Ok Sup Forums...

ok Sup Forums, could someone whose not an edgy teen from Sup Forums logically explain to me why women are paid less for doing the same work as men? why aren't we rioting and demanding women be paid the same? again no edgy teens explain using logic and reason.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wjWBXbGVyQU
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

if you compare women and men doing the >>>>same jobsame company

Women are paid less because they're not as pretty as men.

they are not

this char compare earning regardless of work time so a man working 40h/w is compare to a woman doing 20h/w
woman in general work less than mean thus earn less

the pay gap is just a myth

>be man
>get a well paying job in a challenging and high-demand field like engineering or biology
>get paid a lot

>be a woman
>get a job as a schoolteacher, nurse or secretary so i can talk to people all day
>get paid less than a male engineer
>OMG WAGE GAP!!

there are more factors but that's basically what it boils down to

New Australia shitposting as usual

Because women tend to choose different jobs than men, and these jobs happen to be less well paid.

There must be an explanation for this somewhere.

Women ARE paid the same amount of money as are men for the same job. This ''study'' is true but falsely presented. What we have here is
the total amount of money that women earn/ the number of working women
the total amount of money that men earn/ the number of working men
What this 'study' doesn't take into consideration though is maternity leave, the fact that women work less hours than men, that women are less likely to ask for a raise, that women generally go for less paid jobs and many other things. The reason why women aren't as represented in politics as are men isn't because someone is stopping them from doing it, it's because women just aren't that interested in politics. It's the same with why men don't go for cosmetics that much, they just aren't interested in it.

>society is liberated, and it's people live within a democracy

>everyone is entitled to free choice over certain or most elements of their lives

>This includes career and job direction

>Women inherently favour flexibility and convenience due to their original biological function

>By favouring flexibility over competitiveness, they end up crowding themselves out of STEM fields

>STEM field jobs pay more as the roles are more engaged, and require more effort and more hours from their workers, with less flexibility

>End result: women dominating the low to mid-level sector, men dominating the higher value-added fields


So to answer your question, women are paid less because they choose to.

Women get paid more in porn movies than men do. A lot more.

>paid less for doing the same work as men
Because they dont do the same work as men

Fuck off Australia

Men are more likely to work full-time than women;

when you take the gross-total-earnings of all men vs. all women, you end up with the shocking 72 cents figure.

When you compare male and female full-timers, you get basically this.

>women make 72 cents for every dollar a man makes
Is just one of those figures that's been repeated so many times, everyone just pretends it's true.

youtube.com/watch?v=wjWBXbGVyQU

leaf pls

>Work in all woman environments my whole life
>Women always paid more
>Never understand this paid less shit
>Planning on killing myself for working in all woman environments my whole life

>why women are paid less for doing the same work as men?
They aren't.
And women shouldn't have jobs anyway. She should be at home raising her children and maintaining the home. Putting her kids in "daycare" so she can keep having a "career" is child abuse.

If only the legislatures passed style some law to make this sort of thing illegal.

Oh wait they did.... Twice.

At this point the women only have themselves to blame if they are actually getting paid less, as they could sue the shit out of any employer who did it. Oh wait you can't find a single court case in the past decade? Must be the patriarchy oppressing women from reporting this.

>logically explain to me why women are paid less for doing the same work as men?

Because they aren't, the studies that bring up the 77% wage gap don't control hor full or part time, and they don't control for actual occupation.

It just measure the total amount of money all women make, and the total money all men make and measure that indiscriminately, and then act like it's because women are oppressed. Economists have destroyed the wage gap myth countless times.

All these counter-arguments that debunk the wage gap myth, yet President Nigger confidently repeats the lie over and over.
This is why shillary won't win.

>take a bunch of people
>split them into two uneven groups
>calculate each group's average salary
>surprise surprise, they aren't the same
It's a case of misinerpreted statistics, nothing more. If you doubt it, do the same experiment with two groups of men. If you reach the conclusion that men from a "richer" group are oppressing men from a "poorer" group, well then there's no helping you.

>i am now going to repeat my molymemes

What's wrong with putting your kids in daycare as long as the professionals there know what they're doing?

If Shillary wins, will she get 77% of the term?

she'll willingly take 77% of executive powers to prove her point

I know thats a dude, but why cant every woman be built like that?

In the same jobs they get less work done than the men who aren't really trying.

In the UK women in their 20s and at least their early 30s earn more than men, but no one ever mentions that. I wonder what happens around that point that would cause women's pay to go down?

It's also been shown that men with children earn more than childless men and women with children earn less than childless women. Most people have children so it has a pretty big effect.

My girlfriend is a statistician and the "wage gap" always sets her off ranting about misuse of data and the public misunderstanding of statistics so I know more about it than I'd like to.

Why have kids if you're not going to raise them and are just going to neglect them?

because men are better at everything including at being women

Women spend their money and then some.

I saw an intricate study written up in my uni using proper statistics terms and methods etc with gaphs and shit.

All the graphs compared men and women's wage per WEEK rather than hour.

Fucking retarded

Becuase feminists keep encouraging them to go into businesses they aren't good at.

Part of raising them is letting them out into the world to interact with other people. I can leave my kid on daycare for like 7 hours a day where he will interact with other kids, have some fun and develop some skills. I will still be a part of his life and raise him, I just won't be there 24/7. The problem here is if the daycare is equipped to give him the education he deserves. They are probably going to mix him with some nigger kid with -20 iq points than him or be unable to intellectually stimulate him. But as long as you agree with the daycares methodology, I don't see much of an issue. It's not ideal but it's not "abuse" either.

>for doing the same work
Which work? You can't just say "the same work" as some vague statistical hand-wave, it doesn't work that way. If your premise is correct, you should be able to tell me precisely what "work" you're talking about.

Bait? But yeah, you got what you asked for more or less.

>why are we doing this thing that we aren't doing
We don't pay women less for doing the same work. We pay them less for doing less work.

>logically explain to me why women are paid less for doing the same work as men?
Women that work half the hours of a man get paid less overall. WHAT A FUCKING SHOCK!

>work in college bookstore
>everybody makes minimum wage
>the women still bitch about the pay gap

You are supposed to copy Australia's behavior, not Canada's.

>You’re gonna make the same if you do as good a job

women have babies

>doing the same work
This is the entire argument.

It's making unequal things equal, and expecting natural law to abide by it.