The Corruption of Science: What They Won't Tell You! t.Stefan Molyneux

youtube.com/watch?v=XrGRP2mu0GA

why atheism, which encourage people to workship science, can be dangerous

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jBNzJISlxl0
youtu.be/VOKCzsAsL3I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether
americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_corruption_of_science.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

This is important

>Worshipping scence is dangerous goys!

Not An Argument: The Argument of the Inept

good topic

i'm agnostic, i just mean that if you dont take it without a grain of salt can be dangerous, especialy about governement funding reasearch(global warming)

Wasn't he arrested?

Checking out.
Seems neat.

science is the modern religion

Not an argument.

stef is an living, breatinhg, throbbing argument

Being conservative has become synonymous to being retarded.

This guy... This guy right here

>worship science
Do you retards not know what science is? It's not some crazy conspiracy or even a belief system. It is simply a method through which we can test and confirm/disprove hypotheses through observation and empirical evidence. That is far preferable to "muh tradition" and "muh religion"

Kill yourselves.

stop spamming everyone, its annoying to read a thread when you are late to join

>Tell someone his post is not an argument
>someone else tells me that doing so is not an argument

No it's not an argument. Why would you give a real argument to someone who is not giving you a real argument? I was just pointing it out.

Not. An. Argument.

This is easily the second stupidest molyjew video i've ever not watched. And there are a lot I haven't watched, so that's saying something.

Yes: You shouldn't just trust a scientific headline.

"Atheism" as in the new atheist movement (aka sam harris and richard dawkins), encourages people to use logic reason and evidence (aka science) to make deductions about their world.

Steph proves once again that he's a total idiot and is simply conflating communism with athiesm AGAIN.

And i didn't even watch it.

Your daily reminder that Stefbots are literally cultists who would sooner commit suicide than live without their Dear Leader.

>It is simply a method through which we can test and confirm/disprove hypotheses through observation and empirical evidence.

PROVE

>That is far preferable to "muh tradition" and "muh religion"

IT

i mean that the current result of science can be falsified, not that the methodology of science is wrong

and when i mean workship science, i mean workshiping the result of research that call themselve science

>implying most scientists do not corrupt their data to receive more money from positive results for their bosses

climate change
>science
kill your self

Why and when did this guy get famous?

Maybe people agree with his ideas?

Stefan Molyneux is the greatest philosopher of our time and has the world's largest philosophy show on the Internet.

Not an argument

Worshipping anything is dangerous.

Stefan Molyneux: "Fuck physics, make iPhones."

youtube.com/watch?v=jBNzJISlxl0

Not an argument

...

...

...

...

i want these renditions to fuck

I choked on my food good God I love you user

We cucked Ben Garrison so hard.

youtu.be/VOKCzsAsL3I

The memes are uniting!

They have a hero, humans tend to flock to those figures to help understand both the world and those on it. It's understandable, the world is extremely complex and confusing, the problem is that if you don't put those figures beyond doubt, how could you trust what they say or their intentions? That is obviously very dangerous, putting your hopes on an individual, because every individual is fallible.

The worst thing about learning about truth of human nature is how lonely you feel knowing that in truth you can never trust on someone with heart and soul.

science "replacing" religion is always complete fucking lunacy and degeneracy.

religion is not a science club.

Stefan the Sophist

Stefan is wrong here, and this where you see he is nothing more than an ideologue. Science is the most effective tool humans have. Stef hates science because of le tax is theft meme. He is willing throw away 200 years of technology because he thinks the state doesn't have right to take away your money.

>molycore is rising

This is excellent news

you didnt see the video

I've seen enough Molyneux to know. He constantly rants about how understanding more about the Universe is bollocks and that that making stupid shit for normies to consume is more important, not realizing that humanity is teetering on the edge of being locked on this planet forever unless we get the fuck out of here in the next 200 years. AnCap won't mean much if it can't get off this planet.

>not realizing that humanity is teetering on the edge of being locked on this planet forever unless we get the fuck out of here in the next 200 years
What?

>I've seen enough Molyneux to know. bla bla
good it mean that any argument that you could give mean nothing against that video

If Molyneux is arguing against public founding the obvious reason why he's wrong is because private founding only does so with profit in mind, things which they can not profit, say something they can't patent, they won't found it. That is ALREADY true, we depend on public founding to make crazy ideas come true.

>conservashits

>I've seen enough Molyneux to know.

No you haven't obviously.

That's like saying that you have watched enough video's on particle physics to be considered an expert on the subject of particle physics

Your manking an "argument" based on faith. Which is basically religion renamed.

Of course *you* wouldn't understand, you're a Brazillian. You don't live in the West. Society is already decaying. Like, super fucking fast. This kind of decay and ignorance hasn't been seen since the glorious Mycenians decayed into little more than illiterate boat niggers. Now its happening again. Only this time, if we allow ourselves to even stop producing and finding more fuel for a year, we're fucked. Billions of people depend on oil for agriculture. And if we even fall back to Roman levels of civilization, we're still fucked because we've already used most of the easily accessable oil on the planet. The rest is locked under the sea or the artic, where you require oil to buld machines that can harvest the oil in the first place.

You should worship science. Not because good, but its the only thing we have left. If we give up now, as I explained, we're doomed. And wehat can MNolyneux offer you, seriously? Free Market capitalism isn't fair or just. Its doesn't reward hard working intelligent people. It rewards niggers and prostitutes like Molyneux and Pewdiepie who say and say do the stupidest things for click bait, which is why Molyneux supports it. As long as you have a large audience for dat ad money and dem donations, it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong.

Molyneux is. His entire hypothesis is based on UPB, which is proven wrong every time a person take a bite out of a pice of chicken. Sometimes, it is preferable to steal from something else. And this isn't morally wrong because PROPERTY RIGHTS DON'T EXIST. Therefore, there is literally no reason to consider what he says.

Lol that clip
>Newton you faggot, stop fucking around with planetary motion and research something useful that people want, like an elixir of life!
>t. Stefan Molyneux c. 1660

>PROPERTY RIGHTS DON'T EXIST
Wew, lad.

the problem with public research is that the governement bias research that incrase their narrative (leftist governement give leftist result, right wing governement give right wing result)

>muh dont trust science because I have to pander to my conservashit/alt-right audience for dem shekels
>don't worry about the environment or new energy sources (because that shit requires public funding which is evil because it WANTS ME SHOT), it's all a hoax by the science kabal

>rights
>exist

i wont workship the current result of science because they are most likly funded by leftist organisation

if we were before 1905 you would have asked me to workship that the aether existed en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

They don't. If they did, Carnivores wouldn't exist. Property right are *enforced*, like all rights, by humans. Which is why you have the second amendment, at least in theory. In reality, there's nothing stopping anyone from stealing your shit, other than the fact others humans give a shit. If they didn't, then property rights don't exist.

Think about it this way. Molyneux is in love with UPB. But when a man goes out and catches his game, and he eats the flesh that animal carefully nurtured and labored on, Molyneux takes no issue. And the reason he doesn't is because its not human. He doesn't consider it to have full appropriation of its body. But to the Universe or nature, that isn't human or animal. Its detached, so it considers you going out and killing another person and eating them to be no different. Which molyneux would certainly take issue with. He's detatched from reality.

1. Correlation implies causation, especially those that confirm my hypothesis.

2. Don't trust scientists. They are owned by the State and you know it: the State touches it, it sucks.

3. However, when I'm citing studies to appear more credible, trust the scientists I'm citing. That and the random biased think tanks I follow.

>less than 5k views on the video

Does Molyjew have shills in Brussels now too?

where is your address then

4. Them crowdfunded science is more credible because it does not rely on the State. It relies on what people actually want and find useful.

>Ignores virtually all this type of funding only exists because people want to see their preconceived views supported by science. They are literally paying for a study.

>the flesh that animal carefully nurtured and labored on

source? did the animal tell you this

>source

Science.

...

Ain't giving views to this idiot anymore. He claims theories as facts with neither evidence nor contradictory.

He's a narcissistic self entitled cult leader, vomiting the "burden of proof" on anyone but himself.

scientist use animals for experiments all the time. your argument is invalid

>not an argument, the post
Best of luck with future arguments, friend.

>why atheism, which encourage people to workship science, can be dangerous

This isn't true. Atheism doesn't innately encourage anything. Now, the "new atheist" movement is shit and encourages the "fucking love of science." Richard Dawkins followers are worse than religious-types. However, they're not the only strain of atheism.

The problem is not atheism itself, it's just this specific movement that's dominated atheism. Their mistake is they think that science should replace religion. This is wrong. A worship of science should not follow atheism, art/culture should. You're guys' beloved Nietzsche says the same thing. As does Hume, Schopenhauer and Mill.

>tl;dr fedora atheism is cancer, noble atheism is the righteous path

>You're

lol

Every single day, every time Molymeme makes a new alt-right video, a thread on Sup Forums!

leftists love science, until scientific racism comes along

Nietzsche thought the masses needed religion. He thought widespread secularism would be destructive, because most people can't handle themselves, they'd self-destruct and/or be complacent. He foresaw "nihilism" for the masses with the removal of religion.

And he was right.

Not

if you dislike it, why are you bumping in this thread?

Every single day I see your flag I am crying louder and louder :(

when will i escape this hell of a country ;_;

No. In Twilight of the Idols he points out how religion isn't enough. How it fundamentally doesn't work for humanity because its ideals are unattainable and should therefore be gotten rid of.

He goes onto say that nihilism will ensue from religion's ousting and that this state is insecure. It follows from this that we need a replacement for religion to defend ourselves from the cancerous void of nihilism, i.e. culture and art.

...

He was clear he wasn't writing that for the masses, that the masses weren't capable of thriving without religion

Is that real? I didn't know Ben even knew about Stephan but It looks unedited.

His argument against religion and Christianity more specifically was that it placed artificial bounds and "guilt" on what would've otherwise been history-making men.

But Nietzsche never wrote his books for the blockhead at Walmart to say "I'm der ubermensch, look at my fedora, now I need my hotpockets to cope with the stress of life."

He'd think that is ludicrous, and that most of the weak "herd" need herd religion to deal. His revulsion came toward the strong adhering to this herd morality, in which the result would be as he put it "everyone an invalid or an invalid's attendant."

And let me guess. You actually believe that scientists which are only given grants in attempts to prove something, are 100% honest 100% of the time and don't mess with their shit?

I bet you also believe neo-darwinian theory is scientific fact and not about to be completely BTFO.

>he Corruption of Science


so is this faggot pretending to be a scientist now?

>He'd think that is ludicrous, and that most of the weak "herd" need herd religion to deal. His revulsion came toward the strong adhering to this herd morality, in which the result would be as he put it "everyone an invalid or an invalid's attendant."

Which is essentially what you have with all of these Christcuck losers wanting women's rights and privileges (men being an invalid's attendant, since women only care about equality of outcome, NOT equality), refugees (more invalid attendant), and Popes kissing niggers feet (okay, maybe not invalid attendant as much as foot fetish homosexual interracial porn).

It's true.

Here is an older article before the Government started mass censoring the Internet.

americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_corruption_of_science.html

Scientism is deadly.

What? How the fuck did you get into our country? I thought we got rid of you all in WW2.

>Go to the about section to get an idea of what the website is about
>"The right to exist and the survival of the State of Israel are of great importance to us."

lmao

...

As it should be. Ever heard of the 144,000? We live in the age of information and nearly everyone is so massively ignorant of fucking everything.

Feels bad Senpai.

Kinda reminded me of Kierkegaard's some articles. Muslims and Jews are bigger threats non the less

>Science is perfect and uncorruptable

Nobody who actually does science has ever said that. That sounds like the IFLScience/Bill Nye/Neil Degrass Tyson crowd, who are idiots.

Science denyers are retards

fedora tipping atheist and liberal believe it through

there is a lot of global corruption into what kinds of research governments decide to fund

Both sides have their science deniers, fanatics, and cherrypickers. It's not a left/right issue that you can just sit there and say "hurr durr leftists amirite?"

By and large I've found atheists to believe in the science as similarly and as fervently as christians believe in god. The more atheists I'm exposed to, the less I trust them and the more I believe they are wrong.

For reference, I'm an agnostic theist.

racial equalism is "science"
more than 50% of the population think thats science, in the whole europe its like that
thats the science