Why is not having children degenerate?

Why is not having children degenerate?

>waaah why are whites disappearing
>has no kids

If you don't have AT LEAST 3 children you're a failure tbhonesto

I'm not talking about whites in particular, I'm talking in general.

You didn't answer why.

You're designed to have children. If you don't want to or can't have children, you are defective.

Is wanting to have children a liberal idea?
are the Jews responsible for the declining birthrates in the west?

No, obviously not, liberals are the type that think that three kids is a large family. Liberals are typically child free or will only have 1-2 kids. And yes, the Jews are responsible.

It isn't. It is far better not to have any children and tread the path of God. But if you are the type of person who is prone to degenerate behaviours like jerking off, paying for sex, porn etc. than the only way to alleviate this legimately and not fall into the trap of degeneracy is to have children i.e. a functional family.

How is not having children the path of God? 1. We are all God's children. 2. God told us to be fruitful and multiply.

>Why is not having children degenerate?
Because Sup Forums wants to see the last white generation suffer from the previous generations.
I for one will not be having any children whatsoever

I would say it is degenerate.

But not having kids, or having few, is arguably the road to extinction in the 21st century.

I mean, if you think about it, it is in your own interests to have other people who think like you do, or at least have the same desires when talking about politics.

I like motorsport, so I would vote against outlawing it in most cases.
If everyone in my electorate liked motorsport, we'd have more of it.
But if you bring in people who don't (foreigners) then you dilute your once motorsport-happy community with leafy-green turbo hippies.

Imagine you already have those turbo hippies, and both sides are too stubborn to change.
You simply 'outbreed' them, you have kids who you influence into voitng for motorsport.

It's simply much easier to give birth to voters than change an already established voter.

And when you are too old to look after yourself and your interests, you will need the generation below to look after you, and you had better hope they are leafy-greens.

If you think about it, your neighbour is voting against your differences, but how similiar to you is he to voters in the next suburb? state? country?

The further you get away from your own demographic, the more dissimilar the voters become, and for that reason it is not in your interests to import foreigners.

But as a western country, if you compare euros to asians, it would be better for me to import the euros, in the case that I had to choose.

Non whites shouldnt have children

gods a meme tho so it doesn't matter

We'll see.

>Americans arguing about God still

I guess I'd be an atheist too if I grew up on that shit-hole of an island

I'm atheist but I didn't grow up here, amerifat

you dont believe in god you just hope that god is real which isn't the same thing at all

Nice assumptions my fellow burger

you hit the nail on the head desu

living there isn't much better

>pic related

This. Der jeden have taught all their lefty Marxist pets that the secret to happiness is hedonistic solipsism. Having kids is a burdensome afair to be avoided by good goys

Yeah, exactly. Even when they do have children, it's all about them and how important it is for them to maintain their "identity" or whatever- having to spend too much time around the kid is basically inhumane, apparently. Mothers must have time out of the house, time with friends, time alone and typically a career to feel fulfilled.

Some people can't seem to feel love, extreme care for family or other more important things in life.

If you have a wife and kids your full attention is not with God. Only those who become celebate and follow the monastic path or join the church are in a position to give all of their attention to God. Getting married isn't a bad choice, but not getting married and following God is better.

Okay, tell me where God said to give him your full attention, whatever that means? And do you deny that God specifically designed us and instructed us to have children?

I'm really sure God wants us to not have children so we can all die out and his children will be no more. I'm sure he only designed women for men as some type of joke, and really he wanted us all to be celibate.

From previous post I wrote with additional info in parentheses; But if you are the type of person who is prone to degenerate behaviours like jerking off, paying for sex, porn (like the vast majority of us) than the only way to alleviate this legimately and not fall into the trap of degeneracy is to have children i.e. a functional family.

Paul mentions it in Romans, I think.

What is your point? Not that I think you're right anyways, but how does any of this demonstrate that to tread the path of God, we shouldn't have kids? How could God want us all to become celibate? Would that mean that he wants humanity on Earth to end?

Trying to read through Romans now and I don't see anything about giving full attention to God, more like loving, glorifying and believing in God, but I also see things in Romans alone that basically attest to the fact that God designed us for procreation! You still haven't told me if you agree or disagree that God told us to have children.

Might not be Romans, maybe try Corinthians. He explains it better than I could atm.

You were right, it was in Corinthians. Still, Paul doesn't say that the Lord tells us these things, just that he believes that way. I can't understand how God could want us to be celibate, unless God wants humanity on Earth to cease. How could that be right?

cause people who have children and a future divorced wufe want YOU to FEEL the PAIN as well

they see you, single, childless, enjoying life, doing your hobbies, enjoying your free SILENT time and they LOATHE YOU FOR IT