Reaaaaly maeks u think

reaaaaly maeks u think

Please tell me that this is a meme picture made by someone on Sup Forums and they don't actually believe this bullshit

That's peak leftist intellectual

it's just marxist ''i'm right because i use fancy words'' bullshit

Well Sup Forums, really makes you think, doesn't it?

Noticed there wasn't any America in this thread.
This will be my only post

Eduardo Galeano go back to your grave.

UNCOMMON
N
C
O
M
M
O
N

That's called college. They'll mellow out after a couple of years in the real world.

>A FUCKING SUN!

...

Except that last part will never happen.

Nice meme

i agree, those fags need to stop reading and get to work

>ruling by the masses
>letting people with low IQ's run the country

>businesses getting profit from selling things to willing buyers is theft
>government taking money and goods from people at gunpoint isn't
it's like marx was mentally disabled

Capitalism claims to "own" "scare quotes" and other types of "punctuation".

Communism can't work because there's always that one Fucktard who asserts himself as supreme leader

It's also the fact that people who work harder don't want to be equal to a bunch of lazy fucks that only do the minimum necessary

There's that scene from the last episode of Mad Men where Roger visits his 'lost' daughter on her hippie commune. The only dude there says, "There's no heirarchy maaaaaaaaaan." Roger responds with a wry smile, "There's always a heirarchy."

That's how communism and socialism in general fails.

Then he snorts cocaine out of a hippie dick. What is your point?

And assassinate all dissident intellectual.

>Implying communist states don't claim to own all the people and resources.

>Single-factor understanding of History
Liberalization of sexual morality, feminism, homosexuality, pedophilia... being sanctioned at the start of a civilization's decadence phase?
Nah, that doesn't exist.
External invasions by barbarian hordes?
Nah, that doesn't exist.
Inevitable balkanization of "diverse" metropolitan empires?
Nah, that doesn't exist.
Usury, sky-rocketing debt and physical devaluation of metal-based coins?
Nah, that doesn't exist.

None of that shit exists or is part of the reason why empires rise and fall. There's just this single-factor explanation of the whole of History. Marxist idiots.

>Fuck fascism
Yeah, no. Fuck you.

Come on Brazil. You're not that dense. The point is that communism cuts against human nature.

What happens if everyone invests their money responsibly and 99% of the world become capital owners?

Managing ill gotten wealth in the stock market is not hard work

how can something that isn't finished or hasn't happened be a trend

>human nature
Are you even trying, murrica? It is human nature to rape little girls and die at your 20s from an yeast infection - doesn't mean that this is a good thing.
Communism is to our society what antibiotics were to medicine. Stop fighting change and just evolve!

I really don't want to have to live during the revolt against the state by workers. That is going to be a bloodbath.

>poorfag neets actually believe this

>everyone owning a share of the capital
I think that's what socialism is actually meant to be it's just they stall at the whole investing their money responsibly part so they substitute it with massive amounts of state violence (it's a fairly poor substitute).

If you can't sell something, you don't own it.

Looks like leftypol content

At least it's more rigorous than da joos. Sup Forums doesn't even analyze what they see as the prime political evil. It's like they think history started in the 1920s. Where is your cool graphical comic illustrating the eternal race struggle between aryan and semite? Or whatever scientific hypotheses that you hold dear? You guys always push out beady-eyes tier content, but race-swapped with an accordingly different facial highlight

Ask a wealthy stock broker if he remembers the last time he did a 60 hour week of back breaking labour and you will hear a lie or nothing at all. After all that's what peasants are for.

Same for most working class folk. Most people don't work exorbitant hours, unless they're single parents trying to spare some dignity and balance 2 unskilled jobs or clock in absurd overtime to support like 3 kids

the reason why they don't work 60 hours a week of back breaking labour is because they went to university to get educated, you dumb cunt.

But this is wrong.

>This is an oversimplification
>Zesty Internet memes
No, this is what lefties actually believe, gypsy.

Makes u think huh

So did half of the millennial generation and look how that turned out for them

Stop defending boomer ponzi schemes

how did it turn out for them?

Hey man, thanks for the reply. Don't forget to rate and subscribe.

god bless america

daily reminder that marx himself believed that marxism was a terrible and poorly thought out ideology

so you're just gonna make up bullshit?

LOL
suddenly in the last stage states and unions just give up power, and then "everybody's chill"?
What in the name of shit would make the states and unions want to give up power?

Give me one good reason why I shouldn't want industries to be worker controlled. This doesn't mean management is thrown out of the window, what it means is people get to work for their own gain, rather than for the gain of their employer.

>spouts marxist ideals
>knows next to nothing about karl marx
how embarrassing for you

No employer would ever agree to that.

>history is a linear progression

kek only fucking children and STEM majors think this. anyone with even a basic understanding of historical context knows this isn't true

Yes.. That's the whole point.

Historical materialism is the ultimate redpill. Get over it.

Look like it was made by a 5 years old who just read the commie manifesto

They have low IQs because of capitalism. The labourer is subjected to long days which drain him of energy and, as a worker, is reduced a cog in the capitalist machine and robbed of the opportunity to maintain his skills beyond his singular function in the workplace. Adam Smith observed that "the man whose whole life is spent in performing a few simple operations.. has no occassion to exert his understanding... He generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become."

Marx never said taxation isn't theft. It isn't so much the sale of commodities that Marx takes issue with. Rather, it is the exploitation of the labourer in order to create surplus-value.

There is a difference between "capital owner" and "a capitalist." Marx refers to someone who profits from a small amount of capital as a "small master," but he writes that "capitalist production only then really begins.. when each individual capital employs simultaneously a comparatively large number of labourers; when consequently the labour process is carried on on an extensive scale and yields, relatively, large quantities of products."

>communism where everything is for the people
>but no one can own anything

>no one can own anything

Nice meme. You have every right to own commodities and personal property. The exploitation of the earth and labour power in order to generate surplus value is what communism seeks to end.

would full ownership to the same level as the second amendment be allowed a communist society. that would be instresting

This. Please do not confuse private property and personal property. Private property is stuff that should be publically owned but itsn't such as industries or resource gathering sites. Personal property is your clothes and cellphone.

>naive autist that has already shown himself to know almost nothing about karl marx honestly believes communism is possible or ideal
>doesnt realise that it works totally counter to how we as a species think, feel and function
>doesnt realise that the abolition of government and private property requires something not unlike a government to enforce
>doesnt realise that others would disagree and form their own not-quite-governments
>doesnt realise that those governments would need to generate resources to remain competitive
>doesnt realise the reinstating of private property to incentivise the generation of said resources would be necessary

we had communism once, then what people there were met and realised it was retarded.
people too stupid to speak a language knew that communism was retarded and yet you dont

how incredibly embarrassing for you

>Muh hard work

Fuck off. You are obviously young/poor and don't have a clue how things work. Just because you're working 60 hours a week (omg so long!) doesn't mean you are providing a skill or service that is valuable or not easily replaceable.

I will be working in investment banking and have already interned in IB for the better part of last year. We work 80-100 hours a week on average. I run on 3 hours of sleep. All-nighters at the office aren't uncommon. These are the dues you pay in this world.

All the people I have and will be working with busted their ass in high school and college to get good grades so they could have this opportunity. Education (in the right majors/at the right schools) generally increases the value of your labor and the labor we provide is not easily replaceable.

Actually, it's more like

1917~1995

Holy shit, this full communism isn't working, revert back to property rights!

>inb4 not real communism
>inb4 more Hegelian bullshit about "progress"

JC: Do you take uppers?

Do you mean the right to bear arms? Probably. Depends on who you ask.

>Marxists actually believe that the dumb worthless masses rising up and taking control will make things better.

Deal with it commies, some people are better than others, you don't have a right to anything you see, equality is more destructive than productive, better to strive for individual quality of self rather than bring everything down around you.

>They have low IQs because of capitalism.
I doubt this, the most unintelligent of our masses are people who scum off the welfare system. Laborers are far more productive within society, but it appears that once you remove any form of requirement to exert production within the system, essentially become a leech living in leisure, then there is an even further break down of character.

Selling your labor improves character greatly so, unemployed deviant bums are a representation of the Communist ideology in it's final form.

This >I doubt this, the most unintelligent of our masses are people who scum off the welfare system.
Meant for

Just a few cups of coffee.

Might look into it once I start working full-time but I'd rather not get into a habit.

>Selling your labor improves character greatly so

That's nonsense and you know it. Maybe it improves character if you're a student or something, but definitely not if you make a career out of being an unskilled labourer.

Historical Materialism has been proven to fail to predict historical trends from the 20th century and few people seriously believe it, today. It's a sophisticated form of a "teleological" argument for history, and teleology in general is not sound.

Communism is controlled opposition. Karl Marx was paid by the Rothschilds.

>live and labor together
Because being a worker drone under the constant scrutiny of the stupid and corrupt is the limit of Man's worth? That's your idea of paradise?

Marxism is retarded, it relies on false premises such as the labor theory of value, profit is inherently unjustified, and that voluntary association is oppressive. It's ass-backwards and our progressive college lib students need to stop supporting the opposite everything that is proven to be good in the world for hipster/diversity points.

Nothing to say on the welfare leeches? Those "liberated" from the confines of selling ones labor, cause I see no kind of exertion of quality coming from them.

And unskilled laborer deserves nothing, he deserves no "equality", it is not up to a violent revolution to make sure he lives a rich man's life. He's a working class man who is either too stupid, lazy or content in his position, most are happy being what they are. You commit the sin of presuming that liberating these people from labor will somehow make things better, perhaps it's better to make there are classes.

>Those "liberated" from the confines of selling ones labor

That's a strawman. I disapprove of them as much as you do, and Marx would have as well. Labour is, always has been, and always will be an essential component of human life. The manner in which it is arranged, however, can be changed.

Your second point is also a strawman. Nobody is suggesting that unskilled workers and skilled workers have material equality. Marx would argues that the skilled worker's labor is of a greater value since more labor has gone into the cultivation of his skills. The way that labour is arranged in our society is destroying the unskilled worker.

Bring back feudalism if you ask me.

How are those Iberian mountains, f@m?

More like the decline of civilization.