What is anonymous doing about net neutrality, it's been oddly silent

What is anonymous doing about net neutrality, it's been oddly silent.

Maybe in our age we have learned to forgive and forget

Other urls found in this thread:

ispspeedindex.netflix.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

any kind of core member of anonymous is either working directly for the government, in jail, or a staunch die-hard trump supporter.

You're on your own, net neutrality is the greatest troll to date, followed closely by the 2016 fbi election intervention.

If you think it's getting bad you have no idea what the fuck you're in for in the next 8 to 12 years.

Sorry, just forgive and forget.

Inb4 a new group of power hackers emerge but they're too busy trying to find the video of the milf jerking off her son

The Jews have truely diluted modern men with their delinquency

>milf jerking off her son
sauce?
That does sound more important.

he's right
whatever force anonymous was trying to stop years ago has infiltrated and now completely control it, to the point that merely having this site show up in your search results will land you on a list

and stuff like this happens by design as well
remember the "alien" photo?

Fuck hearing about "Anonymous" is fucking cringe. My buddy put on a video last night of some Guy Faux mother fucker on youtube and I couldnt handle the cringe. Had to explain to my normie friends that this guy was a fedora and that real Anons are too busy fapping to traps to do anything else.

We're all just shitty autistic weebs who sometimes find things online to shit on but most of the time its easier to jerk off than to get together and do anything

>fapping to traps
that's no accident either

The trap threads gained popularity about 4 years ago, right around the time that advertisers started placing restrictions on that shit so they had to pull out of Sup Forums

2 years ago m00t finally sells Sup Forums, what's the very first thing that happens?

Shotacon and gay fur are officially allowed on Sup Forums. The very same day.

They are literally making us all gay to appease us, like a society of Bonobo monkeys where they exist in peace because they're all gay fucking each other.

Same concept, except online.
We are a successful experiment in crowd control through sexual reprogramming.

Sure, I am crazy, but just look at the Catalog and compare it with pages 1-15 from 5 years ago.

Trap threads where always there, but they where funny and ironic. There was one and it was meant to TRAP or trick you. Now 50% of all threads are femboy or sissy trap threads, gay fur, hermaphrodite fur, chicks with dicks, shotacon or other feminizing shit.

We even invented a new paradigm to excuse our change, we invented the 'dicks are not gay' paradigm.

Anyway, it's way easier to jack off, and it's impossible to wage war on another man if you're butt fucking that other man.

Anonymous was never an actual entity. Certainly what calls itself Anonymous now is not it.

There used to be a million+ people on this board 24/7. Anons would come up with all kinds of nonsense to try to pull off with massive numbers and simple hacking tools. That's all Anonymous ever was and it never will be again because we're under too many rules and the numbers have fallen way off.

You're talking out your ass dude. Go on the catalogue and count the amount of trap/gay thread and then all the straight ones.

There are currently 6 trap threads, and a total of 12 gay threads on Sup Forums right now.

and that's with my filters turned on.

So yea, do what you will with your 12 gay threads user.
Do what you will.

>10 replies
>no mention of ifunnny watermark
You people disgust me

There's three, two of them filled with spam and on the bottom. At the time of this message there are forty straight threads. Eight gay tops

We're more worried about the state of affairs inside Sup Forums at the moment.

Even ifunny gets more traffic than us.

Life is hard, for retards its harder.

Tough break retard, the repeal is for the best.

That's because Anonymous is dead. It took several years of investigation, but the authorities managed to track down and silence all of the major players in Anonymous who meant anything and were really in it to help society. For the past five to ten years Anonymous has consisted of nothing but tinfoil hatters and attention seeking losers who can't organize user to hack its way out of a paper bag.

Not only that, but they made a healthy profit from all the mask sales.

In an attempt to reduce distractions we will be conducting an organized effort to reduce the amount of trap and general faggotry on Sup Forums starting tomorrow.

This is not an attack on gay people, just an attack on laziness and complacency.

Check in tomorrow for an update.
In the meantime suggestions are welcome on the linked thread.

>not an attack on gay people
>targeting only gay people
Delusional faggots

traps are only targeting straight people to begin with.

that's the definition of trap.

Traps are for fags and bisexuals, they don't target straight people on Sup Forums. If you're clicking on a trap thread to jerk it then there's no need to pretend you're straight.

The faggots claim to be straight dont they? so its obv not an attack on gays riiiiiight???

The people who say it isn't gay are just as delusional as the conspiracy theory fags in this thread

When people about anonymous like its actually real is so fucking cringe, when you hear normies in bars talking about it its fucking awful.

since when is faggotry the same as gayness on Sup Forums?

Some dudes just want to jerk of to other dudes without being spammed with scat.

Anonymous died when the hackers got bored and left

This "conspiracy " goes way beyond you and me and im sorry if you dont want to take action you can sit back like most people and be overrun by forces above you without a clue to whats going on... I guess ignorance is bliss

Since yesterday faggot.

I do too, but there is too much of it and it is leaking into every other aspect of Sup Forums
I would definitely welcome a containment board like we have for the ponyfags

Also, dumping scat/gore to derail a thread is proven not to work. People are jacking off through the scat and gore.

We're trying to come up with something new

Yeah god damn mook turning the anons gay, putting traps in the threads and shit

...

There really isn't that much, and straight porn outnumbers it by far. Spamming the threads is what causes more to appear. Spam one thread and butthurt fags will make three more. There's plenty of times where there's only two trap threads up at most, the old one that's dying and the new one. But sure you fags can pretend you're doing something

when was the last time you heard of or from that gook?

he's not here, he never was.

Sup Forums is not being run by any one person.

The pedos on the darkweb sites felt the same way as you, they mocked people who tried to warn them. Until one day it turned out that their sites and forums where all run by the LEA and other agencies.

For many normies Sup Forums is considered the greatest threat on the open public web.

Clearly turning anons gay is going to eliminate the threat. If you're afraid Sup Forums is full of people just jerking off then you might as well put an effort intog etting rid of all porn. Normies don't think Sup Forums is a threat, they just think it's full of racist neckbeards.

>an effort intog etting rid of all porn.
This is the start of that effort.

Do you know why gun sales go way up after any anti-gun bill or law is proposed?

Outright going against porn would unleash a porn apocalypse the likes of which we've never seen before. It would be entirely counterproductive.

You fucking newfags, all of you. We knew this was going to be our legacy, because just like knowitall archaeologists ascribing asinine theories as to the hows and whys of ancient history, none of you jackoffs actually know what Anonymous was about.

It was never "a social movement." Hackers and steroid was a joke, an insult memed into oblivion at the expense of a typical ignorant did-not-do-research "journalist" who couldn't navigate his way around a powerpoint, much less read a teleprompter.

It was never a group of "hacktivists" as wikipedia insists on claiming, choosing to focus disproportionately on Chanology and Lulzsec.

You want to know what the "real" Anonymous was? Hundreds of thousands of bored teens and college students, that united around a single banner that anyone, regardless of political affiliation, race, sex, creed, gender, or nationality could rally around:

"For the Lulz."

reminder that net neutrality did not exist until 2015, which if you must be reminded is far past the golden age of the internet

The lulz was all that mattered. Good or bad, morally right or morally depraved, it didn't matter. Anonymous was Chaotic Neutral at its core, capable of stuffing an old man's mailbox with a metric ton of birthday cards one day, and trolling Oprah with over 9000 penises another. It was hunting down the pedophilic admin of a rival board that kept trying to scrape membership from Sup Forums and literally visiting the apartment where he and his mother lived, as they pretended to not be home. It was blasting Never Gonna Give You Up outside Scientology churches for reactions and it was fapping to camwhores like Boxxy, Creepy Chan, and Cracky-chan, raiding online 2D pixelated chat boards spamming pool's closed, doxxing people who filmed themselves dropping puppies over bridges, and convincing idiot underageb&'s to wipe their harddrives with high powered magnets. Its egging on (and being surprised to see) some user literally stick his dick into the eyesocket of a skull he stole from a catacomb.

These things have come and gone. You will never see the Anonymous as it was mythologized. That user has long since died. And not to work for the government or be incarcerated- that was literally like a dozen people. The "real" anons? We grew up. We got jobs. We have bigger shit to worry about now and don't have the free time or anonymity or lack of a future with which to conduct the lulz like we used to.

You'll never be Anonymous. You're just some jackass playing pretend with dad's rusted gun, without knowing which direction the bullet comes out of.

...

>muh anonymous
what's wrong with making people pay for using shit? Milton Freidman once said that there's no such thing as a free lunch. Why should OUR AMERICAN BUILT INTERNET be free?

get a fucking job you bums. Jesus.

>an effort intog etting rid of all traps.
This is the start of that effort.

Do you know why gun sales go way up after any anti-gun bill or law is proposed?

Outright going against traps would unleash a trap apocalypse the likes of which we've never seen before. It would be entirely counterproductive.

LOL Sup Forums voted for the swiss cheese brained mongonaut who encouraged this kinda shit

hopefully they're all getting their helium bags ready

Im Afraid that the original spirit of Sup Forums is already Dead.

Raids are getting dismimissed with a "Not your personal army" shit.

Porn was always on here but since the whole trap movement ive seen less and less "Fags" and more n more actual faggots.

Sup Forums got lazy Sup Forums got boring..
No change provoked by us..
You lazy PC becoming fucks.

that's not true. when the internet started out, net neutrality was mostly implied, because it was only later that the idea of preferential treatment/blocking by the providers arose/gained traction

Yes, we've been through that already.
We're not looking for anomalous to come and save us anymore.

So either bring something new to the conversation or go wank to the memories of your past glories.

it's not about getting internet for free. the argument is only about whether the corporations can extract even more money for less service from you

Bad B8

>there's no such thing as a free lunch

Lol, I grew up on free lunches.
Sure, the tax payers payed for my free lunches.

But if you don't want to pay your taxes then get the fuck out of America.

Go start your own country with no taxes and see how long you'll last before you start drinking your own piss.

Again, what's wrong with paying just a little extra on your ISP bills? I think the problem here is that this place is filled with fatassed cumstained neets who don't realize that the true problems in this country stem from a lack of market competition. Competition that could give us 25 years of unbridled advancements in information technology, just like Carnegie, or Rockefeller did for their industries.

think it through

Anonymous is dead.
Has been for years.
No ones doing shit.

now that they cant unwrap their mouths from their god emperor trumps cock, Sup Forums will gladly be their ISPs cuck

>I grew up on welfare, which makes it okay for an entire sector of the economy to be run like my mommy's trip at the beginning of the month!

Literally grasping at the straws. This is the potential for creating a faster, better, and more cost effective internet for the greater consumer. You are a non argument personified.

if it does come to that then I will learn to love the feminine cock. Until then I will do my best to move it out of Sup Forums and into a new hospice.

I'm not here to de-gay the faggots.
I'm only trying to de-fag the gays.

Because

1. Startup businesses on the internet arent possible anymore.

2. Free sites (Fb,Yt,Sup Forums. Etc) cannot exist

3.the cost added up is much higher then now

>what's wrong with making people pay for using shit?
I smell a fucking normie on my intertubes

Fucking clueless trump fag confirmed.
This is why the US is a meme across the universe.
Go back to your parents basement, son.

Higher prices are qualitatively correlated with quality. Quality that as of now we do not enjoy because of some of the tightest, stringent regulations on planet Earth. With enhanced options and liberty of the competitive spirit, we will be able to accelerate the development of our personal lives as well. Repealing NN literally will have no downsides.

more like you fags need to read up on your history. Advancements can only be made in the absence of inappropriate regulation. Statism is the norm on Sup Forums now?

>the better consumer
oy goyim

Remember when i said the only time there's a fuck ton of trap threads are when they get spammed so butthurt fags make more? You literally just paraphrased that and used it for porn. Just admit you don't give a fuck about Sup Forums you just hate traps. I know you want to see yourself as some savior but you're not.

It's called pricing for the market. Look you dumb mouth breathers. Do you want:
1: High bandwidth content?
2: expanded infrastructure?
3: Greater service range?
4: Greater service quality?
Companies need flexiblility to adapt to a flexible market. NN prevents all of that. Which is why we needed to get rid of it. GOD BLESS INDIA, GOD BLESS THE USA. take some from the pic and follow the lead, socialists.

>muh jooz!

Jews are some of the greatest minds and businessmen our society has to offer. You're just a envious skinhead idiot who can't make it on his own.

I didn't know we where arguing net neutrality, you where talking about free lunches...

The money price of non-net neutrality is not the problem, the amount of blind faith and trust that has to be placed on mega corporations to offer a free and open internet where innovation can take place is.

Why would a corporation like Viacom offer access to their competitor's networks if they weren't obligated to?

Why wouldn't other countries start their own local intranets instead of dealing with the increased prices of importing American web services?

The problem is not that we don't want to pay more. It is that the end of net neutrality is going to end the World Wide Web by a matter of simple economics and convenience.

You will have the Viacom Wide Web, the India Wide Web, the China Wide Web, the Comcast Time Warner Wide Web, and so on.

>Abolishing NN has literally no Downsides

>Does not debunk any of my points

>Diagnosis = Retarded or Confirmed B8.

Fuck off with your shills.
Ajit pai is a piece of shit and everyone knows it.
Higher prices == higher quality? Don't fucking kid yourself. Those ISPs don't care about quality, they care about profits and shareholders.
Go eat an infinitely long fat turd to stop yourself from opening your mouth anymore.

Wrong, multiple companies means competition. Alleging that competitors cooperate is absolutely insane. Do Ford and GM collude with each other? No. Wrong again NN socialists. This will actually enhance our state of affairs, and eventually lead to a lowering of prices per gb used. That, my son, is the true sign of innovation.

pic is you. Prices are correlated with increased liberalization of a market and competition. The more we have, the lessening of prices and greater services, the less, will lead to an inverse. Fucking brainlets on here.

The consumer will pay less because isp s will compete for consumer attention and use sponsorship dollars to bring down the monthly charge. You'll pay less but google Netflix or content providers will flip the bill or their shit will just run slower.

Dude, I am wearing a pair of panties right now.
Don't talk to me like you understand what i'm trying to do.

I already said that we recognize spamming scat and gore does not work, I know it creates new threads, I know it generates code words like tr@p or other misspellings to circumvent filters and spam bots.

I know this because I've seen it and participated in it.

I also know that given free reign Sup Forums will complete its transformation into a slow porn board like infinichan within a few years.

>I'm edgy beacuse im a racist
kys

Incorrect, quality and price are a function of demand and capital to build new infrastructure, repealing NN would loosen the inhibitions placed upon ISPs by allowing them to raise prices appropriate to the current economic climate. What you described is actually what is happening right now, BECAUSE OF NN. Greater liberties of the market place will allow companies to have greater abilities in their charging plans.

Jews are just controlling cucks in morning for their mutilated cocks.

the united states has some of the most expensive internet in the world and not even in the top 10 for speed
ISPs are non-competitive and enjoy regional monopolies where they jack up their prices arbitrarily with no alternatives
this is why Google's fiber was so enticing to people because they literally created competition in their markets forcing the ISPs in those cities to upgrade their shit and lower their prices with a slight effect across the country
Google stopped offering fiber because the shitty ISPs were throwing litigation at them left and right to stop them creating a competitive market and refused them using the same poles they were using for last mile connection
now without neutrality the ISPs can pick and choose what their customer's use by making it inconvenient or uneconomical to use alternative services basically killing competition and new businesses on top of censoring what people see and do and increasing the cost of inferior services on top of that
The ISPs don't want to upgrade their infrastructure so with the same bandwidth in order to serve some people more than others they will slow everyone else down and favor the ones who can pay more on top of the speed bs they do now

Newsflash
Nobody gives a shit

Then all it takes is one neutral isp to take over the market. HurDur consumer decides you koolaid addled weebafoo.

...

prove it. Most people who control this society are White, Anglo-Saxon men.

ispspeedindex.netflix.com this is the measure of speeds of countries, the USA, in truth, are one of the slowest.

Why?

Because we have vile doctrines of tyrannical oppression of the innate human spirit to innovate and improve. Get necked NN fag. We will make America, bigger, better, and stronger with more Free Market in the Market.

No. You're wrong. The US has the greatest consumer price of any not shit tier nation. Regulation has done nothing to bring down costs. Faggot.

You don't seem to understand, right now the internet is like the original AUDI(the combination of BMW, Mercedes Benz, Porshe, and VW) it is a series of corporations that through laws and regulations and economic reality are forced to cooperate and operate as a single united entity, in the case of german cars that's the Auto Union of Deutschland International(audi) or what GM was a long long time ago.

In the case of the internet that is the World Wide Web, or triple WWW

The only reason the internet is so powerful and useful is because there is only one of them, and we all have to use it.

The competition you're alleging will be created by ending net neutrality will encourage the creation of smaller Non-worldwide webs

Local webs, like the California Wide Web, for example, which would only service california and offer california web services and would not work outside california. Relatively cheap, and if you're a californian it is everything that you could ever want as a consumer.

BUT for the rest of the world a HUGE chunk of the WWW has just been removed, and all global influence of california is gone because california would be gone from the WWW.

A person in nevada would not be able to email a person in california without having to pay for and set up a bridge between the World Wide Web and the California Wide Web

That is just an example, but that is the problem with net neutrality.

It isn't even about the money or fair competition, it is about the USEFULNESS of the internet itself

What do you think of Portugal and how internet is available there?

you prove my point the US is slow for internet
was it because of a ruling in 2015?
no, it's because ISPs in the US are greedy cunts who will get away with putting profits before quality service
there's a reason Comcast won worst company in America

Abraham mutilated Issac's cock because he wasn't his son. Their patriarch set the standard.

And there will be regulation, as I said, over the past 9 years, the Federal Government has gradually encroached upon not just information technology, but many other industries as well. Competition, in their bid to create the best service for the optimal price, will be flexible in their service plans on how many bytes per month, how many dollars per month, and what internet website types such as Netflix, Youtube, eic will be given priority in THEIR plan. That, will be the sign of true innovation, and true improvement in internet service, reliability, and ability to facilitate commerce. NN is holding back the wonders that could be, the wonders of being able to choose, while still having Uncle Sam at your back.

What do Jews have to do with this you schizo? They are a tiny minority that isn't even in business. Like I said, WASPs.

Wrong. An isp can advertise itself as neutral and get the whole market. NN without big bro.

chopping the internet into regional nets would be the stupidest thing imaginable
like returning society back to the medieval era

Jews own spectrum retard.

Ahaha what part of that was racist?

there's a reason youtube and netflix got big in the first place and it was because they serve the most content and do it in the most popular way
putting walls up and forcing the use of inferior services through throttling isn't going to change that, it just kills new services from even starting

nah

You didn't answer my question.

why should I have to pick and choose what services I use and pay more for the ability to use other ones when the current internet lets me access any service at the same speed?
it's a direct downgrade to neutrality and only serves the interests of ISPs profits
Say you were at a shop and they served any kind of food you want, however, some guys who operate the entryway say you can only access sandwiches or soup or pay more and access salads. That would ruin the shop for a lot of people.

Why would isps target small domains? They're going to be holding the big boys for ransom while small sites can squeak by. Big CPs will just have to pay for their share of the bandwidth toll road.

The undeniable fact that you have to blame your out-group to substiante your baseless claims shows that you need to just grow up, and get a fucking life.

No, they got big because the government, back when it was ruled by obama, tried to stifle any and all competition. Remember, those examples you gave me, arose DURING the Obama administration. BTW, Poor brainlet, you are implyingthat you are so stupid that you can't budget your options, and choose accordingly to your needs. Almost every area of this country has a plethora of options. The fact that you had to negotiate with your provider over a contract that you didn't understand makes you a turbocuck if anything else. You act like infrastructure companies are out to get us. What's next, is the water company going to waterboard you?

You didn't have one. Portugal isn't a relevant example. America is what matters here, and NN was stiffing the glorious industries known as ecommerece. The largest job creators of this century for sure.

That's exactly what I'm trying to say.
That's what the removal of net neutrality will inspire.

The separation of the WWW into many different and lesser networks.

I am willing to believe that as long as the tiniest shred of shit exists, Sup Forums will always tell you to go be a faggot somewhere else.

>2001
>triple WWW
>WWWWWWWWW

>because there is only one of them
Haha, no! We only have one World Wide Web, you just affirmed that many other "webs" exist. Internet is short for internetwork, hence, there are all kinds of Internets out there. Yes, Internets. Proper noun, faggot.
>It isn't even about the money or fair competition
The usefulness of the Internet itself is accomplished within the local Californian Internet, because it exists and you just called it an Internet. Fuck, next you'll say it's a series of tubes.

Seems like your a Jew who owns part of spectrum.

It reads like there are a few biases here.

Jew Bias.

Seems like you're a little bitch that hasn't had his Fentanyl shot yet.

Like what? The fact you are semi-literate?

>Wrong.
Which part?
Do you constantly speak so presidentially?

>NN without big bro.
What does that mean, what is NN? did you hear that on TV? Who even uses that acronym

>An isp can advertise itself as neutral and get the whole market.
What?... No dude, I don't think you get what net neutrality even is.

It's not a selling point that a company can slap on a package like "Organic" or "Gluten-free"

Net Neutrality is a doctrine that only works if everyone is participating, like the MAD nuclear war prevention(Mutually assured destruction)

If any single country stopped participating in MAD and nuked a country then we would instantly have a world wide nuclear war

If any company stops participating in net neutrality, then there IS NO net neutrality automatically.

the water company is a Utility and can't charge me for different tiers of water
the simple question is why do you think people should have to pick what they can access on the internet and pay the same for less access or even pay more.
The internet should be open and accessible to all no matter what websites you visit or how often you access them
I already pay more for my 150mb/s than at least 10 other countries pay for 250+ and nobody should limit my choices for internet use

Don't get mad at me because your dad wanted your dick to be mutilated just like his.

Yes, you are slightly correct, but with the increased market hybrid vigor, and the increased diversity of services, the infrastructure will be built FASTER and BETTER than it would under NN. Without it, ISPs could construct the new 5g wireless and fiber systems at such a breakneck speed, it will even make the like of Kurzweil drop their jaws. The internet and the Free Market are the future of human progress and endeavors, and together with sensible legislation, we can create a better, safer, faster, and freer internet.

I have to ask, why are nazis so god damned braindead that they think semites are behind everything. Even the dust settling upon a bookshelf of copies of Mein Kampf.

New law makes it so isps will have to tell who they're throttling. One isp doesn't throttle anyone. That isp gets all market.