If not capitalism, then what? don't le communism only works on paper meme me...

if not capitalism, then what? don't le communism only works on paper meme me. what will follow this failing late stage capitalism disease

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8ymEKiY1UR8
vimeo.com/19426214
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>if not capitalism, then what?
National Socialism. Duh.

t. Cuck

That's the best you have? lol

Anarcho-syndicalism.

>kill all non whites
>kill all whites with iq below 100
>kill all whites who get in the way
>government takeover
>kill them all
>kill and hunt down all outside government influences
>government takeover of media
>start indoctrination of the children phase
>promote strong traditional family roles
>promote the most intelligent to have most children
>promote an altered version of Christianity that is pro science and pro white race
>nuke Mexico

...

>Capitalism
>failing

Honestly though. Once machines take over the labor force the economy will have no use for 90% of the population except to consume. We'll probably have to start making up pretend jobs for people or become a welfare state.

with current technology trends the way they are and the things that can be easily forseen, most likely some kind of post scarsidy socialist thing akin to star trek, or we nuke each other back into the stone age and go hunter gatherer for a few centurys

Why do you think we'll continue developing machinery when we have a worlds worth of cheaper than dirt slave labor?

Capitalism is fucked unless drastic changes are made, and soon.

Because we have been developing machinery...

Workers aren't cheap though, and they create liability. But yes, in fields where labor remains cheaper than machines, machines will not take over.

>works on paper meme

So let me guess, you're looking for a unique brand of communism/socialism/anarchism that has never ever ever been tried before and it will be the solution

This late stage capitalism puts emphasis on profit, while labour is cheaper than machine, machine will always be the choice. It's cheaper to keep paying people nothing to barely live because fuck livlihoods when you can make profit, until automation is cheaper and more efficient there will be no change, and these bougie ass companies don't care about advancing their machinery when they can continue subjugating the poor. Let someone else (the Government) take the brunt of the revolutionising innovative leap, or put in laws forcing them too. The problem is labour laws aren't international (tfw Americans think they're an advanced society and you can injure yourself at work and literally die because you can't afford to fix it) so no one can regulate all of the countries workforces, so intl companies will still keep hopping to where the labour is more exploitable. Rise up comrades.

If things continue, america and Europe are going to go down in average iq by 10-30 points at least in the next 50 to a 100 years.

How do you think that will affect advances in machinery? I'm not sure.

Egoism

>tfw Americans think they're an advanced society and you can injure yourself at work and literally die because you can't afford to fix it

Obviously you've never been here m8.

This, it MUST be cheaper.

If third world labor is cheaper than machines, then a company using third world labor will put the more expensive machine-using company out of business

>promote an altered version of Christianity that is pro science and pro white race

So pretty much most Christianity in the 18th and 19th Century ?

I never have but I'm not wrong either

exactly, either there are international labour laws preventing continuous exploitation of "the next best cheapest labour force in some 3rd world country noone really cares about" until machines are cheaper

If Trump ascends, perhaps a great Republic, like that of old Rome, will arise.

you do remember how that one endet right?

Fascist regulated market is the best economic model. Unlike Communism, National Socialism allows the private ownership of private businesses, only it does not allow rampant oligarchical monopolies to control all of the state's vitally needed resources like free market Capitalism does. In National Socialism the state controls and has the first say with vitally important resources, not private corporations owned by private individuals.

youtube.com/watch?v=8ymEKiY1UR8

nationalsocialism

Are you implying free market capitalism leads to monopolies?

Anarcho-Capitalism

Yes you are completely wrong, hospitals are practically required to provide emergency/life saving care, you will just have a massive bill if you are not insured, and if you don't pay it the bill only thing that happens is your credit takes a hit. I

I've know many poor folks who have contracted chronic and terminal diseases and they are never denied care, they just don't get first choice in their medical care.

Secondly, employers will get their asses sued off if you were injured due to their negligence or poor oversight,and this will be used to cover expenses.

Like I said you have no idea WTF you are talking about.

...

It only takes a few people with brains to do that.

>late stage capitalism

Stop this meme. it's a tired old meme coming from late democracy.

No fucking shit.

Don't derail the thread trying to argue this.

Completely "free market" in the most absolute sense would likely lead to monopolies and cartels in the industrial age.

>kill all whites with iq below 100
50% of the population has an IQ below 100. (I'm guessing you're one of them.)

>companies will be able to take over entire industries when the government isn't there to give them hand outs or regulate them

t. bootlicker

Needs ConAgra

Then why does the success of a nation and its average iq matter at all?

If what you're saying is true, then all of Africa should be a paradise because it only needs a few smart people to create/implement/run things. Right?

There is absolutely no way we can continue without acknowledging the fact that genetics/hereditary has a significance effect on intelligence and behavior. All systems will fail if policies are created that ignore it.

>'s cheaper to keep paying people nothing to barely live because fuck livlihoods
Third worlders who work in foreign owned factories producing goods earn an average of 4-6 times the local wage
Fuck you for wanting these people to go back to sustenance farming prostitution and scavenging garbage to sell.

What do you mean by "when the government isn't there..."

You morons think that the government is the only thing stopping it from working smoothly.

You dumb fucks simply don't understand that the super rich would crush your free market on their own.

>Any industry in America
>Not insanely regulated
The tax code alone is over 15k pages

>he thinks the super rich would exist without the government

That isn't true.

No where near half (at least not in America. Maybe on your shit rock though)

Post-Keynesianism will become the new economic orthodoxy.

Neoliberalism is dead and buried.

I said that it *can* happen and you replied with a personal anecdote? The way America treats things like work holidays (mandatory/sick/pregnancy) is almost laughable for a "first world" country, you have a terrible system surrounding insurance in that you either have expensive as shit insurance or don't have it an d get completely fucked when something goes wrong, especially in the medical field.

Americans on Sup Forums (and in real life) seem to take every criticism of their country as a personal attack, rather than religiously defend your broken system by saying "I know some poor cunts that get un-optimal medical treatment but hey at least they don't normally just die - and if uninsured the medical bills will be literally crippling for anyone that doesn't have a nest egg and will damage your economic potential in the future"

You can still cum on a map of America and critique the system.

I didn't say I wanted them to go back to farming I said I wanted international labour laws?

see look at any regime where the government has been taken out/dissolved/etc, the rich are instantly the targets

>giving a shit about third worlders

>the rich are instantly the targets

And then the rich usually fuck everyone up for a good bit

"The Man Who Planted Trees" A moving short film. Recommended even to the hard-hearted.

There needs to be a new system that's not communism, capitalism or fascism. Somthing that is more relevant in today's work. Sadly no such system exists yet.

*today's world

Nice catch, it is gorgeous vimeo.com/19426214 for anyone interested. Very worth the watch.

>hurr durr people r horses

damn we even managed a good conversation before australia turned up

>I didn't say I wanted them to go back to farming I said I wanted international labour laws
You said you wanted to ban the types of jobs that pay 4-6 times what the average wage in their areas are

Retards like yourself have already gotten their way in some nations and the result is what I told you.

>Retards like yourself have already gotten their way in some nations and the result is what I told you.

In a non-patronising way I'd like to see proof of this, just out of genuine interest not calling you out.

Most based comment in thread. The tragedy of the commons & concept of natural monopoly are completely fallacious.

Chaos is an illusion, fear of chaos is what makes chaos a reality. This is what is happening when people say "we need regulators/market intervention or there would be chaos".

Collectivist create the very problems they so fear.

...