All my life i grew up republican though secretly i felt an anger inside. a hatred of so much...

All my life i grew up republican though secretly i felt an anger inside. a hatred of so much. a hatred i couldnt begin to describe.
when i first learned of nazism, i was disgusted yet intrigued. it captured my attention long enough for me to read and study, and i found my hate had taken a new name and form, a belief i found solace and comfort in. then my disappointment set in when i found the ANP was nothing but racists with missing teeth screaming about their southern heritage. where are the individuals? where are those who believe as i truly do? ask a nazi anything. ein volk, ein reich, ein fuhrer

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LQdDnbXXn20
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

OP, whats it like to be a faggot?

pretty average most days, dont see what the LGBT seem to be screaming about

What brand of chapstick do you use after sulking all that dick?

cherry starburst

When you see a nig walking down the street wyd?
Do you work with any of 'inferior races' how you treat them?
In my city most of the nazis just fight each other. One of them even put a pipe bomb in anothers mailbox over a leadership disagreement lulz.
Is this common?

When i see a nigg, i leave them alone unless if they talk to me, in which case ill probably crack a few black jokes but attempt to do so in a way that goes over their heads, which isnt usually to hard, but on the off chance they do get mad, im 6'6 and played football most of my life and still lift, so im not to scared about a scrape. the guys in your town sound like the punks i saw at the ANP who believe racism is the main part of the belief, and are really just angsty teens trying to be edgy

Should all lesser races be exterminated?
Or all whites live separetely from them (and vice versa) and never bother each other?

only those beyond redemption should be put to work. i dont know if id say "exterminate" but maybe put to work for the good of the state and to better the overall quality of life of the majority of the nation. definitely live separately, unless if a white person would want to live in the conditions of the other side. unless the other side started being violent, i dont see why violence should be brought in at the start. theres a reason it is called a "final solution" because the question has many answers

If one on the other side was educated, civilized, peaceful etc... would you tolerate (presuming you had control over it) their existence on the white side?

So do you for real hate the Jews or are they just a group to blame/ pin your hatred on?

if it were up to me id probably approach it how the third reich approached the japanese they found useful. for straight business find a middle ground, however grudgingly, use their ideas, and leave them be, if they insisted on living on the "white side" and were educated, peaveful, civilized, it would depend on the generation to be honest. the first and secon generations id never allow. once the education course set in by the third or fourth, perhaps in a remote "white" area, though it wouldnt be as good as an Aryan area. though my vision of those not in work camps is more of america split, us left to our devices, them left to theirs but abide by our laws and customs and leaders

I'm sorry you feel so angry.

I'm in the same boat as you, OP

do i blame the jews for the loss of WW1 for germany? in part. do i believe they were innocent people randomly chosen by a madman for no reason? certainly not. and i believe hitler knew some innocents were suffering for the larger majority, as we can see of his treatment of jews who were also veterans for Germany during the first world war (as well as austria i believe)
when you read the diary of anne frank, youll notice when the SS finally find Otto, they pause when they find his Werhmacht uniform. they hesitate. this isnt thrown in for suspense, its true. ottos crime wasnt being jewish, it was running and hiding. had he come forth, he and his family may have been thrown in a ghetto, but tell me that isnt preferable to Auschwitz

why? i dont let it affect my day to day to life. i live just as you. i work, eat, sleep, fuck, laugh, cry. the only difference is the thoughts in my head.
i never understood why racism or homophobia is bad. why do you want everyone to like r accept you? so long as they leave you to your own devices, who cares. and if push does come to shove, and i win i was right. im superior. if i lose, i was wrong, and you have won not only a "moral" (in your eyes" victory, but a psychological one as well

Because anger is unpleasant. Exhausting. A pain you cannot soothe.

And to answer your other question, bigoted feelings aren't bad. What is bad is bigoted actions. Because it hurts people.

since the dawn of time there have been the conquerors and and the conquered. we see this with native americans, asians, europeans, africans, any civilization. show me a period of time and i will show you conquered people. not many know that Nazi symbolism and structure (atleast under hitler) was influenced heavily by rome. look at the roman eagle, with the SPQR banner. you will see a stunning resemblance to the nazi eagle. i guess what im getting at is recreating the most successful empire the world has ever seen will be difficult. but isnt it worth it?

theres that word. bigot. 70 years ago in europe half the continent fell in line with my belief. 100 years ago in north america the entire nation of America did. 200 years ago i wouldnt be radical enough. the definition and use of bigot will always change so is there any value to it

though i will admit you are right. there are times i wish i didnt believe as id o. times i wished i saw the world in a better light. then i turn on the news. 13% of the nation commits 50% of the murders. illegal immigration isnt punished, but encouraged. immigrants refuse to learn the language of the people they assimilated with, and cry racism if i ask them to speak english.its gotten to the point i even fucking hate some accents. uneducated. i can forgive someone an accident of race. i cant overlook ignorance and joy in such.

I used bigot because it's a catchall.

You are right that it depends on the culture at the time to create its definition. But of course it has value. Not some objective value. Things are not objectively bigoted or not bigoted. We define that. But it has a current meaning, and that meaning is valid, and it is useful.

The definition of freedom is entirely subjective. But just because it changes from context to context, and through out time does not mean that it doesn't have use and meaning at any given time.

Everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.

If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in each man's life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility. Henry wadsworth.

Not gonna pretend that the idiocy and harm of others isn't fuckin' irritating. But it's worth remembering that basically all people are trying their best. They do not intend harm.

so you like it in the ass OP?

Not a nazi, but I agree with you on immigrants not speaking english then playing the race. I have no sympathy for them. They should be deported, and whoever let them in, fired.

Freedom id give is less subjective, as its an idea. are any of us truly free? we live, and die, in service to a state be it fascist, socialist, or capitalist. our lives as useful as parts in a machine, marching forward. freedom is an idea, and idea worth dying for yes, but an idea still. further, say i have my beliefs and never attack anyone of color all my life, am i still a bigot? if not then the word has no meaning to me, and if i am then why if i have done nothing wrong? if im not free to my beliefs without political correctness calling for me to be hung, then am i free at all?

i want to believe that. i truly, deeply do. at one point maybe i did. but its gone. tell me that if i was dropped in compton right now, a white guy alone at night, i wouldnt get mugged or killed. tell me if i was dropped in the middle east that i wouldnt be killed by the people there. people doing their best has long since passed. look at immigration into europe. sweden is now the rape capital of the world. the land that gave us vikings now teaches vikings were always islamic because of a ring they found. the best has been forgotten. superiority is what everyone claims now.

if people would look past the name nazi, theyd see alot theyd probably agree with

Freedom is far more subjective than bigotry. Bigotry at least has a framework. Hatred of difference. What differences make a bigot depends on the sensibilities of the time, but at least that framework remains the same.

There are countless definitions and interpretations of freedom. And they can be extremely subtle. Like, the libertarian definition of freedom in regards to speech is that anyone is free to speak whatever they wish and that others are not free to stop them. The social justice warrior definition of freedom is to create a situation where a person is free to speak and others are not free to criticize and attack them. Two subtle, but valid definitions of freedom. All we can do is take sides in this debate, because they are both equally valid interpretations of freedom.

I would not describe a person as a bigot. I would describe them as having bigoted beliefs. And i would not begrudge you bigoted beliefs. That would be thought crime. I only stand against bigoted actions. Not because i am against you, but because i am protecting others from your harm.

You might get killed, but it would not be because they hate you. It would be because they want your money. Because they're poor and desperate.

Just because they're trying their best, does not mean their best is very good. Just that they're worth pity.

do me a favor and watch this, its only 4 minutes. at the very least, watch the first two minutes. tell me these 2 men defending their services are bigots, despite they truly believed they fought not only for their country but all of europe

youtube.com/watch?v=LQdDnbXXn20

pity, re-education, placed in work camps... ill tell you which is most effective at keeping everyone else safe. let me say it now i dont dislike you for your different beliefs, nor do i dislike anyone who has disagreed. youve been very polite this talk, and i thank you for it. im assuming youre white, but on the chance youre not youre one of the decent ones.

Not everyone in a conflict fights for the fundamental reason the group goes to war. By far, most of the soldiers of the south were fighting for their states, not because they desperately wanted the right to own slaves.

I don't expect to change your mind. I just hope that i've reduced your anger.

that's what's wrong you let other people down based on unreal arguments and weak comforming thinking simply because of color, there are alot of people from the so called "inferior races" who are actually superior to the majority of whites, or whites who judging by their actions and constant way of life(drugs, criminals, etc) you can pretty much tell they are inferior to other colored people, but even with those behaviors they are a person, usually have a brain, reasoning, and with that you can harm anyone or help anyone

In my opinion, not matter how hard nazis try to be the superior race, they aren't, and by the way aryan people didn't like caucasians back in the 30's as well, so all americans thinking to be a nazi is like some colombian feeling he can support hitler as well

ill agree with you on that, but youll find an overwhelming number of men who fought for the third reich and nazism, not because they wanted to exterminate europe, but save it from those that might harm it.

and here we prove my point. no one is looking to do their best. only to be superior. my family came to america post WW2. my ancestors fought in german army in both wars. aryan blood is mine. maybe thats another reason i find such distaste in the ANP

Here is the typical larping shit that we see all the time. You were never right wing you think these fake incidents will somehow make right wing ppl turn a new leaf. Go away

further ive stated hurt no one, and never plan to hurt anyone. who cares what my thoughts are? i dont care what the lgbt thinks of me so why should they care what i of them? i dont care what coloreds think of me, why should they care what i think of them? needing approval from everyone isnt diversity its a weakness

It's a reasonable goal. But they were, tragically, wrong. Everybody is the hero of their own story.

It's an unfortunate fact that when people do harm, the academically true shortcomings of their beliefs start to gain the meaning hated and negative connotation of their overall goal.

When people describe others as ignorant or bigoted, they spit it with venom on their lips. They are ignorant and they hate them for it.

I do not hate bigots. I don't think they're evil. They just act in ways we cannot tolerate.

youre right. i totally loved obama. absolutely. get the fuck out of here if you dont want a discussion lol

i feel this exact way about certain people. exactly. its actually scary how different our beliefs are, but similar at the same time.

We just have a different set of facts that we believe are true. We're both coming up with reasoned conclusions based on those facts. The question is, which set of facts are true, and which are false. At this time, i am not interested in having a statistics battle. Just in reducing tension. Everyone is more amenable to changing their mind when they are less hostile.

i agree with you on not wanting a full on statistics discussion. their tedious and most often pointless. no one changes their beliefs. in a strange way id say probably both of our beliefs are true. just because yours isnt true to me doesnt mean its not any less true to you. truth, like most things, is subjective to view. just because youre right dont mean im wrong, as that old song says

>wtf
Rome was conquered too, everyone got conquered at least once. Climate, certain animal domestication, certain types of plants, all this could be spread more rapdily over a long distance than other places conditions and lead to faster civilization than other places making them "inferior" and an easy target to conquer. Furthermore, the by far old gap of exodus Erurope has compared to America is about 85,000 years, so there's no reason other than good land and climate luck for "whites" to have developed faster without saying their thousands of years of adventage they have to the rest of the world

I understand you OP. Neo Nazis are degenerate subhuman scum that are an embarrassment to the name. I absolutely HATE them. They worship the doctrines but dont know anything about them or what Nat Soc is. Just a bunch of faggots that hate everyone that isn't white. They are literal scum of the earth.

I see
any reasons why you aryans are "superior"?

when did i say that rome wasnt conquered? i never did. i said it was the greatest empire we've seen. and you know what lead to its downfall? military mistakes sure, but a large part was what we now call political correctness

I actually feel a little bit sorry for nazis in that respect. I totally disagree with them, and i think we ought to fight against them as strongly as the 1st amendment allows, but i totally get the feeling of belonging to a group and then having a bunch of shitheads also in that group. And there are a ton of neonazis who are prototypical examples of not superior human beings. I'm a feminist, and when there are feminists who are complete assholes, i just go, "uggghhh...."

the main belief is aryans are physically and mentally superior. i kind of relate it to dogs. all dogs are dogs. but in a fight if you had to bet would you bet on a full grown husky or a chihuahua? thats oversimplifying it i understand but its the most basic breakdown of how i view it

my point was to show the fact it wasn't that perfect as same as the nazi culture(if we can call it like this) they got conquered too, any conquerer minds will get conquered is almost like the law of attraction

thats why i claimed to be a nazi, not a neonazi. neonazis are scum of the earth, racists to afraid to actually act outside a group. youd find it weird but i dont consider myself a racist, just more of a realist.

There is no room for them. They are the appitamy of what they hate. Degenerate subhuman scum. And I totally agree. I do feel bad for the real Nazis that fought and gave their lives to the cause. Sad this is what's left. But facism and the nat soc ideology is making a come back and a lot of people are starting to lean that way. Hopefully we'll see it in our lifetime.

This.

Language forms culture and gives the framework for all thought. What would be the lingua franca?
Do you stand opposed to technological progress / what would be the ethical boundaries?
What is the stance on eugenics?

I usually select dogs based on temperment. I don't really care what they look like. I occasionally wonder why the nazis were so focused on looks. I mean, i understand that it was just an ethnic cleansing used to scapegoat problems in the state, and that genetics was just a flimsy justification, but in their propaganda they could have focused on temperment and character, but they wanted blond, white, blue eyed people. Odd choice of focus in my opinion.

hopefully the fatherland will give us a sign, though i dooubt it will with merk in office. imagine if germany was still nazi germany ad the arabs flew planes into their towers. for sake of argument lets say they actually did it. i guarantee you the war wouldnt still be on 16 years later

Let's say that someone wanted to throw you in a ghetto right now. Assuming they were capable, would you, once there, just decide that the authority was right based on their ability to enforce your degradation?

It seems like the core of your argument appears to be "other races can be useful and tolerable, but still ultimately inferior", but if you were proven wrong, what would your reaction be?

As well, exactly how did Jews lose Germany the war? It's true that Germany wasn't invaded and definitely shouldn't have shouldered the entirety of the reparations, as they went into WWI reluctantly at best, and could have prolonged the suffering of Europe for much longer, but I don't see where the Jews factor into the loss.

I delineate nazis into citizens and soldiers of actual germany, and neonazis as people who are not german citizens, but agree with most of their ideology.

It's a significantly important point. When i am defending neonazis right to speak on the left-wing politics places i hang out at, the more violent angry liberals are trying to justify violence against neonazis because we fought a world war against nazis, i point out that these neonazis are american citizens and entitled to all the rights of our constitution, which includes the right to speak without worrying about getting assaulted.

was in large because of inspiration from wagner. look at operation valkyrie, wagner was present in inspiration in alot of nazism

>physically
Blacks are statistically the ones who produces more, testosterone, stronger immune systems(according to Kaiser Permanente studies into HIV, Cancer patients)
In sports blacks are often stutied for the famous "Black athletic superiority"

>mentally
Asians are more than stereotipically in fact the race most accepted in today's colleges and universities
Mexicans and cubans have in average the best physicians in the world, with people at really young ages already practicing medicine

Nope i dont think so my dear user

i was more pointing if you had to bet your life on who would win, would it be the larger stronger dog, or the smaller jumpy one, but i do agree character and temperament should be considered

ill answer this in 2 parts, give me a second to type

Take your time. I wasnt expecting to have to work tomorrow so I took an energy drink an hour ago and can't sleep.

blacks were bred for generations to be athletic in america, albeit for reasons outside athletics. look at africans, they arent the same typically. the plan for after the war was to do the same to aryans, whos base was already superior. further, i challenge you to show me any race who perfected warfare more than whites post industrial age. most technology, no matter how innocent, is first military tech. further, id choose an american doctor over any asian or latino

call in sick lmao

German tech is used all over America today. The Nazis were far more technologically advanced than any other nation. If they were still around they would have started building bases on the moon probably. Germania would be the powerhouse of the world.

Wish I could. Have to at least be in for opening, which is the worst part. If I was being asked to close at least I could sleep in.

Unfortunately my friends I'm tired as fuck and must go to bed. I am glad to see more and more people waking up to Nat Soc. Nice thread OP.

>Let's say that someone wanted to throw you in a ghetto right now. Assuming they were capable, would you, once there, just decide that the authority was right based on their ability to enforce your degradation?

well first i dont believe my situation would be similar to ottos. most of the nation believed otto needed to be relocated, while im only in danger in the immediate area, but lets say im in the exact same situation. i do believe i am mentally and physically superior but im not naive enough to believe i could fight my way out of an entire city. id attempt to escape, using any resources or knowledge i may have. if i couldnt escape and my reality was i must live there, id attempt to find like minded individuals.

>It seems like the core of your argument appears to be "other races can be useful and tolerable, but still ultimately inferior", but if you were proven wrong, what would your reaction be?

this is exactly my belief, and im certain other races believe it of me. if i was shown proof i was wrong, at first id honestly probably dismiss it. if shown time after time i am wrong, i suppose id have to rethink my beliefs.

>autisttime.jpg
I actually thought you OP were different from the other racists cunts but I see the same ignorant arguments

here
it was just biodiversity and thousands of years from early colonization what differ europe or "whites" to all races, making them obvious adventage in order to conquering other places since dozens of thousands years ago
>facts

in the 40s the nazis were making tech america couldnt compete with until the 60s, i firmly believe if germany had won theyd have been on the moon in the 50s

if u disagree show me where

are you retard?

>for dummies
whites grew up faster due to easy climate, good plants and a gap from 85,000 years to America

the warfare shit, as other countries were just being constructed Europe already had it's full made countries with concrete economic statuses aand thus got more time, economy and development for pushing warfare to it's limits than countries which by the time were just in plain revolution, other effect of biodiversity from the starting

>As well, exactly how did Jews lose Germany the war? It's true that Germany wasn't invaded and definitely shouldn't have shouldered the entirety of the reparations, as they went into WWI reluctantly at best, and could have prolonged the suffering of Europe for much longer, but I don't see where the Jews factor into the loss

i actually enjoy this question. youll find in germany late into the first world war, on jewish politicians under the Kaiser were willing to prolong the war, yet jewish politicians, many with ties to banks, wanted to back out in order to protect investments both in country and out, and some even predicted a depression would hit after the war, and prolonging the war may make the depression worse. this is part of why i blame them for the loss, they lost patriotism and dedication to their country and became more concerned with their pockets. i could almost forgive this but then

Jewish Bolsheviks murdered 66 million people in Russia.

In response, the Nazi movement sought to destroy Jewish Bolshevism. but this is an entirely different topic

>>>
actually if the nazis would be the superior race mentally and physically they must have won the war but the U.S raped the shit out of Germany with their so believed superior genes and 85k yeas gap adventage
pathetic lol

and i wonder, who built europe while other countries wouldnt be built until generations later?\i sense youre getting angry. i dont see why.

Sadly the identity movement is full of cia infiltrators and hicks. The real movement's online

oh?

europe stoped being nomads before other races man, they found a good place for staying before the majority of races and their earth and climate were easy in order to develop faster

it was almost as if some mental superiority knew that nomadic lifestyles would die out, and the future was in this

OP headed to bed. guten nacht space robots