys I think OP is on to something, I imagined he was a retarded faggot and it came true

Oh we got a relativist here
proceed to eat shit, good sir. At least your degenerated viewpoint brings laugh to people like me.

yeah like lines of code

time for some fresh air, kid

whats your point / question noob....

>people are particles
>imaginary
>souls

haha kek
I'm gonna ask you one easiest question that would be hard to google.
If you won't give the right answer that would pretty much clarify that you are a narcissistic retard and do not understand a thing about stuff you are speculating about.
>how electron configuration of Chlorine would change in this reaction KCl + CaCl2 ?

Physicist here
Youre a fucking idiot and you should kill yourself