How smart is Sup Forums?

How smart is Sup Forums?

50%

That depends. Are we doing this in zero gravity?

H - heads
T - tails

HH
HT
TH
TT [ruled out]

>1/3

Any other answer is literately retartet.

and in a vacuum

>given that at least one of them landed heads?

Are u srsly retarded?

HH
HT

>1/2
>50%

kek we got a retard over here, guys.

33(1/3)% chance.

It's a condition, it didn't happen yet, it has to happen to satisfy the criteria.

25%

33.333333%

Ffs. No cuckboi

HH
HT
TH
HH

Both have two sides, if you're gonna count all combinations you can't just skip one, even if it's the same.

or TH

1/3.

think of it this way
you flipped 100 coins.
99 landed heads, what's the chance the 100th will ALSO land head?

>yet

Means it is going to happen = 50%

I'm half asian don't even test me

Non zero according to quantum mechanics

Retard. he left out TT because at least 1 coin landed tails, ruling out TT as a possibility.

The otehr outcomes are all possible and EQUALLY probable

HH
HT
TH

HH is 1 of those 3.

1 of 3

1/3

When we threat both coin flips as one event:
33%
When we threat them as two completely different events:
100% for the one, and 50% for the other

you forgot both coins can be the one that hit heads so;

HH
HT
TH

1/3=33%

Not the same question, retard.

Ask yourself;

How many outcomes for a 2 coin flip contain at least 1 heads?
Answer = 3

How many outcomes for a 100 coin flip contain at least 99 heads?
Answer = 101

You fail at basic conditional probability.

Answer = 1/3

You're a moron and people should laugh at you.

1/3

Question is vague. Should be either "has landed heads" or "will have landed heads." 50% if former, 33% if latter, as explained by anons above.

No, you're retarded. It's 1/3 both ways.

Except HT and TH are the exact same thing.

2 possibilities.

50%