People who go to church are stupid

People who go to church are stupid
/discuss

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Episcopal_Church_(United_States)
christianbiblereference.org/faq_premaritalsex.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I wouldn't say stupid, just unable to reason outside of the doctrines they were raised with. It's hard to leave behind something that deep in you.

Nothing to discuss. They are straight up stupid. Not bad, not mean...Just stupid.

@747217814
How?

Tumblr is calling you back home.

Unable to change your thought process since childhood is indicative of stupidity.

I had a conversation with a family member the other day.
>he starts be telling me all my problems are cuz I don't go to church
>I said I don't bevel in his god
>He said I had to prove god did not exist
>I replied that it was him to prove he did
devidebyzeroerror.jpg
>I then told him I would prove his god did not exist if he could prove RA the Sun god did not exist and I would use his methods.
He got so mad I thought he was going to hit me.

is there a higher being? maybe. maybe not
is there any evidence of it? no
is there any logical reason to believe in any god? no

Not all of them are stupid, some of them are just uninformed about science or should I say, reality.

>>Fedora Detected

People who make a threads on online image boards about how people who go to church are stupid are incredibly intelligent.

Being this new, fucking kek! He tried to @

>hat memes vs. reality

Fannyblasted christcuck detected

This its pretty hard to make someone belive in something theyve never "felt", seen or is even proven, i had this dude trying to convince me to turn into a muslim, he told me all these things that he belived and i didnt see why he would belive in it. It was super weird

>CH EDUCATION CH
nope thats not how it's spelt

@747219424
I dont doubt you spend a lot of time on here

>Guy points out the obvious
>Must be a triggered Christian guys!!!!
10/10 user, you gottem

Im happily cucked, ever heard of pascals wager? Besides whats wrong in believing in God if it doesn't hurt anyone?

Lmao @ "free thinking".

You are free to think one way, in the mind of the person responding with this list.

>using the thoughts of one man from the 17th century based on made up probabilities to base your entire perception of reality around

Why am I not surprised

People who give a shit about this topic, thread or church people in general are douchebags.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Episcopal_Church_(United_States)

Here's a church that allows gays and same sex marriage, maybe you should do some research ?

>HAHAHA LOOK AT THIS GUY WHO ISN'T TOTALLY WORTHLESS LET'S MAKE FUN OF HIM :'(

Thank you for being a rational human being.

>beeehhhh god isn't real and anyone who thinks otherwise is an IDIOT

>GOD IS REAL GOD IS GOOD SHUT THE FUCK UP I DON'T WANT OPINIONS

Like can we have a middle ground please?

I used to think like you, but the older I get the more I can't shake the fact that in order to believe the Abrahamic god is real, you need to base it on some seriously stupid ideas.

If you're basing your ENTIRE LIFE on stupid ideas, then what does that make you?

Believing in god does not mean you have to base your entire perception of reality on your beliefs.

>Basing your beliefs on the thoughts of a dude who lived in the Xth century
pretty much every ideology or world view that ever existed.

I go to my parent's Korean church. (My church too, I guess.) It's huge. We have a gym! Anyway, it's not so much about religion as about socializing with as many Korean girls as possible. My parents would take a shit, if I polluted the bloodline with a white girl. So not really stupid to go to church.

If you take anything at face value, that's a problem. It can apply to things outside of religion. You can think you've questioned everything and your core beliefs, but no one has. It's just absolutely impossible and if you think you have you're either lying to yourself or you aren't aware of the amount of things that still have never been questioned by anybody ever, and it's your job to find out what they are. To overcome your personal reality is a big step even for the most intelligent individuals.

>Believing in god does not mean you have to base your entire perception of reality on your beliefs.

It means that you believe that god is watching you and judging you based on instructions he gave you, and that disobeying him means you're going to be tortured forever, or at least denied eternal peace and life.

>pretty much every ideology or world view that ever existed.

You need that whole line for it to mean anything, and the made up probability is a crucial aspect, arguably the most important.

None of that is disputing the reality that you need to believe stupid ideas to believe god is real.

Real and heterosexual. Very well thought out shit tier bait you got there, atheist retard.

>le Crusader larper
>LE DEUS VULT LMAO

The cringiest of christians

what a load of faggotry. not that there aren't a few good points there, but the faggotry level is painful.

Most people who believe in god have either believed in him their entire life (which does line up with my point) or started believing in him after a particularly low point in their lives. That doesn't make them stupid, it makes them open the vulnerability, just like everyone else on this planet. Just because it so happens to be something you disagree with doesn't make them any stupider. I'm not religious, fuck I'm not even agnostic I'm just a straight up atheist but I don't put my opinions above others when it's something as vague as morality.

Im not religious but i go to church to hang out some nice people there, we all treat eachother with respects and they do throw some nice events

It's not about the morality, it's about the fact that they believe in stupid ideas. Ideas that are logically flawed enough that people often figure out its bullshit by the time they are 13 or 14 even when taught it for their whole life.

I'm not saying that they are all stupid, but they do believe in profoundly stupid ideas.

And by the way, believing in stupid ideas isn't normally that big of a deal, but when those stupid ideas are what you base your perception of all of reality on, it becomes a problem.

People who go to church have an entire community they can rely on.
What do you have OP?

a bunch of crusty "intellectual" fedora tippers circle jerking to hating on Christianity. this shit is gayer than the 7 trap threads i've seen in the past hour combined. and all you niggers fell for their bait, making their jizz party even more satisfying for them

Doesn't bait require that you don't really believe what you're saying? What if I'm just saying things that trigger you, so it seems like bait from your perspective?

>It means that you believe that god is watching you and judging you based on instructions he gave you.
Nah dude to go to Hell you have to be a rapist or a murderer or smth like that and for the rest of the rules (no pornography,no lying blah blah...) you basically get a free pass,its human nature its forgivable.If things really were the way you described them i wouldnt believe in god either.

>made up probability
Umm... yeah its a hypothetical wager its supposed to be made up but it makes perfect sense, philosophy is based on made up stuff,and thinking about said made up stuff.

Yep, at least 1/64 times as cringey as a baiting, attention whore atheist. deus vult sage

St. Peter saw homosexuality and masturbation as equally deplorable sins. Just remember that next time you rub one out christcuck

Masturbation is gay,makes sense if you think about it...

Some churches are all right. My wife and kids go to a Quaker church where they basically just chill for an hour with other people. It's just a time for people to collectively meditate or pray or have a conversation. Dogma is dangerous, buildings aren't.

>Masturbation is gay
You are touching a dick...

Also there's a skeleton inside you right now.

>Nah dude to go to Hell you have to be a rapist or a murderer or smth like that and for the rest of the rules (no pornography,no lying blah blah...) you basically get a free pass,its human nature its forgivable.If things really were the way you described them i wouldnt believe in god either.

Pre-marital sex will get you sent to hell, and part of those instructions is that you have to worship god and that you have to try to not have sex out of marriage.

>Umm... yeah its a hypothetical wager its supposed to be made up but it makes perfect sense,

The idea itself is based off of a statistical chance. He uses the false premise that god being real is likely at all. It would make just as little sense if applied to Zeus or Islamic doctrine, or even judgmental fairies

Pussy.

>thinking I give a fuck about the opinion of some dead guy who isn't the word of God
>sage

...

>He uses the false premise that god being real is likely at all.
Not only at all, but that there's a 50% chance the Christian god is real.

That 50% chance is a completely made up probability, you are too stupid to realize that.

>Catholic
>doesn't care about the saints

Wow weird I would never expect you to have stupid and nonsensical opinions.

>pathetic nigger tier bait, the best the ignorant atheists can muster
You tried so hard, and got so far!
But in the end, it didn't even matter!
^which is funny in several ways, but your stupid ass wouldn't know
SAGE

I'm born and raised atheist. I haven't believed in god a day in my life. That post made me want to make a serious effort towards seeing if I cant find a little bit of faith in jesus within me after all.
Im starting to think we need christianity back in the west. Badly.

Athiests are close-minded, family.

And apparently you're too stupid to realize I was agreeing with you.

But god is real?

>there are flamgorps all around us
>prove it
>i don't have you to
>then i don't have to believe you
>you're just closed-minded

We can just replace it with something better.

How do you propose we accomplish this?

>doesn't believe in myths
>closed minded

Like I said,

Ideologies have a long history of replacing religions. Also, could just make up a good religion without any myths.

I'm not saying every atheist has the broughest mind there is what in the matter of believing in religion and not believing in religion? Atheists are close minded?

>Pre-marital sex will get you sent to hell
I'm a member of the roman catholic church (I dont know where youre from but odds are that youre from a country that is mostly protestant) we dont have those rules here I agree they are stupid but so are the people who made them.

>The idea itself is based off of a statistical chance. He uses the false premise that god being real is likely at all.It would make just as little sense if applied to Zeus or Islamic doctrine, or even judgmental fairies.
It doesnt make sense if applied to Zeus or judgmental fairies (old slavic religions and other pagan religions i presume ) since the deities in tho religions openly manifest themselves and demand sacrifice and all that jazz unlike our god who is more subtle(the devil really isnt in the details),and thats why you can apply it to our god since his existance is just as likely as it is unlikely.


>Also there's a skeleton inside you right now.
Really,did he use his boner to penetrate me? ba dum tss

I meant "brightest"
>eurofag.

I live my life as if god exists otherwise I wouldn't have morals like non believers

...

110% false
The bible has been proven true and God is real, atheists will burn in the Lake of Fire with the Talmudists and Muhammedans.

When did they change the catholic rules that pre-marital sex is a sin? It was in 2007.

>It doesnt make sense if applied to Zeus or judgmental fairies (old slavic religions and other pagan religions i presume ) since the deities in tho religions openly manifest themselves and demand sacrifice and all that jazz unlike our god who is more subtle(the devil really isnt in the details),and thats why you can apply it to our god since his existance is just as likely as it is unlikely.

This is both factually wrong and stupid. What evidence do you have that your god is real compared to others.

>morals are only valid when written down by ancient Palestinians

Lol what a fucking retard. This guy goes around all day basing his life around that idea. Thanks for the laugh.

Fornication is a sin because it says so in the bible, Jesus said to flee fornication

>This is both factually wrong and stupid. What evidence do you have that your god is real compared to others.
Thats my (and pascals) point you cant prove it but you also cant disprove it.
But i can obviously disprove the existence of pagan deities (the harvest was pretty good without us having to microwave any babies)

>When did they change the catholic rules that pre-marital sex is a sin? It was in 2007.
Well our pope Francis is reforming the church and getting rid of those retarded rules.

It's pretty clear that pre-marital sex is a sin.

christianbiblereference.org/faq_premaritalsex.htm

1 Corihians 6:18
Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

The basic, common laws applied around the world right now that sustains a functional groupe of states and nations, you dropped-at-birth inbred, are made by men and has nothin to do with religion. In fact they are written with that in mind.

>secularity

Nothing you are saying is putting the likelihood of god existing at 50% or anywhere near that measure. Focus on that. If you can't, (which you can't) then pascal's wager is bullshit.

Yes that's clarified in the link I showed you.

Sex outside of marriage is a sin to christians.

example 1

>filename.jpg

I can prove the existence of a deity-->100% likelihood that it exist
I cant prove the existence of a deity-->0%likelihood that it exists
I can neither prove nor disprove the existence of a deity which simply refuses to openly manifest itself-->50% likelihood that it exist
And besides the bible doesnt want us to blindly believe and obey it makes that very clear.

Almost none of those things start with either 'U' or 'R'.

Your misuse of statistics and understanding of probability proves that you're not intelligent, and maybe even below average. Just letting you know, you can't put the likelihood of something existing at 50% just because you can't disprove or prove its existence.

That's probably too much for you to understand in the first place.

Proof that it's indicative.

It means you are lacking in cognitive ability. It's a pretty common thing that people do, and if you can't do it then you are not competent in your higher cognitive functions.

That or maybe you were beaten until you believed it or something. It requires stupidity or insane amounts of emotional barriers keeping you from thinking rationally. Btw nearly every atheist I know started out as a christian kid.

So what leads you to believe there is not a god? Are you having faith in others who tell you there is not? Is it merely the absence of the anthropomorphized god? Or do you have a higher knowledge of the enormous universe?

I'm cool with saying that the established religions are fucking retarded and most are a money making scheme, but I leave that door open to the possibility that we are just some experiment that has been abandoned or is watched in a way we can never discover.

It just seems more stupid to make firm stances on things that can not be proven or disproven.

I've been talking about the abrahamic god this entire time, so we're on the same page.

>I'd be a piece of shit if I wasn't afraid of god
Wow you're such a good person

I'm about to don a metaphorical fedora but there are literally zero christians who can win an argument with me about the nature of their belief being stupid.

My dude first of all my intelligence has noting to do with the topic at hand if you dont consider me worth your time then simply dont reply to me.
Second of all I get your point that :
chance of smth existing-->0%
chance of smth not existing-->0%
does not equate to
chance of smth existing-->50%
chance of smth not existing-->50%
but it does particle physics is full of these its actually based on this.Basically if you cant prove the existence of smth that does not mean it doesnt exist.

Agree with everything there but the thing about God existing or not. The zealots can't prove God is real, and you can't prove he isn't real.

A steadfast belief in any state of God's existence makes you as much of a zealot as the most hardcore Baptist out there.

Don't be a retard. Choose agnosticism.

Also I meant to cite OP. Not you, .

Kek I can still bait faggots on the internet

>says retarded bullshit and includes the term particle physics as a non-sequitur to try and add to his point

Holy fucking shit dude

While I agree, literally nobody cares what you think here, you're not going to change anyone's opinion so just fuck off m90.

>non-sequitur
How tho how is this non-sequitur its a perfectly valid point.The train of thought behind pascals wager can pretty much only be compared to the way we try to explain particles,we mostly just assume things (for example the 8 yang-mills fields we use to describe gluons-we made them up).

Disproving Pascal's wager only requires you to understand that not being certain about something's existence does not automatically give it a 50% chance of existing. This is basic, basic logic.

Pascals wager isnt about proving the existence of god youre going about this the wrong way.

Pascal's wager is about betting on the existence of god, in order to place his bet the probability he's using is completely pulled from his ass.

Were both actually wrong
the chances are:
Does exist: any real number

The number is so low for his existence that it's basically negligible.