Friendly reminder that if you vote Republican :

YOU ARE ACTIVELY VOTING AGAINST YOUR OWN ECONOMIC INTERESTS

Other urls found in this thread:

freenation.org/a/f12l3.html
takimag.com/article/why_democrats_lost_the_redneck_vote_scott_locklin/print#ixzz2zkpZaYYx
washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/26/the-superbug-that-doctors-have-been-dreading-just-reached-the-u-s/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Shhh... don't tell them.

Globalization.

Vote for Venezuela instead!

k

Really makes you think, Basic Bernie Automation Income.

Nice meme.

Republicans are somehow rulling your life whilst saying the government needs less control

Democrats are somehow freedom whilst saying that taxes are evermore needed and that you dont "Need" certain things such as guns and therefore should not have it

WTF people still have a problem with gays?
It's 2016 there's literally nothing wrong with sucking dick.

Both parties aim to create a globalist transnational oligarchy; there is no qualitative difference between the two.

That's why people bucked the GOP establishment in 2010, and now did the same thing by nominating Trump.

>voting for what benefits YOU, and not on principal and what you believe is right

And liberals call conservatives selfish, kek

i vote democrat to keep my cock fighting ring i have funded by government aid

>paying less in taxes is against my interests
>not having the government subsidize criminal elements is against my interests
>having a whiter America is against my interests

False

Did you know that Wal-Mart actively lobbies FOR the min wage increase, while simultaneously fighting it in public?

Did you know that the most corporate money goes into Democratic and "progressive" political movements?

Did you know the ultra-rich are 99% Democrat, and put more cash than you've ever dreamt existed into keeping you from realizing that your "open minded resistance" is actually a carefully contrived plot to make you cut your own throat?

>WTF people still have a problem with gays?


Being gay is not OK.

Remember that, faggot!

...

Wow, OP you're given me a lot to think about.
Gee, y'know, it's like, yeah man?
Can't believe I never thought about it like that.
Gosh, it's like, yeah, y'know?

EAT SHIT BERNIE

Economic interests are subordinate to racial interests. Preservation of white people matters more than individual wealth. Individualist capitalism is a Jewish notion used to destroy the white race.

Eat shit, Bernie

How can voting for more regressive taxation be FOR my interests?

How can voting for a welfare system that is PURPOSEFULLY wasteful be FOR my interests? (the negative income tax as a sole replacement is vehemently opposed).

yes....vote for Dems, senior

we like our free stuff after we break your laws and cross the borders

P.S.....the Syrian and Somalian refugees want free stuff too

What's with all these S4P and Sup Forums nigger faggots on Sup Forums? Do you faggots not have Overwatch to jerk off to or some shit? Maybe finish your middle school poster projects?

Also, friendly reminder:

>bernie & his cucks throw all their eggs in one basket
>rely on Trump to give them exposure
>waste their time and effort
>they wanted Romney or Cruz to moderate
>rules exist that bars this debate from even happening
>bernie got cucked again

Who needed this debate, exactly?

Republicans didn't force banks to give housing loans to everybody that asked regardless of their ability of likelihood of paying it back which directly lead to the housing bubble that we're still recovering from. They also didn't force banks to give student loans to everybody that asks either.

The lodge system, which still exists today in a much smaller form, was the "welfare" mutual association that most european immigrants used, especially with medical care.

New Dealer's didn't like the "ethnic" centrism of these organizations and found ways to reduce their importance throw expansion of government.

freenation.org/a/f12l3.html

also, if you're a male and you vote for a feminist you are voting against your own interest.

Give me the gibs Bernie. Don't eat shit go treat yourself to some pizza hut.

This. Also if you're white and vote Democrat you're voting against your own interests.

You jackasses fight over who gets the biggest slice and what you are doing is shrinking the pie.

NOT to say the Republicans are actually any better, the RNC is as corrupt as the DNC and the rhetoric barely matters, but your implication that the Republicans are worse than the Democrats on this is obviously insane.

Even if i agree with you which i dont.
Economic interests vs opening up the boarders and white genocide. Not a hard decision to make at all.

From what I understand is that when you vote for the Democratic party in America, they will raise your taxes and you'll be paying for the EBT and education for dindus and illegals.

I'm forced to vote for ((ABRAHAM))'s party because the Democrats want to take my guns.

Friendly reminder that if you are white and vote democrap, you are voting for people who are against your race existing.

Who the fuck is this and stop spamming her you fucking cunt she's the most average look whore I've ever seen

DEMOCRATS THINK IMPORTING BROWN PEOPLE TO STEAL YOUR JOBS AT SLAVERY LEVEL WAGES IS IN YOUR ECONOMIC INTEREST

It's true. That is, in the sense that voting for libertarians is far more in your economic interests than for republicans.

>inb4 never win, wasted vote
The founding fathers that Americans love so much were libertarians. I don't understand the modern doublethink of simultaneously venerating them but rejecting the ideals that they used to found the fucking country.

Fucking Raymond Tusk from House of Cards. Asshole.

This board has become infested with economically illiterate lefty shills

I always thought the ultra rich were Democrats look at Socal loads of rich liberals that vote demoshits and NY city where its nothing but rich people they keep voting for demoshits

This is why I'm a liberal. End cockatrice fights now!

Yes, the Democratic party would be an equivalent to the PvdA/SP in the Netherlands, except the Demcrats have had better control over their hardcore socialists until Bernie "Bolshevik" Sanders.

I noticed OP replaced the "redneck" on the left with a more generic white guy. Perhaps even leftists have some self-awareness of how blatantly hypocritical and condescending they are.

>The latte tribe insists that working-class peckerwoods are voting against their economic interests when they vote for Republican candidates. This may be true, but it doesn’t mean that voting for the tax-and-condescend party would be a vote for the economic interests of the world’s Archie Bunkers. NAFTA was a Clinton Administration achievement, after all. Why should Archie vote for the Meathead party that shipped his job to Mexico? Economists of all political stripes have also noted that low-income working families tend to pay an appreciable portion of their earnings in taxes. Maybe they get it all back in “services” somehow, but the working poor notice how the non-working poor live off the state without doing any work. They take it personally that working harder is penalized while left-wing policies reward being lazy and dependent. Palefaced plebeians also dislike the latte-tribe concept of “white privilege,” which says the Obama daughters should be given legal preference over poor white kids.

>The latte tribe are rabid tub-thumpers for the current immigration tidal wave. Mass immigration is very obviously against the interests of all working citizens who aren’t government bureaucrats. Why do we need a million legal immigrants a year when the U6 unemployment rate stands at 15%? The sweatshop wing of the Republican Party is also pro-immigration, but at least the Republicans aren’t completely hostile to citizens who would prefer we have fewer immigrants. Modern Democrats think those who aren’t so enthusiastic about the immigration tsunami are evil irrational racists rather than folks who are looking after their self-interest.

takimag.com/article/why_democrats_lost_the_redneck_vote_scott_locklin/print#ixzz2zkpZaYYx

>That image
How's China's lack of health regulations oversight doing?

Oh, that's right. Superbugs. Thanks lack of regulations and regulation enforcement!

washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/26/the-superbug-that-doctors-have-been-dreading-just-reached-the-u-s/

>vote Republican
>middle class slips farther into obscurity

>vote Democrat
>cohesive society slips farther into obscurity

Lesseroftwoevils.jpg

The ultra rich are split between "pro business" and "pro big government" and switch on the fly. Very few are pro market - which is the classical liberal "libertarian" position.

If you're a white male and vote Democrat you're a literal cuck.

I can at least understand why dindus vote the way they do.

Both parties are being taken over by the electorate.

I can't make the argument that there should be NO REGULATIONS. I CAN make the argument, that about 80-90% of the time, regulations do more harm than good and must necessarily reduce freedom.

They're also forces of control - like the cognitive dissonance between "rent control - affordable housing" "single payer healthcare" and SILENCE on "regulating" colleges and universities.

While you're deciding which party to vote for they're both trying to screw you for their personal benefit.

>being a white male
>voting for Democrats
Do you let feminists fuck you with strap ons? How about walking around in chains apologizing for slavery?

Communism is not in anyone's economic interest, shill

Fuck off Trudeau

>I CAN make the argument, that about 80-90% of the time
Well sure, anyone can make an argument by making shit up. It's still a shit argument. Overwhelmingly, regulations are a great thing. Why do libertarians never speak of the 1800s? Nearly every regulation you hate was missing them. I guess it's inconvenient to talk about child slavery and burning rivers, huh?

>"single payer healthcare"
>Implying America is first world

Iam a proud white liberal even after years of browsing Sup Forums

> le democrats are for white genocide meme

Trashed

Sup Forums is filled with paranoid schizo right wing nut jobs

>current year
>still pushing "muh economic interests" meme

There are enough government gibs as it is.

>communist nation doesn't regulate it's own state-owned enterprises
>this is proof that capitalism is a failure

>proud white liberal
How many men in drag have fucked you in street parades?

+5 upvotes have been donated into your reddit account

Hillary's husband signed NAFTA. Trump is the only candidate concerned about the economic interests of the American people.

>Sup Forums is filled with paranoid schizo right wing nut jobs

Then fuck off back to plebbit where you belong

Most regulations are subject to capture, this is documented. Regulations is a euphemism for PRO ACTIVE RESTRICTIONS.

This is the equivalent of have a police officer in your house to make sure you are not breaking the law.

How many cuckbucks is one upvote worth?

Well Trump is a protectionist and Hillary is pro-immigrant and pro-outsourcing, whatever retarded point this pic was trying to make it's no longer accurate.

You're not even a liberal, like a good leftard, you "appropriated" that name too.

The real liberals left are "libertarians."

>blames communism
I knew you faggots were going to do this. But unfortunately for you, this is a totally irrelevant red herring because what we were discussing was lack of regulations and regulation oversight. Enjoy your superbugs, faggot!

Well we used to say that if the politicians didn't trust their people they should elect a new people.

Looking at the way governments across 'the west' are spending our tax money to create refugees, then spending more of it to support said refugees, it looks like they might have finally started taking me seriously - but not in the way I was hoping for. :((

Naw I'll stay here , it's fun to troll trailer park trash that vote against Their own economic interests because of their social prejudices against non whites

AFAIK Trump is very clear on this - When you have a trade agreement, it has to be a two way street, very simple - a protectionist OR Free trade quid pro quo.

You're absolutely right. We should just return to the policies of the robber barons of the 1800s because a bunch of white boys who live with their parents said regulations were icky.

There was a good movement to judicial reform of the property rights and liabilities (torts) and it got perverted into an explosion of the Executive branch serving large entrenched businesses at the expense of small ones.

>muh robber barons
Kek, government education.

>voting against my own economic interests
Listen, I know you're an uneducated, low-wage earning fuckboi that has everything to gain from left-wing policies, but being middle class and owing the federal government and my state hundreds of dollars every April, simply because I'm paid dividends on my investments, isn't in my fucking interest, you poor, worthless, parasitic fuck.

By the way, aren't you the one who just posted an image of judging policies based on their outcomes instead of their intentions? Regulations put an end to truck systems, child slave labor and pollution so bad water burned. Why do you want that awful shit back? I assure you the market did NOTHING to correct any of these issues, which is why the government stepped in. Libertarians tend to forget that people fought long and hard specifically to get RID OF the sort of society that libertarians want for a good damn reason.

More babbling. Still no valid points.

>The capitalist policies that libertarians want weren't already in play in the 1800s
>What are the 1800s?
>[Libertarian silence intensifies]

>Kek, government education.
Did you attend private school? Is that why Canadians are certifiably retarded?

>low-wage earning
>implying you're rich and don't just mooch off your parents
Get the fuck out of here. You're not rich either, faggot. Libertarianism is nothing more than economic LARPing.

EAT SHIT BERNIE

In fact, most classical liberals argue for torts in replacement for "regulations" because the EFFECT has in fact been hybrid corporations (banking, media, cable etc) with revolving doors between FCC, SEC, FTC etc. and REDUCED Liability.

The government enforces liability and property rights through courts - it doesn't pick winners and losers.

>Earn $40k a year in income
>rent a house for $1049
>drive a 2001 Dodge
>earn $3600 in dividends
>kek, you owe us money, faggot
The problem is the fucking dipshits you vote for are just as dumb as you and assume I'm rich as well. Go be a leach somewhere else.

>Republicans are somehow rulling your life whilst saying the government needs less control

And yet the Republicans are calling for intense personal government regulation of bedroom affairs and women's vaginas. Seems a bit unprincipled.


>Democrats are somehow freedom whilst saying that taxes are evermore needed and that you dont "Need" certain things such as guns and therefore should not have it

I think they're saying you don't need weapons of war, like tanks, bazookas, assault rifles and grenade launchers.

I better vote for my own interests then!

>hurr durr all republicans are racists
What if i just don't want the government controlling everything i do think or say?

In 9 out of the 10 countries I have studied revolving around extensive welfare states, the burden is on MEDIAN INCOME earners, NOT "the rich."

So for example, Bernie may talk up Denmark when business freedom is HIGHER than the US, and all the "benefits" are paid by compulsory income and consumption taxes. The government is "saving" for you. there is no "redistribution"

>From what I understand is that when you vote for the Democratic party in America, they will raise your taxes and you'll be paying for the EBT and education for dindus and illegals.


It triggers you, doesn't it? Your party must keep you in a constant state of terror by telling you things like that.

The EFFECT, you retarded faggot, is that we don't have to put up with rampant environmental and human rights abuses from the rich anymore - at least not to the degree we used to.

Do yourself and everyone else a favor. Don't try to preach about economics until you're independent. Also, learn some fucking history.

I don't even know what you're arguing here. You're literally hovering near the poverty line. Also, yes, you DO owe us money, faggot. You know why? Because you agreed to taxation when you sought employment, started a business or played the stock market. Deal with it. If you don't like it, move to a country that doesn't do that. You don't get to use our roads and infrastructure and use our law enforcement, etc. then bitch it's not fair you have to pay for them you fucking parasite. Next time someone breaks into your house when you're at work or you're the victim of some other crime, don't bother calling the police. Look up a private agency. I'm sure you can afford it with your """"high"""" salary.

>In 9 out of the 10 countries I have studied
Kek Could you be any less experienced with the real fucking world?

>the burden is on MEDIAN INCOME earners
And why do you think that is? Look at America. Constant tax breaks for the rich and offshore accounts. Loopholes everywhere. It's ridiculous. But then again, I thought the claim was that "the rich pay all the taxes"? So which is it?

>Republicans advocating against homosexuality instead of the act of forcing the church to marry homos.
>Somehow not forcing someone is anti-freedom

>Democrats banning things and forcing you to not be able to own what you want is freedom

"Eat shit, Bernie" in this thread

A FUCKING LEAF

F
U
C
K
I
N
G

L
E
A
F

Either way.

So BURN IT DOWN!

Stop shitting up the thread.
There is a difference between enforcing property rights and TORTS --------- AND for example, and SEC supporting Wall Street.

ALL I am pointing out is Bernie is lying. The burden WILL NOT come "from the rich.

YES, as far as income tax, it is a burden on higher earners, BUT NOT payroll and consumption!

>I don't even know what you're arguing here. You're literally hovering near the poverty line.
That's the fucking point, you moron. I file single, with no exemptions, but get fucked because hurr durr muh investments. Only da rich do that.
>you owe us money
You're an entitled little bitch. Deal with it. You're not even a man.

There's nothing wrong with jerking off to Overwatch :)

I agree, it is in my best interest to vote for the venezuelan candidate!

Also, roads and infrastructure are paid with primarily by gas taxes, you fucking moron. I drive a V8 that gets 14 miles to the gallon, so get the fuck off my road, fuckboi.

>You're an entitled little bitch.
No, YOU are the entitled little bitch here. You're also lacking in self awareness. Do you use our roads? How about our water supply? Do you ever make use of the police? What do you expect to happen if your house catches fire? Let it burn? Do you even contract with private companies for any of these things or are you a giant fucking hypocite, as we all already know you are?

You're not right. You're just a whiny, greedy bitch, like all republicunts.

> conveniently leaves out the part where whites use more welfare and food stamps

What is your argument? If you're against taxation, you shouldn't be using them. I'm not against taxation.

All those services you mentioned are paid through property, state income, consumption, and ad valorem taxes - you troll.

>1800s, where the standard of living for the upper class was lower than that of today's lower middle class, wasn't a paradise
Libertarians btfo, amirite?

>tanks, bazookas, assault rifles and grenade launchers.
Id love one mate, why shouldnt people be allowed those things?

>Bong
Same with voting to sTay in the eu you stupid globalist fuck. Come fight

Eat shit, bernie

>Doesn't know about proportional statistics or reality.