China deals with spies by catching and killing 20 CIA informants/operatives within China

>China deals with spies by catching and killing 20 CIA informants/operatives within China
>America deals with spies by electing them president and putting them into positions of power

really makes you think.

nytimes.com/2017/05/20/world/asia/china-cia-spies-espionage.html?_r=0

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JJuDNGZx8n8
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surveillance_disclosures_(2013–present)
google.es/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/10/nsa-spying-scandal-what-we-have-learned
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

Trump BTFO

Hey Charlie Chang, if China is so great, why do you live in Vancouver instead?

Samefag

Terry Davis must be pleased

...

Yes, user, people do post in multiple threads.

I wish newfags actually knew what a samefag is (protip: it's one guy pretending to be multiple posters)

>tfw CIA is spying on China for god knows how long
>tfw NYT make it a headline for whatever purpose it served for
mfw discussion on this article is censored on our intranet as usual

>implying any Americans were killed

All of those assets were native Chinese. USA wins again

>tfw CIA is spying on China for god knows how long

Since 1949.

That's correct. China wouldn't execute our agents, they'd probably trade them back for one of theirs that we caught in a spy swap.

As Kim Il Sung once said, "One American life is worth ten Korean lives."

to be honest, it is pretty rude to execute spies
why can't you just send them back?

They weren't Americans, they were Chinese who were on our payroll to give us military secrets.

>NY Times
into the trash it goes.jpg

oh i see
then its ok i guess

do you understand what the word 'chance' means, my friend?

all the polls were within 2% accurate, Trump only won by like 20,000 votes or something miniscule like that

>hurr durr 90% should win 100% of the time
People like you are why casinos are still in business.

>>America deals with spies by electing them president and putting them into positions of power

Trump is not a spy. At worst, is someone else's puppet (Putin, Bannon, Ivanka, Exxon), but is too retard to keep his mouth shut

Hope you enjoy your wall, Paco.

Do you understand what the media establishment is? Do you understand what the anchoring effect is? Thanks to people like you a lot of politicians and pollsters can keep fucking people over.

youtube.com/watch?v=JJuDNGZx8n8

>believing anything MSM says in 2017
that's what they want you to believe, some govt insider on chinese forum said several CIA informants worked for the US embassy in China, they have diplomatic immunity so our govt couldn't do shit but expel them back to the US, and the US returned the favor accordingly. That thread was deleted really quick.

>Do you understand what the media establishment is?

Yes, but that can be said on both republicans and democrats.

And you think a billionarie who scammed people with casinos and universities was the saviour of the west?

>Thanks to people like you a lot of politicians and pollsters can keep fucking people over.

If I had to pick between two evils, I'd pick the one that doesn't destroy civilization and start WWIII

>USA wins
Losing assets is not winning. Intelligence is leaking from somewhere and the US still doesn't know from where.

>And you think a billionarie who scammed people with casinos and universities was the saviour of the west?

Trump isn't ideal. He has an entrepreneurial track record though. There are a lot of hurdles in that game. People bought his work again and again. There is a substance in that you can't eliminate with one or two projects that make Trump look bad and just repeat it over and over again.

I believe when you are outside of the business world all your life and depend on tax money (other people created for you) you get a very distorted view over the long-term. This leads to decisions like Angela Merkel's simply ignoring the borders of her country. Then she had to cover up umpteens of criminal cases by migrants. She still managed to let other people do the dirty work and made herself look innocent. You just don't get such irresponsible bullshit with business people.

>If I had to pick between two evils, I'd pick the one that doesn't destroy civilization and start WWIII

Me too. I honestly don't get what you're implying there btw. Probably because I don't read the "correct" media.

>believing anything MSM says in any year ever
They were liars 50 years ago, only worse because there was no alternative media back then.

The Founders didn't envision an America of career politicians--they thought that your town doctor or attorney would go to Congress, serve a term or two, and return home.

Pay careful attention. A guy like Trump who's already made his money is less likely to want to rob the people. The poor, idealistic radical like Obama is much, much more harmful.

yeah I know, but many normies are waking up in current year, it would be pretty stupid to buy everything media says now

This is a very important part of why China has social restrictions and the great firewall.

Oh and in case you all forgot
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surveillance_disclosures_(2013–present)
google.es/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/10/nsa-spying-scandal-what-we-have-learned

Nigga we all execute spies. It's like the number 1 reason next to traitors and capital punishment.

Even France still can do it.