Why is it controversial to say that men have had a greater impact on culture, history, and civilization?
It's an undeniable fact that men have contributed more to the creation of the world around us than women have. Honestly, the only women I can really think of that's contributed something interesting are like, Marie Cure, Marjane Santrapi, Ada Lovelace, etc.
I just don't see why stating a fact is controversial?
bump
Maybe because in the past women were pretty
>oppressed
And some people don't find it fair that you don't bring up that fact. Also the truth hurts.
tru
because its true
Who gave birth to them?
>women
Get over yourself faggot, your post soul only be relevant if we we reproduced asexually.
Sage.
Because the modern women who have never suffered any oppression 'feel' like they have.
When you tell people with no real understanding of the world around them and no experience with hardship that they are treated poorly, they believe it.
Enter the modern feminist. Or don't if you can help it. Nobody wants to fuck a fat, greasy man-hating cow after all.
The fall of our civilization is deserved though. As evidenced by the falling. Would not have happened if it was worth preserving or built well enough to resist. Back to the drawing board white man. Maybe next time you'll spend less time helping the people killing you and more time fight back. GG.
hehehe, nice one.
but you need to work on that pasta to sound a bit more convinced.
Women contribute blowjobs.
implying women could make babies without men
only after they were proven to be less useful than their male counterparts after centuries of culture based in equal rights that failed due to women.
He isn't, just that women gave birth to them. Which is true
???????????????
People are a product of experiences. Experiences with men and women. I'm guessing you have more experiences with men, though.
>Thinking women had no influence on what men do or did
It's not controversial, it just sounds narcissistic. If someone called it controversial then they just said it to not make you feel bad and like an asshole. It was probably the WAY you said it that made you seem like a douche, you twat.
>That women were even remotely close to having the same impact
Can't handle the truth?
Men did all the hard work
>just rise kids and keep the house clean
Because most people, and women especially, believe that an absence of evidence isn't an evidence of absence. Women didn't get credit for many of the things they invented simply because not very long ago at all, women had about as many rights as a dog does today.
So when you say we impacted things more without even trying to note that many, many women throughout time have had credit for their inventions or discoveries taken from them, you just sound ignorant and/or disengenuous. Many of them even intentionally sold the rights to their product to men simply because more people would buy it/trust it if it came from a man. In my grandmothers lifetime, and she's still alive right now, it was almost impossible for a woman to be able to find a job that wasn't shit pay with almost no room at all for promotions. That's because traditionally, the women, instead of doing things like attending university or getting good jobs and building resumes and experience, would marry and stay at home with the kids. Women look unsuccessful in the past because they were too busy keeping house and cleaning snot off kids faces to find the free time needed to do the stuff that you would consider "better" somewhat arbitrarily.
Plus, women are skittish as fuck. A lot of them would probably think that your interest in this topic says something very negative about you and how you perceive women. I'm not sure they'd be wrong to, either. You won't achieve anything by convincing people that either gender is better or worse. Even if you're right, it's still a completely pointless thought experiment and you sound like you just got out of a bad relationship
Bringing up facts doesn't work these days. Anything you say is interpreted solely using emotion and not rational thinking. Everything you say will immediately be twisted until they arrive at the conclusion you are racist or sexist, not understanding the irony of doing so. For example, if you claim there are genetic differences between people of European and African descent (a demonstrable fact), people generally jump to the conclusion that you are saying Europeans are better than Africans and call you a racist. There are two 'reasons' to jump to this conclusion: either said person believes all white people are racist (which is a racist belief), or said person believes black people are inferior (which is a racist belief).
tl;dr race war now
You're assuming OPs gender by saying his statement is narcissistic, you twat.
it isn't controversial because it's the truth. the only people that gets upset over truth, are the liars
Wow, a gold star answer on Sup Forums. I am impressed.
So do gay guys.
because its a point used as a stepping stone to daftly explain why women shouldn't be recognized for historical/scientific contributions, or why they should be denied the opportunity to do so going forward.
motherfuckers willing to prevent world-changing scientific discoveries just to make sure they aren't done by yucky girls. go join fucking isis.
you dont have to be gay for that tho
Don't have to be, but it helps.
even couple hundred years ago women have no rights other than having a house to clean and children to take care of. no wonder men have greater inpact on history.
/thread