Redpill me on anarcho-capitalism pol

Redpill me on anarcho-capitalism pol
No memes pls

Other urls found in this thread:

loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/somalia-sharia-law/
tradingeconomics.com/somalia/sales-tax-rate
youtube.com/watch?v=xNC8zoO6QhA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It's fucking retarded
>duh privatize the roads
>get rid of the entire gubbermint!
>regulation is for bootlickers!

Hunger games dystopian fantasy world.

RARE

Isn't private sector more efficient than gov bureaucracy?

no memes
newfag

>Isn't private sector more efficient than gov bureaucracy?

Not at all. Look up Chomsky and get back to me.

Eastern Europe in the 1990s

You literally cannot make an argument that disputes it.

>no memes

See pic. This is what anarcho-cap leads to.

>no memes
>posts the snek

>No memes pls
sorry

So you're saying that people whose best interest is to earn money are worse at doing something than some uninterested lazy fucks that sit in the office and want to get home asap?

not an argument

...

If anarcho-cap works why is no other country other than Somalia a anarcho-cap society?

Let me give you an example:

USA is the only developed nation with universal healthcare. USA has the highest cost per capita spending on healthcare in the world, with some of the worst results. That's all because of the inefficiencies of the insurance industry system we have for healthcare in this country.

Somalia is not ancap....where do you guys keep getting this?

ancap does not equal anarchy. I do understand there is no codified example of what is each minor government alignment.

But Somalia is a failed state, they do currently have a government, its closer to a theocracy than anything else.

Healthcare is also one of the most government regulated sectors of the US economy

>But Somalia is a failed state, they do currently have a government, its closer to a theocracy than anything else.

Amerifat education.

Go back to eating burgers.

>Healthcare is also one of the most government regulated sectors of the US economy

And if we had a single payer healthcare, the cronyism in our system with disappear.

Anarchocapitalism has been done thousands of times throughout history. We just called it feudalism.

>We just called it feudalism.

This guy gets it. Government is the only thing preventing feudalism from taking over.

it's the fedora of governments

loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/somalia-sharia-law/

Yeah, your education is fucking terrible, you can't even do a basic google search.

Look I get it, the Somalia you've created in your imagination allows you to instantly dispel all counter arguments, but that Somalia doesn't exist.

>le feudalism is ancap meme

>somalia-sharia-law

That's not done by a centralized state though. That's done at the individual level. When you get rid of government, the thing that replaces it is religious law.

Anarcho-cap society is basically just a theocracy. ISIS is the most libertarian society on the planet.

See Somalia

you're using a country in which the average IQ is 68 as an example. Therefore not an argument.

What do you have against dildos?

>Leaf

You can live in your disillusioned world. You are basically assigning whatever political ideology you hate to whatever is most expedient to you.
Logic is bereft from your reality.

...

>you're using a country in which the average IQ is 68 as an example. Therefore not an argument.

Again how does the IQ matter at all? There is no centralized state in Somalia. People have free access to weapons of whatever they want. No taxes.

Sounds like a libertarian paradise to me. I thought you all liked that stuff? Oh but it wasn't "real" libertarian society right?

What is real libertairanism if it's not a theocratic feudal shit hole out of the Hunger Games.

One last thing before I am done with you.
tradingeconomics.com/somalia/sales-tax-rate

Somalia has had taxes since 2014.

>You are basically assigning whatever political ideology you hate to whatever is most expedient to you.

How is anything I said wrong?

The people who support anarcho-cap society are religious lunatics. That's a fact. Like those Bundy fucks in Nevada. These are anarcho-cap Ayn Rand cultists.

>Somalia has had taxes since 2014.

Are they enforced?

That's the key fucking point. Is any of that enforced?

At least on the paper feudalism had some sort of social role and people had the religion to at least mold their ethics.

But now, the only thing out here to mold our ethics is money.

>Again how does the IQ matter at all
Seriously? They would be classified as legit morons in the West. So IQ DOES matter.

...

Somalia improved economically at a higher rate than its neighboring countries since its dictatorship collapsed. Having no government served that country better than the government that preceded it.

Belgium went without a federal government for almost two years during the economic collapse, and performed better than comparable European countries at the time.

Somalia was an islamic-socialist soviet union satellite for a good part of the XX century. Without government, its HDI grew faster than neighbor countries, nowadays it has a government again.

In the past decades, Somalia has followed socialist formulas leading to inflation, currency control, yadda yadda, the same as Venezuela is suffering today.

After its government collapse, government generals became warlords to enforce their own kind of law, Somalia actually was split into multiple states fighting for control of the whole thing.

Saying Somalia is anarcho-capitalist, when anarcho-capitalism is based around the NAP, is pretty fucking retarded.

Again still not addressing what I said in the post, only deflecting.

...

>Saying Somalia is anarcho-capitalist, when anarcho-capitalism is based around the NAP, is pretty fucking retarded.

IT WASN'T REAL LIBERTAINISM

What is real liberatanism?

What is it like? Theocracy? Feudalism? Slavery? Hunger Games?

>people who are unmotivated and just want to finish the day
Sounds like your typical office worker.

You can't let morons do whatever they want. LEt alone give them weapons.

I'm as libertarian as the next guy but...
There is nothing stopping an imperialist nation from invading

The Momentary system would be unstable

Courts would be untrustworthy (I don't care how much free market incentives encourage ethical practice. If you could have a court entity forcibly take property through lawsuits, highest bidder arbitration will still be a leading cause of court corruption)

Without government, property ownership would be vary arbitrary

A limited confederacy is the most effective way in protecting Liberty

It's retarded. Minarchism hoever is works.

Better than any and all kinds of socialism.

I believe in capitalism, not so in this anarchist kek kek capitalism.

You seem to think that these are the same. But if you want to ask a thing from a nationalistic capitalist, Do feel free.

>There is nothing stopping an imperialist nation from invading
Private armies, mercenaries
>Courts would be untrustworthy
"Anarcho-capitalists counter that this argument is circular, because monopolies are artificial constructs that can only be maintained by political immunity to natural market processes, or by perpetual provision of superior quality products and services. Unless competitors are prevented from entering a market, the profit incentive, which is fueled by constant demand for improvement, proportionately draws them into it. Furthermore, as demonstrated by the medieval systems in Ireland and Iceland, treating the right to justice as a property means that it is sold - not purchased - by victims."
>Without government, property ownership would be vary arbitrary
NAP

>Belgium went without a federal government for almost two years during the economic collapse, and performed better than comparable European countries at the time.

This was during the €uro crisis. I don't usually support laissez-faire -policies when it comes to deregulating on grander scale but when there is a sudden economic fluxuations the wisest policy is usually to do absolutely nothing and see if the economy will fix it's self as it usually does. Implementing economic policies and cuts while panicking is in all likelihood the worst possible thing to do which is exactly what the rest of euro-zone did and why their pretty much fucked while those who did nothing bounced their economies pretty much back to their previous levels or even started growing.

Don't try to fix it if ain't broken.

literally not an argument

I'll bite, what's "nationalistic capitalist"?

...

Well, are we talking about libertarianism or anarcho-capitalism, make up your mind.

For libertarianism, private property must be protected and contracts respected, neither of those happen in Somalia. Libertarians (minarchists) believe the state must take care of that and exclusively of that.

For anarcho-capitalists, the NAP must be respected, now, in order to achieve a society where the NAP is respected the economy must be either prosper to begin with, or at least let it act for a couple of decades if the country wasn't prosper initially. Obviously, if Maduro died tomorrow and Venezuela became an anarcho-capitalist country, you wouldn't be able to say that their demise is anarcho-capitalism's fault. Somalia inherited shit from the time they had a state, and turning shit into gold takes fucking centuries of progress, and it certainly can't happen if every time the country begins progressing a new state forms. Somalians are not anarcho-capitalists, they are thieves and communists fighting each other, quite difficult to build an anarcho-capitalist country when nobody in the country even knows what it is.

Yes it is. Even if the private sector was only as efficient as government, government still needs to pay the bureaucracy as well as whatever private company is contracted for the job.
Also, since the cost to government is socialized, there is no incentive to save money or choose the best company for the job.
Oh, and if government sinks millions into a worthless project, the government simply continues going into debt, and cannot therefore be outnumbered by a more efficient body.

This faggot doesn't know what he's talking about, and Chomsky is the biggest fucking cuck known to man.
Let me know if I got anything wrong

out competed*

>libertarianism =/= anarcho capitalism
fuck off

Mmmmmm

feudalism

>private armies and mercenaries
A free market wouldn't have enough incentive to raise/train an army great enough to fight an imperial force and companies within the ancap society would likely invest in the imperial force to expand profits
>NAP
Also arbitrary. NAP is a good principle to base laws off of but not not effective if not backed by a central authority

>I'll bite, what's "nationalistic capitalist"?
Say, buy electricity from finnish companies. instead of importing gas from Putin's Russia.

>any court system
>not backed by political immunity

...

>medieval systems in Ireland and Iceland
>comparable with modern day arbitration

>A free market wouldn't have enough incentive to raise/train an army great enough to fight an imperial force

Neither would a state in most cases. There are a shitload of countries that could come knocking tomorrow in here and invade, yet for some reason it's not happening.

Pretty sure that if we were allowed to have guns we would offer way more resistance than with a state.

Besides, saying that free market doesn't have enough incentive to raise an army...have some altercation or a threat from another country and see how I become the richest man in ancapistan.

>Also arbitrary. NAP is a good principle to base laws off of but not not effective if not backed by a central authority

Why?

...

I'm pretty sure Malta is protected by the UN. Ancapistan would not seek such protection as they would not have a representative body and that the UN would require citizens of Ancapistan to play by their rules since Ancapistan would have not soverenty.

Nobody is required to live under the NAP principle so a society of pirates and criminals could form a society parallel to the rest of Ancapistan. NAP would not be universally accepted unless there was some universal power that recognized and upheld it.

No*

Libertarianism encompasses a whole variety of political ideologies btw (not just ancap)

Nap would be great if we just say Georgia and Ukraine was something the fucking russians deaät with it.

>implying the government isn't the feudal Lord

>anarcho-capitalists will never, ever be able to refute this

...

...

...

How well can your identify arguments?

What are you advocating for? I think there is a communication error.

UN intervenes everywhere in the world against threats, a country invading a peaceful country is a threat to everyone.

>Nobody is required to live under the NAP principle

This is false, in anarcho capitalism, private law enforcement companies set up competing law frames, the decentralization leads to optimization, and the most optimal one is as always the NAP because it allows for a bigger prosperity.

Anyone living outside of law frames or being part of a minor law company is called an outlaw, and they are totally unprotected against theft and other crimes.

A society of pirates and criminals could try to form, but private companies would defend their customers and their resources would be way bigger, criminals are always small-time, if you can organize enough power to subject a country to your force, you'd probably be richer using those efforts and management skills in trying to serve society in the free market. If a company forced you to buy their burgers, McDonalds would come and rape their asses because serving society is more profitable than being a tyrant against them.,

...

#Maga
I vouch for Trump vs Hillary debate.

>ancap does not equal anarchy.

DUDE IT EVEN HAS ANARCHO IN ITS NAME.

It also has capitalism, and capitalism needs private property and contracts respected to happen.

asking for actual knowledge on any topic on a homosexual indonesian slave trading sight

just

Because its is Based on Nature way of making things that works for BILLIONS of Years ! and it is called ANARCHY starting with the letter A like ACE !

Government is a feudal lord you get to re-elect him or elect a new feudal lord. This is democracy.

In anarcho-capitalism you won't have possibility to do even that. Same with libertarism.

But it is impossible for the moment cause you all so fucking dumb and degenerate we cannot implement it without a total whipeout of the human race..sorry try DIRECT DEMOCRACY 2.0 NOW !!!

Didn't you make a criminal case from a man disagreeing with feminists?

I kind of want to agree with you, but seriously. What the fuck.

Oh god who seriously believe in this.
Do libertarian really think people are reasonable, have you see how many obese there is in usa?
It's not on your best interest to be so fat but a majority choose that way.
W-Why? I thought people always do what it is in their best interest!

>sight

Anarchy is based on Chaos and Chaos is the god of gods.. Also called Entropy it is the foundation of every and all systems..

it's actually failed communist state

You have a limited optic bias .. you need to see things from out of the box Anarchy are not for dumb peoples Anarchy are for highly educated peoples who go outside of there home some time to see the world as it is..

In libertarianism you quit your job and go work for another company, voluntarily. In Ancap you do the same but you keep all your money because no taxes and you only pay for what you need

How much of that obesity is caused by government programs enabling them and government intervention in health-care providers forcing them to socialize costs between their customers?

The moment you realize being fat is killing you and there's no safety net, you change or die, but with government you don't need to change.

...

Anarchy is just a term to let people know that you are ignorant about politics and basic human nature.

>Anarchism is good
> Entropy means all degenerate is good.

What. I don't even believe the higher power,
but you want to fuck him up too.

>How much of that obesity is caused by government programs enabling them and government intervention in health-care providers forcing them to socialize costs between their customers?


Zero or close.(in fact gov program permit to reduce the obese %)
Most people have a job and a assurance in usa.

What is your point i don't understand.

I said people are unable to know what is good for them

Always depend on your Optic .. if you think GOD is a living being like you and me you may be desapointed.. GOD is a frequency like a radio frequency a sinusoidal wave length.. Probably something similar to the golden ratio .. youtube.com/watch?v=xNC8zoO6QhA