The last rockstars

the last rockstars

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=yheH2YMO70Y
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

You could make an argument that they were the ones that killed it

>You could make an argument
>doesn't make one
White people everyone

Yes.

youtube.com/watch?v=yheH2YMO70Y

Nah, that was grunge.

>Oasis
>Rock
>Not brit-pop

That's not Fred Durst and Kid Rock.

britpop is was a culture or movement, not a genre

"Britpop is a UK based music and culture movement in the mid 1990s which emphasised "Britishness", and produced bright, catchy pop music partly in reaction to the US led grunge music and the UK's own shoegazing music scene."

The sentence should finish with "It's also shit music"

these are not Foo Fighters

ah, wikipedia, the foremost expert on music. skimmed through the page, it also acknowledges that britpop was a cultural movement rather than a genre

It also said that its a music genre.
Anyway, are you an expert in music that can claim "its just a cultural movement" with nothing to support it? can you show me your credentials please?

Anyway, how is britpop a cultural movement?
Can you show me ONE source that talks about britpop without talking about it as music?

it was clearly meant to highlight how stupid it is to say that it isn't rock because its "britpop" as if theyre mutually exclusive. rock is a genre and britpop is a movement in which theres both rock and pop music. even rock and pop arent mutually exclusive.

its like saying the cure isnt a rock band because theyre goth.

Why they are not mutually exclusive? I can say that they are not mutualy exclusive in one way: both are shit

*The last rockstar

Out of the way, kids.

>Wonderwall
>rock

Yeah, it's obvious fucking Smooth Jazz isn't it

It's fucking pop. Nothing rock about Oasis at all.

Can you tell that to ?

Fuck outta here montie

I love Oasis when I'm in one of those moods, just pure feel good mindless rock

kind of like the strokes

foo are too cute back to be legit stadium rock

how is this even a question that Blur is better than Oasis. Even if you don't like Blur or Damon's other projects, you have to admit that they atleast tried to shake the britpop sound and experiment with different genres.

They were top and remain so lad

*blocks your path*

>played in front of 90 000 people
more like 20 000

don't mind me, last rockstar comin through

You fucking morons forgot about Kanye West.

Weren't Chester Bennington and Fred Durst and all those fags rockstars?

That's not Taylor Swift.

What are you even talking about?

Shite.

and that argument is?

Do americans really consider whiny angst bands like linkin park rockstars?

Retards keep saying that they played these big concerts to like 90,000 but thats complete bullshit. No way they played to more than 20k people.

Why do nu males hate Oasis so much?

T S

R H

I Y

T T

E E

more like rapstars

Sh8t t8ste m8

That they were basically the logical conclusion of rockstars, a couple of lads who just wanted to get party, play in front of thousands of people and to be arrogant sods while doing it, and so why would anyone continue after it?

they were probably bullied by guys lile noel and liam

Imagine being this inbred and retarded.

You're asking why anyone would want to be rockstars after Oasis?

...