Can we make this a thing?

Can we make this a thing?

This will only fuck up the "It's ok to be white" statement. Something like this will give credence to the assumption that "it's ok to be white" was created by white supremacists. Don't fuck up something great by overreaching.

Boi, I just want to see a media shit storm is all.

Then just watch the news. It's in a constant state of sensationalized shit storm simply because it sells if it's presented that way.

blank paper

correct.

Everyone already knows its a white supremacist smokescreen. There's enough screenshots of Sup Forums threads promoting it and talking about it to prove the connection.

The connection is also obvious if you spend 3 seconds thinking about it.

It's an innocuous statement designed by trolls to entice a response. Obviously you fell for it.

Nice try Antifa

Good job fucking fascist

>it's just a meme, bro.

You need to feed and house slaves, and worry about rebellions. It's more efficient to keep the population so burdened with debt that they will serve you out of desperation.

Well, I've been poking around this here internet just about as long as it's been around for consumers. I've seen my fair share of trolls. This is a total troll move. A very good troll move, but still a troll move. But you can think I'm just buying into it if you want. 30+ years of watching trolls troll, you can recognize sophisticated trolling well enough.

There are two possibilities:

A) It is a legitimate reminder that white people are still people, and is meant to be taken in the context it is given, but has been corrupted by trolls

B) It is, as that gentleman said, an innocuous statement designed by trolls to entice a response, which underlines the pervasive social commentary that it's NOT okay to be white due to people's responses to it

It doesn't really MATTER if it's crafted by white supremacists or not, it still shows quite clearly that white people and the idea of white identity are taboo.

Black identity is fine, because "whites forced us all together, so we have no cultural history anymore, unlike white people who have Irish or Italian heritage to be proud of." But white people, who chose to become pooled together in an identitarian sense 60 or 70 years ago by their own will (albeit in contest to the Civil Rights movement, but the end result is the same of white people being all on the same team and black people being all on the same team), are not allowed to be unified in the same way, despite the fact that racism against white people isn't directed towards their cultural heritage like Irish or English or French or Italian or whatever, it's directed towards their whiteness and perceived privilege.

>Something like this will give credence to the assumption that "it's ok to be white" was created by white supremacists.
It was though. It was Sup Forums's idea. Only supremecists actually give a damn about how white they are.

No there's a third you left out and tried to dismiss later

C) White supremacists changing their message to seem reasonable by hiding behind a simple statement

And yes, it does matter who crafted it, because there's a little thing called "intent".

Nope you are wrong.

So white supremacists aren't allowed to be reasonable?

The statement isn't "White people are better." The statement isn't "If you're not white you're not okay." The statement is a reminder that "White isn't the same as evil."

And that's true. You can't delegitimize a true statement just because you don't like the person that said it.

>So white supremacists aren't allowed to be reasonable?
You can't reasonable if your a skinhead. They're just masking their true intentions by posting a statement that differs from what their actual intent behind it is.

But is the statement legitimate?

Is "It's okay to be white" a true statement, or a false one?

If it's true, then there's no grounds for arguing with the statement itself, regardless of who exactly made the statement or why.

If it's false, then we have deeper societal problems than white supremacists being two-faced.

The thing is, the white supremacists only win if you CHALLENGE the statement. If people walked by those posters and had nothing to say about them, then the attempt to stir up shit would have failed. But people challenged it, and gave white supremacists ammunition to use.

>Is "It's okay to be white" a true statement, or a false one?
It's a true statement but you are only looking at it at face value; it's being said by a group of people who despise anyone who isn't white. Now what do you think Sup Forums really meant by saying that? Be honest.

>lol you're at fault
Why are you defending them?

It doesn't MATTER what they meant, it matters what they said and how people interpret it.

See, when people see you challenge the statement "It's okay to be white," they don't see you challenging the non-expressed beliefs of a person who isn't there (whether they're white supremacist or not), they see you challenging either the statement or people who agree with the statement. And that's why your ONLY OPTION to come out on top is to either agree with the statement or not acknowledge the statement whatsoever.

It's a sneaky and insidious troll, where the only winning move is not to play.

>It doesn't MATTER what they meant
Yes, it does, that's the entire point of it.

OP here.

Just asking how this thread went from asking if we can make that poster a thing into people arguing about the whole "it's okay to be white" thing?

Because your bait was a reference to that, dumbass.

MAGA