What's the endgame here?
Been noticing lots of anti online-harassment stuff in both the UK and US media, and we all know that the powers that be don't really give a shit that some second-rate feminist comedian is getting insulted on Twitter, so what's the real reason this stuff is getting pushed forward? Pathway to tighter internet restriction or something?
> tighter internet restriction or something?
obviously
it's the same deal with "internet" addiction and those chinese internet/gaming detox centers
To shut places like this down. Using the internet will require a government ID.
Helps maintain the female victim illusion, enabling feminism (and progressive movements generally) to gain strength and further divide white men from their women.
They want to take away freedom of speech. There's going to be hate speech laws soon
This makes me so fucking mad I can't even contain myself. I don't know why, but something about the idea just makes me want to shoot up a fucking school
they are falling to preassures of the proxy lobbyists
He's an avid statist. Virtually every segment involves some call to action, for people to whine to their legislators, in order to grant the government more power.
What is the deal with that? Weren't those people really addicted?
If hate speech is so bad someone should tell people to stop hating on whites before they turn against all the non-whites again and fuck the whole world ... again
>shoot up a fucking school
That's very interesting Anonymous
Would you be so kind to tell me your location?
>To shut places like this down. Using the internet will require a government ID.
I am familiar with the concept, but the poster seemed to imply that the addiction wasn't real or that there was an alternative motive to those centers.
ah sorry senpai
Evalion is the new Canada.
Except she gets ignored more somehow.
An internet where you can say whatever you want is not good for traditional media which tries to control the message.
>Implying it doesn't already
>having an ip address is government ID
fám
The end of anonymity. Meaning consequences for everything you say and do that don't fit the narrative of the powers that be.
They want mandatory online IDs. They want to force everybody online having to use their real name when using Facebook/ Twitter/ etc. That stuff is already happening in China and politicians in the West would love nothing more than those same laws here. Right now this sounds unbelievable and far-fetched, which is exactly why you need these stories to be pushed, to make people feel unsafe and like the internet is just lawless insanity that needs more government oversight.
Are the glory days of Sup Forums really over la?
Sup Forums's glory days were over nearly a decade ago senpai. We're just circling the drain now, getting in a couple good shitposts and a few more memes while we wait for the end. But don't worry, we still have time to enjoy what's left.
>Sup Forums's glory days were over nearly a decade ago senpai.
>what is oregon shooting
Essentially, they're slowly and carefully getting us used to losing free speech. They're conditioning us. We're lose our liberties to protect peoples feelings (or so they would have us think), it's happening everywhere. People in Canada have been arrested and gone to court over arguing with women online, and schools in alberta don't allow you to use mother/father or his/her in letters. Or maybe I just watch too much Alex Jones...
The end of the internet's wild west days before they could truly begin.
>my son isn't studying 8 hours per day
>we tried beating him and yelling at him but nothing is working
>better put him in state prison re-education facility for a few months
is how a lot of this works; parents treat their kids like shit, kids shut down / go into vidya, parents freak out and think they're addicted
the kids probably genuinely need help in a lot of cases, but only because chinese culture treats children so badly
Sup Forums died when they banned raids.
Problem with this so called "hate speech" is how does one determine what's hate speech? From what I've seen online and youtube vids of sjw's, feminazi's etc is anything that someone disagrees with or gets triggered by can be construed as hate speech.
"Hate speech" is WAY too general and near impossible to determine what is and isn't in that category.
Hate speech is free speech, threats are not. Saying you're going to rape and murder someone is a threat.
Honestly these fucks on tv and the media just need something to fill space. And politicians sometimes need something to do so they can pretend to matter.
Enter needless governing.
i got arrested for online harassment but wasn't convicted of anything AMA
BEADY
What ended up happening? What did you do?
I really don't get why the first amendment doesn't just immediately invalidate any of these accusations.
I had a temporary restraining order put on me as did 2 other people for supposed online harassment in Washington state. The judge threw it out as the proof was bullshit cherry picking and freedom of speech.
The same 2 girls who pull the PO showed up to a town meeting 2 days later. It was total bullshit for a month. I didn't even know who the person was until the court date.
Your rights end where their feelings begin.
I insulted a girl for calling and haranguing me about being a "white boy" and that's why I couldn't get laid and I had to go to court but she didn't show and I got off as innocent.
I'm pretty sure her uncle was a cop or something
>It's a post 2012 fag speaks on things he doesn't know episode
Is it time for an oldfag pissing contest? Girugamesh, etc?
they're using online extrene "hate speech" aka trolling/cyber bullying like in OP pic as an excuse to create "anti-trolling" laws, which will be abused to limit free speech and censor anyone critical of the establishment and the SJW agenda.
See Reddit as a prime example. Those critical of European mass immigration are getting censored, banned and shadowbanned left and right, under the guise of "hate speech". Then when you read the comment, you get the impression that everyone agrees with the mass immigration, since anyone critical has been silenced by the mod drones.
An entire subreddit called Europe (equal to Sup Forums board) got shut down because admins felt the posters were promoting hate-speech, calling them skinheads and stormfront faggots, while all it was was Europeans frustrated by the immigration problem.
The media have been going crazy at "näthat" (net hate" over here for some while now.
It's just trying to control the opposition. But it will never fucking work.
bingo, they need the masses to get used to being afraid of government. More censorship more fear more power
Is it time?
>call what are actually threats of violence "hate speech" because it happened to some abloobloo poor minority even though it would be treated like simple threat through existing channels if it happened to anyone else
>equate speech with violence
>we need more laws because hate speech and threats are the same even if it doesn't contain any threats POC ARE THREATENED WALKING THE STREETS EVERY DAY ITS REAL TO THEM
>limit speech
Bootlickers never change.
Ironic because BLM-kiddies threaten to kill or make jokes about killing Zimmerman, Wilson, etc on a near daily fucking basis.
>But it will never fucking work.
it is working. Google "group think". They are literally brainwashing people on big social networks like Facebook and Reddit by shaping what they see and what they don't see.
If all Germans were exposed to the uncensored truth, they would rebel instantly.
She'll always Sup Forums my queen
>oy vey we can't have all this free speech
>we're taking it away to protect you, trust me
POST 03 FAGS GET OUT
Shows like pic related also don't help.
>very first episode is about a gang that kidnaps babies and sells them in secret online auctions
I can see older people being scared shitless watching this and support more controls.
didn't boxxy cuck moot tho?
>Girugamesh
>oldfag
You'd like to think so, wouldn't you? The fact is people know things are shit. No one wants to fuck up their life by ending up in maximum security for the rest of their lives.
People aren't as brainwashed as some make out. They know the score - they're either too cucked or just don't give enough of a fuck to risk death by cop.
That bitch is from 2009. I wish I had my old laptop so I could start Zoe posting.
NEDM?
...
Was the rumor yeah
Its a excuse to censor everything even more, freedomfag
*coburn intensifies*
itt: people who dont
THINK
H
I
N
K
...
>People aren't as brainwashed as some make out.
That's true. But the problem is that they don't know how many of them aren't brainwashed. Through censoring and selective promotion, social networks give not-brainwashed people the impression that they are the minority, that they are the outliers, while in actuality they are the vast majority. This is exactly what is happening in both Germany and Sweden. The average white German is very anti-immigration, but they are shamed into staying silent about their beliefs.
Its scary, but it's working. A massive population with the potential to completely overthrow the government will go extinct thinking that they never had a chance.
Sup Forums became shitty around 2008 - 2009 when people started to get arrested for raiding lulzcows. Even with the "no raid rule" in place, it's easy enough to change IP so no raidfag gave a shit.
The feds ruined this place. There are no real lulz to be had on Sup Forums anymore. Lulz turned into lel then into kek and now finally cuck.
Well your ISP does track all your online activity and keep it in a log. That way, if you're ever caught doing naughty things like distributing kiddie porn or joining ISIS, the government has a way to prove it in court.
Of course, ISIS and pedos are using the deepweb from an encrypted connection anyway, so it's not really hurting anyone dangerous.
lel deepweb
Just looked it up. That's a bit before my time.
Little babies have a problem on the internet. Rather than dealing with it they gaze up at the big brother government to help them out.
Then why are you still here? Why not stop whining and fuck off?
...
Deepweb is a real thing. Google it. Maybe even fire up TOR and check it out yourself.
Why are you so angry, you dumb babby? I'm still here because it's still an alright place to chat anonymously about politics. Sup Forums has changed a lot, though, and is basically a softcore, cucked version of its old self.
A fucking decade. That's all it took.
As a child, I have no idea how may times I heard, "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." Cartoons, school, parents, books, everywhere. It got said everywhere. I even resented it a bit, too, because I was a gigantic pussy at the time.
A fucking decade is all it took to go from that to this. Fucking hell, man.
Download TOR browser and goto
bqktpwi2fhcvh6ri.onion
This. I remember when the entire concept of cyberbulling would have been laughed at during the early days of the Internet. It helped keep the lamers out.
it's called
>libido dominandi
the lust for power
There's theoretically a difference between being brainwashed and being afraid to speak out because you'll lose your livelihood and freedom.
In practice, though, it works out the same. I'd say there are less brainwashed people, and way more who know what's what but cannot speak out publicly.
What governments should fear most are people who no longer have anything to lose. They won't be able to silence them anymore.
Europe is in the process of de-nationalizing, breaking down the ethnic nations into mixed peoples in states based on civic, not ethnic, nationalism. This is why it's important to bring refugees into Europe. Europe already does a poor job compared to USA and Canada in integrating immigrants. Hate speech will be cracked down on to help integrate the new population.
>Europe already does a poor job compared to USA and Canada
get off your high horse, burgerman. We do much more to integrate immigrants, but it's futile as the immigrants have no intention of becoming part of our culture. That is the difference between our immigrants and yours.
Reminder that the European mass immigration is sponsored by American jews who hate the white race.
This particular issue really isn't about hate-speech per se, it's actually about convincing women to give up *their* anonymity online. The system needs women to want to be online, click the links, buy the products, and give up their information online.
It's unfuckingbelievable that Mr. Current Year references Amanda Hess. Alone at the sadly defunct The Last Psychiatrist called out her bullshit a couple of years ago:
thelastpsychiatrist.com
A brown kid in Denmark is always going to be an outsider. Not so here, Americans don't have a race, we're just American. Anyone can come here, become a citizen, and enjoy civic pride. Not so for European countries. But don't worry, that will change over the next 20 years or so, and you'll be just like us.
This. It's that simple. Control the flow of information and reduce ethics divergence.
You have no idea what you are talking about. It's a clash of cultures, not a clash of races or skin colors.
There is no comparison between the immigrants of America and those of Europe. Hell, your biggest problem is that your immigrants are "stealing jobs". We can't even get ours to work.
>RO aegis/athena map, char and login server cmd prompts on desktop.
Where has the time gone?
Hear me out.
restricting the internet is a good thing if we can take advantage of it. No more porn, no more bread and circus, no more places like this where every idiot can spout their opinion (after all, democracy being degenerate is one of the first redpills).
Yes leftists are trying to lock down / de-anonymize the net to shame right-wingers. But why don't we focus on taking advantage of the inevitable death of online freedom to shame them back?
Imagine a system where you would be able to request an internet history of your spouses legally?
Bam, no more associating with whores, you know who's been fucking Chad on Tinder. Also employers could refuse to hire porn addicts and closet fags. Leftist businesses are easily identified by their hiring policies
>No more porn
gtfo kike shill. You're part of the problem.
Clearly people like you don't give a shit about real internet freedom. You're perfectly fine with giving away your info to kikebook and the NSA. You only protest when your porn gets cut off. Loser. You were never free on the internet.
You're a really sad fuck....
definitely someone who needs a strongman in a funny hat to control his life
t. Stellaris
Too afraid people will find out what you fap to and traditional women won't want to marry you?
Jesus, where did you get all those assumptions from?
In my ideal system, the information would be encrypted to third parties (strangers and the government). Only those engaging in contracts such as marriage, employment or parenting will be able to vet the other person's browsing habits.
If you're ok with degenerate porn, better find a girl who is too (there's plenty) and they won't even care. But don't go looking for pure traditional females if you're a hypocrite.
Clearly, porn is on the top of your list of "freedoms"
If you'd complain about abuses by the government, or politically incorrect speech being censored, you'd have a valid argument. "muh porn" isn't a valid rebuttal.
Besides, what I'm proposing IS NOT a ban on porn. It's a decentralized solution. People who don't want to marry a porn addict will be sure of it, and likewise you'll be able to find out if she's a slut or tumblrina
This one's obvious - loss of anonymity and greater government policing of speech
It was a joke, you autist. Calm your tits.
sorry. This exchange pretty much proved though how anonymity can be a problem because it prevents genuine communication. It's hard to tell who's joking and who's not. This is a reason why anonymity is a form of subversion in a way.
imagine if the entire Web was moderated like Neogaf my friends
>Limiting frees speech.
Go uncuck yourself you Clinton supporter. The only instance the internet should be silenced is for taking down websites that threaten national security.
in the united states its a non event. we have freedom of speech as a constitutional right. disagreeing with some one isnt harassment . the feminist tried to get some guy in trouble for doing nothing more than that and failed
the shock to the collective feminist system was so great it made anita look more like a merchant and get diabetes
>anonymity can be a problem because it prevents genuine communication
Actually it's the exact opposite, stop tooting your own horn.
yes. that is what they are trying. Wide open free internet is the only chance humanity has. If we can spread information freely we can grow. Cells in your body that fail to communicate properly with other cells are called cancer cells. We are not cancer here. (sadly pretty much only here)