Thoughts on this?

thoughts on this?

No one gives a neon bright flying fuck. You fucking 12 year old.

You cant police the internet.
He isnt violating any dmca laws.
Its part of the Fair Use

It's not just about pewdiepie it's about some ass hat who thinks he is all high and mighty and probably acts like he's done nothing wrong his whole life.

> capitalize on coziest job in the world
> become a major earner, known by everyone
> suddenly need to conform to masses or lose what seemed like a private job

fucking kek this is just the dumbest shit for everyone involved

Fair use is only determined by a judge or jury, its a legal defense not a hard set of regulations

>legal defense
You're wrong buddy
Examples of fair use in United States copyright law include commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, and scholarship. Fair use provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor test.

Sean (formerly Thomas Russel Vana) Vanaman's Address: 761 2nd Ave, San Francisco, CA 94118-4020
Pewdiepie said nigger, but everyone gets mad during a game as says shit, it's a factor of life.
But completely removing a video for copyright because he said something in a completely seperate video?
That is just abusing copyright law, and then he tried to defend himself by saying all gameplay is copyright infringement, while it is to some degree, if he takes down one video for "copyright infringement" he should take EVERY video down, instead of trying to be on the moral high-ground like the privileged fucking cunt he is, pewdiepie is STILL getting shit about the rape jokes he made when he first started, he even admitted he hates who he used to be on youtube, sean vanaman is the epitome of a fucking SJW sheep.

pewds a nigger, vanaman is a fucking nigger too, they should hook up and make lots more fucking niggers

fuck you and fuck all niggers

>will literally do nothing to his revenue
kek

but whether any work falls into fair use or not is determined in court, not by Campo Santo, YouTube or you

H3H3 would beg to differ

Even if they get a 90 year old tech illiterate jugde, they wont get past eh appellate courts.

Like he gives a shit. He has already made more than enough money of JewTube for him and his family to live like a king the rest of their lives.

no he wouldn't, he won in court, but his win was for his specific work, it doesn't set a broad legal precedence that protects all YouTubers

Fair Use law is case by case instance, every work has to stand for itself in court if it gets that far

Lol yeah fuck that guy. I was gunna buy firewatch when it went on sale next since it's not even worth full price, but not anymore if this is the way the developers act. What a petty brat.

Ugh anyone who uses privileged as an adjective towards another person needs to die already. Tired of this shit.

>hurr duurrr the moneiz

The likelihood of this guy having a micro penis is very high

he just mad
wouldnt hold up in court

pewdiepie wasn't doing commentary or anything protected by the first amendment when he was making the video. it was just a live stream of him playing the game, he wasn't critiquing it, and the h3h3 ruling really doesn't have anything to do with it.

>anyone gave 2 shits about firewatch kek