Sits on a solid gold throne

encouraging the people to 'live within their means' during these times of austerity, while addressing a room full of multimillionaires.

She also voiced support for a government imposing longer working hours with less pay on junior doctors.
All while wearing a hat encrusted with rubies, emeralds, sapphires, pearls and diamonds.

She then left Parliament and returned to her one billion pound house.
Her crown left shortly afterwards in its very own horse-drawn carriage.

Why do we not have a democratically elected royal family?
If we have to have one at all, we should get to vote on it.

Piss off Corbyn, go learn the national anthem

what a surprise coming from a reptillian mass rapist satanist queen

Haven't you got prayers to go to Muhammad?

Is there any difference between submitting to a cult and submitting to a german family?

You're a retard, the Queen has no say on her speech, she's a puppet for the PM.

>encouraging the people to 'live within their means'
How dare She. Despite actually practicing this by making many budget cuts at Buckingham.

Yea, quite a bit. What kind of half-wit couldn't see that?

Democratically elected royalty DOES exist, they are called Celebrities.
The Kardashians are just one example.

B A S E D

>worshipping a selfish lazy inbred who has done nothing but sit back and watch as her supposed Christian country is turned into little Somalia
>paying for this

Fucking serf.

>encouraging the people to 'live within their means' during these times of austerity, while addressing a room full of multimillionaires.

>while addressing a room full of multimillionaires.

Not true lad, Peers only get £300 a day

>Elizabeth II
>Lazy
Her Majesty has worked pretty much every single day of Her life.
>has done nothing but sit back
Not allowed to do anything. Your precious politician-elus have seen to that.
>paying for this
No, Her Majesty gives the nation ~£200m/yr of Her own income.

The throne of England is literally a 1000 years old wooden seat with a rock inside it.

Filth detected

Likelihood estimates
Sturgeon: 15%
Corbyn: 25%
ReligionOfPeace: 67%

Engaging cartoons

You're right. She *is* German.

Submitting to a royal family usually grants you a prosperous nation, you know, that thing Ireland will never be

THE QUEEN WILL DIE TONIGHT BUT ONLY IF YOU POST "GOD KILL THE QUEEN"

>97 KB
It was. Back when they had a monarch.
Brian Boru ftw.

>oh better not have a 5th extravagant lawn party this year the plebs might notice I'm a huge fucking hypocrite and shit on a gold toilet whilst their quality of life continues to worsen.

fuck Corbyn the socialist commie the nutter wants to gut the military and get rid of nukes plus is now towing the labour "lets stay in the EU and take all the cocks" position. He's just further perpetuating that all republicans are far left hippies and have no patriotism

what is the US, France, Germany and a shit load of other western democratic republics. They are about as prosperous as the UK and sit roughly the same socially for good or ill

I hope prince Harry starts a military coup then hangs you traitors Like you deserve.

I thought ur queen was a muslim innit?

>oh better not have a 5th extravagant lawn party
The government actually puts those on for various purposes. You're also ignoring that She pulls Her weight and contributing to Britain a helluva better than you, Mustafa.

Make it William. Harry needs to do that here.

She does a shitload of work considering she's 90

People severely underestimate how much they contribute to international relations and charity work

millions of people do charity work and they do it all without going home to live in billions worth of luxury and being treated like a god.

>without going home to live in billions worth of luxury and being treated like a god.

WHAAAAAA some people are more privileged than me.

Mate I'm English and my family have been here for eons unlike yourself. I'm sure if most people had the same access they could do 3 days work with aids for the sole purpose of public relations to but you keep up with your meme rebuttals I'm sure they make you feel like you win arguments

Don't care about money I care about people inhering political or sovereign power instead of being elected.

I fucking hate this country.

Ol' Phil had better give her a stern talking-to.

>instead of being elected.
Tony Blair was elected.

The Royals are more loyal to this country than ANY career politician ever could be.

Daily reminder that the Queen cucked Rhodesia and abandoned them

>democratically elected royal family
I guess you dropped out of high school Pip?

Do those people also pay 500% tax?
And who is treating Her like a God?

>Mate I'm English
Pic related.
>I'm sure if most people had the same access they could do 3 days work with aids for the sole purpose of public relations
I'm sure they could. But Her Majesty wasn't content with that, and has instead spent Her whole life working for the country.
>but you keep up with your meme rebuttals I'm sure they make you feel like you win arguments
No, i win arguments using facts and truth, rather than just loudly expressing my petty tall poppy syndrome.

You prefer popular thieves and charletans in charge instead of having someone who actually cares about their nation?

Pretty sure that was Parliament.

How is the monarchy any different to a multibillionare that gives his fortune to his son who then goes on to have swathes of power and influence as a result of the fortune.

The monarchy exists because it was founded atop the blood sweat and tears of many men and women in the royal line before the current monarch.
Should they not pass down to their children the wealth and power they fought for?

Buckingham Palace could house hundreds of refugees. Move them in and move the Royals into a council flat in Newham.

>democratically elected royal family?

really is that why one royal had to abdicate his position due to Nazi sympathies? Is that why Charles has been suspected of breaking the royalties political neutrality to harrass MP's in letters? Is that why they support the EU and further succession of national sovereignty. Is that why they would have fled to Canada had Germany successfully invaded the UK in the second world war? Yeah keep telling yourself they care an ounce about us. Im sure Vicky's tirade about being above us really has left their family beliefs.

>tall poppy syndrome
Fuck off cunt, tall poppy syndrome is a good thing.

Anyone arrogant enough to think that they're hated solely because they're rich deserves what they get.

I have no problem with the majority of rich people, but Gina the Hutt belongs on a scaffold and anyone who tells me that's tall poppy syndrome belongs there with her.

>really is that why one royal had to abdicate his position due to Nazi sympathies?
Oh? And who do you think that was?
>Is that why Charles has been suspected of breaking the royalties political neutrality to harrass MP's in letters?
Hah, you know what that "harrassment" was? Trying to help the agricultural productivity of an area. What a bastard indeed. Caring about His people like that.
>Is that why they support the EU
They don't, though. People have gotten in shit for revealing how Elizabeth II wants England out of that toilet.
>Is that why they would have fled to Canada had Germany successfully invaded the UK in the second world war?
How is that unreasonable?

>tall poppy syndrome is a good thing.
It specifically isn't.
>Anyone arrogant enough to think that they're hated solely because they're rich deserves what they get.
Except when it's fags like OP who do seem to hate people just because they're rich.
>but Gina the Hutt belongs on a scaffold
Agreed. That's not tall poppy, though. The woman is a blight.

Well you for a start.

no but most people are descendants from those who subjugated common people for hundreds of years and most people don't physically own continents worth of land.

>facts and arguments
yeah calling people muhammed is a quality argument

I hate most politicians as self serving liars but we can get rid of them.

Millionaires have no official power and if troubles come to light they would be fucked. Keep their damn money I don't care about that but don't claim those fuckers were the ones dying in trenches and fields for hundreds of years and not the common man who was ripped from his home forcefully and forced to fight for the glory and gain of others. Im sure the millions of dead from wars profited just as much as the royals.

Ed VIII

doesn't matter he broke the constituitonal agreement that they don't involve themselves. Motive matters not as it opens avenues to other abusement. We have had fucking a civil war over this shit.

really because reports this year claims we need to be a key part of shaping the continent along side Berlin. Sounds pretty pro EU to me
its unreasonable as if they cared truly they would fight and die with those who couldnt just run away

>It specifically isn't.
Ayy lmao.

Tall poppy syndrome doesn't exist. Nobody hates people solely for being rich except the most extreme commies, and there's far more colourful language to use when describing them. Tall poppy syndrome is an invention of rich elites who are genuinely so arrogant that they cannot conceive of a reality where even a single person dislikes them for any reason other than pure jealously. Tall poppy syndrome is a fantasy created by self-absorbed cunts, and the mere fact that someone thinks that it applies to them is proof that they are so arrogant they deserve the hatred they receive.

It's not about the money, it's about being a shitcunt.

Even OP isn't guilty of TPS. He doesn't hate the Queen for being rich, he hates the Queen for (supposed) hypocrisy.

If you're going to bear that flag at least shitpost well.

Why are republicans so pathetically jealous of others? Why do they honestly care about the wealth of a long standing figure who embodies their national identity, despite the fact she gives more to the economy through tourism than she takes?

>Nobody hates people solely for being rich except the most extreme commies
That's usually what it refers to.
>Tall poppy syndrome is an invention of rich elites
Not really. You mostly see it among poor people regarding slightly less poor people.
>He doesn't hate the Queen for being rich
Certainly seems that way. Just veiled behind what he wrongly thinks of as hypocrisy.
Basically, it's not that black and white, and i was really just using the term as a catchall. Didn't expect a whole to-do on it.

>Democratically Electrd Royal Family
>Implying that we wouldn't end up getting a Muslim one

*elected

You've quoted that almost verbatim from huffpost, fuck off and gas yourself

Finally a tea boy calling out the pathetic nobility concept, all these years here and I've never seen one of those

Isn't there like a 25% push to put Dom Bertrand on the rightful Brazilian throne since you've had zero luck from democracy?

She would be right whether or not she were rich.

Oh tell me more about how Brazil's government is better

Subhuman half ape can't think what a surprised. Should just nuke all of south America bunch of dumb cunts who think their the greatest no matter what

>That's usually what it refers to.
That is what it refers to, but the appellation is usually wrong.

>You mostly see it among poor people regarding slightly less poor people
I come from an extremely working-class background and I've never seen TPS groupthink. Sure, a few people get asshurt, but they're bitter fuckwits. That's hardly the widespread scourge that TPS is characterised at, and it's not even aimed at the supposed victims of it.

>Certainly seems that way. Just veiled behind what he wrongly thinks of as hypocrisy.
As a salesperson let me tell you: assumptions are unreliable. Don't make them. If you don't know something - ask. Never guess. The guy dressed like a hobo may just be a gentle push away from an 8,000 television.

>i was really just using the term as a catchall
Don't. Tall poppy syndrome is the worst meme. When rich people get hate 99 times out of 100 it's well-deserved. There's a lot to hate about British monarchy, even if you refuse to believe it, and even if I don't agree with it. Compelling arguments for republicanism exist and you don't need to be green with envy to believe them.

Take your "poor misunderstood billionaires" tears somewhere else.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Resentful Labour, probably a Muslim, thinks that rich people shouldn't have an opinion, and that the traditions of the country should be undermined because he is jealous of gold hats. Fuck off back to the commune you hippie.

You surly hav'nt seen prince williams interview this morning,
He called for a referendum next year..... to abolish the monarchy !
He's a good lad

You are insane, source your claim

>Subhuman half ape can't think what a surprised.

>what a surprised

> bunch of dumb cunts who think their the greatest no matter what
>who think their

Not the guy you were talking to, at least we can speak better English than you do, even though it's not our native language.

It seems like you are the dumb cunt here.

Just because the shit I have is not better at least I'm not accepting a fucking queen "chosen" by god

Stfu zeekoid
Your argument is halfbrained

Im one of the republicans in this thread. I can respect that as long of course as its genuine and not just to make him look good with no expectation of it happening

Lol
Fuck off france

It's 1am here and I'm not handing in a resume or taking an English test

And just cause I made a spelling mistake my argument still stands. You gonna argue the point or be some left learning fucking chimp and point out things other then my points like a jew

No one thinks the Queen was chosen by god that's Medieval tier thinking. (Funny coming from a third world shithole)

The Queen is from a system of government that has proven itself time and time again, she has pretty much no power and actually makes the country money. If you truly believe people think she was chosen by god you can go drown in a mudslide cause that's one retarded opinion

>Sure, a few people get asshurt, but they're bitter fuckwits.
Which is what i was referring to. That and an absolutely hilarious show i witnessed on a train in the Valley once, where an aboriginal family were harassing a small girl (daughter/sister/lover? Who knows with them) about going to school. "You think ya fuckin better than ush because ya can fuckin count now?"
>assumptions are unreliable.
In general, yes. But on Sup Forums? I let my standards slip, sorry.
>When rich people get hate 99 times out of 100 it's well-deserved.
From my experience, i just can't agree. It's usually people blaming people richer than them, people with whom they've never interacted or have reason to, for their own faults. And again, it's rarely the millionaires who get it.
>There's a lot to hate about British monarchy,
Can't agree there either. There are many misconceptions, though.
>Compelling arguments for republicanism exist
Heard many arguments. None were compelling.

Disregard. I can't find it. It was some interview with Dom Bertrand.

>you will get to see the People's Commonwealth of Britain established in your lifetime

Feels good, comrades.

>Heard many arguments. None were compelling.
"Republics are desirable and Britain ought to lead the world towards republicanism" is a compelling argument to progressive ethnocentrists.

You aren't one, which means it isn't compelling to you, but it's a compelling argument to a lot of intelligent people who think differently. Yes, people can still be intelligent while having different perspectives.

>In general, yes. But on Sup Forums? I let my standards slip, sorry.
It shows.

>an aboriginal family were harassing a small girl about going to school.
Aboriginals aren't human.

>It's usually people blaming people richer than them, people with whom they've never interacted or have reason to, for their own faults.
It's usually people blaming the class that wields power for wielding that power poorly, or, at worst, maliciously.

The class of rich and elites is responsible for a lot ills, and it is appropriate to assign blame to wealthy people for those ills based on their wealth, because their wealth is what defines their responsibility.

The hatred doesn't stem from wealth, it stems from misuse of power. The apportionment of blame is determined by wealth, and that's appropriate.

>but it's a compelling argument to a lot of intelligent people who think differently.
See, i would say compelling as regards a strong fact based, unbiased argument.
>Aboriginals aren't human.
Agreed, but that was just the most amusing example i could think of.
>It's usually people blaming the class that wields power for wielding that power poorly, or, at worst, maliciously.
Then that's not what i was referring to, as it's justified.
Like with OP, his concerns are based on misinformation.

Solid gold chairs are within her means

Nice, straight from the Guardian comments section.

You have to go back.

British, can trace my heritage to 6th century Jockland.

Traditions are not being undermined, I'm doing what the 'royals' have always done, seeking to wipe out a weaker group and seize power.

I suggest Barbara Windsor as our new Queen, she can be Queen for the next five years, wear the silly gold hat and do her cheerful laugh.
then after that I suggest Bendydick Cucumberpatch for King for 5 years after that.

It should be down to public vote and popularity, what makes some person think they are 'royal' anyway? the whole idea is just ludicrous.

>i would say compelling as regards a strong fact based, unbiased argument.
Cool. A lot of people are principled, not pragmatic. Like I said, people can think differently to you and still be intelligent. A cosmopolitan might even argue that the world resembles the way we believe it works anyway.

>Like with OP, his concerns are based on misinformation.
Then it's not TPS.

>can trace my heritage to 6th century Jockland.
Remarkable. I don't think the College of Arms would even be able to do that, but hey, good for you.
>It should be down to public vote and popularity,
Horrible idea. Populism ruins everything. Qualifications are far better to have.
>what makes some person think they are 'royal' anyway?
Having a royal position, usually.

>Like I said, people can think differently to you and still be intelligent.
Of course. But they need to be able to state their case intelligently.
>Then it's not TPS.
It seems to boil down to, "How dare these people be better than me and have more money."

>the nutter wants to gut the military
You mean gut it more?

>It seems to boil down to, "How dare these people be better than me and have more money."
Then how is it based on misinformation?

Either OP is misinformed, in which case inform him and he will agree with you, or OP is a bitter commie, in which case laugh at him.

Either way, TPS is the wrong S.

No I mean he wants to get rid of it totally and every nuke we own. Basically he wants to cuck us for his socialist fantasies

I'm sanctioning your bennies RIGHT NOW

>Horrible idea. Populism ruins everything. Qualifications are far better to have.

Qualified for queen,lol.
Any cunt could do it,its not exactly difficult.
shake hands with people, say a few words and pull the lever that opens the curtains.
fuck sake a dog could be trained to do it

she works harder in a year than you have in your entire life working your cushy 9-5 job

No it boils down to "why should these people inherit power and position over me whilst expecting everyone to grovel before them like serfs when we live in a supposed democracy"

>Likelihood estimates
>Sturgeon: 15%
>Corbyn: 25%
>ReligionOfPeace: 67%
Whats the other 3%?

Let's hope for Civil War. Fathers need to fight Sons again.

T. AS government and politics

peers get a flat salary, the £300 a day is awarded for them sitting in the house.

Where clit cancer when you need it ??

Fine, i submit to you pedantry.

>Any cunt could do it,its not exactly difficult.
Which is why there have been no bad leaders ever?

>"why should these people inherit power and position over me
Because it's inheritance? It's also because that's the best method of long term planning for a government.
>expecting everyone to grovel before them like serfs
They don't, though. It's no different from any other head of state.
>when we live in a supposed democracy"
But you don't. It's a constitutional monarchy.

>Fine, i submit to you pedantry.
This was a valuable use of my time.

;_;

>Jockland
Why am I not surprised?

What is she producing to make that income?

fuck off I'm no commie.
I just see the royal thing as undemocratic, it cracks me up when Cameron says about "Our great democracy".
We live under a very undemocratic monarchy, arguments pro and contra do not change that fact, all must swear allegiance to the royals above all else.

>Implies everyone is worth the same
People like you that preached that niggers should vote, that mixbreeding should be allowed and that immigration is a good thing. You are nothing but a culturalmarxist. Go be a jew somewere els Goldensteinmoneygrubberberg.

>encouraging the people to 'live within their means'
She's right, though?

Average personal debt excluding mortgage in the UK is a staggering two year's income. If we had to pay that shit back due to another Labour government fucking the economy, it would wreck most households.

That Liz owns 1/5 of the dry land on the planet via the Crown Estate corporation is neither here nor there, is it? We've borrowed too much unsecured debt. 1/7 households are living off of debt, this is not good.

All governments are democracies in the end, mate. If people didn't want a Queen there wouldn't be one.

Its amazing that Britains are incapable of making the logical connection between their overbloated bureaucratic welfare systems, and their ever-deteriating economic standards.

Britain needs to abolish its national health service and let the market sort it out, not try to squeeze more out of doctors for less. That just aint gonna cut it.

Basic economics.

>>"why should these people inherit power and position over me
>Because it's inheritance? It's also because that's the best method of long term planning for a government.

What utter rubbish,.North Korea is good in your eyes then? they love inheritance.

He's not likely to be British mate.

>Because it's inheritance? It's also because that's the best method of long term planning for a government.

Just because they inherit power and influence over people doesn't mean the people must accept it. Also I think Switzerland is arguably the best governed place in the world and they are a republic.

>expecting everyone to grovel before them like serfs

what is her majesty and highness, what is royal pagentry, what is kneeling and bowing what is an oath of allegiance to serve the monarch and not the country and good of the people.

>But you don't. It's a constitutional monarchy.

and yet we are told we also have a democracy.

I never said any of that, you are putting words into my mouth.
Under her clothes and without the goldy hat the queen is just another human

£74k/yr. A lot less than we give ours, but i guess yours are expected to have their own income.

You and me both. One day i'll break free.

Rents from owned land.

>it cracks me up when Cameron says about "Our great democracy".
He's a politician, what do you expect? He has to defend the franchise until he's sick of it and someone else gets the gig.

They're not all perfect.

>Democracy
It's essentially a meaningless buzzword and has been for a long time.

Check out the reflection. Kek!

and despite that she is expected to be something far more every waking moment of every day

What is the USSR, what is the peoples republic of China, what is every despot and dictator. People don't demand change for one of 3 reasons

fear
propoganda
apathetic content in their personal lives that isn't worth risking

The NHS is 70% privatised, and has been since about '82. If you're unfortunate enough to have cancer, 85% of your treatment is provided by private for-profit organizations.

The NHS logo is exactly that, these days, a logo. The government sinks ~£125billion into the NHS a year, and we haemmorage ~£10billion on foreign nationals abusing the system.

The real money sink is Public Sector obscene pensions at ~£200billion in taxpayer money. That's before we take into account the State Pension available to all. Now, to their credit, the Tories have come down hard on the Civil Service and the NHS pensions, altering the Final Payment payout to one that represents an average of lifetime public sector earnings. So in about 25 years we may see that figure dramatically reduce.