What does Sup Forums think of the new IT reboot?
What does Sup Forums think of the new IT reboot?
Other urls found in this thread:
i.4cdn.org
screenrant.com
twitter.com
how was it?
felt like goonies with all the cool shit replaced with a weak ass monster
was it spooky?
Why was Pennywise so disappointing?
had maybe 3 scary moments
its a comedic adventure with IT
CGI scary
not Tim curry scary
I see, what a shame. What overall rating would you give it?
...
fucking kek
How do you rate this reading of the orgy scene from the book?
i.4cdn.org
Scariest scene was the creepy painting that came to life.
Wish more had less jump scares and was more eerie.
The Library scene was very well done cos when Ben is looking at a book on town's history, everyone in the background freezes and just stares at him. It was very well directed otherwise sadly most of the rest of the movie is your usual horror style BUT the kid acting is some of the best kid acting I've ever seen and the dialogue was all so realistic which was great.
This movie only cost $35 million to make so you have to understand how tight the budget was. The director said he wanted to do a scene where one of the kid's scenes lots of kids' bodies floating in the water as he is standing on the bridge but the director didn't have enough money to set that up
9/10, he narrated it well.
Read the book if you haven't. It's about a cosmic war between a turtle God and a Demon. Shame this movie didn't have any of that but there were some turtle references so who knows if sequel will go all philosophical.
I WILL GO SEE IT
Curry wasn't scary at all... Reboot is better in most ways, for sure. Original is too dated and how it time-hops helps ruin it.
You should see it at some point. Prob better than you think
Oh I will go see it, it looks good to me so that's all that matters.
It had some uniquely shot scenes that didn't feel like your typical cinematography you see in Hollywood films like this one where the Leper is chasing Eddie and it cuts to a shot looking up at him with the bright sun.
Really effective
>the kid acting is some of the best kid acting I've ever seen and the dialogue was all so realistic which was great
Yes! And I see the budget for its sequel going up.
My hearth is with Tim Curry!
Georgie in the intro knocks his head on the yellow "stop" bars, He will also be shown visibly getting his arm torn off, Wheter in the first movie, you have to notice his missing arm in the end.
...
Lame. Part of the charm of the original was how funny and not-scary the monster was depicted, which is what made him scary AND memorable. This one is just jumpscares and changing the monster to make him more in-line with the types of movie monsters that the source material was trying to NOT be. The entire portion where Bev suddenly got turned into a damsel in distress was retarded.
Other than that it was adequate. I liked the original better. At least its better than that fucking shitheap of a book its based on.
turtle god?
please explain
>The entire portion where Bev suddenly got turned into a damsel in distress was retarded.
It literally isn't at all. How else can It attract all the kids down but to capture one of their own, especially taking the girl?
It makes complete sense. He wanted them to find her too so he could trap them in the room and eat them all together at once
Maybe I didn't get all the jokes but I didn't think it was funny at all.
>At least its better than that fucking shitheap of a book its based on.
The book is the Lord of the Rings of horror
>Full History on the town from past to present
>Full explanation on every main character including their entire past life
>Backstory about the creation of the universe, detailing a cosmic God vs Demonic entity battle
Anyone who has read this book knows this. It's a 1,000 + page masterpiece that can never 100% be told well on the screen.
>rating the miniseries as better than the movie AND book
kill yourself
Tim Curry was better pennywise in that with out him the movie would've sucked but Curry was phenominal. Skarsgard was phenominal too, but the movie would still be good.
Child actors were great, the funny scenes were funny, and the tension build up was great in most if not all the scenes.
>
I agree, Nothing to do with that triggered gender thing, but i am REALLY tired of a princess in need.
The worst part with this movie is how much the clown business will suffer again.
Not the same user, but apparently it's like ying and yang between the turtle god and Pennywise. (I'm not entirely sure)
He helps Gandalf escape Narnia.
>please explain
In the beginning, the Turtle created life. I forgot how it is explained but he vomited out the universe from himself or something and then he gave birth to the demonic It entity which represents the negative energy and everything that is wrong with our universe.
The turtle tries to give the kids in the book signs for them to try to defeat It.
Also, the Turtle resides in the Deadlights which is some interdimensional realm. The kids must enter that realm to defeat It
SK uses the turtle in many of his books.
Same with Randal Flagg that keeps appearing.
Just a thing he does.
I did notice that one scene where Billy said he saw a turtle in the lake. Also Georgie had a turtle lego.
>Nothing to do with that triggered gender thing
>but i am REALLY tired of a princess in need
I liked how It's left eye drooped to the side before he was about to eat someone or when he got hungry
kek
Is this the Deadlights? Why is it in It's mouth? Unless this represents that It's soul resides in the Deadlights
screenrant.com
This information is a bit old though but still it gives us a sneak peak on what will happen in Part 2:
Producer Barbara Muschietti revealed to Collider that one infamous scene depicting the massacre at the Black Spot won’t make into the first IT movie (though Part 2 is another matter):
>“They were able to [incorporate it into the script], but they were not able to incorporate it into the budget. Just like we weren’t able to, but it’s going on the second…that sequence with the Black Spot, we think it’s gonna be a great opening for the next film.”
With Muschietti saving that scene for the equally-anticipated Part 2 of the IT saga, at least we now know how the second chapter of the horror saga will open. It wasn’t just the Black Spot incident that fell by the wayside, and the director himself identified two specific scenes that he sadly couldn’t film for IT Part 1:
>“There are two sequences that I thought of that I had to postpone until more money comes. One is a flashback, that sort of portrays the first encounter of It and humans, which is an amazing scene. And the other is a dream, where Bill sees— he’s leaning on a bridge, in Derry, and he’s spitting on the Kenduskeag Stream, and suddenly he sees the reflection of a balloon. And he looks up and it’s not one balloon, but a bunch of balloons, and then he starts to see body parts, and the shot goes wider and it’s a multitude of dead kids floating. I couldn’t afford it.”
So flashback of It landing to Earth is confirmed!
Such a shame about the dead kids floating scene. As you all know, this movie only cost $35 million to make so was a very tight budget.
ill tell you a secret :
this thread is another neverending shitposting , this time the "joke" is to keep asking everyone who thinks what about that movie
Best part is that that wasn't CGI, Skarsgard can move his eyes separately
You'll see only what your little mind can allow. Go! Now...for if you stay, you'll lose your little mind in my deadlights, like all the others... like all the others.
I am probably the only one who has never seen the miniseries in full and I suppose it won't be scary for a 24 year old
That was the deadlights.
I wasn't familiar with them until I read a thread about the movie before I had seen it and the way the OP of that thread described the deadlights in the book, that webm was definitely the deadlights in the movie.
You can't tell in the webm but there's actually three small circles of light in the back of It's throat that are in the formation of a triangle. And then Bev goes all spacewoman and starts levitating after she gazes into the deadlights.
You are right. This guy can move his eyes about
What in the actual fuck is that webm.
I am confused despite reading the book, so does the deadlights trap your soul? I thought It just eats people but then we saw them floating around in the new movie and as this user quoted from the book
One of the better movies I've seen in a long while. Depth of characters, good humor, good horror. I really didn't think there were many jump scenes in the true sense. You always had a feeling it was coming and it was well played rather than BAM in your face.
I recommend it.
What's the matter? One balloon not enough? TRY A BUNCH!
you gotta go see the movie. it's unlike any other horror that's came out in a while
An interdimensional Alien possessing his prey.
This movie left out heaps of other shape shifting It does such as transforming into a giant eye and the kids have to keep poking the eye for It to become weak.
idk about you but imaging a giant eye being poked really sends shivers down my spine
I've heard, I will definitely see it soon.
Not that I want to encourage addiction but he only wrote anything worth reading when he was coked and liquored up.
fuck i hate that faggot playing ritchie. i just cringed the entire time because of him.
If it's that eye, fuck yes that creeps me out, imaging it walking on the tentacle things as well.
the mullet kid?
The book is a fucking masterpiece of horror.
Another part in the book details one of the missing kid's last day alive where It appears shape shifting into some giant cockroach with claws as he catches the kid and rips his head off.
Excuse me, sir, do you have Prince Albert in a can? You DO? Well you better let the poor guy out! A-ha! A-ha! A-ha!
no glasses kid from stranger things.
also why were kids who look 6 getting bullied by kids who could drive? it looked so out of place.
oops I meant to reply to this guy
But yeah anyway the book is fantastic. I hate how people always bring up the Orgy scene and how that is meant to discredit the whole massive encyclopedia that King had created
I don't like robot movies so I didn't see it
In the first IT movie it shows Georgie getting his arm ripped off, which wasn't that great, is it in the reboot and if so is it better?
Richie is just like that in the book and the kids always keep saying "BEEP BEEP RICHIE" to him due to all his jokes
I love the part in the book when I think it was Richie who says "STAN YOU JEW" and Stan's mother is like "RICHIE HOW DARE YOU!"
>is it in the reboot and if so is it better?
yeah It drags his body away. no body is left and throughout the movie Bill keeps thinking he can find Georgie which gives his character more hope of getting his family back together and happy again.
I really liked the scene when Bill is trying to explain to his dad where Georgie may have ended up in the sewers by building some miniature of the sewers and his dad gets all upset and angry saying George is gone forever
Oh, nice. The first one just didn't really do it for me.
arm? which arm? it's just snack
Never saw the miniseries and wtf... they couldn't even show his sleeve missing on tv?
The miniseries had a lot of shit missing and was very toned down from the book.
funnyman! nice joke! make another one!
No sewer gangbang, no watch
The turtle has ruined the whole thing for me.
The fact that an arbitrary animal that evolved from reptiles in our universe created the universe completely pulls me out of the horror aspect.
Stephen King is a faggot, kysf It
I definitely think it's stupid, but to me it doesn't ruin the movies because it's more assosciated with the book.
cuz remakes are shit
Fuck off!
Are you 16 or just genuinely retarded? Its not a "remake", its a new adaptation. And while were at it, the original is shit in literally every way imaginable. Tim Curry doesnt salvage it and suddenly make it a good series/ movie let alone a good adaptation. Its hilarious how retards like you think praising something older automatically makes you look smart
>The entire portion where Bev suddenly got turned into a damsel in distress was retarded.
Yeah that was pretty lame, here's this girl who's been kicking ass and taking names, while being kind and honestly a genuine character i liked. But they cheapened it when she turns into a DID.
In her defense tho, Pennywise got her off guard. But... still.
more like he pocketed most of the budget and hired mexicans to do set pieces.
hes write tho.
steven king made money selling child sex stories with a front.
Excellent.
Really good.
>Original is too dated and how it time-hops helps ruin it.
Idiot, it's a two parter.
3/10
Underaged gangbang from the book is missing
...
i think the entertainment industry has run out of ideas like ten years ago. all they do is warming up old shit.
I honestly feel like people these days have a hard on for children in movies. Stranger things..AMAZING. New IT movie.. Great.. Child actors.. Big hard dicks. Over what? Was the story new? Amazing. No.. It had great child actors..
Isn't there an underage orgy in the book?
I think I heard that somewhere
nah someone is lying, that'd never be allowed
They run a train on her
Just saw it. It's a tween movie. Retarded and not scary
NO UNDERAGED SEX ORGY/10
No. No way. Never.