His ""countries"" civil war didn't create a new definition of brutality in warfare

>his ""countries"" civil war didn't create a new definition of brutality in warfare.

>his country didn't achieve their independence through peaceful means

Yours didn't. It was world war 1 that did.

>le golden lemon faec

>his country had a civil war

>the American civil war was the bloodiest conflict in all of history before the first world war
>it was the first war with significant use of iron ships, and submarines.
>it was the first war with use of automatic weapons

You were saying?

>His country never dropped an atomic bomb on an enemy country.

> Theodoricus the monk, who wrote a history of Norway in Latin c. 1180 ended his narrative with the death of King Sigurd the Crusader in 1130 as he considered it:

>"...utterly unfitting to record for posterity the crimes, killings, perjuries, parricides, desecration of holy places, the contempt for God, the plundering no less of the clergy than of the whole people, the abductions of women and other abominations which it would take long to enumerate"[16

> The English historian William of Newburgh, writing c. 1200, writes of Norway that:

"...for more than a century back, although the succession of kings there had been rapid, yet none of them had ended his days by age or sickness, but all had perished by the sword, leaving the dignity of empire to their assassins as their lawful successors; so that, indeed, the expression, "Hast thou killed, and also taken possession?" [cf. 1 Kings 21:19] may seem to apply to all who reigned there for so long a space of time."[17]

>not having a 110 year long civil war

>his """country""" never genocided poles
lmao that's like one of the most important requirements to be considered white

...

Leave Poland alone, they are freedom friends

to quote your father great britain:
"it's just banter m8"

>implying Germany isn't under a civil war right this now

Just because it's a different type of war, doesn't mean it's not a war

>his """country""" next civil war will be without nukes

>friendly banter mexican
>bunch of USA flags responds

There won't be another civil war in Russia.

Mexican diaspora are very annoying

>the American civil war was the bloodiest conflict in all of history before the first world war
>Only 600,000 dead
>millions killed in Napoleonic Wars, the 30 years war, the crusades, etc.
>20 million killed in the contemporaneous Taiping Rebellion

Americans education everyone

by that logic even the US is in a state of civil war

USA's is only in major cities, Germany is all over the country

But okay, let's say there isn't one yet. Do you think there might be soon, though?

Circumcision destroys our brains. Please be patient