Is there anything in the world that doesn't require any material at all from the earth?

Is there anything in the world that doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
Is there anything that is 100% manmade?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_element
youtube.com/watch?v=D5in5EdjhD0
phys.org/news/2010-12-theoretical-physics-breakthrough-antimatter-vacuum.html
youtu.be/X5rAGfjPSWE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

bone

Children

Where does matter come from?

deez nuts

Just wondering do you of anyone know how long it takes for a bone to fully become biodegradable and turn literally into nothing?

Requires a man.

Try again feminist.

stupidity.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_element

is that kevin smith going for a swim in his swimming jorts?

This is the stupidest fucking question I'll read all day for sure. Go back to school you fucking brick.

nothing ever becomes "literally nothing"

a fart?

Interesting, however these elements are usually made by a nuclear fushion of two existing elements.
So its not really man made since it does require something that is already there.

No it's Frodo looking into the dead Marshes
Lol you are technically right, but not the answer I was looking for :p

Man is manmade also check em

But it also does not happen without our intervention and creation of the element, I think thatz as close as you can get.

>he doesn't believe we are created from God.

this
couldn't have said it better myself

Software. The hardware it runs on requires material from the earth, but the software itself requires no material.

I think You can't make software without using the hardware to create the program.
So it requires something that isn't manmade to make it.

Then literally nothing can be 100% manmade since it requires man to make it, and man requires material from the earth in its creation.

So how can people say God doesnt exist if there is nothing that we can fully create on our own

Math

Not only math, but any abstract concept is made by men. Even the abstract concept of nature

We could get our material from another planet or moon. We already have actually. If you require man to create the laws of physics, than yes you are right. However, this is not something you should hold our species to, so consider things we build using atomic and sub-atomic particles to be man-made. Especially if they cannot and do not occur naturally in the observerable universe.

Those are just concepts though, it's an understanding.
You can't physically hold math.

There is no god anywhere in this equation. There's raw materials in the earth, and there is man creating things. The question is if man can create anything without using raw material. Since man uses raw material though his very existence, the conclusion is that everything man makes is made using raw material in some fashion. The subject of the existence God requires a different question, since this one is fully answered in itself.

Except that man came from the earth, so even if our great great grandchildren on mars created something, it would require in its history material from the earth. So yes, this isn't a useful standard for evaluating man's creations.

God is not provable or disprovable

But you can observe math in the physical reality. It's there, but it's abstractly there.

>existence *of God

>from the Earth
We are all star-stuff, OP.

Everything we make needs raw materials. Those come from the planet we live on. Which is made up of elements up and down the Periodic Table of elements, most of which were formed in supernova explosions of dying stars in the distant past. Which were originally fuelled by hydrogen which congealed first into clouds, then nebulae, then into gas giants, then into stars, which lived out their lives, burned their fuel, then exploded. The hydrogen is everywhere and the Universe makes more of it all the time, spontaneously; where it comes from we can't know because we lack the instrumentality to sense things outside of our own Universe's space-time. So the short answer to your questions is "no".

>doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
Electromagnetic radiation (such as photons from the Sun) is about the only thing that doesn't originate from anywhere on Earth. That includes radio waves and other deep space noise.
But if you mean rocks, or solid or liquid elements, etc. if humans are making it from any material at all, then that material obviously had to come from Earth.
Even if they're pulling it right out of the fucking atmosphere and making cubes of ice or whatever from "nothing" then they're still using the earthly material from Earth's atmosphere.

This post

So is hydrogen a fixed commodity, or is there a way to create more hydrogen without blowing up a star?

Mostly Hydrogen, some helium, and a bit of lithium actually. These are the elements that formed after the plasma cooled and dispersed as the universe expanded after the Big Bang. Physicists are hypothesizing that the universe would be much different, to the point where the heavier elements wouldn’t have formed due to a uniform atomic weight across spacetime.

> doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
>from the earth
Everything.
Earth itself and every bit of dust we gather from it is stardust, and so are we.
Everything your gaze falls upon was forged in the purgatory of stellar fusion, so nothing on earth originates from earth.

I did say 'most'. :-)

Yeah,actually Humans,and morons like you.Go kill yourself

It can be argued that this experience of reality is merely an illusion of a stream of data that we are selecting our experiences from via our beliefs. If this were true, matter would be a concept, thus making anything newly discovered by the individual a unique material, no matter that it is false. So something not of this Earth is generated every time someone makes a decision that something material is true.

An idea.

Very high density energy and extreme heat such as the core of a black hole. There, and only if it should erupt, would new matter be formed.

There are systems that break water (H2O) into its separate hydrogen and oxygen components. The hydrogen is the burned as fuel.

We already have the ability to create atoms of a different variety, including hydrogen if we wanted. However, hydrogen being the most abundant element and variation of sub atomic particles, it’s easier to break down more complex atomic structures to create it than flinging sub atomic particles at each other in a particle accelerator.

We cannot break sub atomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, etc)

first you'll have to define what matter is, and thus, what is not. That's a big unanswered question. We make equations and models that coincide with the stuff we behold in this world, but that is far from providing us with the intelligibility to determine what the "material world" and obviously, where does the matter comes from.
Pretty interesting subject.
youtube.com/watch?v=D5in5EdjhD0

fusion is the process of merging atoms, requiring higher amounts of energy than the formation of molecules, which is a chemical process.

so logically, a process causing one free proton and one free neutron to join with an orbiting electron (if we take bohr's model), would require even more heat / pressure than stellar fusion.

So yes, such a process is possible, but most likely does not occur naturally, and we still have a hard time to get stable fusion processes running, so it will be beyond your and my lifetime before we have the technology to do so. But I'm quite positive that we will gain this tech eventually.

But one step lower, not just binding electrons/protons/neutrons, but actually forming them from even smaller particles, is possibly something we may never achieve.

Information

"Nothing can come of nothing"

To create something that doesn't stem from any existing chemical on earth, it would have to materialise out of nothing.

Actually, matter can be created.
phys.org/news/2010-12-theoretical-physics-breakthrough-antimatter-vacuum.html

Vacuum energy, tho...
>spontaneous spawning and annihilating of sub atomic, paired particles
And without the nature of dark matter being explored and explained to a satisfying degree, we still lack too much parts of the puzzle to declare "nothing" as actual nothingness.

Not to mention the possible option to manipulate the higgs-field one day...

There is no such as true nothingness. Even the vacuum of space has energy to it. Check out this video on YouTube by PBS Space Time; youtu.be/X5rAGfjPSWE
A very interesting channel. Also, watch lectures by Lawrence Krauss on the subject of nothing and the Big Bang. He explains how the Big Bang could have occurred from nothing.

Meteorites

Information

Human language.

So some people argue that reality is just things that we select from our belief?
If that was the case then wouldn't our lives be awesome, if we can choose what is real?

What a dumb question, even humans are made with material from the earth, its not even a valid question

>is there anything in the world (earth) that doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
no.

is there anything in the universe that doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
yeah, space shit outside earth's atmosphere

What is a particle accelerator? It breaks subatomic particles.

>anything in the world that doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
all matter on this planet was forged in the Sun... or a sun, but likely our sun just cause proximity.
ideas are man made. The very phrase "man made" is a man made concept. logic in all it's forms is man made. information is the answer you seek, literally.

That’s why life isn’t 100% awesome. Reality couldn’t give less fucks about your opinion, feelings, or beliefs. Reality is actually trying to kill you all the time, and will eventually succeed.

Bitcoins

No. Can't just create matter. All matter already exists. Synthetic elements are still comprised of energy that constitutes Earth. Guess we could fashion something from other celestial objects if you really don't want it to be made from the atoms that comprise Earth.

>Even the vacuum of space has energy
a vaccum is "a lack of" if anything is nothingness, it's empty space. there is cosmic radiation everywhere, sure. but you're getting sucked out of the airlock no matter how much solar wind is outside.

I don't understand.
If your select your reality based off of your belief, then why would it not be awesome.
I get that reality doesn't care about you, but if you can base your reality off of belief then you can decide what happens.

There is no way you can control your own reality.

>All matter already exists
wrong, cause
>Can't just create matter
is wrong.
stars convert matter into energy all day long, bro. plants convert it right back into matter.

someone hasn't had quantum mechanics 101 yet

... how do you think the universe works?

The closest things come to becoming "nothing" is becoming pure energy, which doesn't just happen. For the most part atoms stay the way they are forever. The sun has the power to combine atoms though.

no material from earth sure a pice of a shooting star you can buy these online

I thought plants were able to convert matter into energy through photosynthesis.
How do they convert energy into matter, and why haven't we been collecting this matter to create things?

The matter is energy and vice versa. You can't get something from nothing. Any theories that posit you can have never been proven. We can create elements, but that which we used to create them has always existed as one form of energy or another.

>Is there anything in the world that doesn't require any material at all from the earth?
Meteorite

How can the sun combine atoms?

...or someone just didn't quite grasp it. definitely one of the two.

uhm the closed thing to nothing is antimatter
Its called fusion fag

No, they convert one type of energy into another type of energy. Converting energy into matter is insanely inefficient. Producing one gram of matter would take an insane amount of energy.

Antimatter is not nothing. Not even close.

It's like the universe is made of red bricks and blue bricks. You can't say that red bricks are something and blue bricks are basically nothing.

that's debatable the end of the universe could be the big crunch but the heat death of the universe is inevitable. the heat death of the universe is when the universe's distribution of heat evenly spreads throughout, and reaches what's called a thermodynamic equilibrium.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

right , light is an mixture of wave and radiation so its carrying energy if these energy comes to an plant it starts an chemical process.

These are all just speculations though right?
How do they know all of this shit if there is no matter that they physical examine?

1/4 of the periodic table of elements is man made.

energy of light, + water + carbon dioxide

The parameters of your question are poorly defined I think. What do you mean doesn't "require" any "material" from earth? What do you mean by manmade? Like consciousness?

Humans can synthesize elements not found in nature (on Earth) using the particles that we find here. Is that what you mean?

well you are right even if you combine antimatter with matter you get an crazy ammount of energy i haven't thought this through

What? This is known as well as we know anything.

What? This can be examined, on some level. The biochemical machinery of cells has been observed before. It isn't just a theory.

Are you still a junior in high school? If so, take your sciences. Will broaden your perspective a lot!

Semen?

Niggers are related to the catfish