Which moral philosophy/philosopher are you closest to

Which moral philosophy/philosopher are you closest to

selectsmart.com/philosophy/

Other urls found in this thread:

selectsmart.com/philosophy/
plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Am I based?

I'm /Nietzsche/ so being "based" isn't really a thing

FYI Nietzsche was a large anti-nationalist but his ideas are good for incentivising nationalism

His aestheticism and aestheticism in general goes hugely against Sup Forums in that Sup Forums should (although it doesn't) value logic and empiricism more over 'what looks good' otherwise we're the same shit as SJWs

I'm almost Thomas Aquinas, you're a heretic or whatever.

I've always thought of Sup Forums as SJWs that are on the other side of the war. Anyway the world is beautiful if you can see it

I got Jean-Paul Sartre, and I understand why, but I'm not happy about it.

Am I based?

Irish as fuck.

Too lazy to take it again last time I got 100% on Hobbes

Fair enough, I think the world is beautiful but I think what is more important is to make it more beautiful

Openly entertaining the idea that we're just the converse of SJWs isn't very well received here even though its a perfect diagnosis

I was surprised I got such a high on Hobbes

idk lads

The only possible answer

...

No, from what I can tell your moral philosophy is 'I do what I feel like'

Did I do good? Or is Spinoza a meme?

Spinoza is based

Aquinas

KEK

Aquinas and Bentham FTW!

All are subject to God's laws and the goal of God's laws is the greater good

r8 me

Sartre was cool. The most existential existentialist.

After a thorough 5 minutes of research on wikipedia I think I know why I got Spinoza.

I really want there to be free will, but I don't think it actually exists. And that makes me sad.

also glad I'm not very much like the edgy teen Nietzsche. But I was expecting more Plato even though John Stuart Mill is basically muh freedoms which is what I also believe in.

Who Epicurean here?

...

kek, that was surprising. I may be in agreement with Nietzsche on almost everything he's ever written about, but 100%? Jeez

I just didn't want to get 100% :(

Basically... LEAVE ME ALONE GODDAMIT.

Out of the way you fucking plebs

I don't really agree with his diagnosis but he does have some nice ideas. Not exactly my perfect match, but eh.

EZ PZ

That's okay...I guess ?

That is one weird combo

Saint Augustine is the master race my friend

>jean paul sartre

Who was this mother fucker?

A depressive chain smoker.

A commie

...

lma o

>Has Sartre
>No Kierkegaard
Shit list desu baka senpai

Retarded commie who denied biological realities (and used contradictory logic) to push his MUH FREE WILL meme.

The worst hack in the entire history of philosophy.

Fuck

I must not be very smart then, and misunderstood the questions and/or answers.

...

Not upset about this.

Lel Objectivism is life

Naw the questionnaire was based on philosophical opinions not economic.

You got him because he was super pro free will not a communist.

Rand

Feels wierd man.
Even more so that st. Augustine is the patron of my local church

Anyone who didn't get Aristotle or Aquinas is a pleb.

if you have any anti-whites (existentialists, nihilists, jews, atheists) in your top 3-5 you should reconsider

how can you have 91% Bentham and only 65% Mill when the two have virtually identical philosophies

I've gotten the same. Unexpected.

...

...

I was expecting this.

Brudder

Brethren

My moral philosophy has shifted. I guess I need to read up on Aquinas now

How'd I do

...

I got John Stuart Mill. Not bad.

Few people get Kant.

>Aquinas
Tried so hard to prove god exists but couldn't quite do it

>%100% Thomas Aquinas %100%

Got Immanuel Kant. What does this mean?

Randroids hate you. Kant is literally satan in objectivism.

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)

We can make a prior judgments; the negation of such judgments would a logical absurdity because a priori knowledge is known without sensory data.
We combine a priori and a posteriori knowledge to
We have freedom
The objective facts about the human knowledge leads to Kant's morality
We must act out of a sense of duty in order to be moral
Moral action does not come out of following inclinations
Moral standards must be followed without qualification
We must always act so that the means of our actions could be a universal law
We must always treat people as ends not means

100% ayn rand

>selectsmart.com/philosophy/
based dos meus

on phone, but im 100% Epicureans apparently.

How'd I do?

almost identical

John Stuart Mill

Thoughts?

She was supposedly an "Atheist" though

It was bound to happen at some point

Should I be reading his work?

His isn't a particularly "feel good" philosophy.

I have no idea who Spinoza is, but 95% Aquinas eh?

You tried.

What is he about?

Not going to attempt a screenshot on mobile. My top three were Plato, Kant, and JS Mill. Sounds about right, Socrates is my main man.
IMO, a lot of the 'modern' philosophers simply redid 'The Republic', but with different assumptions about the things they could not prove. A different set of axioms, if you will. Just like non-Euclidean geometry required them to throw out the one thing they knew they could not prove. Postmodern philosophy seems to operate by starting off with the most ridiculous set of basics.

A lot of the best classics have a sort of synchronicity. Whether its Lau Tsu, or Plato, there's a kind of enlighteent that exists somewhere beyond the realm of just thought.....things that words fail even to describe

I'd like to see political compass results combined with these to see if there is a connection.

figured out how to screenshot.

This good?

MAXIMS
You can read him in laymen speak here
plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/

...

Highlighting what should have been my true number 1

Yes