Should the government have the power to decide at which age 2 people are allowed to love each other?

Should the government have the power to decide at which age 2 people are allowed to love each other?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/-Plk7TLNmsU
youtu.be/SNVj59B_sLE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Yes

by the government do you mean the people?

the gov seeks to patholigize reproductively valid behavior in order to fill prisons to gain revenue from tax payers

what are you, a communist?

...

B A N J I
A
N
J
I

the government is the elite class, not the people

Yes

No. No one wants the government controlling love. They want government controlling sexual contact.

You could argue that sexual contact is an expression of love, but yes, certain expressions of love should be controlled.

Regular day of Sup Forums filled with virgin autism

this
/r/ing the pic of the old hag and the young qt and the "If you are attracted to this you are a sicko who belongs in jail" or something caption

sex/love is such a basic concept that even a 5 year old can understand. Yes there will always be rapists and it is easier to rape a 5 year old than a 25 year old but rape is still rape and consent can exist between a 20 year old and 5 year old

>No goyim, women in their most fertile age shouldn't be allowed to reproduce. Following the natural course of attraction and fertility is unnatural.

what's the youngest you would fuck?

>image.jpg
Girl in the OP with her Asian boyfriend

>B A N J I
Girl on the left in this picture with her Asian boyfriend

DESIGNATED

wow! u have SOURSE?
please give me that

Burn the eggroll, pay the toll

No. Fuck moralfaggots and bootlickers.

White women can't resist getting BANANA'D

I'm under the impression that America is irrationally obsessed with age regarding sexuality.
Like, if someone posts a picture of a 16 yr old, og even a 20 year old that looks younger, most americans seem to completely loose their shit and start screaming pedophelia.

Can any burgerclap confirm if it's a normal thing to be so obsessed about it?

Here, no one really gives a fuck, I mean as long as a 30 year old isn't fucking 12 year olds, ofcourse.
But I had sex for the first time with my gf when she was 12 and I was 13. Then we fucked throughout our teens, and now she's a lawyer and I have a masters in biomedicine.

>B A N J I
There is no confirmation on what type of guy that the girl on the right in this picture likes but she is pictured with lots of Asian guys

More like Burn the eggroll get paid a lot more by a financially successful, non beta liberal cuck superior asian

Because white dicks is too BIG for her gently vagina

Nice.

degeneracy..

Stop posting pictures of kids you fucking disgusting pedophile. You sho uld be executed for your filthy habits.

Christian so my wife. You're lying if you pretend there is something wrong with being attracted to 16yo girls rather than 30+ hags

Hello pedo

...

The government should take control over our reproductive organs so we cannot produce semen or eggs without their permission.

So 2 out of the 3 teen White girls posted have Asian boyfriends and the 1 out of 3 likes to post pics of herself with Asian guys.

It is hilarious how hot & bothered White guys get over Blacks when the only way Black guys get White girls is when Jewish porn producers are paying them

What's going on in that pic?

I get a chuckle when people try to frame psychologically damaging a little girl as a fundamental natural right.

People are allowed to love each other at any age. Even if you're fifty, you can be in a relationship with an eleven year old legally. It wouldn't sit well with me because it's strange, but it can happen.

People are not allowed to have sex with each other until they are more likely to reasonably be able to take responsibility for their actions. Thus, having sex with that eleven year old is a no-no and it should always be considered a no-no.

>tfw no state issued gf

>if you have sex you burn in hell
'murica

Same girl also

There is far less argument against paedophilia than there is against homosexuality, yet the latter is openly accepted and legally protected.

Why is that?

plastic nee san

Technically it's the other way around. A healthy male seeks the most fertile mate to carry his lineage. A late teenager is more "ripe" than a 30+ year old.

You can love something without fucking it you degenerate

is lexie pro trump?

Yeah, but we shouldn't respect the consent of 5 year olds. Their will is practically irrelevant. And they should never be acted upon against their interests.

The generally agreed upon concept is that it's a-OK to fuck girls after they finish puberty. Age of consent is set between 16 and 18 most places, and it's federal law that you have to be 18 to shoot porn. Like 85% of women are developed by 16, 99% by 18.

We focus on the age because we don't like subjectivity in the law. Setting a hard delineation between ok and not ok based on age is better than allowing a jury to decide after the fact whether or not it was OK that you tapped that 15 year old.

>A healthy male seeks the most fertile mate to carry his lineage. A late teenager is more "ripe" than a 30+ year old.
Literally what I'm saying. How did you even misunderstand that?

That's a completely unreasonable interpretation of my post.

yeah, like i could talk with a girl like that

As long as fucking un doesn't stick his nose in it the elected government has the right to do it.

I'm just joking pham. But yeah all 16yo girls had sex already it doesn't hurt them

> a 5 year old can consent.
children can't possibly make a rational decision. You can't hold them responsible or accountable for anything, they can't file a contract, they can't go to jail.

>SLIPPERY SLOPE IS NOT AN ARGUMENT
>I SWEAR GAY MARRIAGE WONT CHANGE ANYTHING
>TRANNIES, PEDOPHILES AND BEASTIALITY? IMPOSSIBLE

Oh God, maximum cringe. His mother looks as if she's holding back tears of despair.

she'll look 13 forever

:^) They can certainly consent to changing their gender :^)

drown him in the bathtub and start over

>pedo thread
>turk flag
saged

Also savagely raping your daughter in the ass has nothing to do with love, Muhammad.

LOO POSTING

Yeah, this. They can be transgender or gay, so they clearly have sexual awareness (following the "thought process" of liberals).

If it keeps pedo child rapists away from their victims, yes.

OP is an asshole.

No, sex is a private family matter. It's up to the girl's father to say when she is allowed to do sex stuff and who she's allowed to do it with.

...

OP seek help

> implying that there aren't a lot of daughters of single mothers

Nah. The parents are not in control of their children. It's the state.

The youngest I would do is about 2yo but only if she was my daughter. Outside of the girl being my daughter, 16 because that's the legal minimum age of marriage.
youtu.be/-Plk7TLNmsU
Like in this video, she becomes visible girly and doable late-2yo.

The government should have the power to stop older people from exploiting stupid, gullible children.

fuck no, if laws can be changed because people identify as a woman, then I identify as a 16 year old.

>The youngest I would do is about 2yo
>but only if she was my daughter
>Like in this video, she becomes visible girly and doable late-2yo.
Everything is wrong with your post. Somebody please report him to FBI

>The youngest I would do is about 2yo
*breathes in*
boi

not necessarily. it just shouldn't prosecute parents who kill pedos

It's so fucked up they'd fake this to make a point. Couldn't they have used a story of a little brown girl being forced to be a child bride? Did they not think people would care if they used an actual story from a place where child brides are an actual thing?
Are you just messing around or are you actually this much of a statist? Why should bureaucrats in Washington or Tallahassee decide when I can give my daughter away in marriage?

fuck you
i always get banned when I (You) this, but I don't want my mother to die

>I identify as a 16 year old.
syrian refugees actually pull that shit

>underage daughter dating a fucking chink in girly pants
>any real father would beat the shit out of the subhuman

Anglocucks fathers probably pay for the condoms

...

I LOVE YOU MUMMY

>reporting someone for not acted upon preferences

the eternal kraut

>You a statist?
When it comes to the creation and destruction of human life. Yes.

Marriage. No... You should be free to marry her off whenever. Marriage won't intrinsically harm a kid or even a baby.

Yes. Property is theft. Ownership of your own body necessarily deprives the community of its rightful use.

The real commie revolution begins with redistribution of vagina.

>Everything is wrong with your post
What? Do you have something against father/daughter love? Or do you think girls can't enjoy sexual touching at that age? I'm not sure what your issue is.
And when do you think Lotte in that video becomes doable?
It's good to start early. As soon as her daddy thinks she's doable he should start playing with her.

I hate to use Seth MacFarlane as a reference for anything but it is the same media machine that makes your point as he is calling out in this clip.

youtu.be/SNVj59B_sLE

fpbp

/thread

>When it comes to the creation and destruction of human life
I'm not sure what you mean. I'm not talking about the destruction of anything.
>You should be free to marry her off whenever
And sexual activity within that marriage, no matter how young she is, would be okay, right? You're not being very clear or maybe I'm just not good at understanding what you're saying.
Well, yeah, I understand why they did it but it's still messed up to make up a story when there's plenty of actual stories they could make a big deal of.
Shame on you, Norwegian anti-child bride activists, you racists.

>The government should have the power to stop smarter people from exploiting stupid, gullible people.

If you mistyped and meant late 12yo, I'm with you. Videos and photos can be misleading, though, some teenage celebrities look totally mature and when you actually meet them in person, only then you realize they are basically just kids.

...

>And sexual activity within that marriage, no matter how young she is, would be okay, right? You're not being very clear or maybe I'm just not good at understanding what you're saying.
I'm not the Irish guy, but yes: I would say if the parents consent to their daughter's marriage or concubinage and the man is legally obligated to care for her for the rest of her life, they can show affection however they please.

I mean the state should intervene when it comes to he destruction and creation of human life. Sexual activity at a young age is destructive to human life and damaging to the creation process itself (childhood).

No sex during child marriage. Still a child regardless.

THIRTEEN FUCKING STRIPES

Not even a good joke

Steam the rice, pay the price

It would be well needed in Germanistan at least.

Isn't 13 young enough for Germany?

>Chinks
>Subhumans

Wash your hands before you call others subhuman, pedro

They can love each other. The government can, however, decide when people are mature enough to make such decisions, and since it would be impractical to go down on an individual level they set an age when people generally are able to take such decisions and handle the responsibility. It is also to avoid potential abuse of minors.

No, I meant 2. Though you may be right, pictures can be misleading. But I don't think in this case. I've seen actual 2/3yos, they're pretty good.
>Sexual activity at a young age is destructive to human life
How? How will having her kitty et or sucking her daddy's dick destroy her? I mean, yeah, s-s-shoving it in a hole that's too small will be bad for her but that's not what I'm talking about as being okay.
But at least you're better than most, you at least agree it's okay for girls to be married young. It's never too early to be planning for her future.

you do you youre part of the government

...

Like with most laws either the state decides or the local community decides (mob rule). We went from having blood feuds and honor duels to fines and jail time to reduce the mortality rate. Personally I don't think the state has the right to interfere in people's personal lives (state serves the people not the other way around).