I have a Muslim Co worker and he's extremely anti gun.
He keeps saying that people shouldn't own guns and that any revolution would be stopped by the military easily.
Here's my question.
Is he saying this because he wants Americans to be defenseless against Islam or is he just a dumb liberal?
Other urls found in this thread:
gunfacts.info
themosqueinmorgantown.com
washingtonpost.com
foreignpolicy.com
twitter.com
Both?
Best picture I've seen in years.
He's both Muslim and liberal?
That's kinda an oxymoron
Totally depends on where he's originally from, if he's from Pakistan/Afghanistan/Yemen than he's probly gonna be pro gun, If he's Iran/North.Af then he's gonna be anti gun.
He's from Afghanistan
I forgot to mention that when I first met him he said he was athiest. Later he admitted he was Muslim.
Well then He's suffering from PTSD...he probly witnessed someone dear to him get shot in front of him, war is shit.
What do drones and hellfires have to do with guns?
Just keep track of his fifth columnist ass, and own guns.
>Is he saying this because he wants Americans to be defenseless against Islam ...?
I would report him to the authorities, sounds like he has the potential to be a lone wolf terrorist.
>100% of the Afghan War was conducted from Air.gif
>hey white kafir, wouldn't it be batter if you were all unarmed?
what could go wrong?!
>Is he saying this because he wants Americans to be defenseless against Islam?
Yes.
That's how muslims start out. When they're outnumbered it's all "gays are a-ok with us! Violence is never the answer! Suicide bombings are never justified!"
Then when they grow in numbers they attack christians with rocks like in Dearborn, MI.
He's trying to honeydick us to give up our guns until such a time as the ackbars take over and everyone has a full auto AK and we have to pay a jizyah to have an air rifle.
Everything these goat fuckers say is a lie so they can betray you.
It's called Taqiyah and being a two-faced liar is promoted in their religion.
You better buy another gun, just to be safe.
This
>He keeps saying that people shouldn't own guns and that any revolution would be stopped by the military easily.
That is not why the right to bear arms exists.
Muslims vote overwhelmingly left in all Western nations. Left parties want to surrender Western culture. This pleases the Muslim.
>Muslims vote overwhelmingly left
Before 'Iraq Clusterfuck' 80% of US Muslims were Republican voters...even in 2000 76% US Muslims voted for Dubya...It's tottaly reversed now with 90% voting Dem.
>any revolution would be stopped by the military easily.
He's an idiot. First of all, the military would completely fall apart if ordered to fire on American citizens on any significant scale. Whatever remained would be no match for the 80 million armed gun owners and rogue military units now roaming the country.
If it was SO easy to control people who don't want to be controlled we wouldn't still be chasing goatfuckers thru caves in a sandbox 15 years strong.
Many muslims oppose guns because they think they are breeding fast enough to achieve the "demographic take over" and they don't want a monirity armed against them.
Many Saudis oppose American gun control. The aim is to disarm nonmuslims.
Ask him the following questions, in a very pointed manner:
> Why do you want Americans to be disarmed?
> If rebellion is futile, then what are you worried about?
>any revolution would be stopped by the military easily
Yep, no revolution in history has ever succeeded against professional soldiers, much less female/gay/transgendered professional soldiers.
>even in 2000 76% US Muslims voted for Dubya
I'm curious to know where you found this statistic. I suspect it is from the CAIR survey, which was an unscientific survey performed by a questionable source. A scientific survey performed by Zogby gives a 57.5% Muslim vote for Bush. I would guess Bush performed especially strong with Saudis, but I can't find more specific data.
Bush receiving a favorable response from Muslims over Gore in 2000 would be an exception based on those two specific politicians, not the rule.
This PDF is your best friend against gun grabbers. Its got facts and its got the sources listed, trust me, it will save yor life.
As for the military-will-crush-a-rebellion thingy, ask him if Britain and the US ever succeeded in defeating the Taliban in Afghanistan ior the insurgency in Iraq, or how the US had a hard time against the Vietcong.
He's not an idiot. He's an information broker. If you get into a conversation with him on how wrong he is about guns vs. tyranny etc, he'll know who has been thinking this subject through, and who likely has guns and ammo at home.
Looking for statistics, I found something even more telling. A survey was performed just after 9/11, but before the war machine started or Republicans were associated with opposing Islam, which showed Muslims identified 23% Republican, 40% Democrat, and 28% independent. That hardly qualified as 80% Republican voters.
Source (page 6 for 2001): themosqueinmorgantown.com
>Implying all branches of the US military aren't full of would be revolutionaries
Why don't you ask him, pussy
>The American Muslim Alliance estimated that 60,000 Muslims voted for Bush in Florida, a state he won by mere hundreds of votes. “George W. Bush was elected president of the United States of America because of the Muslim vote,” Grover Norquist boasted.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/republicans-muslim-vote-george-w-bush-donald-trump/419481/
60,000 Muslims is not 76%. Try again.
he has been taught than people who wants gun are literally white inbred nationalists.
Say to him:
>We're not talking of army against army here we're talking of a nation's military going against his own people! Would you be able to kill someone who's just fighting for his right? Even if you think he's in the wrong he's still fighting for his freedom. He's in the right, he's the scrappy underdog against the evil empire. But in reality there is no evil empire, many people in the army are pro 2nd amendment and right wing, you really think they'd just gun them down like dogs? And EVEN if you think the government would to to such extreme methods remember that we're talking whole cities eventually being turned against them, sabotaged factories, seized armories, assassinated leaders and captured officials. We aren't a bunch of untrained goat herders guarding oil fields in the middle east, we're Americans and we won't let anyone trump all over our freedom, even id it means fighting our own kind!.
OC pasta, perfavore no steal
>fitting captcha
It was 70%+ on Florida back then, you and I both know what 60000 votes meant in florida against gore don't we?...even Bush's right hand man Grover thought so.
And yes 70-76% was a poll conducted by Care after the election and the GOP didn't dispute that figure at that time, so who are we after 15 yrs?
GOP didn't comment on the CAIR poll because it was unscientific. In fact, the GOP doesn't comment on most polls. However, the scientific Zogby poll showed ~57.5% for Bush. And again, Bush receiving a favorable vote from Muslims was a result of who the two specific candidates were, Bush and Gore, not because of party affiliation.
You have provided zero evidence that 80% of US Muslims identified as or regularly voted Republican. You provided the number who voted Bush in the state of Florida.
I've provided evidence quite strongly to the contrary in the Project MAPS/Zogby poll conducted in 2001, a poll conducted 18 months before 'Iraq Clusterfuck'.
>Is he saying this because he wants Americans to be defenseless against Islam
Yes
In a stand-up battle of course a citizen rebellion is going to get creamed. But you can't tax an entirely hostile populace. And if the rebellious populace is your own, they can cause the military to defect or hit all the soft infrastructure targets that would cripple all those expensive pieces of technology.
*A correction as I forgot about Nader in reading the statistics. Less than 50% voted for Bush if you include those who voted Nader.
Point out how effective the U.S. military, and the former Soviet military has been in occupying Afghanistan.
That article quotes the same non-scientific CAIR survey. Everything else is anecdotal. I've found more on Muslim voting patterns, but they only go back as far as 1992. The exact numbers I find according to MAPS/Zogby for 2000 are as follows.
Bush: 48%
Gore: 36%
Nader: 16%
That's not 80%. Or 76%. Or 70%. Moreover, more identified as Democrat than Republican. This affiliation may have something to do with Clinton, who is widely reported to have carried the Muslim vote in 1996, although I cannot find specific statistics. The following article reports Bush Sr winning Muslims 2-1 in 1992, likely aided by the Gulf War, and Clinton winning Muslims 2-1 in 1996.
foreignpolicy.com
So much for the "reliable Muslim voting bloc".
This.
This nigga lowkey looking to saleel the sawarim.
When both the Jews and Arabs are trying to disarm you in your homeland, then that's when you can reasonably say your land has been invaded by foreign, subversive soldiers.
>Is he saying this because he wants Americans to be defenseless against Islam
just, wow
Muslims think the way to prove they are good citizens are to suck daddy governments dick.
They really don't have any sort of non-collectivist philosophy to draw from. This is the best they can do to assimilate without teaching them stuff.
Why? I want my enemies to be defenceless too, except we're on my fucking soil.
stop posting this image in every fucking thread you post in
>any revolution would be stopped by the military easily
Is that wrong?
how'd they do against some ill equipped afghanis and vietnamese?
