Solve this without any arguing.
Solve this without any arguing
69
2+2=4-1=3
quick maths
55
10
No
kek'd
10
10.
10
14
24
9
This
what are you fucking 12?
14
10 or 2
54
18
24
square = 3
triangle = 2
circle = 4
4+3x2 = 4+6 = 10
10
>cringe
Your mom
oops! It's 14.
14 :)
done it in my head
3*3*3=27
2*2*2*3=24
3*2*4*4=96
4+3*2=10
10
24
10.
oops again. Heirarchy gets me every time.
fuck I'm very wrong :/
Ok
Square * Square * Square is 27
Square=3
Triangle3 * Square = 24
Triangle3 = 8
Triangle = 2
Square * Triangle * circle2 = 96
6 * Circle2 = 96
Circle2 = 16
Circle = 4
Circle + Square * Triangle = ?
4 + 3 * 2 = ?
4 + 6 = ?
10 = ?
damn + got me
14
no possible solution
any value would create a number having 2 decimals, which is not defined
Why can't you just use x instead of • like a normal person?
are you fucking retarded?
you are ignorant
hurrrrrrrr
>inb4 I was merely pretending to be retarded uherheurhuhuehrh
ITT another ARGUMENT about the + / * order
Because we would have to solve square cubed x squared = 27.
I am not fine with having 2 types of squares and a cube of squares!
oh gee another + / * order issue / chance for the worthless to feel good
27 cube root is 3
24 divided by 3 is 8
8 cube rooted is 2
96 ÷ (2x3) = 16
16 square rooted is 4
2×3 +4 = 10
jesus these make me weep for humanity every time i see a math question post
shut the fuck up retard
if you can't maths, why post in a maths thread?
> tfw this is the only guy who gave correct answer
...
>implying the order of operations is even a debate
>can't maths
laughable judgment is laughable
>or 2
>correct answer
pick one
>/b
get oriented 3x and then talk shit
If all dots are "+", so :
? = 54,78077777777...
60
fuck implying
given the problem presented - it is
You do understand that the third equation would hold if it was -4 instead of 4, right?
3 * 2 * (-4) * (-4) = 96
So there are two potential answers:
4 + 3*2 = 10
-4 + 3*2 = 2
There are actually more answers to this equation. However, if Sup Forums can't even figure this out...
That is like saying if the earth is flat or not is debatable.
PEMDAS
> given the problem presented - it is
Nigga you trying to invent a new theory?
It's 10
3x3x3 = 27
2x2x2x3 = 24
3x2x4x4 = 96
4+3x2 = 10
It is not you retarded piece of dickloving shit.
I'll explain it to you like this
The fucking dot means multiplication, let's say multiplication is white, so it has priority over the
"+" and "-" who are jews and niggers respectively
So, that means you have to multiply first and then add the other shit.
10
you fucking retards.
the only reason people will disagree is because of order of operations
that said, squares are 3, triangles are 2, and circles are 4.
the answer is 10
Every positive real number has two square roots, it is always assumed to be the positive one.
Let's delve into fucking complex numbers then, eh? How many cubic roots of 8 are there?
Spoiler alert: more than one.
t. 400 IQ rick and morty fan
>t. 400 IQ rick and morty fan
kek
88 (heil hitler)
yup 55
Exactly, it would be ridiculous to get into complicated stuff like complex numbers or negative numbers
> complicated stuff like complex numbers or negative numbers
McDonalds employees detected.
You can assume what ever the fuck you want, but potential solution to this system with circle being -4 still holds.
Fuck people from Sup Forums are idiots :(
14
>complaining about others intelligence levels while helping OP troll Sup Forums like the worthless pawn he is