Start a civil argument with a trump supporter

>start a civil argument with a trump supporter
>he keeps bringing up "Hillary lost" out of bigotry instead of choosing to have a civil argument
why do you sub-humans do this all the time?

Imagine how fucking idiotic you'd have to be to be fooled by Donald fucking Trump, that's who you're dealing with.

Itt, faggots still butthurt over shit that is meaningless.
Keep crying bitches on both sides of the political spectrum.

Your frustrations give me a hard on. Please keep shit posting.

Good point user

See? This is what I mean, you always try your hardest to counter arguments, but you can`t come up with anything, so you result in calling others "faggot", and mock them

Its every bit as bad on the left. Not saying because I'm a Republican or anything. It just seems like you have 5% of the population at the extreme fringes of the political spectrum being deafeningly loud about everything

Nigger ive been calling people faggots prolly longer than youve been alive.

If your upset over trump supporters. Then how bout this.

Stop talking to them faggot.

>Keep crying bitches on both sides of the political spectrum.
I know it's hard to comprehend, but being against hillary doesn't imply being for trump. It's perfectly reasonable to be against both.
Only stupid people believe you have to pick a side.

And for the mass majority that is the case.

And youre absolutely correct on people polarizing themselves like they do. It is pretty pathetic.
Just like how this thread is.

Sage

But thats the rub, its gotten to the point where you can either be one or the other. If you say your against both youd get a bunch of dirty looks and the two other tards will go back to hurling insults at eachother

which is why you don't waste your time talking to them

Yes, yes they do

Why bring it to Sup Forums?
You want the Trump fag containment board

because it's the only thing that matters.
hillary lost.
This is why we voted him.
With hillary, and her retarded plans for a no-fly-zone over syrian, we'd have WWIII by now.
Most people voted for him solely to prevent this crooked, insane bitch from entering office.

And if the DNC is retarded enough to field her again in the next election, you'll get 8 years of trump.

But thats not how healthy political discourse works in a democracy. In fact ignoring people whos opinion doesnt match yours is half the reason why we're in this situation. The Tea Party rose up from those frustrations and has metastasized into the mess we're in now

No it doesnt. Hillary was a no go, even stereotypical demms were not en masse for Hillary.

Youre doing exactly what OP is talking about ya dumbshit

If you dont like it go fap to traps and lolis

and what OP is talking about is a strawmne, refusing to accept our real reasons for bringing up this argument, as you did right now.

Also, treat your butthurt. It's radiating.

There's something lacking about someone whose only adjective is retarded

Sure, dodge the point.
Really supports your argument, if you had one.
Retard.

Lol this.

>whose only adjective
4 adjectives in that post.
2x retarded
1x crooked
1x insane

Your argument is invalid.
Retard.

Can't we just both agree that both candidates were fucking awful choices

Literally who gives a fuck

>be OP
>be obviously buttblasted about HRC losing
>start "civil" arguments w/ everyone cuz so butthurt
>everyone immediately sees your butthurt cuz Hillary lost
>everyone mentions how buttblasted your dumb ass is

gee, lets wonder why your buttmad faggot ass whining becomes topic of every argument

How is stating a fact bigotry?