Ever notice how 80% of people who have problems with trans people are men. Doing it in the name of protecting women...

ever notice how 80% of people who have problems with trans people are men. Doing it in the name of protecting women. Like even online I've only seen maybe a dozen women total complaining about it compared to the hundreds of men I've seen

Other urls found in this thread:

nydailynews.com/news/national/wa-man-women-bathroom-test-transgender-ruling-article-1.2535150
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

women are stupid tell us something we dont know

I don't think there's a single man who would object of a woman in the men's room.

Someone has to protect the nest

Truth

so women wont have a problem with me self identifying as a woman and going into their locker rooms swinging my shlong all around?

As tho women are completely incapable of speaking for themselves. They clearly don't give a shit...

Because that's what transgender people do... You're not politically incorrect you''re just a moron

>be me
>be grill
>always wanted to be a male, but realise that "trans" is a delusional identity
Keep those loonies away from me

at least you can admit its a you problem not a then problem. Now work on yourself rather than making other people's lives miserable

y or n. i should be able to self identify as a woman and use their facilities.
i dont care what trans people do.

I would, they usually hover over the seat and get piss everywhere, then leave it without wiping it up. They also throw used tampons and pads everywhere instead of in the trash, poop on the seats, and then make a mess of the sink with makeup kits.

Fuck women, they stay in their quarantine zone.

If you go through years of therapy and hormone treatments (which requires the approval of a psych after at least a year) then yes.

laws that they are pushing don't require you to be clinically transitioning just merely self identify.

I think that's a croat problem not a woman problem. Because I am a woman and I've never seen that happen

How do you know those complaining are men? Just because they have a penis doesn't mean they identify as a man. You're an intolerant shitlord.

That's simply not true, stop reading all this fox news. They are also passing laws criminalizing these people who have gone through years of therapy and hormone treatment.

Women are children. All this progressive bullshit is just their shit test against the world made by men.

> Gender segregated bathrooms.
I honestly don't care if a woman needs to drop a deuce in the shitter next to me. Why do we split up the waterclosets again?

nydailynews.com/news/national/wa-man-women-bathroom-test-transgender-ruling-article-1.2535150
Washington is simple self identification.

And I am the OP a woman and I can say that is exactly why not a single fucking woman will vote for Trump. Cause he supports dumb motherfuckers like you

lol triggered

i would
have you ever fucking had to clean a women's Restroom?
it's fucking Disgusting

All of you Trump supporters aren't politically incorrect. You're all just collectively stupid and for some reason your all proud of it. Its like watching monkey's play with dynamite.

No but that's because I work in high finance and don't need to clean bathrooms for a living. Oh and guess what I'm a woman, thought my small brain shouldn't have been able to handle that? I'll say that to my 70,000 a year and see what it has to say about that.

I've never demanded LGBT rights, despite being a trans candidate and bisexual; so, how was I making other people's lives miserable?

how many cm does your roast dangle out to now?

oh and the best part is I work in high finance make 70 a year and am only 24

Women want "transgendered" men in the women's bathroom so they can get dicked and claim it's not cheating.

A tranny getting in the man's room wouldn't get beat up, just raise some brows.

So far all the people I've seen complaining about it were older women

>As tho women are completely incapable of speaking for themselves. They clearly don't give a shit...
You are right, but not for the reasons you want.

Women are fucking pigs. They only clean because of social pressure.

And dicks.

And men don't clean at all.

You mean you're afraid they'll see your tiny penis?

24 years old and you still can't manage to not piss on the seat?

Speaking as a grill, while they don't belong in the woman's room because they're not women, I don't think they pose a threat to me. Male to female trannies are usually gay, they don't want women.

Women don't rock the boat, they follow the crowd.

rekt

Shit b8 m8. Should have been more subtle.

That would make it harder to pee.

>I'll just ignore my faults because I don't have to deal with cleaning the mess

Ever notice how 80% women dont have problems with anything???

Thats because women just do what they are told.

Someone please add a 3rd door that's a Therapists office that says "Get help"

I've never conducted a study to find the number.

What methodology did you use to find your 80% number?

I'll say it again:

>This is a fabricated non-issue
>Trans people have been using any bathroom for decades
>Hasn't been a problem till now
>Suddenly its a precarious election year
>Better trot out the wedge non-issues
If you're getting upset over this, liberal or conservative, you're a fucking easily manipulated retard

They aren't women though you stupid queers

Yeah that's totally it, has nothing to do with men being self entitled assholes who think they can do anything they want. Including deciding the rights of minorities that they aren't just not a part of but have been actively oppressing for hundreds of years

...

Please don't use that image; let's try to be as inclusive as possible.

...

The latest incident was a woman complaining.

Anyway, since women fucking want degenerate, perverted men in their locker rooms staring at their daughters, I say allow it.

I think men's bathrooms are globally messier. I've seen few women's bathrooms that look worse than men's next door. Like 1 out of ~10 I've been in.

Okay snowflake.

Are you a virgin?

Except this isn't what would happen. What would happen is exactly the same thing as in 1912, except gays would also get preferential treatment. Men would sacrifice themselves because it would be their duty. The feminists wouldn't mind at the time, but they will later write articles about how they in fact saved themselves and the men deserved to die.

Transgender people are just the p word. You are born with the gender you live and die with. Trans folk are offensively sexist and rude to people who were actually born XXY.

Don't be posting politically correct shit on the board retard cunt

Actually, its very VERY rare for "women and children first" to apply to sinking ships. Maybe 1 in 6 cases.

>being this fucking delusional
How do they brainwash these people? Sup Forums should start looking into it.

Recently I've noticed an alarming amount of Shit posters not wearing the usual leaf or Aus flag...

Trans is a fucking mental disorder. Probably they were beat a little too hard. Look what happened to Japan when it got nuked.

7 sisters here, can confirm.

At least they have some self respect.

It's true that the women and children first principle is very rare, because it's rarely applicable. In most scenarios, the sinking is too fast for survivors to be saved in an ordered manner as was the case on the Titanic. The Swedish-Estonian ship Estonia is a good example of this. The ship sank so quickly that the question of who was to board the lifeboats first never became a relevant question, and after the ship was abandoned, many froze to death in the cold water waiting for rescue. It is hardly surprising that in such cases there were more male survivors.

However, what we were discussing was what would happen if the Titanic disaster would happen today. In this case, the principle is applicable and would apply.

70000? You must live in a city, where that's proportional to your real skill level which would be earning 30-40k a year.

MAYBE JUST SHIT AND PISS AT HOME LIKE A NORMAL PERSON YOU CUNTS

Hm? It has no basis in maritime law. It happened in an 1852 troop transport, on the Titanic, and that's about it. The most recent such crash I'm aware of, the Costa Concordia, had children faring the worst of any.

Out of 18 sunk ships, they did a study that indicated in only 2 cases (the sunk troop carrier and the Titanic) did women get favored. In 11 out of 18 cases, women were disfavored.

So no, in general women are disfavored, rather than favored, in such situations.

>>be me
>>be grill
TITS OR GTFO

And here I just read about some dyke looking girl being yelled at by a woman in the women's room because she thought the dyke was a tranny. I don't think we actually have data on this pointless culture battle that the Jews want to distract you with

>However, what we were discussing was what would happen if the Titanic disaster would happen today.

Probably the same thing as the Costa Concordia disaster. Women are no longer oppressed by the idea that their lives have priority, so men, being stronger in general, would be able to better save themselves; in addition, more women than men would be hampered by trying to escort the children, and since children are nowadays just a vain and kitschy fashion statement, that would further mean more women (and children) would die.

Do you think this is safe?

>three guys in a bathroom is dangerous

What's the point?

The male to female ratio of the number of dead or the number of survivors is a completely useless metric to test whether this principle has any relevance. On the Costa Concordia, 33 people died in total, out of over 4000 on the boat. You can't tell me that's data that supports the standpoint that the "women and children first" policy isn't being followed. Men aged 18-50 have a naturally higher survival rate than any other group. That's why the policy exists in the first place. We're discussing the situations in which the policy is applicable.

Those last 11 words really sum the whole thing up.

Dispite hating the way this progressive nonsense is peddled, I agree that the whole thing is slight of hand. Sad part is, I doubt that there's really anything being covered up. I think it's just distraction for the sake of distraction. The news media just wants to sell adspace, and they're willing to inflame emotional public outcries on both sides so that you'll watch somebody try to sell you a car for 30 seconds.

Can attest to this. Used to clean restrooms at walmart. Women's restroom was always infinity times worse. I'm only slightly exaggerating.

That was not a post requiring TITS or GTFO as she was not attention whoring for being a girl.

Please see pic related

Is the tranny in the pic a man or woman?

And I mean what they were born as, not what they autistically identify as.

>The male to female ratio of the number of dead or the number of survivors is a completely useless metric to test whether this principle has any relevance.

Okay, then I will amend my statement to note that "as far as ANYONE can tell, women and children first applied twice." A historical curiosity at best.

>implying 70k is a lot
Kek

> trannies imply that they might get raped by evil men in the crapper
> totally not heterophobic

dudes dont care if you use the crapper for it's intended function, which is CRAPPING (and pissing) but degenerate trannies and homos usually turn a crapper into a "bathhouse" splattering shit, piss, used rubbers and cum everywhere

i challenge you lefty whores, go into ANY gay club and enter the men's room.

this will settle your hash and end bitches' indifference to trannies in the ladies room instantly.

And the whole issue is fixed.

The only way you get around this is by going full retard and trying to argue that what someone think about themselves overrules scientific fact.

Real men have an instinct to protect their women. Maybe you should move to Europe.

I work as security guard, visiting male and female restrooms is like visiting better part of japan and india respectively. Women are superpigs when nobody sees them.

Ships with women and children in general are a historical curiosity. Even fewer of these sink, and even fewer of these sink in such a manner that the women and children first principle would be applicable. But yeah, let us ignore all the other cases in which this kind of chivalry appears, which is in virtually every single part of society, such as public transport, queues, distribution of food and resources etc.

How the fuck is that a tough decision? Who would ever choose a beating over being yelled at?

As someone who has worked in the mental heath field it is definitely a them problem. Don't get me wrong someone has to give us money, but I'd prefer they had all their "parts".