There are hedonistic degenerates on Sup Forums right now that aren't redpilled on the sexual liberation.
There are people on Sup Forums right now who believe that "DUDE EZ PUSSY LMAO" is an argument.
There are people on Sup Forums right now, who believe there's nothing wrong with dating/marrying a girl who didn't lose her virginity to them.
Can you really not think beyond your dicks? Blacks have the exact same outlook, see where it's gotten them.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
sweet aryan woman, i would love to culturally enrich her with my bbc (big brown cock). god bless america
I'm not attractive enough to be that picky.
How old are you? Date younger, Ivan. Go find them where they're at. Churches, etc.
Good post OP, but prepare to be assaulted by thousands of cries of "muh dik"
common filth was right
it's a shame that nobody white does arranged marriages anymore. The whole idea of "dating" is bullshit
21 and church is a meme. You don't find young girls there.
There are virgins on Sup Forums right now who masterbate to anime porn
There are virgins on Sup Forums right now who believe that "DUDE, MUH CHRISTIANITY, MY CHRISTIAN BLONDE WAIFU HAS PERFECT GENETICS AND IS PERFECT AND SUBSERVIENT" has any bearing on reality.
There are virgins on Sup Forums right now who are so shallow and selfish, that they would shun a woman just because they don't have a low self esteem and unhealthy attitude about sex that they have.
Can you really not think beyond your left hand ? Real women have emotions and need to be loved and, yes, need to be sexually satisfied to feel good about themselves. Just because you have no experience with a living breathing woman, hating every 20 year old girl who's had a couple boyfriends isn't gong to help you find your virgin mary.
There is nothing wrong with sexual liberation in general, the problem is that women are incapable of monogamy its literally their fault sexual liberation has lead to the fall of civilization.
you're a literal nigger
ok so now being a high testoterone alpha is lame now ??? being a pussy little faggot who pees his pants around a confident woman is the savior ? hahaha don't you fucking Sup Forums faggots have any integrity ?
Because I support sexual liberation? Humans are sex crazed primates the should be able to fuck when they want, but women ruin everything because they are mindless whores who cant stay commited for shit. In the end men are supposed to cruise through some sluts then find a wife, this never occurs once in a woman's brain as she sees her husband as a sucker she can use not a lover.
Can't speak for Russia obviously, but I've actually seen quite a few young girls (16-20) in the Churches over here.
Beyond that, there's always smaller, more rural places if you have the time and money.
The system of arranged marriage had its merits, for sure; however, I'm not really "anti-dating," and I think there's a case to be built that dating is fine, so long as its done in a culture with a healthy attitude on sex.
Not an argument
>If you won't date a used up whore, you have an unhealthy attitude about sex
Yeah, I suppose I do. So does reality, considering every single study done on sexual promiscuity and marital happiness/stability yield the same results. Virgins are objectively better for marriage.
>inb4 those stats are irrelevant because they hurt my feelings.
Have you ever heard of self control
oh wait you haven't, nigger
no, you're also from the Bahamas, which means statistically you're literally a dindu
most of these kids have
a. never been to a church, and
b. have no idea where young girls hang out because these kids don't leave the basement
they fall for memes easily, pic related is your typical Sup Forums kid
I dont live here my man.
>Humans are sex crazed primates.
Just because something is natural, doesn't mean it's moral or not-harmful to civilization.
"Sexual liberation" is inherently corrosive to the institutions of monogamy and marriage. Neither of the institutions exist in a vacuum, and sexual promiscuity takes a huge toll on both.
>if you have the time and money.
>if you have...money
Check muh flag
interesting post
Go outside.
not an argument ? your miserable sexless life isn't an argument ? why don't you join ISIS.
they are all virgins and..
god will grant them many virgins when they die for his cause and feed him their soul
>Check muh flag.
That's disheartening.
I go every sunday, and meet with the older teens and young adults on Wednesday nights.
I don't care where most young girls hang out, because most young girls aren't marriage/dating material. I care where "virtuous" young girls hang out.
it's true
most of these kids calling people 'degenerates' should really look at themselves and should understand that anti-social behavior is degeneracy
>Humans are sex crazed primates the should be able to fuck when they want
Yeah most living things have an incredible sex drive because without it there would be no continuation of the species
However it's the same for eating, in fact eating is the 2nd highest dopamine release besides sex, does that mean you should eat all day and become a fat fuck?
This
One's alleged virginity has absolutely no bearing on the validity of an overwhelming amount of data.
Try again, nigger.
Women being incapable of monogamy is the only negative of sexual liberation though, though I agree letting women choose their mates is a dumb idea because they are subhumans.
good troll attempt, insane person
You're right but all the hypocritical bonobos will rush in to throw their insults and their stupid "le keys n' locks" Sup Forums tier analogies.
>Implying I'm trolling
>Implying there's not an overwhelming amount of data that supports this.
christianity is virtuous now ?? haha circumcision ? feed jesus your soul ? non believers to hell ? what are you talking about ? christians are the biggest fucking sheisters in the country because in their eyes their evil is JUSTIFIED because they believe in the jew god
haha virtuous ? how 'virtuous' are you gods chosen people ? oh yeah you guys fucking love jews my bad dude
ha you suck dude. haha just call people a nigger and don;'t even debate them. nice dude
>Being an atheist
>Being complicit in every single Jewish social movement by extension
Go tip your fedora harder you hedonistic faggot.
>Implying this isn't shit-tier trolling
>Implying I haven't posted data which completely blows your shit the fuck out
>Implying you were ever open to debate
>Implying I insulted you first
:^)
sorry i'm more a luciferian
>expecting the average Sup Forums user to be intelligent enough to reason through that argument.
whatever man you did trigger me though
i actually personally know people that think like this and they are FUCKING LOSERS and they want to bring me down with them
no, i don't fuck gutter sluts. no, i don't like degenerate women. but this black and white thinking bullshit is going to cause many of you to die alone and unhappy
Oh, so you're really just an atheist with some edgy aesthetics and anti-social tendencies.
What I've never understood about pol is the sexually repressed virgins who for some reason are advocating for it to be even more difficult to have sex with women. If it was 1954 you would die lonely and handholdless
Why make it even more difficult for yourself? Isn't politics and society what you make of it? Are we not all here with an opinion based on our circumstances, and thus want it to change to how it affects our life?
With sexual liberation I can live the way I like: by myself. I am no longer forced to live with a retarded female which will only drain my resources, whine without end and introduce psychological insecurities.
I can get laid whenever I feel like, the money from my work is mine and I do what I want with it.
Smart men pump and dump, only the retarded ones that dream about retarded things like kids and marriage get screwed. Sexual liberation is great for men, women are the ones fucked in the long run, since the number of men falling for marriage scam is falling dramatically.
i don't think you know what atheism or luciferian means
>>Calls people losers
>>Worships the sorest loser in all of the history of existence
I don't see the appeal in sex without a strong emotional attachment. Casual sex seems destructive.
I guess it's a sign of my own emotional immaturity. I'm pretty normalfag even, but I've managed to hit 24 without finding a girl I'd be content to have sex with.
I feel like a piece of shit whenever I kiss girls, even.
haha oh yeah because the jew god is the winner. sorry i forgot. luckily i'll go to hell and you won't have to be bothered with my different views when your in heaven
They want more than sex, clearly. Sex isn't the goal or some cure.
>this much damage control
Agreed.
Women need to be molded by a man.
They are not wonderful, special identities we have to discover.
They're shallow, egotistic cunts without any sense of honor and loyalty. Even against their so called "best friends".
that's not true at all, if it was 1954 anyone here with a job would likely be married
they don't have sexual drive and they are angry because we live in a society that ridicules them for having no desire to be with a woman. i understand, they just want to be alone and watch hentai without anyone like their parents talking shit to them for it
And while you wait for the right moment to lose virginity to the woman you want to marry, she rides the British Broadcasting Corporation.
i think we have molded them into shallow egotistic cunts
I'd rather be a hedonistic degenerate than a bitter virgin desu
>If it was 1954 you would die lonely and handholdless
wow what a slut
welcome to america
So you want us to date deluded women who believe in semite sky gods?
Sex isn't hard to get, currently. That's the point. When it's so available it corrodes society.
Humans are born with a natural desire for sugar; however, people who eat too much sugar are more often than not unhealthy, obese sacks of garbage.
Same goes with sex, too much of it and society goes down the drain.
Sexual liberation is nothing new. It happened in the late Roman Empire, it happened in the pre-Stalin USSR, and it was widespread in many primitive societies (Such as the Mosuo in China) who never made it off from the ground.
The building block of civilization is the family unit. Things like sexual liberation, polyamory, etc. destroy that building block.
I figured you were just an edgy hedonist that bought into (((Anton LeVay's))) cult of personality. Who in the Hell worships an actual loser?
...
thats so fake
made by some faggot with a cuck fantasy
you think the bible came up with lucifer you fucking idiot ?
Until you're invaded and killed by Muslims
Dont bother with these people. They have no self control.
Nope, date whoever you want. I would only recommend dating virgins, due to the fact that they are the best bet for marriage success.
It just so happens that there's a strong overlap between the devoutly religious, & somewhat sheltered, and girls that are dating material.
Seems rather silly to try and go Shark finning in a landlocked, freshwater lake.
>Things like sexual liberation, polyamory, etc. destroy that building block.
How about we first fix things that REALLY destroy the family, like all the cunt-protecting laws before we complain about "sexual liberation".
You're right.
But how can I find a 10/10 young virgin girl that came from a wealthy family?
I'm honestly just shitposting at this point. Why bother going into a theological argument with someone who is less relevant than the Germanic pagans?
But I don't masturbate.
>unwilling to fly your own nation's flag
LITERAL
>another Bahamian
ffs there's only like 340,000 of us yet there's always some of us on Sup Forums and on Sup Forums of all places
Literally how do we do it?
not many people on /pol are smart enough to follow this logic, understand it, accept it, and follow it in their lives
en.wikipedia.org
western society is built upon shame, religious shame to be specific. this religious shame is the only thing that has allowed for women to participate in it, yet not fall apart to degeneracy when given full participation equal to men. islamic nations accept women cannot participate and remove them from society comletely, live under theocracy and have suffered for it through the centuries from lack of development. western christendom relied on this shame to ostracize those who tried to go beyond the leash they were given... yet has enough tollerence for 'free thinkers' to give the necessary advancement that pulled literally the entire world into the modern era.
this all falls apart when society loses its religious shame. look at britain, germany, france... their churches are empty and being vandalized. their borders are swarmed by the pious. the only way to save the west is the return to christianity.
Feminism is absolutely corrosive to the family, I agree; however, sexual liberation is far more dangerous.
Again, statistics suggest that, and the "sexually liberated" are currently attacking monogamy itself, now that they won the LGBT alphabet soup battle.
>But how can I find a 10/10 young virgin that came from a wealthy family
Lower your standards, date younger, ignore wealth. You're the breadwinner, not your father-in-law.
If and when this happens I will be already long dead.
Also, muslims are too retarded to accomplish anything. They are a thing now because of oil
>I agree; however, sexual liberation is far more dangerous.
Nothing is more dangerous than feminism.
>Again, statistics suggest that, and the "sexually liberated" are currently attacking monogamy itself
Implying these are not feminists.
Except humans aren't any of those things. When birth control didn't exist they views shit like kissing on the same level as sex so minor things like even holding hands, dancing, hugging, sharing looks, and having intelligent conversations were a thing then. People used to enjoy spending time with another person without sticking their dick in them. And when it was time for SEX they probably did it once or a couple of times before the woman blew up.
Degenerates took advantage of birth control and contraceptives made to keep people healthy and safe and propagated hook up culture. So the degenerates who wanted ton fuck left and right back then we're shunned and got punished because they caused actual problems. Now they get away with it while brainwashing people into being okay with this.
It's not okay. It never was okay.
Your hentai addiction has molded your sexual attraction to artificial women, stop hentai and you'll find real women more attractive.
But if you have a hentai addiction (it's an addiction, don't lie to yourself) you probably weren't interested in women before.
Only unattractive men who have nothing to offer would want an arranged marriage. If you're a decent guy it's not hard to land a decent girl. They're kind of drawn to one another because they're such a small minority. Most girls are bar sloots and most guys are sportbros
>you'll find real women more attractive
Translation: Become an orbiter.
Jokes on you.
I use my right hand.
The internet destroyed shame. Anonymity is probably the main reason, and ultimately , people don't like this, but internet freedom has to be removed. There has to be a way to allow spouses/employers/parents to read people's internet habits (preferably without unlimited government access to the data) otherwise society will collapse on itself. Behind the screen there's no more shame and really, no more western society. It's one globalist heap of crap, thanks to the web we're snared in.
Anonymity is Sup Forums's sacred cow and really it's responsible for a lot of the problems it complains about.
I want you to know that I think you're unintelligent
>Nothing is more dangerous than feminism
Feminism helped to set the stage for modern sexual liberation, and was influenced by Marxism (Just read up on Betty Freidan/Goldstein); however, the concept of sexual liberation existed long before feminism and has had disastrous consequences each time it's tried.
>Implying these are not feminists
They are, because feminism is part of this current cultural Marxist coalition, but if the world looked the same, only without feminism, we'd still see it happening.
You're implying the right thing, though, which is that the cultural battle against feminism is inherently intertwined with the battle against sexual liberation; I'm simply cautioning not to take half-measures in your opinions.
Do you think some degree of de-anonymization of the internet needs to happen to fix the family?
I don't like the idea but I'm worried that it will be necessary, and either way leftists are going to use it for their own purposes. Maybe it's a good idea to prepare for this and use the same tools to shame whores and degenerate men, and make it backfire.
I agree that internet anonymity allows for the eventual de-stigmatization of otherwise shameful behaviors and attitudes, but the internet itself didn't destroy shame.
Shame's influence in society was mortally wounded by the 1960s cultural revolution. It seems almost absurd to go back to criticizing things like hippies and The Beatles, but this was when we started to see the decline of Western Civilization's health.
Hell, the anthem for the modern left, is practically John Lennon's "Imagine."
I think even in the 50's the atomization of society via suburbs and the beginnings of consumer culture already started to eat away at traditional values. Remember, the kids raised in the "pure" 50's became the hippies. They were the first generation raised on TV in every home and processed food from the supermarket.
No, I'd argue that currently, things like free speech and anonymity are our bulwark's against the modern far-left.
Like I mentioned before, this nonsense started far before the internet. The internet helped exacerbate it, sure; however, take a good look at what happened and what is happening on the internet.
Yes, Sup Forums is hardly the most moral of places, but Sup Forums wasn't moving the needle of culture in the sense that other things have.
If you go to, say, Twitter, everyone on the Far-Left uses their real names. Everyone on the Far-Right is anonymous, or under a pseudonym.
The Left (and they've really done this since the internet's creation) struts around triumphantly in the open. It's not the deviants that sulk in the shadows, it's anyone arguing for a strong family, for tradition, group pride, etc.
To de-anonymize the internet would be to take one step forward and two steps back in my opinion.
Still, I have sun, beaches and bunda ;^)
Oh, I agree absolutely that the table was set back in the '50s. I think Ramzpaul mentioned that at Amren one year.
I was just trying to attach a date to the event itself.
The degenerate onslaught of '60s culture can be traced back quite a ways. Certain aspects to the '20s & '30s, others even further.
I think that's normal, otherwise there's a sense of alienation. Some speak of wanting to be away from the other after they do it. That doesn't seem right.
There is someone on Sup Forums who thinks it's clever to describe the types of people on Sup Forums "right now".
It's not.
This post was made by a femanon that is sexually frustrated because Chad Thundercock has not fucked her recently.
Oh hey, it's the literally Jewish guy yet again. You responded to me in the millennial thread too. This is outrageous.
I actually didn't. By the time I read that thread it was already archived.
This is actually the first I've posted on Sup Forums today.
Too many shills from Reddit engaging in obvious and obnoxious anti-Trump shilling.
Maybe he's confusing you with me. We have similar ID's.
Damn this is weird. I swear I talked to the literally Jewish guy today. It was in a thread about millennials. He was repeating the same anti-technology, anti-Internet stuff.
Could there be more Unabomber sympathizers on here than we originally thought?
Maybe it was an earlier thread. I know there was a long millenial thread here:
and I didn't post in it but I read it just as it got archived
Eh, I've read Kaczynski. "Industrial Society and Its Future" is a work that I'd recommend to anyone on Sup Forums but I don't buy into the anarcho-Primitivist approach of combatting Leftism.
If we're delving into extremes to save civilization, I'd rather we start borrowing heavily from leaders and thinkers like D'Annunzio, Mussolini, Codreanu, Mosley, Primo de Rivera, Pelley, etc.
That was it. This is weird. Why did this thread all of a sudden lose all momentum when I came in anyway? I'm saging to test. Sup Forums has been going down a lot lately today.
There was an outage for about an hour around when that millenial thread was nearing the bump limit.
Anyway you only have to deal with my madness for another month, then I'll have a full time job and post here a lot less.
Chastity shaming is worse than slut shaming, because chastity has been considered a virtue in western society since the fall of the "boy buttfucking is okay if you're rich and he's poor" Roman empire, whereas lustfulness is a deadly sin. What's happened here is that virtue is being dissuaded and sin is being persuaded, feeling satanic yet?
Green brothers are cucks.
Probably a combination of things
>Unintentional sliding
>A few posters leaving
>Discussion veering off into sub-discussions
>etc.
Starting threads with qts can only garner so much interest.
I don't believe Ted's solutions work, but I always just worry that everything has to collapse before anything ever happens. I'd be an even bigger hypocrite than I am now given the profession I work in, though I do want to move somewhere more remote in a few years (not to that extreme)