If we can say their are different breeds of dogs why can't we say their are different breeds of humans...

If we can say their are different breeds of dogs why can't we say their are different breeds of humans? If the pitbull is more likely to be violent than the German sheapards is that pitbull not worth less than that German sheapards? If we can acknowledge that then why can't we acknowledge the simple fact that other breeds of humans might be inferior?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=P8UQVPpECZc
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because, all Human are the same.
Biologically.

Because you don't know how genetics and breeds work. Your human 'races' are more like variation of goat colors than breeds of dogs. Like in a selected dog breed there is different colored dogs.

Ask your science teacher.

Scrap that, I had a stroke, disregard the example. But anyway, like said, technically all people are about the same even if there is slight differences.

Except those assumptiona that a pit bull is more violent is incorrect. I've seen violent small breed dogs and large breed dogs. The small ones obviously can't do much damage so their violence is irrelevant. The larger breed dogs are usually less inclined to violence for a multitude of reasons but mostly because they prefer using dominance methods. Of course as with all creatures capable of some thought they can become violent in certain situations or because of previous experiences. Humans are just much more complex in their thought and racial thinking is highly hypocritical as most races view other races as inferior in some way. It's natural tribal thinking and it's only people of higher intelligence and understanding that see these things as primal and outdated.

Caucasoid
Mongoloid
Negroid

Thre different taxons in the human evolution.
We are literally not the same

Not correct. Over the many thousands of years there is variation, as one said earlier of different colored goats. That doesn't mean that that basic structure of a human is different. The brain of all "races" is that same along with all organs. The outer shell is subject to much more variation simply because that is the one that is subject to the maximum amount of stimuli. Simply being darker skinned is a minor trait that allows survival in equatorial environments. The same can be said for people who historically lived on mountains, as they are smaller in stature to accommodate the fact their is less oxygen to support larger body structure.

Not really

There is a lot of caucasian people that look mongoloid or negroid, and vice versa. The interbreeding, as you will, is just too varied throughout the history that it's impossible to distinguish population just by the genetics.

Yeah cause the irish and brits had so much exposure to mongoloid people....

Statistically speaking, poodles bite more than any other breed.

You also have to understand that IQ is a standardized system. Being prepared for a test doesn't necessarily mean you truly understand the questions or that you aren't intelligent. Many highly intelligent autistic individuals test badly but they are considered genius in whatever field they practice in. Of course access to education and the actual ability to attend school or University impacts this as well. Clearly this chart is highly biased against less developed areas. It would have been no different if you tested English peasantry 500 years ago. Comparing nobles to common folk.

They are also one of the most popular breed of dog and usually pampered and spoiled. These things can actually cause aggressive behavior.

>All of you are idiots.

There's is a natural ebb and flow of all societies and peoples. All of this is something that can change on a long and grand scale.

Right now the people posting here aren't being violent, but their ancestors were and the ancestors of those that are were once peaceful.


Nature. Fuck.

So why are niggers(negroid) that live in Africa, still living in mud huts for thousands of years STILL
They are inherently less intelligent and rely on external forces to sustain their selves

Currently people are fucking other ethnic groups more than ever before, so hard to say what the natural flow is. We are probably going towards homogenous human prototype on lightspeed.

Few generations of schooling and and someone powerful enough to rally down the corruption might change things really fast. It's not like africa was fucked by every other country for century and practically crippling big portion of african countries, right?

Statistically racist people have lower iqs. By your logic we have to assume you're a moron. You like to make decisions before meeting people. We can do it with you too.

>Obviously different race to any other ethnic groups

The weak get taken over, that is how its been for every civilization the 150,000 years of humanity.

Let me guess, you're going to bitch about neanderthals being exterminated by homo sapiens?

The IQ had to be adjusted several times because the population in the better countries got better lieflihoods and education over the years.
I mean it's easier to learn if the threat of a warlord cutting of your penis and eat it to gain its power is pretty small. Having a school or food in the first place also helps

>Sam Hyde
Kys, there's little difference in the genes of other ethnicities, they're all people of the same species.

>he believes in IQ testing
You're a moron.

Well, they're inbred monkeys (anglos) so there's that

>they're all people of the same species
No

Niggers skulls are different then asians,whites.

Depends on what areas you speak of. A large portion of Africa is developing. The same could be said for some tribes in the Amazon jungle. Just because a tribe isn't what we considered "civilized" doesn't mean they are unintelligent. They have obviously developed a society and are capable of sustaining themselves. In some ways they are more knowledgeable than you in survival and could probably survive without assistance indefinitely. If you wish to see yourself as superior because you can eat all the hamburgers you want and drink yourself to a stupor so be it. Obviously a true argument against that wouldn't make a difference.

Because we're not dogs.

Fuck off SJW

>he actually believes in Social Darwinism
That philosophy is only correct on the surface, otherwise it's hooey.

>judging based off phenotype
Moronic argument
Not an argument.

You are smart enough to understand that natural selection isn't about strong taking over weak or smart taking over stupid, but who gets to fuck who. Your current homo sapiens has neanderthalic dna in genes, so technically we already got fucked by them anyway. (or the other way around I don't know)

Because almost nobody never breeded people intentionally.

This. anyone who bitches about another race or culture or society being wiped out by any other is just a big pussy who doesn't get how this game works yet. The strong eat the weak. The end.

So? Even among Caucasians there are different skull shapes. The fact we can interbreed is proof of being of the same species. If not then the offspring wouldn't be viable or fertile.

Wrong.

>What are hapas

Caucasians, black people, asians etc are not as different as a german shepherd and a pitbull.

More like a white german shepherd and a black german shepherd with a shorter nose.

Some differences but the same race.

Human beings. Man you need a Biology class.

They are more different actually. Race > breed.

We are able to discuss our advantages over these people through communication across thousands of miles in a matter of seconds. We have running water and sanitation etc. Yes we are way more civilized.

We can, and do, but acknowledge all as human.

Put together a better argument for your edgy racism next time.

Explain how. Faggot.

Holy fucking retard-grammar, maybe you shouldn't have been bred.

Apparently individuals of of European and Polynesian descent.

Heh, this thread is prime example of IQ of post lowering the more posts a thread at Sup Forums has.

>he thinks civilized means better and superior
It's like listening to that one kid brag how he's the best because his daddy bought him a bunch of toys. Pathetic.

Necessity breeds innovation as they say.

It’s really not like that

civ·i·li·za·tion
ˌsivələˈzāSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
the stage of human social development and organization that is considered most advanced.
"they equated the railroad with progress and civilization"
Wow i alnost thought i was wrong for a second and than i remembered what the fucking definition was.

Nature isn't strong vs. weak, it's about those who are most able. "Might is right" is just a fancy phrase a maniac invented and claimed to be backed by science to justify his inflated ego. Please take a Biology class.

Because we made dogs you literal idiot.

/thread - eat dicks

I feel like OP only posted to be validated and clearly doesn't care of anything other than his own opinion.

This same argument can be made against large swathes of the Southern U.S.'s demographic. Highly religious region with low education rates and high drug usage among with teen pregnancy rates that are sky high.

Advanced doesn't necessarily mean good, so wrong again.

Might is right. Let me think about that for a min. Does that seem to be the way the world is run? I believe so. USA is mighty and kills a lot of people. Every one of the worlds largest and most powerful countries got that way and stay that way through the use of "might is right"

Rekd

You're retarded.

Lol iq is the most useless figure

Good is a completely subjective opinion.
Anything can be considered good depending on who you ask i think it is good therfore it is.

Not an argument.

Doesn't mean that's the most sustainable system. I should think that the most sustainable system is the MOST intelligent system.

because there's only one type of OP
faggot.

I think good can be objective if one takes the stance of Compassionate Humanism.

Most want to stay that way and the other reason is no money, and no concept of it

Then allow me to rephrase: it doesn't make us any better. If it did, all the mudhut peoples would've been extinct by now, yet somehow they survive and communicate with each other just as we do. You really need to look at science.

This. And evolution is just not working at specimen level. It works in perspective of populations in several generations at least. One individual life is almost never affected by evolutional factors, their effect is insignifiant

Caring about sustainability.
Grow up. No one does, take what you want be happy die fuck the future you wont be here to care about it.

The USA kills out of perceived necessity, not to assert dominance. For the 127 years that saying's been around and what with all the innovation, shouldn't the weak be non existent by now? Why haven't the strong actually dominated? Oh right, because it's unrealistic philosophical hogwash.

Cannot be arsed going through the thread but, reading your "topic" makes me wanna puke.
Spell check muh?
FAGGOT!

Nothing has any objective value. Compassionate humanism. Sounds ridiculous why would anyone care what happens to anyone else if it doesnt effect ones own life? Stop being such an empathetic cuck.

Better is subjective i feel being able to shower in clean water and fuck clean woman without aids or not being worried about being killed by yellow fever or tigers better yes. Yes its better than living in a mud hut according to my subjective point of view.

Much*

We do. We just call breeds of humans "races".

Not one to /thread my own post but..

/thread

Except that concept forms the basis of what we considered "moral". You can not expect a successful society to thrive without having law

They have dominated look at us we have whatever we want when we want it. what you are forgetting is people with empathy exist and commiting mass genocide to some mud hut people wont happen whats the advantages? Erasing entire populations doesnt garner you a lot of friends with the other advanced super powers.

Races are more like subspecies, not breeds; there are no breeds of wild animals including people, unless you are going to do some eugenic experiments

>If the pitbull is more likely to be violent than the German sheapards

It's not, Achmed.

Seriously?
New muh here?
Fag!

I dont really care of the society is successful only if i the individual am successful within the givin society. The whole world could burn for all i care as long as im where i want to be. You only have to follow morals if they are laws. That you only have to follow them enough to not get caught not following them. They dont really matter.

youtube.com/watch?v=P8UQVPpECZc

Honestly, most of this thread should go over biology some more. Robert Sapolsky is good starting point.

To jest jeszcze bardziej niż kiedykolwiek wcześniej taniej u siebie z tego co pytalem w dniu koncertu na razie jest ok ale nie wiem czy to prawda że nie będzie mnie jutro w szkole podstawowej i gimnazjum i liceum to nie jest tak źle z tym co robi

>better is subjective
Then you've proven my point, because if there's no objective superiority then our advances mean that we aren't superior and they aren't inferior as well as vice-versa, but rather a difference in culture and circumstance.

Honestly, good luck Sup Forumsro.
99% of the thread can't spell, let alone understand biology.
Nice of you trying though.

If even 1 of thousand Sup Forumstards gets into educating themselves even a little bit more because of this, I think it is worth it. (Not really, but let me stroke my ego)

I agree with you but i have my own opinion as well that this os a btter life for me at least and to me they live as savages. But i couldn't really care less i just enjoy the conversation.

It's not much of a conversation, if you are just reinforcing your own ideologies or views instead of trying to look things from completely different aspect, as in what a person you are having a conversation with might have.

Fair play user, good luck!

That's not relevant to anything I said.

Reeeeeee, punctuation /bro!
Do you know it?

Should i care?

You may define this however you like im still enjoying myself

Black people can't produce the oil necessary to make their hair Caucasian like. Therefore they are different

Not saying it's wrong. We are all here for endorphin spikes from chat masturbation anyway.

Obviously you do otherwise you wouldn't be replying to threads. Sounds like you might just be narcissistic.

And thus you've outlined the flaws in your thinking, we're mutual and social (not socialist) beings and it's through our mutualism that we prosper. By joining forces we become more able to survive, it's not a matter of strength or superiority.

Because recognizing certain truths will not better society no matter how true they are

He might very well be mentally ill given a portion of the people here accept philosophy over science.

>why can't we say their are different breeds of humans?
Because it's true, and we have higher values than truth, like equality.

All border collies are descendants of a single English herding dog from the 19th century, but humans can't be different because we only separated a hundred thousand years ago.