Guns don't kill people; illegal Mexican immigrants kill people. Prove me wrong

Guns don't kill people; illegal Mexican immigrants kill people. Prove me wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

gunviolencearchive.org/reports/number-of-gun-deaths?sort=desc&order=# Killed
gunviolencearchive.org/
abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/FedCrimes/story?id=6773423
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Youre right op. But where did they get those guns? Was it the us government?

idk where they got/get them. myriad sources no doubt

the vast majority of those myriad sources being illegal

I do recall obama giving them guns to try and "track" them down.

White Americans kill people Hmmmm

Barry and Eric had novel ideas about all kinds of things.

Keep the gets coming

Other countries with guns don't have so many problems with mass shootings. It's Americans that are the problem.

We should have more guns, to kill all the Americans

sure, of course. you're getting the hang of it user

>We should have more guns,
agreed
> to kill all the Americans
Go ahead and organize and make an effort. I encourage it. Rounding your lot up for extermination would be ideal

Those mass shootings are live training exercises. But they wont tell you that on the news. They want good ratings

...

>itt white not being able to own to killing children at school with legally obtained guns.

go away alex

your post is not only a non-sequitur, it makes absolutely no sense. Congratulations.

You guys are afraid of the truth. And thays why theyll always get away with these things

...

Guns don't kill people, people who say "guns don't kill people, people kill people" kill people. With guns.

probably some proportion; agreed. presumably you're not stupid enough to believe that guns are the problem....

Isnt it technically the bullet that kills people?

>Itt white poeple shoot children at schools with legally obtained fire arms ,but blame everything on mexico.

monkeys kill people too... if they have a gun, so maybe the gun is the problem

No, it's the acceleration...like radiation

No no, we blame the jews

This "argument" is invalid because it starts with the false premise that gun control means banning all guns.

It's also just plain low quality bait. I don't have a pic of bait this poor in quality so you'll just have to imagine it.

ohhh boy this meme again.

why not a fork?
>ban forks to mitigate monkey murders

you're incredibly naive, incredibly stupid, or both.
typical democrat voter

dat alliteration doe

defending a life and using a gun for it, is a flawed logic in itself. defending yourself in a situation means defending yourself with the necessary force, but nothing further. walking around and shooting someone with a gun is maxed out to the extreme. the possibility to kill someone snatching a purse or for drunk hollaing at your gf is not necessary but forced to the exreme.
>defending yourself with a gun = deadly force aka murder =/= defending
>if you have to rely on a gun to defend yourself means you are a bitch ass nigga without common sence and gay thoughts for gunblazing cowboys
>you are the walking, talking fanfiction of the NRA
>living in somalia as a pirat

>defending a life and using a gun for it, is a flawed logic in itself
stopped reading after this. shit tier bait

That's shit logic that assumes its own conclusion.

>i have a premise
>an argument based on that premise tends to support that premise
>therefore my premise is true!

And dumb faggots like this think they're the smart ones...

But if he throws enough bait in the water he will get plenty of bites.

Poor fool, probably a community college stem major indoctrinated by the left. Thinking he has logic and reason on his side because he passed a few basic math and physics classes.

and that´s why america has more gun violence than any other first world country.
>stopped reading
>making assumptions
>calling someone uneducated based on subjectiv thoughts
...must be the mexicans

How can an 80 year old defend himself against a 25 year old without a gun? How can some wimpy manlet like you defend himself against Tyrone Niggercock?

majority of gun violence is committed by the disenfranchised for the purposes of making money through crime, to solve this issue we need to legalize drugs, increase funding for addiction treatment/care and get young kids in these situations into programs that give them a chance to get out of their shitty situation

You fuck right off with your logic, sir.

Sure buddy. Lets just do things that make sense. Stop trying to solve problems and just agree with my opinions that lack any empirical evidence.

gunviolencearchive.org/reports/number-of-gun-deaths?sort=desc&order=# Killed

Actually, the vast majority of "gun violence" in the US is self-inflicted for purposes of suicide.

>Black-on-Black crime is committed by Mexican immigrants

>Industries don't do modern goods
>cars don't get you places
>telephones don't make you capable to avoid waiting days for a letter for simple things
I really don't understand people make that statement like op

Unless you're a nigger, then it's most likely another nigger will kill you

I wanna go to a disco prom at sunday...
streamable.com/8v90t

i'm not surprised that you don't understand that humans operate all of those technologies and make decisions to use them. i'd love to pick up a telephone receiver and beat you to death with it

incidentally, what third world shit hole do you come from?

Should we blame condom manufacturer for aids too? Theyre not doing a good job in making peoole use them

Another logic win

Checked and kekd. Fast and Furious was a shitshow and the whole world knows. I have European coworkers who asked me aboutit and I had no good answers.

...

Incidentally, do you really believe you can actually think weapon itself are not dangerous?

do you honestly believe anything can't be used as a weapon?
buy an english grammar book please

I'm for gun ownership, I just think we need more mental illness checks to hopefully reduce the suicide success rate.

If someone has to go the extra mile and offs themselves, they've earned it.

But suicide should be a test that doesn't allow calculators dammit, it's ruining the art.

...

We've doubled the number of guns in circulation in the last twenty years. The murder rate is nearing all time lows.

Your idea doesn't seem to be working.

No, it's mostly black and hispanic gangbangers. You'll find that gun rights advocates, on average, are generally law abiding.

>America is the only country where shootings regularly happen
>Currently one every week or so
>"We've doubled the number of guns in circulation in the last twenty years"
Excuse me sir

There are half a billion unregistered guns currently in circulation in the US. You are literally doing nothing but wasting everyone's time and money to accomplish nothing.

>implying killing someone who's trying to kill you is not necessary force
>implying im not an disabled/elderly person without the natural means to defend myself
>implying bullets are magical instakill projectiles

Are you retarded?

There aren't mass shootings every week. When you have to resort to hyperbole to try to make your point, you should realize that you're a fucking halfwit.

If I can own a gun, everyone can own a gun.
I'd rather not have a gun and have to defend myself against someone without a gun,
than to have a gun but then have to defend myself against someone else with a gun.

Then you're retarded.

Studies have shown that defending yourself with a gun results in fewer injuries and deaths than any other method.

Reality shows that you're infinitely more likely to die in countries with American-style gun laws.

False.

...

No one wins in a knife fight, user...

atleast try.

I have nothing against owning guns. My problem is the ease and extent to which mentally unstable people can aquire them.

I don't want people to be able to walk around with knives either

gunviolencearchive.org/
Over 14k dead this year, what an utterly pathetic goverment you have.

SOCIALIST COMMUNIST NAZI REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Tons. You chimps never read it.

80% of all violent crime is gang related. Of the 8,000 or so gun murders, that leaves under 2,000 that aren't black and hispanic gangbangers killing each other for sport in the ghetto where guns are generally illegal.

Most of the rest of those are illegal aliens and the occasional liberal snapping and going on a shooting spree.

Less than 2,000 murders a year, in a nation of 350 million people. It is literally nothing.

Um it doesn't actually sound like you think people should have the chance ro defend themselves. Can't walk around with guns, knives, what about cricket bats? Rolls of coins?

OP, it's essentially a statistical argument.

If you care about innocent life, then do the math.

Which number is greater?

Innocent people killed by guns in accidents, mass shootings, murders, etc.

or

Innocent people who've had their lives protected by a gun owner who was not a cop.

If you *really* care about innocent lives you go to the scenario which protects the most innocent lives. That's scenario #1.

Well get over it. There are half a billion unregistered guns in the United States.

There is quite literally nothing you can do to stop someone in the US from arming themselves.

...

100% of your figures are made up

Also liberals going on a killing spree? that's fucking rich.

Incorrect. According to the CDC, defensive gun use occurs several orders of magnitude more often than murder.

Could be because you chimps never post it and just expect people to take your word for it.
In your case for example 8,000 gun murders, doesn't necessarily mean 8,000 gun deaths.

For example, do you think the number of people saved by guns outpaces the number of people who were killed in vegas this year? I doubt it. And that's ignoring every other murder that took place.

This. The number itself, even skewed, is laughably pathetic.

If people actually gave a shit about the number of lives lost anyways, they'd be banning cars, tobacco, fast food, drugs, ect.

If you want to carry a stack of coins to feel safe, then go ahead. The mere fact that murder weapons aren't in active circulation should help as well.

The CDC doesn't run numbers on guns (they're literally not allowed to by law, thanks NRA) so I have to wonder where you're getting your numbers from.

what if I proved you right instead?

>implying killing someone who is stealing a purse is bad
It was his own decision to steal

Sorry, when you aren't a libtard, you don't have to make up figures.

www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_06.pdf

abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/FedCrimes/story?id=6773423

That's because only irrational retards include suicide and defensive gun use in their gun death statistics.

I am. As I said, owning guns is fine. Have an arsenal. Just wish we could stop the crazies from getting them or weed them out before they go postal.

>James Hodgkinson
>Stephen Paddock
I can name more

Samebong?
What do you call a britfag who post repeatedly?

You're quite simply lying at this point.

They did a study on gun violence in 2013 after an Obama executive order. It didn't go well for you folks.

All those Republicans in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit...

Cars have a fuction in society
Guns were made to kill people, Not usually needed for everyday life.

The rest things would go under bad life choices but you dont harm other people than yourself.

Must be hard being a simpleton.

Kek do you even read bro? I said I have nothing against owning weapons. Just that I wished the wack-a-doodles didn't get them, I mean wack-a-doodle in the clinical sense not the colloquial one.

You can't. Get over it and be prepared to defend yourself.

You only have one life. Take some responsibility for defending it.

So you're afraid of less than .01% of the population having a gun? Cool. Better ban guns!

>They did a study on gun violence in 2013 after an Obama executive order. It didn't go well for you folks.
It's amazing. Libs demand that government look into gun deaths because they are SURE that the result will vindicate their world view, and then it doesn't so they ignore it.

Same shit with police body cams. Obama DoJ leans on local police to wear body cams because they are SURE that the footage would exonerate all the innocent blacks. What happens? Instead the footage is used to slam dunk the case for prosecution. Fucking whoops looks like Tyrone really is a lying thug.

They make up shit to make themselves feel good and then demand everyone else believe it, too, and are shocked to find that reality doesn't work like that.

Are you a fucking moron? Do you read? I said I okay with people owning guns! I own 3.

How dare you come at me with empirical evidence

You seem to be spouting talking points here. I never implied I am not responsible for my own safety.