Friend says story of woman mauled to death by own dogs doesn't add up

Friend says story of woman mauled to death by own dogs doesn't add up

washingtonpost.com/video/c/embed/ba2d38f8-e27f-11e7-b2e9-8c636f076c76

So, the police doesn't believe Barbara Norris, the victim's best friend, because she has piercings. She has intimate knowledge of the dogs and the owner, but the police refuse to listen to her, because of her piercings, and will murder the innocent dogs.

Barbara said the dogs would at most kill someone with kisses, and would never, ever harm her own owner. What's more, the killer is on the lose, while the police pins everything on the dogs.

So, if anyone of us were to get piercings like Barbara, our opinions would, even in a case of life and death, be ignored?

It doesn't add up.

the police are generally jaded people. my uncle is cop and he's told me numerous times that everyone is a perp to him until proven otherwise. they definitely wouldn't listen to somebody that looks like a member of the counterculture, and if given the opportunity not to do their job, they're gonna take it

piercings and generational incest. she was probably using them as fighting dogs. all of her wounds are consistent with dog mauling lol, what you think another dog got to her, past her pitbulls and escaped unharmed? no trace of another dog? they'd pull other dogs to pieces.

>Dey dindu nothan
>dey wuz gettin dey life back together after bein fight dogs
>she knows more than the medical examiner

>they definitely wouldn't listen to somebody that looks like a member of the counterculture
While I understand that, still seems terrible to me. Worse still if the Barbara is correct, the killer is on the lose.

There could definitely be another dog involved, and it was two days until they found her. The police will just kill the pitbulls and be done with it.

Okay, Barbara was very coherent, and I think she would take the dogs from the death row if allowed to, but police won't let her, cuz of her piercings.

Because the dogs would chomp her ads too. Are you retarded?

The police is trained to deal with people not animals. How many times have we seem cops just killing puppies cuz they thought they wanted to bite them?

She has more understanding than the cops, so, they should let her take them. Instead of murdering the innocent puppies.

so the dogs that were said to be guarding her body didnt stop the owner being mauled and killed by another dog... or person

...

There is one theory. The most probable. The other is that they killed her, which is inconceivable according to Barbara.

IT WAS PITBULLS RIGHT ?

THEY ARE NEGGERS OF THE DOG WORLD

They just have a negative image.

That is true though, they may have been violent on the past, but now, no more. They just look mean, that doesn't make them mean.

so do Neggers buddy, they are the cause of 80% of violent attacks pall, Naggers and pitbulls frend !!
They are the

They're not responsible, it's the owners!

Owners who failed to keep them tied and muzzled at all time.

I believe understand is key in all situations. Are blacks more violent? Maybe not if you take into consideration everything happening around them. Similar to pitbulls, people are automatically more prone to violence around them, cuz of their appearance.

Would you want to be muzzled all the time in public? How could you possibly suggest this in good conscious?

He a good boy...
He just a little moody...
He Din do nuthing ...
You h8 cus he not german shepard
you a dog rasissss

it's the owner not the dog

/thread

That's how the media portray them as. They need to sell panic, and nothing sells that in dog like pitbull, is that true though? Not in the least.

YOU are not wrong....but 60 % of dog owners are incompetent ... with smaller dogs it has little to no consequence , but with "fighting dogs" its lethal

>60 % of dog owners are incompetent
I would say ill-informed, nothing that love for the pet can't overcome though.

>How could you possibly suggest this in good conscious?
By valuating human lives more than animal lives?

Your pupper might seem like a harmless softy to you, but deep inside, he's still a wild beast whose nature is to chase and put down any other living being he sees as a potential prey.

And he doesn't differentiate between human beings (other than those in his "pack") and other animals.

So, if he's strong and got a jaw and teeth that could rip an arm, don't go around people without making sure he can't hurt them. You're only putting other people - and his - lives at risk, not doing him a favor.

Blind "love" often make people blind to how dangerous their "best friend" can be to other people.

>By valuating human lives more than animal lives?
Not sure you are aware, but the laws say otherwise. Cats and Dogs are to be valued just as you and I.

Ban pitbulls - eliminate the risk

>Blind "love" often make people blind to how dangerous their "best friend" can be to other people
If you watch the video, you will see that Barbara has knowledge that the police doesn't have. Would you consider that "blind" too?
If you do, you are just as complicit as the police in murdering those innocent pups.

Nope, the law says you shouldn't be gratuitously cruel towards them. However, they get put down without a trial when they're deemed dangerous. And no one ever got the death penalty or life in prison for killing a pet.

The story here wasn't fully told. One image doesn't say anything other than a mishap has happened.

K9 DNA in the wounds will override metal face. and it doesn't make a fuck what she says.

image search the story buddy

If you have this info, then how did the girl die? Yeah, just another no content bullshit post. Fuck off, the pit bulls mauled her to death. Fuckin idiot

>they get put down without a trial when they're deemed dangerous. And no one ever got the death penalty or life in prison for killing a pet.
There is no trial because they can't fully communicate with us. As for the death penalty, how many states still have this barbarous law anyway?

Wow, wow, wow

Hold up in there, could there be another reason? Is Barbara correct on the whole deal?

Sheesh, that's all I am asking...

there are trap and submission threads where this is very popular

I don't see here having any special knowledge. Just that typical "they wouldn't do it because they're my precious puppers" attitude of dogfags.

The woman was found dead with wounds consistent with a dog attack... the most likely explication: she was mauled to death by the killing machines she was walking around while thinking they were harmless plushes.

The police did not say anything about DNA, they went all about the type of wounds and their locations. "Metal face" may have a valid explanation, but was passed over cuz of her looks. Since she's also a little chubby.

Go smoke some more weed and ponder it some more you just might be onto something. Like a 3am drunken business plan

Okay, not the same thing, since they don't go to work, school, everywhere like that.

wrong. If there were more guns, good citizens could have taken out those pit bulls at the first sign of trouble. This is a gun control issue. Those dogs are gonna die because some humane gun owner didn't shoot them first.

So, okay, why would they do it in public, at the park? Not while at home? See something that add up.

pitbull owners - probably neggers or liberal cucks
gun owners - probably conservative littledicks
Both of them defend the right to own something dangerous no mater how it affects people around them....
Responsible owners are not the problem ...unfortunately they have to suffer because some cunt breads dog for fighting or misplaces his gun

Seriously, weed can have a calming effect, you should try it.

maybe they should give it to the dogs

What are you? A fucking anti-specist? How can you compare muzzling people all day long with dangerous dogs being walked around innocent people without proper precaution?

Okay, I am not agreeing with you, since shooting dogs is immoral, but I think guns can help to protect.

It also distorts perception.

I agree the part about the gun, but I have to yet meet a dog that couldn't be reformed.

OKay, I am not officially saying you should, but I wouldn't argue against it, if it improves their lives.

Depends on the quantity and the person.

> If there were more guns, good citizens could have taken out those pit bulls .....oh boy

>If there were more pitbulls ...they would help by attacking the other pitbulls

American logic !!!

when you put it that way, it would make sense for the gov't to supply the ammunition, wouldn't it?

Come on... you're trying to bring motive/premeditation to the table in a dog attack?
Dogs don't need have motives, they just get the wrong feeling at the wrong time and things go wrong.
Do you really think the dogs would be thinking "ok, where's the best place to attack that human who's taking care of me? Oh! I know, if I do it at home, there won't be anyone to see me, while if I do it in the park I might get caught"?

Yes , and pitbulls :)

Youre not convincing me, man

Foreign logic.
All pitbulls and guns are evil.

Who is number one again?

Have a lot in common with us, so I can we can understand their rationale. If we can't, they something doesn't add up, like Barbara said.

Oh, come on, this is America, not soviet Russia! People should work to buy their own ammunition! Security should be earned through hard work, not given away for free!

>number one
in what gun deaths?, school shootings? e.c.t
listen i LOVE U.S.A , but this is the thing i think i will newer get ...there is no logic to it ...

It's like all chemicals, it works differently depending on the person.

They seconds count, the police is only minutes away.

Seriously, our economy, culture, and military.

They may have a lot in common with us (as most mammals on the planet). Still, they also are a completely different species which we aren't equipped to understand as well as other individuals of our own species.
Their thought processes are completely alien to us. Saying otherwise is anthropomorphizing them and projecting human traits on them.

It's already hard enough for us to truly understand other humans. If you think you can understand dogs or other animals, you're deluding yourself.

Where does uncle live. I'm gonna kill his children and feed him their innards. God I want to kill everyone so much

Then the deaths are on police hands and we must kill them for retribution

I believe is the other way around, we can understand them, they however can't understand us.

Wow dude, smoke a chubby or 20, chill dude.

Killing is never the answer. I see the pups as sacrificial lambs for the police prejudice against Barbara.

we can understand them, they however can't understand us.....sounds like neggers to me

Well, I think they understand us way better than we understand them.

Which can cause problems because they can way overreact to small things in human attitude that wouldn't have amounted to anything if they hadn't picked it up.

if they do kill the dogs, I hope they at least use the meat to feed the homeless

We tell lies, play politics, kill one another for no reason, Dogs do not do that, they are without sin.

My rage is insurmountable and endless the only reprise is death

This isn't China. People here would rather feed the homeless to the dogs than the other way around.

Your local dealer can cure that.

They'll probably gas them, so the meat would not be that good, I don't think.

That is one theory, yes.

Okay, not saying that agree with that statement, but I see your logic.

Dogs are social animals. All social animals play "politics" inside of their group to rise on the social ladder. And have no problems with killing members of other groups if they feel their group is threatened.

They're without sin because they don't have the self-awareness we have. But they can be mindless killers just as we are because that's how you survive in nature.

i know buddy , i love dogs to , but you have to see the argument of banning or controlling certain types of dog !

They don't kills for sport, we do. Establishing dominance not the same as playing politics.

Everyone is wrong. Nerve gas.

Well, I am for control, no question, that may even benefit the dogs, but labeling a breed like that, is way overkill.

Pit bulls also get a bad rap for dog attacks being attributed to pitbulls because people don’t know breeds.

Also, pit bull isn’t a breed, more of a blanket term for a number of breeds.

Yep any dog attack, and they get blamed for it.

>labeling a breed like that
well they are more aggressive , more powerful, their jaw muscles are stronger , their instincts are more wild ...they are responsible for the most numbers of maulings of people

Pit bulls are the niggers of the dog world. They won't be missed.

Also, you realize the levels of investigation that go into it right?
>These bites look just like a pit bull
>These bites match the dog in question
>Dog did it.

Of course they kill for sports given the right opportunity. That's how they get better at hunting in the wild.
Even when they're not hungry, if they see an opportunity they'll hunt for sports.

And establishing dominance in the group is one thing. But in the wild, territorial animals will fight and kill anything they perceive as a threat.

It's how you survive in the wild, and even though dogs are domesticated animals, they still have all those instincts their ancestors had.

That's what can make them dangerous to humans in human societies, because they don't have any awareness of the way things work beside their pack and will act on those instincts if they haven't been properly raised and aren't properly kept in check by their owners.

if only pitbulls attacked exclusively their owners (not other people i mean) , than I would be ok with their tomfoolery and sudden urges for human meat

Generations upon generations of selectively breeding the most aggressive male with the most aggressive female have created a genetic disposition towards aggression and "snapping"
Fact: Pit Bulls WILL snap at some point in their life, it usually happens when they're older than 8. They DO eventually go crazy because that's what's been bred into them.

FACT: You can raise a nigger in a White home and he'll still have a nigger IQ.

blacks are worse

...