Very forces one to ponder, doesn't it?

Very forces one to ponder, doesn't it?

What the fuck is this retarded shit?

A new meme :^)

What is the wall even a symbol for?

Success

It's a symbol for Hitler's Berlin Wall, can't you see?

Nationalism isn't an economic system. Third row has everyone with hammers like communism propaganda..

For socialism, I don't see a ladder, does that mean that stick guy was crawling in?
For capitalism, that means people can afford to crawl out and those who stay in are better off for it
For nationalism, why would they leave?
I'm pondering if reddit or facebook?

I UNDERSTAND POLITICS
WILL YOU JUST LOOK AT THIS MS PAINT COMIC WHICH TRULY OPENED MY EYES
literally kys

top kek

It's a wall with niggers in front of it.

hopefully not

There are no .jpeg compression artifacts, effectively ruling out goybook.

For socialism it should actually be each person has 1/3 of the ladder, and the government uses force to reallocate ladder portions should a discrepancy arise.

Capitalism is accurate.

Nationalism is plain wrong, that's just "niggers using a ladder to illegal enter another nation".

What

Socialism is meaning for tearing someone down because they have more sucess in life than you.

>being this daft
>For socialism, I don't see a ladder, does that mean that stick guy was crawling in?
The idea is that he's already there.
>For capitalism, that means people can afford to crawl out and those who stay in are better off for it
Wut
>For nationalism, why would they leave?
They want ontop of the wall
>I'm pondering if reddit or facebook?
KYS
Nah, it's OC faggot, then again you're such a new fag you haven't seen the half dozen threads of the original

Nationalism/Communism need to switch places.

Not that I don't realize it's a shitposters graph.

>Nationalism is plain wrong, that's just "niggers using a ladder to illegal enter another nation".
Are you autistic? It's people working together to build a ladder

My god, you tanned Germans are thick as fuck.

Clearly, the goal is to get the stickmen on top of the wall which is the brown thing.

>Socialism drags people down and nobody ends up on top.
>Capitalism sees the problem, solves it and charges money for the solution
>Nationalism sees the problem and together the people solve it

>Estonian
>seriously a commie
Wow, you must either be a 60+ year old pensioner or an edgy teenager

Yes you are 15, I understand.

No.

That would be escapism at best.

Nationalism would be to disregard the wall being there to begin with and start making your own country better. They would be building a factory there to create wealth were they real nationalists.

"Are you autistic?"

Even worse.

>implying the wall is literally a wall
Holy fuck are you retarded?

No it's just that this would be the only way for that retarded piece of shit image to make sense from any perspective.

Fixed

>>The idea is that he's already there
What, was he born on top of the wall? Fuck off.

>brokeass nigga can't save up $30

No you fucking moron, the idea is that the socialists simply take down people who are successful but don't build success of their own.

and the other 2 have ladders to symbolise what?
What does the wall represent to you? Success?

1/10, the bodies aren't on the ladder side of the wall.

get the fuck off my board

...

Getting on top of the wall simply symbolizes a goal, mostly economic success. You're being autistic about it. The capitalist profits off of his skills and and elevates others for a price. The Nationalists work together, not for profit (capitalism) or jealousy (socialism/communism/anarchism/etc) but rather a spirit of cooperation and a love for your nation and people

>get the fuck off my board
Oh, I'm sorry that you're autistic.

>>Capitalist profits by elevating others
You think the guy who owns the ladder is interested in elevating people above himself?
>>Love of your nation
Then why are they not standing on top of the wall?

NICE.

You aren't answering/countering anything I'm saying.

Just get out you filthy normie/shill.

Then why didn't you draw a pillar that has "success" written on the top of it?

Horribly autistic "artist".

>Very forces one to ponder, doesn't it?
what did he mean by this?

>Actually trying to force a meme

Anyone else want to take a stab at this?

In order to be a good salesmen, you gotta believe in your product user.

See, this kind of shit is why /pol thinks Canadians are retarded.

>Then why are they not standing on top of the wall?
Because they have to get there first. You have to build success.

>Then why didn't you draw a pillar that has "success" written on the top of it?
Because the original was a wall and it was an edit of it

Epic burn lmao

Either bad troll or retarded, either case you are now ignored.

>You think the guy who owns the ladder is interested in elevating people above himself?
No, he's interested in a profit. He's offering a service for others and others are willing to pay for said service.

>Either bad troll or retarded, either case you are now ignored.
The last panel is when thew Jews come in and kill all of them

...

In capitalism what's stopping me from making my own small ladder, charging a smaller amount for people to use it to get over smaller obstacles and gradually earning enough money until I have my own fleet of ladders?

Fuck OP, this is a fence/wall thread now

...

Isnt that how the whole wew lad shit started

...

...

>All Socialism is communism
Murrica

Turns out no one likes walls.

did you draw this? its shit

Here you go.

Americans build shitty walls.

close

One thing I don't understand is why is this viewed as a bad thing.
I mean if I make 10 times more money in a day than a nigger in africa, how am I harming that negro in any way, shape or form?

I mean, I'd understand that if the inequality of income was generated through imperialism or oppression, but that isn't exactly the case.
Africa is geographically in far superior position than European countries, seeing that the continent can be completely self sufficient in just about any sort of natural resource.
Not only that, they do also hold an extremely good climate for agriculture, which makes the most valuable crops in the planet grow in there with great ease.

If the rest of the world wishes to reach the same level of wealth as the western world, all they need to do is lower their population growth so it does not overtake their economical growth.

>implying he would flood the market with commodity even if the market had the demand for it and jeopardize its scarcity and price

The idea is to get your emotions into play.

They want to push retarded "morals" onto you and make you feel guilty for something you couldn't really choose (being born in Finland, earning lots of money).

Because leftists view all resources as dangerously finite. Capitalists view resources as dangerously infinite. The reality is that it's somewhere inbetween

>>Implying he doesn't have a monopoly and can control the price.

>implying flooding the market is "controlling the price"
>implying he wouldn't keep one ladder out to keep the artificial scarcity up.

Only if there is a competitor, which he just killed, soo....

I know, it's just really strange that this even works on some people.
I mean, if every country had equality of outcome guaranteed, then why the fuck should any country produce anything?

It's just best to live as an agricultural society where nobody has any money, but everybody has lots of food, because we'll get free money from foreign countries anyway.

This.
I won't even waste time trying to read what other people explain - this is all this picture suggests.

Keeping niggers out

Now you're thinking like a nigger.

Except you won't be able to live in peace in Africa because niggers will ruin your farm out of jealousy that you are smart enough to farm.

Niggers are animals.

>Poland behind wall

>Hungary behind wall

>Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania behind wall

fixed for you my friend.

Resources are finite, but everyone has the right to do whatever the fuck they please with their own resources.
Sure, I do have the moral obligation of taking care of me, my family and the people that help me produce and acquire those resources.

I should, nor should anyone else have the obligation to give away their resources without due compensation.

If Western World provides goods and services in exchange for foreign resources, then it is not the fault of the western world that such a demand exists.

I do not, however fault desperate people for doing what they must to survive when they have no opportunities for material improvement, but at the same time I do not fault the man who ventilates the said man for trying to break into his house.