I just received a reply from my senator on net neutrality, Sup Forums

I just received a reply from my senator on net neutrality, Sup Forums.

> however, I also believe that such federal mandates would unduly inhibit this industry's investment in new technology and job creation. Moreover, the Internet and online content have thrived in the United States without net neutrality, which throws into question the need for more government intervention.

>I am encouraged by Chairman Pai's recent proposal to keep our Internet free from greater government control. Net neutrality threatens the innovation and economic freedom that have made the Internet a powerful catalyst for job creation and growth.

There's no way this shit is fucking real, right? It was in my spam folder, but it comes from pat_noreply (at) toomey.senate.gov

What the actual fuck, Sup Forumsros. Does anyone else's senators feel this way?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/wcinzmfZeCc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

they are paid to "feel" that way. Welcome to citizens united and money in politics

Yes, thank God

pretty much this. I doubt your senator gives two fucks about net nuetrality and is just speaking for a lobbyist

This is some fucking bullshit. I don't think we're going to win, bros. :/

Internet controlled by the government or internet controlled by big companies
You're a fucking retard if you support net neutrality and a fucking retard if you're against net neutrality.
And you're a fucking retard if you're a horseshoe theory centrist idiot.

>technoLOGy

ITT: shills and internet retards

wat do then?

only shill here is you

>is for net neutrality
>doesn't realize article 2 =/= net neutrality

welcome, new friend

this. just give up or go for a truly decentralized internet replacement

you are the worst

says the Soros shill. At least you are trying to earn your pay, faggot

...

Can someone please tell me how lobbying is even legal? Is it not bribery?

This.
The world is burning and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.
If you thought there was a good route for a good ending you haven't been paying enough attention.
The only way to save this world would be for the ENTIRE white race to go full pol NOW and instantaneously.
but that wont happen. However, in 50 years (less more likely) the world will "end"
Humans will exist still and humanity / the planet will survive, but there will be few humans left compared to now.
I'd estimate a world war three as soon as the oil runs out.
Nature is preparing to cull us as we speak.

care to provide some arguments for your claims?

Why, you would just cherry pick one point to counterpoint and ignore everything else that is inconvenient to your narrative. If you couldn't make any logical or sane rebuttal or retort you would resort to name calling and personal attacks.

Still doing this unproductive shit dude?
I mean, it's your life but dam

shill faggot fuck you!

...

Your Senator sounds like a fucking robot user.

>the only way someone can disagree with me is if they are a shill or if they are a moron

Please fuck off with your "net neutrality is a MORAL issue" garbage.

What's the deal with this net neutrality anyway?
Everyone wants shit to stay as it is, so what's the deal with these people trying to change it?
Literally no one is asking for it.

The big corporations are asking for it. They want the power to strangle all competition and force even more of a monopoly on us.

No a insult
Just a observation

I'm just saying you could use all this free time too do product hobbies and improve yourself

But you're a free citizen, do as you please

No, I really liked reading your reply, was wondering why you feel the way you do. I'm not looking to argue, I have a headache.

...

...

If you are a liberal leftist that loves big government, you like net nuetrality. If you are more conservative, think government is too big and intrusive already, you're against it.

ThisThe only "government control" on the internet, is that of stopping ISPs from throttling/blocking shit. Literally. The "government control" that the Sen. was talking about is not control of citizens, per se, but corporations.

Corporations don't like it. This is like their 8th time trying to pull this shit.

Big corporations are just like.. 40 different people.
But here we have hundreds of millions of people who are saying no, and they'll keep saying no.

So why keep going when their proposal keeps getting shut down by literally everyone but 40 people.
It's basically just a huge annoyance to everyone.

I'm not mature at all
Why do you think i'm on Sup Forums you retarded autistic lifeless no girlfriend having shit head faggot

If your argument is "keep the shit the way that it was", then we shouldn't have it, since it has only been implemented since 2015.

...

...

No, you lying fuck, stop trying to appeal to people's personal identities. This is something both conservatives, and libtards agree on: Net Neutrality is here to stay, we're FOR it.

>t. conservative

Says the fagot spaming shit jokes

>liberal leftist
>more conservative
>you like net neutrality

no, every single person who could be effected by it and finds out what it actually is, is against it. there are no political ties, there is no separation of opinion.

You are an uninformed idiot. Owners and operators of networks don't need the crushing grip of government around their throats. Never has government intervention made a product better or more affordable. But you knew that, you're just a leftist commie.

...

>since it has only been implemented since 2015.
No, it's only been ENFORCED, properly, since 2015. It's always existed, and there were lawsuits against corporations the interfered with it. The corporations lost. Now, it's illegal for them to do that shit because of 2015.

>Learn_Before_You_Speak

he is literally a shill, this is a typical technique where he presents convoluted versions of the data to cause us to both not address it, and to argue over the less relevent parts of the debate.

fuck off shill

Net nuetrality is outta here, and it's about fucking time.

this is the grossest most stupid fucking thing Ive ever seen on Sup Forums, and I just casually scrolled past a dude finger blasting a horse.

Samefags, and/or supreme autism

More mature than your faggot ass

you nigger loving faggot

Farking shill

Title II enforces net neutrality, kys.

Wrong media matters spambot, it's a blatant leftist power grab, and it will be removed.

...

Autism for mee

Liberals and Conservatives agree on this issue, bot man

Get a life

Obama administration called it "net neutrality" to troll the fuck out of anyone that ever wanted to repeal it.

Cool, then you must support Voter ID laws for the same reasons.

...

>

They're shills for ISP donors

It's an abomination and by all rights should be prohibited. It's legal because the only people who can outlaw it are the congress, which happen to be the ones benefiting from it. So it's like asking a judge to rule against themselves.

Face it

You love me because you love shit

Fuck off shill

Cause they made it legal and no one gave enough of a shit to quit their petty partisanship and stop it.

...

Look up citizens united
It destroyed this country

My point exactly

>If A, then B
>B
>therefore A.

Not a valid argument, son.

I'm a conservative and I think net neutrality can fuck right off.

You don't have a right to the "internet". If you want to use someones service (like, an ISP), it's business between you and them.

Don't like the service? Stop paying for it.

You're the same fucking moron wanting to legislate that a health insurance company needs to cover "pre-existing conditions", because you actually aren't sure what the difference between insurance and healthcare is.

...

Every Obama Era government overreach needs to be removed, especially net nuetralty. If George Soros and David Brock are for it, you can be guaranteed it's bad for America . God bless ajit pai

underrated comment of the millennium.

>We need net neutrality because of shit that historically hasn't happened but will happen if we don't force the government to regulate it

>We need voter ID laws because of shit that historically hasn't happened but will happen if we don't force the government to regulate it

Pick two.

Citizens United destroyed the Democrats money laundering machine

>Never has government intervention made a product better
yea all those health regulations for my food never made them better at all.

Shit you're dumb.

Your bound to run out of pictures eventually faggot


HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

Autism for the win

...

The FDA? Are you fucking retarded?

...

Thank God, a grown up on Sup Forums

nope its pretty much bribery and a clear disgrace to democracy

I got pics too bitch

...

Those arent samefags at all just an idiot arguing with a log poster

>forcing my ISP to provide me xvideos tranny porn movies is fundamentally the same as General Mills not lying about ingredients in their cereal

...

I have emails from 2 Virginia reps that basically say too bad, so sad. We lost.

I'm a conservative too, and you don't understand NN.
>You don't have a right to the "internet".
NN is not a "right to the internet", it only prevents ISPs from preventing you from visiting websites, and/or throttling your data. That internet that you already paid for... why should they be allowed to charge you extra to view a certain website, or to not slow it down? That's bullshit. It's essentially extortion: "Pay us more money, or we're going to slow your shit down!"

Go read some shit on NN, or watch a video. You're clearly misinformed.

youtu.be/wcinzmfZeCc

Bitch I got less of a life than you

Amen. Kids these days...

Except that's not true. We've crossed into a time when you cannot reasonably live without the internet. Need a job? Good luck "pounding the pavement" pops. Need to pay bills? Apply for credit? Interact with many government services? Hell, I don't think you can even get a library card without a valid email address. And it will only become more necessary. Because of this and the fact that it is held as a legislatively protected monopoly in the vast majority of the country, it should be held to a much higher standard. Those who ignorantly parrot "leave it to the free market" only show how incredibly weak their understanding of basic concept is.

I am together

I'm a giant piece of shit

You literally don't even know what NN is

Shill

Shill

If a private business bakery doesn't want to bake a "gay pride" cake with a dildo in the middle, I believe they have a right to refuse to provide that service.

Therefore, I also believe that an ISP has a right to modify their service as they see fit, even if it's not beneficial for you.

If you don't like it, withhold your dollar or switch to a different provider.

The answer isn't asking the government to force the service provider to bend to your will.

You aren't a conservative.

I wasn't the moron that said government intervention never helped any product be better, try not painting with such a broad brush next time faggot.

the net neutrality shit only came into effect in 2015 so we only had it for 2 years so why are you bitching about it getting removed when we were ok without it for so long?

no congresspeople give a fuck about you. get into reality and stop wasting your time with this garbage

You're misrepresenting the argument, and bringing in unrelated topics.

>pic related, you're actually retarded. Sorry :/