How smart is Sup Forums?
How smart is Sup Forums?
50%
That depends. Are we doing this in zero gravity?
H - heads
T - tails
HH
HT
TH
TT [ruled out]
>1/3
Any other answer is literately retartet.
and in a vacuum
>given that at least one of them landed heads?
Are u srsly retarded?
HH
HT
>1/2
>50%
kek we got a retard over here, guys.
33(1/3)% chance.
It's a condition, it didn't happen yet, it has to happen to satisfy the criteria.
25%
33.333333%
Ffs. No cuckboi
HH
HT
TH
HH
Both have two sides, if you're gonna count all combinations you can't just skip one, even if it's the same.
or TH
1/3.
think of it this way
you flipped 100 coins.
99 landed heads, what's the chance the 100th will ALSO land head?
>yet
Means it is going to happen = 50%
I'm half asian don't even test me
Non zero according to quantum mechanics
Retard. he left out TT because at least 1 coin landed tails, ruling out TT as a possibility.
The otehr outcomes are all possible and EQUALLY probable
HH
HT
TH
HH is 1 of those 3.
1 of 3
1/3
When we threat both coin flips as one event:
33%
When we threat them as two completely different events:
100% for the one, and 50% for the other
you forgot both coins can be the one that hit heads so;
HH
HT
TH
1/3=33%
Not the same question, retard.
Ask yourself;
How many outcomes for a 2 coin flip contain at least 1 heads?
Answer = 3
How many outcomes for a 100 coin flip contain at least 99 heads?
Answer = 101
You fail at basic conditional probability.
Answer = 1/3
You're a moron and people should laugh at you.
1/3
Question is vague. Should be either "has landed heads" or "will have landed heads." 50% if former, 33% if latter, as explained by anons above.
No, you're retarded. It's 1/3 both ways.
Except HT and TH are the exact same thing.
2 possibilities.
50%