Apologize. Now

Apologize. Now.

Other urls found in this thread:

themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/06/19/muslims-have-killed-over-590-million-non-muslims-since-the-birth-of-mohammed/
youtube.com/watch?v=faNge-o0V-k
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Only 100 million

There's been worse genocides

Such as??

SHINY BEADS
H
I
N
Y

B
E
A
D
S

thanks for the land pham

There weren't even that many Europeans alive in Europe, it's impossible for nomadic tribes to sustain that large of a population in the US
Also SHINY BEADS

Fuck no, what does Lichtenstein care about a phony genocide.

no

my parents didn't come from america, I'm a second generation serb.

the sins of my fathers (not even my fathers) are not the sins of my own

shoah, goyim

themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/06/19/muslims-have-killed-over-590-million-non-muslims-since-the-birth-of-mohammed/

>100 Million

yeah, no

Killed by diseases.

I'm sorry

For not being alive to pillage and rape native booty

>Apologize. Now.
or what?

Most losses weren't nomads but agrocultural empires.Also, portugeese and spaniacs killed most of the indians and not those who became americans later on.
We also need to mention how many indians joined europeans in they conquests, we need to mention epidemics that killed more people than guns and we need to mention that fucking sacrificing maniac rulers of indians most likely sacrificed more people than died from european invasion.

That's not their fault. Muslims were attacked by CHRISTIANS FIRST. Also that's not a genocide!

No

Sorry for only replying to say thanks for the rare.

Sorry m8s. We good now?

fuck off

I don't think diseases can apologize.

Your not even a real country, go away.

Delete this. Now.

>tribe samefagging

There is no scientific evidence supporting 100 million being killed. That number came from one white man who thought every Indian death was part of the genocide, even if they died in war.


His fucking book has you brainwashed my friend.

Ok, you are troll.Too fat.

This is like the holocaust the number keeps getting higher.

Nice false information, propaganda shilling thread from your sheltered, rich fag country. YOU are the hypocrite!

sage

redskins suck at math and documenting history and population, they were also such savages on average they were incapable of coexisting with a progressive and civilized society...

>They were attacked first so genocide was OK

>Thats not a genocide!


wew lad

>tfw half europoor half native american

Oh sure. Blame the non-sentient 'diseases' for deaths caused by pathogens which the white man is solely responsible for importing.

I may as well engineer an ethnovirus with retards like you around.

Somebody had to civilize these savages.

>savages
>had to teach the white. "Man" how to fertilize crops, read, and write

>Chistians

Top Bait

>read and write

my sides

>a few million farmers killed 10% of the world population

>implying killing subhumans is a bad thing
If the Americas were to remain isolated they would have nowhere near the civilization we have today. In fact most technological advancements would not be possible if these savages were the dominant race.

Sorry it couldn't have been 100 million more!

a bit relevant

youtube.com/watch?v=faNge-o0V-k

No, I'm 1/16 Abenaki. Send me to Harvard please senpai

Hasn't there been talk recently that there were actually very few natives in America when whites arrived? Like less than a million or something?

*enslaved by its' own people

WE

It's 100 mil now, in a few decades it will be 100 billion Indians killed.

Inb4 "6 gajillion Indians killed by muh Christians."

>100 million

No

>100 million

As if. That number would not be feasible. The amount of redskins that has existed has been static. General Consensus is that there are more redskins living today(in the US territory), then there were back then when the first settlement was established in 1492. From 1492(first settlement)-1924(All redskins granted citizenship), the amound of redskins that would have been slaughtered every year to reach the 100 million total would have had to have been roughly 203,252 redskins every year. Not even the Trail of Tears, which brought about the death of 2,000-6,000 redskins, is nowhere near enough to reach that amount. The lies liberals push is beyond me.

>Be 1/8th+ Cherokee.

Don't give an actual fuck.

They did the right thing, if they hadn't done it the US would be like south america where the spanish fucked them and gave them rights

I'm sorry that I don't care about casino niggers.

The largest agricultural cities had a population of a few hundred thousands. With armies in tens of thousands. The Mayans were pretty much genocided before the conquests, by having shitty crop rotation. The Aztecs were conquered by Tlaxcallans with the help and leadership of a handful of white europeans. The nomad tribes further north had insignificant numbers and mostly killed of neighbouring tribes

So we can easily calculate that a few million civilian farmers and some 500 thousand aztec soldiers with a bonus of maybe 10 thousand nomads equals around 100 million 100% Navajo casino owners that todays americans literally genocided.

POW WOW REMEMBER THE 100 MILLION PALESKIN

There are still so many lives to take

You do realize it works both ways, right? Diseases FROM Native Americans also killed many, many, Europeans when they first arrived. It just so happened that Europeans could survive better than the savages due to better immune systems.

Hardly a crime. Survival of the fittest.

Pfft. Dying of disease doesn't count.

They are already doing more than enough, giving up their country to the mexicans.

>Liechtenstein
>stein
everytime

Hi-how-are-ya? Hi-how-are-ya? Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha!

lichten "STEIN"
every fucking time

Sorry. It'll be made sure that non of you remain to complain next time :^)

>(((Lichtenstein)))

Nigger there were only like 10 million spruce monkey at most and they deserved it for being backwards savages.

>Christians are one person
>you're responsible for the actions of people who you never met and was never alive to see them

Ok time to put your dumb ass in your place

If they had proper border control non of that shit would have happened
This fucking chuckholed of an idea that everyone is equal and should be allowed to roam free is total bull shit in is a genocyde I its self. Worse off its not brough upon by killing but a pussy ass attitude that a person should never stand up for them self or seek their own path.

Kill your self before someone does it for you
Your time is UP!

Just FYI there was no where close to 100 million native americans, ever. If you added up every native american from the dawn of time, to today, you probably dont even come close to 100 million.

The largest NA city in history was Cahokia, which at its peak, had between 6,000 and 20,000 people living in it. In total, before the Trail of Tears, the NA population was estimated at 200,000.

Your 100 million isnt just wrong, its so wildly inaccurate it is a joke

...

Yeah, do everyone a favor and kill yourself. Muslims attacked everyone around them. Its high time we finished them off.

>Pussies should have fought harder

...

No

>portugeese and spainiacs

Lmao

how did amerindians have 100 trillion people with no wheel, no major overland trade routes, fewer domesticated animals, no crop rotations, when the largest medieval cities had no more than a few hundred thousand each?

But there is only one race? The indians and the settlers are the same. There is no such thing as genocide.

This one looks a bit like Trump

I am deeply sorry, that we did not finish the job. And wish that someone does as soon as possible.

Also the funniest shit I have seen in awhile is Spanish rape babies trying to claim being Native.

>Apologizing to tree niggers

They were savages who were brutally massacring each other long before anyone came along.

And nobody owes them anything. They were defeated by a superior force. That's how the history of the world is. If they want to spend their days being drunk crackheads instead of "reclaiming their heritage", thats on them.

We would if it were true, you gullible moron.

How did this meme version of history get started? It was never Europeans vs. Indians. Indians were already fragmented into various tribes and at war with each other. Some of them sided with the Europeans whose superior firepower allowed them to better their longstanding rivals. It was literally Indians vs. Indians using weapons they bought from Europeans, or Indians and Europeans fighting against other Europeans and Indians.

The whole argument is designed to weaken the dominant. Its Euros fault because they won.

Its the reversal of elation of victory to feeling bad for it.

Its the cuckening on a cultural scale.

>apologize

No

They had their chance

>ywn remove feather like Lewis Wetzel

Muh 100 gorrilions! That's the highest estimate. Mosto f them died of diseases anyay. Should Mongols apologize for black death? Apart from that, Inca and Aztec empires were based on wars in order to gain prisoners. They were used as slave labour or sacrificed to gods. North American Indians lived in more or less permanent state of war. They were not more peaceful than the Europeans no matter what romantic literature leftists claim.

This. Also Indians sold land to Europeans for guns, beads, and other assorted shit. They also had little concept of property and only understood the laws of might and power, hence the Europeans had to speak their language. They also raided European colonies that had been fairly purchased, which obviously a declaration of war by any measure. They were brutally killing one another for centuries before in any case...

You think Natives would apologize if they fought off hordes of people invading their land and establishing dominance over the continent? You think they'd feel sorry for winning a battle and gaining/retaining territory? Natives were a shit ton of warring tribes that fought each other over land and resources for centuries before a stronger tribe showed up, took the land, and establishes dominance. Why does no one give the Mexicans shit for the Spanish coming over and kicking the shit out of every tribe? They were literally called 'Conquerors' in Spanish. All of history, even in modern day though to a much lesser extent, is conquering land, establishing dominance, and founding nations/tribes/groups to protect what you have/get more of it. Why the fuck should one set of people feel bad because they were good at it?

I'm sorry the reparation checks you get every month is only enough to buy you a preowned vehicle every month.

Daily reminder that white people did this. Also, Spaniards aren't white.

Not apologizing for something me nor three generations before ever were involved in. You aren't a victim. Just some faggot who wants life handed to them. Fuck yourself.

I don't care about the natives, but amerifats should suffer for the buffalos.

This is accurate. What I like best is how much of a completely worthless argument it is when they mention Indians

>Immigrants killed the native population therefore they're bad
>Immigrants are a good thing for a country and we shouldn't have borders

Both can't exist side by side with each other. This is what I hate about the left, they sit on the fence and jump to either side of it depending on what argument they want to make. You can never get an honest answer from them and they jump from contradiction to contradiction, they argue in exactly the same way Jews do except Jews know how to split hairs properly and be pedantic. The every day liberal is far too stupid to be able to do that.

>Liechtenstein

What is with third world countries being leftists? Montenegro was around just the other day and now they've been replaced by the suicide capital of Europe. Anyone would think it was some shill using a proxy...

Why they're thriving.

Nice try Abdul. We are one of the richest countries per capita.

mostly susceptibility to disease

otherwise, conquest is universal; "indians" came from asia, sacrificed their enemies to volcanoes, ate them, etc.

'fuck outta here

The Native Americans were doomed no matter how belligerent or benevolent the Eurasians were.

The Eurasian landmass is simply so much larger and more varied than North America, the diseases there were much more "successful" than North American diseases because competition was more fierce. Once the two population groups met, either eurasians over to america, or americans eventually technologically improved to the point they could come back to eurasia, the superior eurasian diseases were going to run rampant through the american population.

The very same cost had already been paid by eurasians, just over a wider span of time and geography. Was the Black Plague someone's "fault"? No? Then neither was the plagues that swept through Native America.

Oy bead, it's like annuda shoah. Remember the 100 billion

>implying there were 100 million natives

>tfw 1/4 ashkenazi, 1/4 cherokee, 1/4 armenian and 1/4 chink

Wish I was joking.

Pay reparations, you white devil nazi jap roaches.

LET's DISPEL THIS FICTION ONCE AND FOR ALL THAT THE INDIANS DIDNT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING. THEY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING.

Would you fuck off you postage stamp?

Daily reminder that Native Americans held a higher per capita amount of nigger slaves than whites.