"Far-right"

Why do leftists get away with labeling every party or person who doesn't support unlimited immigration as "far-right", when in reality, parties like UKIP, AfD or the Finns Party have nothing to do with nazism? They merely want to preserve the immigration practices and national sovereignty we had before the 90s and 2000s.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WDYSQKciM34
openpetition.eu/at/petition/online/neuwahlen-sofort-oesterreich-braucht-eine-neue-regierung
orf.at/stories/2340769/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

If you don't want a bunch of violent mudslimes, they consider you literally Hitler 2.0. They just keep repeating it until they get their way.

By definition anything outside of the approved consensus is fringe and thus "far" on either side.

>national socialism
>right

Aleast in the case of SD in Sweden, they have an actual natsoc background and used to be full white pride 14/88 before "cleaning up" to get public support. Still the leaders are the same as back then more or less.

Just makes them more based to me.

It's a strawman, the left stopped addressing its enemies a long time ago.
Nowadays they just paste a label on a fake you, make some shit up and attack that while the media spread the bullshit.

They do that to let the brainwashed masses know not to vote for those parties

NPD is the only solution for Germany

In the state-funded media:

>the right wing populist Hofer
>green candidate Van der Bellen

TRIGGERS ME EVERYTIME

its meme abusing

It's not really outside the approved consensus though, at least not enough to be compared to fascism. Besides, calling these parties right-wing isn't quite accurate either, since many of them support social democracy.

I wasn't aware of that. It's just one party though, and to my knowledge, Jimmie Åkesson is no nazi.

>jobbik
>not far right

That party supports turkroaches and is full "muh turan, muh huns" and shit.

I'm not familiar with every party in that picture, and it's quite possible that some of them could be legitimately far-right. My point, however, is that most of them are not, yet all of them are labeled as such by mainstream media.

>It's not really outside the approved consensus though
Anything that is not approved by the parties you are intended to vote for is outside the approved consensus, by definition. If it was within the consensus a mainstream party would by definition support it.

When you're as cucked as a European, common sense seems extremist.

FYI . . .the EDL are not a political party, they never have been. They are a protest group set up in reaction to radical Islam, that's all they stand for.

Maybe you're right. (no pun intended) I still object to the term far-right being used, since most people associate with fascism.

>When you're as cucked as a European
>62% white.

That is the intention. Would you inform a bank robber that robbing banks is illegal and that he should consider making a deposit?

so what. they are still far right. nazis in germany also were not outside the approved concensus, and they supported social democracy. future generations will look back at these far right parties the same way we look back at nazis today

Oh I understand why they do it. What I don't understand is how no one seems to object to it, but I guess mass media is just that left-dominated.

I'd rather be 62% white than have 62% of my teeth, Britbong

The media is Power dominated. The only ideology of Power is Power.

There is no ultimate universal leftist evil to make people shudder. There is communism and the Soviet Union, but they were allies for a time and there was no need to continually defame them after their defeat. Far-left does not make people worried, even most mainstream approved conservatives who prefer a slow death to a quicker one and so vote for Cuckservative parties.

There is however, an ultimate right wing evil embedded in the psyche of all westerners, so far-right acts as an emotional trigger.

Modern anti-immigration parties, unlike fascists, do not support militarism or dictatorships.

You got the meme wrong kid.

I think it's way beyond time we moved past the "left" and "right" thing. What the fuck is far right? Is the NSDAP considered far right, even when it nationalized banks? If one European government did that now, we would call it commie, and not without reason.
I truly think the left-right spectre is meant to make people swallow ideological tenets that they don't truly support because of a stance that they adopted due to the ideological tenets that they truly support. And this serves the purpose of polarizing things as much as possible, making for the red versus blue paradigm that one can see in most civilized countries. It's just as that guy said, I think it was Kissinger but I might be wrong. It's all about allowing as much discussion as possible, but only about the things you want to see people arguing about.

>Canada
>Leftypol

Why don't you crawl back into that shithole, Achmed Al-Canadi?

thats because they are already much more armed than germany relatively was back then, through international partnerships with the US and EU

>Is the NSDAP considered far right, even when it nationalized banks?
Banks used to be nationalized until Jewish takeover. Now even central banks are independent.

I saw a lot of "Far right Hofer vs left leaning vdb"

> they are already much more armed than germany relatively was back then

Is this supposed to be a serious argument?

>through international partnerships with the US and EU
But the nationalist parties oppose the EU.

>there is actually a Marxist economics
>Marxists have an economic plan
Nice try.

Jobbik is really full far-right, and are taking a more mainstream turn as of late, trying to turn populist. They had a paramilitia in their earlier days.

But I share the concern. I just looked at the wikipedia article for UKIP, where it states
>Although describing itself as a libertarian party, academic political scientists have instead characterised UKIP's ideological approach as being that of right-wing populism, also identifying it as part of the broader European radical right

What a load of rubbish. No citation for 'academic political scientists', of course. The leftists' smearing of their opponents makes me sick.
youtube.com/watch?v=WDYSQKciM34

if these far right parties were not hosted from the context of safe countries protected by american nukes, they would have just as much of a hard-on for military and defense as hitler did

"lel workers of tuh world unites xDD!!"
"wez revoluton and stuffs"

No.

>Marxism
>still pushing this meme
>in 2016

The worst thing about Marxism is that it makes any sane critisism of capitalism impossible.

Everyone assumes you're a Marxist if you point out the flaws in vapid consumerism, environmental discussion even though time and time again we've seen that socialism yields worse results.

At this point I'm pretty sure Marxism exists solely to legitimise the current system.

It's retarded, since UKIP and the FN have little in common outside immigration.
UKIP are right-libertarian as a party whilst the FN are literally socialists

This.

>LEAF

Dont forget, the left are the fascists

come on sign it and help the austriaa bros

openpetition.eu/at/petition/online/neuwahlen-sofort-oesterreich-braucht-eine-neue-regierung

Being anti-immigration makes you right wing even though economically UKIP was at the same place as the Tories last election. Of course some leftist academics will place them far right.

>SVP
>not the Swiss Democrats

That's an unsubstantiated claim.

Sorry. It's just a picture though.

This: orf.at/stories/2340769/