Can Sup Forums intelligently explain why sexual liberation is a bad thing...

Can Sup Forums intelligently explain why sexual liberation is a bad thing, without sounding bitter over the the fact that 10/10 women like these would never consider settling for you?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because they won't settle for me.

since when did white girls get so thicc

No children

Immigration

The end

> 10/10's like these

kek

It's fine in moderation but people take it too far

Women actually become more depressed the more men they sleep with.

The biggest red pill most people refuse to take is that seriously dating women between 18-30 is fucking pointless and absolutely wasteful. Literally the only things you can get out of a relationship at this age is a kid or cucked.

This image sums it up.

The freer the market, the more inequality. It's the same for sex as it is for economics.

added hormones in the meats

>far right

Since the pill.

I'm bitter and lonely, fuck off.

>10/10 women like these

To be fair the right one would be close to a 10/10 in my country so if user like to shitpost using proxy maybe he's country is full of ugly woman

...

According to women a man that is:
Savage
Psychotic
Arrogant
Conniving
Rude
Smug

is an ideal mate,but this matchs the description of a criminal rather than a civilized person thus women should not be allowed to choose their mates other wise they will slowly devolve humanity because the idiotic savages will breed the most and the fastest outcompeting the civilized men like what you see today.

Having sex whenever lowers its value, either making you not want to keep doing sex, or to cause you to be addicted to it to the point that you just keep fucking, and are never satisfied

If you go around having sex every other day, the fun's only going to dry up

I think the divorce rate does a pretty good job of explaining why.

>10/10 women
Nope. This is a bait post.

I still believe in a delusional dream that it's possible to find someone who can melt away the fears and anxieties of modern life, and that she'll always be there to do so.

It ruins the prospect of future families?

There is a direct correlation between number of sexual partners and probability that all future marriages will fail.

Failed marriages = broken homes = fatherless children = lower IQ, more criminal predisposition, more SJW nonsense, lower life skills, less self esteem, social issues, welfare and loads of other shit that comes with it.

Statistics show that the more sexual partners one has the less satisfying their relationships tend to be, and conversely the fewer sexual partners people have tend to be happier in relationships and lead better lives as a whole. How bout you actually look this shit up instead of asking us to do your research for you.

Just wanted to say, if any of those girls went for a run and needed someone to lick the sweat from their asses I would be so game.

>10/10
You have some abysmally low standards, nigger.

Monogamy creates families. If there's no loyalty, there's no trust, and that's a failed family unit.

Chad Thundercock is more likely to be a pump N dump deadbeat dad as opposed to a beta provider. Kids of single parents or orphans are much more likely to be degenerate criminals.

Lastly, all men are naturally aggressive. We're just being told constantly not to be. A nation of bitter virgins who can't get laid is a civil war waiting to happen. Internet porn is the only thing slowing the inevitability.

OR develop normal socialization skills

10/10 women won't settle for betas whether or not there is sexual liberation

That was a stupid question

>user thinks girl in the middle is a 10/10

>thicc
t. tumblr memes

why SHOULD people be fucking around the clock?

>10/10
The only pretty one is the one on the right but her ass is too big. She's maybe 8/10.
>would never consider settling for you
lol implying I would settle for used goods so they could drain me off money. Never trust beautiful women cause 99% of them are spoiled whores with a milage of a prostitute. Look for a girl with an average face, good body and likeable character.

Because marriages last less well when the pair bonding behavioural response has been desensitised due to having sex with multiple different men previously.

And broken marriages have adverse consequences for child development and consequently for society.

To be close to a nine, she would have boobs size that match her but size.

8, 7, 9.5

Free resources and a lack of existential threats bring about low sexual selectivity. Because fitness of offspring is not a factor in their long-term survival, organisms choose to mate with less fit partners, and mate more often. This act produces additional dopamine that further deadens the organism's ability to act, creating a negative feedback cycle.

>10/10 women like these

Not bad bait. i'd give it 7/10

see

Sexual liberation benifice only the upper range of men.

Bad thing? Depends on perspective. For men it's a good thing, although at the same time it makes having a family close to impossible. But a family isn't that important, so overall it's a pretty good deal.

For women, though. I feel sorry for the cunts. I really do. But they brought it upon themselves.

but that's wrong you retard. divorce is more likely as the number of partners increases.

Reread the crumpet's post, you're making burgers look dumb.

This is a 10 for me. I'll take pic related over any bimbo on that pic

They look like nigger bait

Learn to read you embarrassing retard.

Check out Black Pigeon Speaks vid on this. It's exactly what I think you are asking for

Blond's gonna be a mess by the time she hits 36
The middle looks like she has decent body but looks up tight and a dead fuck
The end ass is too big and is just one chocolate bar away from being a cellulite mess plus no tits and is wearing something under the dress to hide her "gunt" otherwise she has a cute face
I've fuck hotter broads then this, they can have their liberation they'll end up regretting at 45 childless, alone and posting pictures of their cats everyday on facebook. That's all they'll end up with

China btfo

I saw this, can confirm.

I mean I've heard the whole argument before about the liberation of women leading to civilization collapse, but it's good to see it condensed in an easy to consume video that Pigeon made.

Saw a similar video by a black man who compared it to what Rome went through. Good to see black people getting red pilled too desu.

J.D. Unwin's study Sex and Culture found that hedonistic cultures breeds low energy. Low energy lowers the condition of the society. making people work towards being rewarded with sex in a relationship raises energy levels and productivity in that society.

it goes along with what previous people have said about pair bonding. having a wife to provide for gives men a reason to go out and be productive. but if women aren't worth working for, as they can be easily replaced then why provide for her?

besides, every great society has been founded on sexual restraint, though some may have fallen into decadence.

In short, chastity of women creates a society mostly of superior men. Guess what the opposite does.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections

the destruction of the traditional family/traditional marriage should speak for itself

They look.like men ur gay

destroys nuclear family, leads to single women dependent on the state rather than a husband, resulting in higher time preferences and more left-wing voting patterns. makes women less happy after their mid 30s, cultivates the anti-male cat-lady victim mentality. is a stepping stone toward the normalization of other degenerate and anti-social behavior. cannot sustain a healthy society over the long term.

Marriage failure rates and lots of sex before marriage have strong correlation.

10/10 is very debatable maybe when they were 18 or 20

those are more like 7-8/10

aside from that nothing wrong with sexual liberation and they shouldn't cry because men dont want to wife them up with their history.

sub-replacement fertility.

there have been studies done and you can just look at history. the easier women in a society are to have sex with, the closer to the end of that societies life. sexual liberation of women always, yes always equals low birth rates for that society. societies where women are more subservient and chaste, always, yes always, multiply and expand. it's not very hard to see this even now, it's happening today. look at muslims expanding and advancing on western civilization. this video(below) gives a decent representation. any great civilization that lets women vote, is destroyed in just a hundred years or so. if women didn't vote, no gay marriage. if women didn't vote, no tranny bathrooms. if women didn't vote, no flood of refugees. if women didn't vote, no "free stuff". if women didn't vote, no left wing. youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw

It's the fact that no woman settles for anyone. They all think they're tens and ninety per cent of male society is told to accept loneliness.

There's nothing wrong with a better understanding of sexual matters, but many women have taken it entirely too far. The result of this 'liberation' isn't a greater understanding of those sexual matters, but instead an increase in accidental pregnancy and single motherhood which is a horrible problem for our society eventually leading to greater crime rate, lower economic productivity, and a greater waste of potential.

You're a moron.

5 star man, here.

How dare you assume that just because I browse Sup Forums that I am not a 10/10 handsome chad. Shame on you.

Sexual liberation is fine since it makes marriage funner and outs all the single degenerates for the slime they are. It's the conceited losers that give it a bad name. In reality it is pretty sweet.

they won't cry, the zoloft and chardonnay will see to that

the more liberated women are the more free stuff. the more free stuff, the more the women use the state as a surrogate man, and provider. as the family is ruined, the women become more and more liberated. This too helps lead to low birth rates of those peoples. It's a fact that women's lib is a sure way to divide and conquer a society.

i dont give a shit, for that blonde woman she can fuck me over and take all my money

sexually liberated women do not settle down into families until it is too late. most likely they have a negroid or spicbaby from some animal they had a one-timer with. thus they will have few children of good stock and hinder the population rate.

meanwhile, the niggers and spics populate like rabbits, and make their way into white countries unhindered. spics here in America more than niggers as far as immigration.

thus, the end of the white race approaches unless we do something about it. Namely: end sexual """"liberation"""" and turn our cultures back toward the family unit and traditional, race-based, nationalistic values.

In short: third post, best post

>those ugly whores
>10/10 women
Your taste is shit.

The one on the right is okay. I like some curves.

...

It's dysgenics, it reduces number children born to less than replacement, bad/non genetic pairing of mistakes that are born, if female gets out of whoring "phase," used up, damaged ability to hold a relationship, correctly seen as used damaged goods from the male perspective.

the one the right

and thats all you need right there

She is good looking but that is wrong attitude to have.

YES, it's easy.

Herpes and warts are not prevented by the use of condoms.

So that's it, if you're sleeping around you're getting STDs that can't be cured. 35% of adults in the USA have genital herpes or HPV.

Fucking grody.

Sup Forums = /r9k/ & underage Sup Forums
Congratulations, you made another of those threads.

They're here every day making identical threads.

It's gay so shitpost away in them.

...

Mark my words, we need to watch China very closely in the coming years. Their "virgin problem" is many times worse than ours. The Chinese are pretty cucked by the government though, so a rebellion isn't guaranteed. Maybe if we are lucky, theyll use their impotent rage to ethnically cleanse Africa.

This thread might be bait but fuck it, Womens liberation essentially granted more privileges for them and at the same time not take any responsibility for their actions or hold men to unfair double standards and it's all at the expense of the disposable male who has be held accountable for EVERYTHING
>alimony/child support
>don't have to sign up for selective serif but can vote (men have to sign up with selective service to vote), and now have all MOS positions open to them
>can accuse any innocent man of anything under the sun, rape, abuser, wife beater etc. and if it turns out she made it up "lol since she's a women, I'll give her a short 2 year sentence"
>woman and children are still more highly valued than men, "WOMAN AND CHILDREN FIRST"
>men still have to conform to strict gender roles because women still want their cake and eat it too
>can virgin/body shame men which is totally acceptable because "lol male tears"
Need I go on

Honestly, I just want to fuck a girl at least once before I die. I don't think I could ever get a prostitute, though. It sounds like rape to me. That and I'd like to bury my face in a chick's ass.

You live in a delusional world

not an argument.

Guys guys
Listen
Guys
A dime is a chick with a face that's ugly

>10/10 women
>skanky old flat-chested hosebags

pick one

Eat Pray Love

OP what are you talking about. I'm dating a 10/10 woman right now. Been through 3 so far.

Typically, the family unit has been the basis of every successful civilization.

Sexual liberation tends to weaken this model.

Source?

If you don't get a kid by then don't you start risking retard babies?

HIGHTEST
I
G
H
T
E
S
T

What you are really asking is: "Why is promiscuity bad for women?" If you haven't been around enough to see that women who don't secure a good husband have worse lives than women who do, then there is no point in having this conversation with you because you are retarded. Why would a good man marry a slut? What does she offer?

This. You're revealing your standards, which are poor. The one on the right is 8 at best. The others........

in the last panel of the fucking image
nerd

It's neither, and it's both. It's good because it has a revealed the true nature of women, and it is bad because it disincentivises reproduction among functional and responsible adults. The genie is out of the bottle with sexual liberation. We can't go back without a muslim takeover, what we can do however, is end child-support and alimony laws. Then women will once again have to be mindful of who they are fucking

>implying only 10/10 girls will act like diseased sluts if given free reign

The best thing for women (especially your daughter) is to make sure that they are marriage material. Their long-term happiness and security depends on being worth a damn as a wife. Liberated women are not worth shit as wives.

Very generous. 5.5, 6, 7.5

This is a bit better. 8,8

>10/10 women like these would never consider settling for you?

considering that we
>pay for their abortion
>pay for their bc
>pay for their children
or
>pay for the std medication

id say not getting a piece of the pie is a pretty solid reason

What should I do if I have no prospects of ever getting laid? Shy and average guys usually stay celibate (girls only want outgoing, muscular guys). I'm willing to start lifting again, but my average jawline and shy/boring personality would hold me back anyway. Is prostitution morally wrong? I've been wanting to see one for so long.

Sexual Liberation is bad:

> Sexually Transmitted Diseases
> Hardcore Pornography/Obscenity
> General Disrespect